Body Becoming with Dr Robyn Henderson-Espinoza / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening and is transcribed from Patreon version of the conversation. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to Audio


Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 0:00

So a generative relationality is a relationship or relationality that troubles the transactional nature of today's relationships and chooses solidarity and chooses to stop at the person on the street and invests in that person. Generative relationality is saying yes, and

Seth Price 0:40

the word body has a lot of meanings. I mean for me, I think of corporate bodies, church bodies, bodies of water, politicking bodies, my body, in any and all issues that I have with that my children's bodies, advertisements and the way that they treat bodies, there is a lot to do with bodies. Now this week, the guest is Dr. Robin Henderson Espinosa, she has written a book called body becoming as a path to our liberation. And it is quite literally one of my favorites that I've read for this year. So I would put this one and Lisa Sharon Harper's fortune right next to one another for entirely different reasons. My favorite part of what Robin has done here is that she has honestly shared so much of her story in an entirely vulnerable way that at the same time, invites whomever is reading her book into that same type of inflection. And enter looking back at what it is to be in relationship with our own bodies. And I know it has challenged me and with that, I'm beginning to like doing intros less and less so I'm going to make them shorter and shorter and shorter. And I think everybody is okay with that. Anyhow, this is the can I say this at church podcast? I am Seth let's do it with Dr. Robin Henderson Espinosa.

The Dr. Robin Henderson Espinosa. How're you doing tonight? Welcome to the podcast.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 2:43

You know it's a it's a Tuesday night when we're recording. And it's almost my bedtime. And this is the last thing on my to do list today. And I feel excited to see what we're going to talk about.

Seth Price 2:58

Me too. Me too. And I realize I've already recorded the audio. But for those people that on that enjoy these videos, I forgot to literally hit the button. But it's nice to have a backup audio. So I realized that I didn't I'm not going back. I'm not doing it again. Because I'm too lazy for that. And there's who cares. So when you when you try to tell people whom you are like, what is a Robin? What what do you answer to that question like, What do you want people to know?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 3:30

You know, I mean, I think it it depends on who's asking that I tend to say I'm a trans queer Latina X. And I'm politicized theologian and adult on the autism spectrum. And then, if people aren't interested in my my professional stuff, I just say I'm a bit of a nerd. And I'm an idea farmer. I farm ideas.

Seth Price 4:08

And I don't think anybody's ever told me that I am an idea farmer. What is the what is the fertilizer for that? Like, this is not what the book is about. We're gonna talk about your book in a minute. So yeah, um, I don't want to bury the lead. How do you call it like, what is the Fertile Crescent land for IDEA farming? And then how do you fertilize that like, what does that look like for you?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 4:27

Well, you know, it's relationship. It's our brains collectively thinking together. The terrain is the never receding horizon of possibility. The fertilizer is imagination.

Seth Price 4:50

Huh? Yeah. As you describe that I'm reminded of literally the universe which is ever expanding constantly. Yeah. Yeah. Which is freaking mind. Bowling. Yeah, yeah. So, quick question I asked anybody that is ever from the Texas region. It is a tongue in cheek question, but it matters to me because you know, there's that Texans just think differently I think. So if what is the only you know, God ordained fast food burger? Is it In and Out Burger being that I know that you've lived in both California and Texas or is it water burger? And it's definitely water burgers. Yes. See this? We're gonna get along great. Yeah, absolutely. And in fact,

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 5:33

they have a water burger into the sea now. Yeah, about 15 or 20 minutes from my house. And so it's almost like I'm in Texas. I mean, our politics here in Tennessee are very similar to Texas. I chose the repression, the repressive politics of Tennessee over the repressive politics of Texas, and I thought I was doing a good job. But now after all the anti trans bills I'm questioning my own logic. Well,

Seth Price 6:03

that's not just Texas. I feel like that's that's many places. Yes. Yeah. Yeah, that's that's an entire Yeah, that's that's a whole thing. So you wrote a book called body becoming a path to our liberation. And even those words are a big thing. If you were to try to summarize just what becoming is because you even say it in the book, but you say it's like it's become a buzzword. And the thing that I hear people say often is, you know, we're human becomings which I think they mean more in like a metaphysical centering way. What are you trying to get at specifically with body becoming?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 6:42

Well, I, I you know, I'm trained as a theologian, ethicist, and I've read a lot of continental philosophy, and I'm particularly attracted to French postwar philosophy. Michel Foucault and Jill Deleuze in particular. And Deleuze and his comrade Guattari. wrote a bunch of stuff together. Guattari was a French psychiatrist and psychoanalyst, and Deleuze was a philosopher. And they conceived of becoming, in collaboration, and, and if and if you want to boil it down to one word that is intelligible because most of their work is unintelligible and written in a way that is, like you're trying to read mud. But becoming is change and change on both a macroscopic way and a microscopic way. So both cellular and global, or planetary. And what I'm trying to do in the book, is talk about how democracy is becoming, and how bodies are becoming. And when we cultivate the necessary relationship with ourselves and each other. We can participate in a democracy. That is the aspiration of life expressed solely in community, and that is what gets us to liberation.

Seth Price 8:35

So what do you mean? So there's this thing so you you go a little bit further in the book. It's actually the first thing that I highlight it, you use the word generative relationality? Yeah, really? I can't say that word this late at night. Generative. relationality. There we go. Yeah. Yeah. What is that? Like? What does that mean? Those two words for some reason in my head. And Robin, just real quickly, like our Dr. Robin, I forget exactly what you told me to say. I apologize. I had to constantly stop. I love the way that you use words in a different way as you write than what I normally like words like fears that I don't read. You started like the intro with rhizome ride ride. Ride. Masoom, right. I can't even say the word. Yeah. Yeah. I had to ask my wife who's a nurse. Like what the heck is somatic mean? I know that's a word that I've heard you say my dear, what is that? She's like, Yeah, it just means body. I'm like, okay, like, I just, I liked the new words. First off, but yeah, what does generative relationality? Like, how does that reshape our bodies and our becoming? And then democracy and democracy feels like you're using it in a different way than what people would hear in television. So can you rip that apart of it?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 9:45

Yeah. So let's think. Let's just think about the traditions that we come from. So, you know, Christianity comes from Judaism in many respects. And you law talks about how Jewish Oz is chiefly concerned with the dignity of all people. And so Jewish law says that you should not pass over someone in need that, that you should have some sort of connection. So think about people who ask for money on the street or ask for food on the street. A generative relationality would be to stop, ask them what their name is. And not just pass them by. You know, it's a question of charity versus solidarity. So generative relationality is a relationship or relationality. That troubles the transactional nature of today's relationships, and chooses solidarity and chooses to stop at the person on the street and invests in that person. Generative relationality is saying yes, and, and I think we see this in, in many different ways in the world's religions. But we don't practice it very much in society.

Seth Price 11:34

Do you think that's because of the way that we're? So how can I say this in a way? That doesn't sound political? I don't know that I can. Do you feel like that is just inherently humans? Or is that a product of capitalism? Or is it a product of exceptionalism? Or is it a product of just only caring about myself like narcissism, that I've just cognitively dissonance away?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 11:59

You mean, the the transactional nature?

Seth Price 12:02

Yeah, where like, I walk past people on the thing. And like, yeah, if you're not in my family, and even if maybe even if you're in my family, it's fine. All I care about is what I need for me.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 12:13

Yeah, I mean, I think it's a combination of whiteness, and the culture of whiteness, disassociate ourselves, from ourselves and each other. So we have no lineage. And as a mixed race person, I am, you know, conditionally white until I start talking about my family. But I have to remember that I am conscripted into whiteness, and I am conscripted into being disassociated at a at a cellular level. So I do think it's about whiteness, I do think it's about Neo liberalism, and the ways in which we have created a culture of hyper individualism. I do think it's about capitalism, and the extractive nature and the exploitive nature of capitalism. All of these things don't encourage generative relationality. Just look at how often I mean, I know that we've been living in a pandemic for the past two plus years. But look at how often we get together with people. How often do we share a meal with one another? I mean, others think we need to go back to some very basic things and rituals, like sharing a meal together. And, and, and recovering the generativity of just practicing ritual together. But, you know, many folks have moved to the suburbs and choose fast food over communal food,

Seth Price 13:59

which is fine if it's water burger, but only water.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 14:02

Right, which is fine. If it's water burger. You should also be sharing a water burger with a friend. And aren't their fries so good,

Seth Price 14:12

especially with that gravy? I don't know. I dip it in the gravy. Maybe? Um, yeah, I might be heretical. Doesn't matter. No, that's kind of like

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 14:19

Texas. butene.

Seth Price 14:23

Either way, it's good. Yeah. Doesn't matter what it is, is just good.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 14:28

Yeah, you have to come to Tennessee and we'll go to water burger together.

Seth Price 14:31

That's done. I can do that. Yeah, Nashville is set. It's only

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 14:35

about eight hours. Yeah. Eight and a half hours. Yeah. And you gain an hour when you come here. So

Seth Price 14:40

Oh, I thought Nashville was still. So is it eight, so you're an hour behind me?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 14:44

Yeah, let's say 30. Here. Nashville is Central Time. Knoxville is Eastern time.

Seth Price 14:50

It was I thought for some reason it was Memphis I thought it was literally the Mississippi that did it. But it's been a while since I made that drive. It's been a while since I made that drive. Do you so you use the word conscripted there, and I literally only scripted not a play on words there one question for you today. And you use the word conscripted in, there's like 90 pages that separate it. So back in the beginning of the book, and I did not write down the page number you talk about, you have often been, or maybe you've felt like, I don't want to put words in your mouth, but you said, conscripted into progressive theology. And then you go on to say something else, which I'd like to kind of know what that means. But then later on, and I do have the page number for this one, because that's when I realized, Wait, I've heard that before. You say that you have been conscripted, that later you were conscripted into ideology, ideologies and supremacy cultures. Yeah. So when you say conscripted, what do you mean by that? And then how is like, how are those two interplaying with one another?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 15:47

Well, conscripted, when I'm using it there, I'm talking about we are our I am, or I have been woven into the fabric of progressive theology or progressive Christianity, when really, it doesn't reflect my theological commitments. You know, because I'm trans and queer than that I must be a progressive theologian. But I'm actually not. I am a liberationist. And progressivism still relies on a sort of liberal 19th century liberal agenda.

Seth Price 16:35

I was gonna say fundamentalism just in a different way. They're the same coin. Yeah,

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 16:40

yeah. Yeah. And I just progressivism doesn't go far enough for me.

Seth Price 16:48

Yeah. And then for the other part, so how are not just you, I guess, by proxy. Humans, are conscripted into ology ideologies and supremacy cultures. So is that a product of our upbringing? Is it a product of the way that we're told to identify like to function in society? Like, how does those kind of play together?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 17:12

Well, in the same way, right socialization, the choices that we make what we've inherited. You know, you know, so much of human life is wrapped up in macneice's, which is a Greek word that means imitation. we imitate models. My next book is on belonging and freedom using mimetic theory. And so I'm thinking a lot about models. And we're conscripted based on the models that we follow based on the models that we imitate. And I don't think that we are imitating Jesus, because we have created a dumpster fire in many respects.

Seth Price 17:59

And mimetic theory there would be based predominantly on Gerard or, yeah, Rene Girard. Yes. So you like the French the like the the other names? Because I felt like one of the other philosophers that you said at the beginning are thinkers that you said at the beginning, it felt like a French name. Maybe it was

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 18:14

Jill Deleuze and Michel Foucault. Yeah,

Seth Price 18:17

yeah. Do you read French?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 18:19

So I used to be able to read French, but I do know, I no longer read French.

Seth Price 18:24

I only read Pinot Noir. And random things on on a wine bottle. But I don't I don't actually know what that means. I don't know. I just can read the word. Yeah. Yeah. Well, no

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 18:35

Armenians night, does it? Yeah.

Seth Price 18:38

And Pina then is good night, I don't know, I'm just making stuff up. I don't know what I mean, I will Google it now. Because it's gonna bother me, I won't be able to sleep until I know what it means. So what is a body? And you asked that question multiple times throughout the book? Because I feel like if you ask that question to say, 50 people on the street, you're going to get some very concrete answers, some very, look at this answers. And you might get some other more esoteric answers. And so what is a body in the way that you're approaching it in your text.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 19:12

So a body is we are a body, but we are comprised of bodies. Together, you and I are an interpersonal body. And then together, we are connected to a larger body, which is our cultural body or our collective body or our democratic body. And, and we're all impacted by you know, it's kind of like the butterfly effect. When I pull the string here, on this end, it shows up the other side of the world. And, you know, we also we also belong to a planetary body. So it's not just, you know, we're kind of like Russian doll sets, you know nested dolls, and, and all of us together make a huge body. But yeah, we're where we are bodies comprised of bodies. And we are in relationship with lots of different bodies comprised of other bodies.

Seth Price 20:26

A Russian doll set of bodies, the mental picture of humans being housing humans housing humans, housing humans. Yeah, that's I don't know that. Yeah. That's that's not a nice picture. It's quite grotesque the way that not that that's how you meant it. I just can't stop envisioning that way. So with that thought process being in there, and I think that you're right, we are not modeling. Jesus. What does that mean for the disjointedness of humanities that make up be at church bodies? Be it our religious bodies, if it doesn't happen to be church? Could be any religion? Any? Because the Bible seems to be pretty clear, you know, that we are all collectively in this together? Yeah. So how do we begin to repair oneself so that our bodies can actually work in relation so that my arm can work in relation with your legs?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 21:21

Yeah, yeah, it's a great question. I mean, I feel like the repair work. And the reparative work is really vital right now. I mean, there's, I feel like there's a lot of need for reparative and repair work, from land sovereignty and land justice, to climate change. But we can start repairing our bodies. I mean, I started by just walking into my therapist office. And asking her how do I have a relationship with my body, you know, I just, I was so disconnected and so disassociated, that I was living life from my shoulders up. And I didn't know how to feel or how even to be in my body. And I had heard for for a long time. Don't lose yourself in the academy. And I sort of was like, What am I gonna lose myself, I don't even know what that means. But what I realized was, you know, I had become a machine where I read and I wrote, and I published, and all the sudden, my materiality kind of evaporated, so to speak. And so I had to do a lot of repair work of just repairing the relationship to self. And I think when we start repairing the relationship to self, when we start doing the inner work, we can begin to live that out in public ways.

Seth Price 23:15

Do you remember like last year, I had all those weird ad breaks, like he would just randomly be something, we're not doing that. Instead, I thought I'd do this, I need your help. If you're able to head on over to the website for the show, there are two things that you can do. One is you head over the website, you click the Patreon button or support button, I forget what I call it, and you jump in there those people helped make the show a thing so that you can listen to it right now. To the easier one, you could just leave a rating and a review on the podcast app of choice that you currently use. Either one of those is fine, but I would love it if you would do either one specifically the rating and reviewing it's an exponential thing that the algorithms pick it up and that's just math it's just compounding on top of itself. Anyway all that to say that was it that was the ad break and now we're going to get back into it

I'll go back to the metaphor you you began at the beginning so you can get lost then in in things that you are naturally good at so in your case farming ideas and lose sense of of yourself. What is the relationship of body to mind and I guess soul if you want to call it that as well?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 24:33

Yeah, you know, I write about this in the book where I walked in to Dr. Edward Antonio's office and said I wanted to write on the materiality of the body. And, and he said, You mean the mind? And it wasn't until I started writing The book was he saying the body had a mind, or the mind was a body. And I come to learn that every cell that is structured in our body has like a brain. So every part like yes, we do have a brain that is ensconced in our skull. But there are multiple minds in our body. DNA cellular structures that those embody some sort of brain activity. And, and yet, we have perpetuated the disconnection between body and mind or body and soul. I don't know where the soul resides.

Seth Price 25:45

I don't know that anybody could say that. They do. though. I am happy with that. I am happy with that movie soul and what they did with it. I love what they've done with those little you know, I'm not seeing that. That's on Disney plus, right? I can't. Oh, it's amazing. So I don't want to ruin it for you. But it's, you know,

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 25:59

don't tell me I want to see it. It's, it's, I also want to see turning red.

Seth Price 26:04

I watched that with a family literally over the weekend. And I really wanted to like it. And for some reason, I can't and I don't think it's the story. The story is actually quite good. There's something off about the animation for me, if you watch the Spider Man into the spider verse. Have you watched though? No, not yet. So that one is animated in a specific way where the frames per second are janky at the beginning. And as he gets more understanding of who he is, things begin to line up. Like it's it's animated in a very intentional way. Something in this red movie with like, there was something like as I watched it, I kept being bothered by just the animation. And it kept disjointed me from the story. I think I'm actually gonna watch it again with the subtitles on so that I'm reading it instead of looking at it. Yeah, because I think I liked it. But I also did not like it because I walked away, just frustrated with the show had nothing to do with the show. But now they they tackle the concept of soul in that movie in a way that I've never seen, that made me have great, great thoughts and Pon durations. There's a big section here, where you talk about which bodies matter. And then later on maybe 100 pages, you start rattling out at the beginning of writing this book, you know, we've got COVID, we've got George Floyd, we've got 250 cases of people just getting murdered because they're the wrong skin color. We've got this, that and the other. Where do we go with that? Because a lot of people talk and a lot of people talk and a lot of people continue to get murdered and be devalued. So what do we do with that?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 27:38

Well, you know, racism originated as white on white violence. And we're seeing that as a power struggle between Russia and Ukraine. In the end, it's been exported, or imported into the United States, as quite violence against indigenous people, white violence against people of color, white structural violence, you know, in the form of police brutality against black and brown, folks. So, I think that in large part, white folks and white passing folks need to do some work around what they've inherited, what we've inherited. And how we, how we are in relationship with power. And how do we compost violence and, and strategies that result in violence. So we've got work to do.

Seth Price 28:53

Yeah. Do you mean compost in that way, in, let it help it to continue to break down and turn it into fertile soil that we can actually do something with is that what you mean by compost? Want to make sure I'm not Yeah, it's okay. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. Okay. Okay. Towards dead center, the book. Yeah, maybe literally dead center. You have an Octavia Butler quote, and I'm embarrassed to say I've never read anything by Octavia Butler. But I liked the spin that you and your partner have on it. And I'd like you to rip it apart of it. So I'm going to read the original quote, and then read what you have as well. So you say or she says, Everything you touch, you change, everything you change changes you. The only lasting truth is change. God is change which you then are your partner then riffs on and says all that you touch, you move, all that you move moves you the only lasting truth is movement. God is movement. What for those that have not read the book, which will be most of the people listening, what does that mean? Like God is like movement like what? What does that mean?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 30:00

I think it could mean that God is becoming. And that in that we are participating in that becoming, you know, I think we have to remember that God became human so that humans can become divine. I mean, that's the tradition. It's called Theosis. And we've forgotten that, and, or some of the traditions that have perfection as a goal, we may never achieve it, but we should always strive to be perfected in Christ. That's about becoming, and I don't mean perfectionism, because that's wrapped up in white supremacy. But I mean, a kind of a kind of becoming in a perfected state, where we are where we are aligned with the logic of liberation, and movement, movement and becoming movement and change. Those are all kind of wrapped up together for me in a in a web that sort of exposes how deeply interconnected all things are.

Seth Price 31:15

Yeah, what our bodies becoming liberated from?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 31:25

Well, you know, just when I think about our current situation, I think about the structural inequities that impact marginalized bodies. And so I think that the logic of liberation creates conditions for a kind of radical freedom and in the abolition of the systems. And we have to remember that, that abolition is about life affirming systems. And so it's not just, it's not just shutting down prisons, it's creating systems where there's where there's flourishing, opportunity for flourishing. And so bodies have a chance marginalized bodies have a fighting chance to flourish. And I think if we're not concerned with the positivity, of liberation, like if we're only concerned with how to eradicate oppression, this is why I talk about composting supremacy culture, instead of dismantling supremacy culture. Because the work of abolition is creating conditions for flourishing, not just not just shutting down prisons or, or shutting down surveillance structures, right. It's creating opportunity. And I think that's what marginalized bodies need, they need opportunity to survive, and they need opportunities to flourish. And without the right kinds of systems in place. Things like structural inequity. And structural inequity, will continue to marginalize and accelerate oppression.

Seth Price 33:36

Is the role of building the compost bin or supervising putting things into that? Is that a role of governmental systems? Or is that the role for the church? Is it a mix of both? And depending on that answer, actually doesn't really matter the answer, how do we hold those that are supervising? What goes into the compost bin because I have one outside. And I live right outside the Blue Ridge Parkway. And if you put the wrong thing in there, bears will be in my backyard. And so composting is wonderful. It can also be destructive, if done incorrectly, it can also be harmful. I can have entirely too much nitrogen in there and literally burn everything that I'm trying to grow because I put too much stuff in here. So whose role is it to supervise that and shepherd that?

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 34:32

Well, this is this is where relationships really make make a difference. I don't know that we need a supervisor but we need community to to help steward the compost bin. We I mean, bad theology kills and everything is theological and all theology is at So, you know, the legislature is making theological decisions in their policy making. So it is the government's responsibility to steward parts of the compost bin. And it's also the church's responsibility. And it's also the community's responsibility. I mean, if we're going to survive this world, which, you know, is really sort of spinning off the rails, it's going to require us all together to learn how to dance together, and we just, we just aren't dancing well together.

Seth Price 35:45

Yeah, I don't remember you tackling this role specifically in your book. But I'm curious, your input. Bye, bye. Don't believe that you have children from whatever but I do. How do I be mindful in the way that I approach? My children's identity? I don't mean, sexual. I don't mean gender. I don't mean religious, I just mean their core, what my pastor would call their soul child like what their essence. How do I or how would you say is a good way to approach parenting in a way that fosters an ability for the youth that are under our, under our purvey to be in a healthier place as they enter into adulthood? And, and not have to struggle so much? With becoming and maybe I'm not asking that question. Right. I hopeful, I hope that what I'm trying to ask is coming across a funnel, try to restate it.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 36:45

Well, I mean, I think I think those of us with children need to trust our children. And I think we've relied on a parenting framework that puts parents as the expert and children as the learner or the inner expert. And, and really, nobody's an expert. Because what kids are growing up today with I did not have to face when I was a kid. So that doesn't make me an expert on our current system. And so, you know, figuring out how to trust our kids and then stewarding connection and having hard conversations and, you know, socializing our kids in ways that help them make better decisions. The world is no longer black and white.

Seth Price 37:50

I never honestly never was it never was. Yeah, it was just highly edited. Yes, yeah. Yeah, highly edited. No, yeah. The reason being is I am so fearful, not as a parent, but as a human, that somehow were made. I'm so terrified that I'm making it worse. And not just me, like my, my generation, because I feel like people my age, and I think we're in similar age. Like, I'm just so mad that it seems like every seven years things seem to fall apart. And I don't know how to not have that bleed in. Yeah, to relationships. But he and my daughters, they don't have the underlying trauma of growing up with all of that, right? I'm just throwing it on them. So I'm always terrified. So I thought, I thought it was a good question to ask. Just because I just genuinely don't want to screw up. I think I don't think any parents want to screw up. Yeah, just,

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 38:49

but at least you care, right? I mean, there are a lot of parents who don't give a fuck. But but you actually care. How your kids enter the world?

Seth Price 38:59

Yeah, yeah. Well, part of that's because they're gonna pick you know, I can pick what nursing home they put me in later, and I want them to be nice to me. No, no. Not, not really. Um, but but a little bit, but not really. Um, so a couple existential questions. Before I let you go, because I like to end with with a few. And this is a new question that honestly is popped up over the last few days. And so you'll be the first person that I asked this to? What is the best way I'm going to rip apart a parable of Jesus? What's the best way to identify that one? Instead of rocking and rolling with the 99? And what's the best way to identify that person? And then intentionally go and find them, seek them out? Bring them back to the body.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 39:46

I mean, I think being faithful in the small things. And few of us know how to do that because we're very attracted to the applause of life.

Seth Price 40:02

Yeah, no, yeah, that's nice. Yeah. When you try to wrap words around whatever God is, or the divine, or whatever that is, what is that for you

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 40:22

you know, when you pour gingerale or champagne into a glass and and you get these bubbles and then the bubbles disappear. That's a little bit like God for me that it's there. It's effervescent. You can you can almost grasp it and then it's gone. It's it's an elusive sort of elusive becoming.

Seth Price 40:56

Hmm. And it tickles on the way down. Right. Tickles on the way down. Yeah. Robin, thank you so much for your time tonight. Where when the book is out what March 25,

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 41:12

march 29, march 29. But some people are getting it early. Because wherever you buy books, people, they're they're getting it early. So I just found out today someone received their books. So go on, and Amazon and bookshop and other places are releasing in early.

Seth Price 41:32

Yeah. Yeah. That's good. Yeah. So I have figured out I don't know how to do this, yours will be the first one that I've done this with. I was reached out to by a bookseller that basically partners with local bookstores and so people that are on the show, they can click the show notes. And it will literally order a book from a local bookstore. I don't remember exactly the name of it, because they sent me I'm we're still working on how to make it work. And but hey, for people listening, by the time this is out, I will have figured out how to make that work. I'm not the best at the Internet. I work at a bank. I'm pretty good at that. Not good with math and numbers. I'm okay with Jesus. But I'm not the best at the Internet. actually kind of abhor the internet. Yeah, but where do you want people to go to kind of engage in the work that you do? Point people where they should be? I don't know how to say that sentence.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 42:26

Yeah, um, when I left my faculty posts in Berkeley and moved to Nashville, I launched my academic scholarship as a collaborative project dedicated to social healing, a little bit like less follow Jesus together and try to build another possible world. And that's called the activist theology project. We are a 501 C three, nonprofit organization. And we're building a digital community. And you can go to www dot att porch.com. So activists theology porch calm, because I think some of the best conversations happen on front porches. And you could connect with me there. Hopefully, we'll have some book discussions there. You can also find the link to the online book event that we're having on April 2. But I would say you know, sure, you can follow me on Twitter, Instagram at AI Robin. That's the letter i Our OB GYN. But if you want to be engaged with other people who are curious about how to build another possible world, check out our app at porch comm.

Seth Price 43:33

I do not know that that existed. Yep. I'll check it out tonight. Yeah, I did not know that. Yeah, I'm all about community is one of my favorite places to be is a private Facebook group. That that cards on the table. I did make. I rarely post but I read almost everything. But it's a place that you're not allowed to solicit, advertise. It's just a place to ask honest questions and say whatever the hell you need to say. Yeah, cuz you need to say, yes, one of my favorite places to be so cool. Yeah, thank you again for your time this evening, very much. Enjoy talking with you.

Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza 44:05

Thank you. And let's do water burger coming to Nashville.

Seth Price 44:08

Well, I'll figure it out.

Now, I haven't added it up. But there are hundreds of 1000s if not millions of podcasts on the internet, and I am humbled that you continue to download this one. If this is your first time here. Please know that there are transcripts of these shows. Not always in real time, but I do my best. And if you go back in the logs, you can find transcripts for pretty much any episode that you'd like. The show is recorded and edited by me, but it is produced by the patron supporters of the show. That is one of the best, if not the best way that you can support the show. If you get anything at all out of these episodes, if you think on them, or if you you know, you're out and about and you tell your friends about it or..hey, mom, dad, brother, sister, friend, boss, pastor, here's what I heard, what are your thoughts on that? If this is helping you in any way, and it is helping me, consider supporting the show in that manner. It is extremely inexpensive, but collectively, it is so very much helpful.

Now for you. I pray that you are blessed, and you know that you're cherished and beloved. We'll talk soon.

Justice, Youth, and Transcending with A.J. Hendry

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening and is transcribed from Patreon version of the conversation. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the audio


A.J. Hendry 0:00

is we need to create a language which enables us to live out of it, you know. And so one of the things that I, you know, if we talk about faith, but not just faith, just life in general, that the language that we had can either restrict us or it can open up doors into a new imagination, right? And so like, what are we trying to achieve? Where we're trying to go? And those questions, I think are really important. But also then what words are we using in order to to create that, you know, we talked about faith right now, right? There's a way to tell the Christian story that ends up just siding with, you know, systems of oppression and power, which actually just continues to marginalized people and continues to uphold the status quo. Well, there's a way of talking about it, and telling that story that brings freedom and liberation and, and centers love and centers, the voices of those who have been oppressed in heart. Right. So it's, I guess what we're talking about is how do we use our language and the words that that we speak, to transform our reality to change a reality to transcend?

Seth Price 1:14

Want to be honest, I'm really getting bad at these intros. I think they get shorter and shorter and shorter. And it's because I don't want to waste any time. I just want to jump right into these shows. But anyway, we're here. I'm Seth, this is the show. And yeah, let me tell you a bit about the guest. So today brought on AJ Hendry. Now, AJ lives in a city in New Zealand that I cannot pronounce. But he is doing some amazing work in and around like, homelessness and youth. And word like justice, and faith intersect. I love what he's doing. He's somebody that I've been watching from afar, for many, many years reading his work. And so I think you're going to enjoy this very, very much. So let's do it alright, here we go. Aaron Hendry, I've been reading the words that you write for many years now. I think it's three or four years now. And yeah, man, welcome to the show. For those listening. You and I are in different days as we record this, which is weird to say, that's, that's the thing. I'm used to shifting time zones. I'm not used to shifting dates actually went to your website earlier before I came down. And what's funny is it's it's like postmarked. And so I was reading an article that says it was posted on February 18. But it's not February 18. For me. Um, but anyway, welcome to the show, man. How are you?

A.J. Hendry 2:55

Yada? Yada? Yeah, I'm good. Thanks, man. Thanks. Thanks for having me on. It's great. Yeah, it's great to meet you in person. I've been listening to your show for a little while now. Yeah, yeah. I appreciate that person through the through a screen, right. Yeah, well, yeah.

Seth Price 3:08

Well come up to Virginia or all? Its New Zealand, right. I'll go down. Yeah, yeah. Why not? Just

A.J. Hendry 3:13

come to New Zealand breezy.

Unknown 3:14

How long does it take?

A.J. Hendry 3:18

I don't know from where you are. A long time,

Seth Price 3:21

I would imagine. So from California, I would assume is where most people fly from how long is that? Oh,

A.J. Hendry 3:26

you're testing me now? I think the last time because I got final in California. So I don't know if it's like an 18 hour trip. Stop anymore. Maybe less. I probably gotten that wrong, and people are gonna blow you up saying

Seth Price 3:36

that long. No one's gonna blow me up. But I don't know. You could be like, You could have said three days I wouldn't. I wouldn't know. The furthest I've ever flown is Thailand. So we left from LA X went to Tokyo and then gone to Thailand. And that that was a heck of a flight. That was a long way. So yeah, yeah. So who are you? What are you people are listening. They're like, alright, what are we doing here? Like, what would you want people to know about you?

A.J. Hendry 4:04

That's a big Christian. What do you start? What do you want to start? Yeah, I mean, I, I look, I guess in terms of the, the Mahi that I do, I'm a youth development worker at heart. I serve young people, and specifically rangatahi young people that sort of at the margins of society. Right now I lead a service that supports rangatahi that experiencing homelessness, eating people that are on the streets needing to be into housing. And I run a program that supports them into housing and gives the wraparound care and support once their house. But yeah, also, I guess I do a lot of writing and podcasting myself through that like sort of intersection between justice and faith and how those things sort of go together. But, you know, like, alongside that, that's sort of my work, but you know, I'm a father as well. I've got two beautiful little boys, a little three year old and a One year old who just you know, delights a lot of my life. And yeah, obviously an amazing wife who really helps me do everything that I do keeps my life in order and keeps me going. Really?

Seth Price 5:11

Yeah, my kids and my wife would agree. And she says it often, which is probably why my kids agree. She'll say things like, if you're, if I ever die, I'm gonna need you to teach your dad how to do this. Like because I know how to do a lot of things. None of them are, are adequately to take care of our kids like I, I would just, I don't know, I would screw up. I feel like have you seen the YouTube video of like a dead and he has his girl's hair in like the little vacuum. And then he slides a scrunchie up on it. He's like, there we go. Ponytail. It's done. That would be that would be me. So you said at the beginning to ask you if you said a word that I was like, I don't know what that word means. He said toffee. What is that?

A.J. Hendry 5:56

Oh, I see the rangatahi something like

Seth Price 5:59

that? I don't know. Yeah. That's young people. Okay. Yeah. And that is what that is.

A.J. Hendry 6:06

That is the term Audi word. So the Maori people, indigenous people that Tang fino are the people the land of Aotearoa, New Zealand. And so yeah, it is pretty common, that we use sort of different words, within our culture. It's excellent. I say, my, myself, I guess this grounding that, you know, I'm I'm Pakiya, which is to be like non marring. And also, like Tangata tivity. So wishes to be the people at the treaty. So I don't know if you know, much around Aotearoa New Zealand history, but we had a treaty signed in the 1800s. And so my ancestors, our place in Arturo and I'll place the New Zealand has come through the signing of that treaty where we came alongside Tofino and said, Hey, we're going to be two people working towards, you know, a better New Zealand, obviously, that didn't really go the way we wanted it to some real terrible stuff that happened through that. But you know, in terms of my role, and not at all, I'm not talking tensility, a three part.

Seth Price 7:06

Yeah, so that's similar than to United States in the way that we treated indigenous peoples and treaties. So we make it and then just break it. Is that is that interesting? I don't know. Very. I know. Yeah. effectively zero, about

A.J. Hendry 7:16

Yeah, it was complex. And it's, you know, one of the great things about having the treaty is we sort of have a baseline, we always come back to around, hey, where did we go wrong? But yeah, very, very early after the signing of turbidity. You know, there was a lot of abuses and crown abuses, you know, the Crown took land, you know, colonized the country. And really, it wasn't an equal partnership, as we've seen across the globe. And we're still dealing with all of that today, which I'm sure we'll get into if we start talking a little bit about the work.

Seth Price 7:47

Yeah, yeah. So you said that you work with homeless youth? So what does that look like, for you, or homelessness and youth? Maybe I'm putting words in your mouth? What does that look like on a day to day basis? Like, like, how did you get that? And what is that? Just for contrast?

A.J. Hendry 8:05

Yeah, I mean, how I got into this, and then, is a story in itself. But you know, like, we talked about, you know, people experiencing homelessness. So you know, that, you know, just to ground it, you know, young people themselves are not inherently homeless, they're experiencing this thing that is going on in their lives, which is messed up, it's wrong, and it doesn't have to be their way. So in my role, like our service supports, young people that, you know, for whatever reason, are experiencing homelessness, and a lot of this goes back to start talking about the tree before, Maori and RT at all, lost a whole lot of land, due to crown abuse abuses. And we're still dealing with the ramifications of that. So the group of people that I serve, the young people that come through my service, 80 to 90 90% of them attended a funeral, which isn't, you know, the indigenous people, which is a shocking percentage, considering, you know, considering the amount of, I guess, you know, the proportion to the population. And so, you know, a lot of that we can tie back to the land wars and the land grabs that occurred, you know, in the early 1800s. And, and I guess what the government had done at that point in time with the ground dead and what was continued. And so, you know, the work that we do really is around supporting the young people that are in that experience and trying to get them some sort of safe and stable housing, I lead a team of youth workers who provide like wraparound care and support. And we kind of run this program where we have, we work with, you know, private community housing providers, to provide sort of, you know, landlord management, and then my team provide the sort of youth work and support and the day to day figuring out life and learning how to navigate that system of being in a home and really the the key thing that which we're doing our CO Papa, oh, I guess grounding principles. What we're trying to, I guess work towards is to create a space of healing for young people where they can heal from what has occurred, what has happened to them, you know, One of the things we're talking about homelessness, it's often thought that a person is homeless because of something that they've done, that it's their fault, that they are the reason that they're in that situation yet, you know, when you take a wider view of what's going on, you know, most of the young people that we serve have been homeless their whole life. So they were born into an experience of homelessness. You know, I've sat with a young man who has told me Hey, like, from day one, I was uplifted from my family's home into the system, you know, spent his whole life in, in and out of, you know, residential facilities run by the government, and then released onto the streets. You know, that's like common experience. Whenever I talk to young people about how long have you experienced homelessness, most of them say like, it's just been my life. And so I guess what we're trying to do is intervene at an earlier stage. Because those people that you often see, I'm sure, it's probably similar in the States, but people you see on the street, they're just not a couple of people that made a couple of bad decisions. A lot of them would have been having those experiences at a very young age, we know that, you know, for at least not at all, those who have lived rough on the streets for a long period of time. First began that experience when they're young. And you know, there's a whole lot of trauma and harm that comes to a person through that.

Seth Price 11:09

I have many, you know, clients at the bank, that a worker, that that have experienced homelessness or other financial distress that leads right up to the brink of that. And yeah, I think you're right, like, I think the stats that we get at the bank, you know, there's like a Research Council that does work on that. And I think it's the average American like, doesn't have over $400 in the bank account, could not handle an emergency, like couldn't afford a tow truck without having to leverage some form of debt. Like, it's everybody is like one trip off the wrong curb and have to go to the hospital and ambulance away from possibly having to deal with homelessness, you know, for having the audacity to get sick, or, you know, a child gets sick or something like that. Yeah, the the lie that people inherently choose homelessness or did it to themselves, it's just capitalism. Does New Zealand have a similar issue with, with that mindset with capitalism? I don't know enough about the structure of New Zealand.

A.J. Hendry 12:11

Yeah, it's, it's really interesting. I've been I don't know if you know, Angela Davis, at all black feminist author and activist. Yeah, she's, she's so much different recommend her work. She's reading nano from from the States was involved in the Black Power movements, and the black liberation movement was imprisoned by the American government during that period of time. And, you know, she's been released since does amazing work. And, you know, there's a really great book, I think it's gender, race and class that she's written, you know, which is another sort of, but anyway, I bring it up in that, like, a lot of the narratives we'll be reading, you know, sort of her work recently, and a lot of the narratives that you have in the states are very similar to what we experienced here. So you know, there's an all of those you mentioned capitalism before, you know, all of those very tied to this neoliberal ideology that really shapes us into commodities as human beings, right? mean, you end up being seen and valued for what we produce. And there's another there's another author that I really appreciate. Bruce Rogers born, who speaks sort about the way that neoliberalism has, I guess, co opted us as human beings in a way that we you know, once again, the value is really centered in our commodity and what we can produce for a society. But he talks about this thing called the privatization of suffering. In that, you know, people's suffering, instead of seeing a collective sense of why a person has ended up in a situation then we sort of privatize that person's suffering and put it directly within Logic within the community. And so that, you know, let's take that example of a homeless young person, you know, that young persons experiencing homelessness, they end up being the person that's responsible you haven't worked hard enough you haven't, you know, done X y&z And you haven't gone and found yourself a home you haven't, you know, there must be some moral deficiency in you that you're in the situation. Now Never mind that that young person is dealing with, you know, generational trauma that their own family, we're experiencing homelessness and their own family has gone through some really intense and difficult things that they were removed from their home at a young age, regardless of any choices that they made were the state took responsibility of them, but never cared for them. And they were homeless through that whole experience and then they were just chucked out at the system onto our streets and without any support or real safety net to care for them. Never mind that actually in New Zealand if you're 1617 you can't get a tenancy you can't you know, find a house I have young people who tell me all the time I just need to work harder to get a house but you can't actually the system, the system is created you know, one of the words I use as in I try to move away from this talk around people being marginalized, you know, like marginalized communities. We've talked about that a lot. But you know, like what I'd prefer to say structurally marginalized. We've created a system and structure, which marginalizes people, which puts those people in that situation. And so when we think about this homeless young person, the system that we created the collective decisions we made about how we govern our society, what we prioritize what we will actually invest, and you know, where we, you know, put our resources, you know, has led us to a situation where we have children living on our streets, where we have, you know, growing inequality and poverty. Those are collective decisions we make. And it's not the fault of those individuals. But we have that narrative that, hey, you must, there must be something wrong with you, you must be lazy, you know why you're not working so hard? And we don't look back at that bigger picture of actually, what is going on in society? And how do we get to this point today?

Seth Price 15:45

Let me back up to this because the question won't make any sense if we don't have a little underlying subtext. So at the beginning, what 1516 minutes ago, you had said, you were kind of at the intersection of justice faith. And these what you said, the intersection of justice and faith and maybe faith in justice, it's either way, what is faith for you?

A.J. Hendry 16:06

Hmm, yeah, so I class myself as a follower of Jesus. You know, I see huge potential in, you know, the Christian faith and the narrative and the story that is embedded in there, once we read it from the taint of white supremacy, and, you know, colonization and capitalism. There's a story in there that that provides the groundwork for us to resist against, you know, why I would name as neoliberal ideology, against the hyper consumerism, individualism, of our western empire that we live in, right. And so, you know, the facts that I hold is, is one that is centered around this brown, indigenous activist, you know, that this man named Jesus who, who came into the world, in a world that was being colonized a world that was, I guess, oppressed where we had, you know, you know, one of the things we often don't see in the Christian story is that Jesus, you know, he didn't just become, you know, a human being, he became one of the most marginalized human beings in that world. At that time, it became a baby who was completely weak, who was completely helpless, he became a Jew, who was in that time in that space, being oppressed, and basically a second class citizen in their own land. And he became one of the poor, one of the outcasts of society, those who had no power, who had nothing. And this is what the divine says, the divine says that I've become one with those who have been marginalized, I become one with those who are poor with for those who suffer. You know, and that's the story that I really, that gives me strength and hope that actually hate the divine has become one with the pool, the Divine is on the side of liberation, that Divine is on the side of justice, that actually God does pick a side, and we who are called to follow Him must choose, you know, or he was the empire of power with capitalism with wealth, or we with Christ, yeah, who stands on the margins and causes us to follow. And for me, that's a real challenge. And that, you know, in my context, like I said, Before, I am Lottie Pakiya, I am normally my ancestors represent the Empire, my ancestors are responsible for the colonization of this funeral. You know, when I look at the suffering around me, I have a part to play in that I am, in a way I have benefited from that, and I continue to do so. And that Jesus calls and says, Come follow me. So what does that mean for me a pocket a man who, who has benefited from the suffering of my brothers and sisters, to join crust? What does it mean to stand in solidarity with him? One of the stories that really speaks to me that I really, that pulls me on, is that story about, about the rich young man that comes to Christ. And we've heard that story before. And it always gets, I guess, watered down to this point where, hey, we're looking at it. I guess often when we hear it, we think about how we can get out of giving up what we have, right? The way I see that story is, you know, Jesus, you know, once again, this man who was part of the marginalized class, who was poor, who was, you know, experiencing oppression and in poverty. He has this young man come up to him and say, Hey, how can I follow you? How can I inherit the kingdom of God, God, you know, and Jesus says, hey, Sal, all you have, and come and follow Me. And one of the things we miss here is that for that man to be, even though he was a Jew, for him to be wealthy, within that society, meant that he had been benefiting from the exploitative tax system that existed within that society that was basically oppressing Jesus and those who were with him on the margins, the poor. Yeah, so Jesus is saying change sides, you know, join in solidarity with me give up your status, your wealth, give up your power and your privilege, and join me here with the poor on the margins. And I think that's the core for for pocket for white Christians. To say actually, hey, how We change our state status, how do we join Christ on the margins of society? So I guess that's what I talked about that intersection of justice and faith that actually, you know, I believe the gospel is justice, it is about God. It's the good news that that the kingdom of God is coming here to Earth today. And then when we participate in that, that is the work of justice coming into this world.

Seth Price 20:23

Yeah. So are you familiar with a practice of Lectio? Divina? Is that a thing you're familiar with? Yeah, yeah. So that I have done that practice with that, that story of the of the rich and men. And every single time that I do it, and I kind of insert myself into the story. I always envisioned him looking over looking at Matthew and being like, but he didn't look, I don't know. I'm not as like, I can't do that. Like, I see what Matthew did. I had I want to do it. I can't do it. I don't want to do it. Because I think I see a lot of myself in that have Yeah, I'd like to say I can do that. And sometimes I do well, but it's a different kind of animal. I don't know, maybe I'm wrong in that maybe? I don't know. It just feels it just feels right for me. Just feels right. Do you remember like last year, I had all those weird ad breaks, like it would just randomly be something, we're not doing that. Instead, I thought I'd do this, I need your help. If you're able to head on over to the website for the show, there are two things that you can do. One is you head over the website, you click the Patreon button or support button, I forget what I call it. And you jump in there, those people help make the show a thing so that you can listen to it right now, to the easier one, you could just leave a rating and a review on the podcast app of choice that you currently use. Either one of those is fine. But I would love it if you would do either one, specifically the rating and reviewing it's an exponential thing, that the algorithms pick it up. And that's just math. It's just compounding on top of itself. Anyway, all that to say, that was it. That was the ad break. And now we're gonna get back into it. So you wrote something on Instagram the other day that I've been saving, specifically for tonight? Yeah, I don't remember when you wrote it, because I'm too lazy to figure it out, because I just took a screenshot. So it says if we want to create new worlds, we have to find new words. What are you creating? And what are some of those words?

A.J. Hendry 22:29

Yeah, I guess what I mean by that is, is we need to create a language which enables us to live out of it, you know. And so one of the things that I you know, if we talk about faith, but not just faith, just life in general, that the language that we had can even restrict us or it can open up doors into a new imagination. Right? And so like, what are we trying to achieve? Where we're trying to go? And those questions, I think are really important. But also then what words are we using in order to to create that, you know, we talked about faith right now, right? There's a way to tell the Christian story that ends up just siding with, you know, systems of oppression and power, which actually just continues to marginalize people and continues to uphold the status quo. Well, there's a way of talking about it, and telling that story that brings freedom and liberation and, and centers love and centers, the voices of those who have been oppressed and hot. Right. So it's, I guess what we're talking about is how do we use our language and the words that that we speak, to transform our reality to change our reality transcend?

Seth Price 23:29

A few days ago, the 15th? I don't know if it's my 15th year 15th. I think it's all the same 15th Eventually, New Zealand band conversion therapy. Correct. That's that's the thing that happened that made the news here as well, like, that's, that's a thing. Well, yeah. I mean, it's, it's a big thing. I feel like there was another country as well recently that has done that as well, maybe I'm wrong. But how does that sit with the faith community in New Zealand? Because I can see how that would sit. I don't even actually see how that would ever make it to the Senate or congressional floor here in the United States. But how does that sit with the faith bodies in New Zealand, something like that, because I think so much of the church is wrapped up in fear mongering and other ring around people's gender and sexuality when that's not even the point of the gospel. But like, how does that sit there?

A.J. Hendry 24:22

Yeah, actually read a piece on that's just recently if you like, but it's fairly. I mean, it's diverse. Right. You know, I think there was definitely a lot of fear in the lead up the campaign within some aspects of the Christian community. Yeah, we saw St. Really interesting and that there was a huge number of, you know, churches and Christian organizations that came out in support of the band, you know, to the bank, the bill to ban conversion therapy. There was also you know, leaders on both sides, both conservative and liberal, progressive there were in support of the ban. There was Some debates around some of the wording and the way things should go. But there was a lot of support for the banning conversion therapy overall. And there's definitely still, you know, in the store a good segment of the Christian community that I think would be really challenged by that and are really struggling with it. But I guess we've got a little bit of attention with his, you know, different voices within, you know, our faith spaces, who are, who are sort of leaning in different ways. But I think it's really positive and that the doorway through these things opens up to further conversation, you know, how do we actually then talk about this in a way that brings us forward to a more life giving a life of filling space, and something that I found really interesting about? I think it's about four years ago, where I sort of wrote my first article, you know, talking about what I believe to be a flaw within the Christian community around the harm that has been caused our rainbow or queer foreigner. And I've been more public about that, since, you know, I've also sort of delivered training sort of talking about how do we have this conversation in the church to move people along on the journey. But one of the things I found really interesting is that more and more, I am noticing that there is a growing amount of people and I don't know if it's the same in the States, but there's a growing enough people here not to anyway, that are becoming more more uncomfortable with the harm that has been caused queer people, and understanding that something within our theology is not quite right. You know, they may not have it, or they might still be fairly conservative, they may still have the conservative theology, but there's a sense in a growing that actually, maybe something's wrong, and the way that we are thinking about this, and the way that we are practicing this, and as I emphasized the change. And so yeah, there's still a lot of work to do to really shift that. But you know, I think that's a positive place to start.

Seth Price 26:43

Yeah, I am, I had a guest, and the episode hasn't aired, although it probably will have by the time this is out. And she says I had asked her kind of similar question, but but not quite the same way. And I think what she said was, she thinks that many youth in the in the faith communities and not just in the Christian church, and many faith communities are, regardless of their views, feel like something is wrong, when their friends that they're in community with who happened to be gay, or LGBTQ, or whatever word you want to put on there aren't welcome. And they're basically like, I, I believe in something but I can't come and be a part of this. Because you, you aren't like, the people that I care about. You don't care about it. They don't seem to matter to you. You say they do, but but they don't actually seem to matter to you. That sounds very similar to what you're saying. How do you lead those conversations? Like you said, you you've done some some talks and whatnot, like, how do you even begin to do something like that?

A.J. Hendry 27:47

I, you know, for me, I think it's about staying where people are, you know, we've got a really Yeah, I guess maybe the ground listen in what it means to be an ally, you know, also, you know, in to be in solidarity with people, especially for people who are coming from outside of that community that has been oppressed, is that sometimes I guess it was maybe a critique to the party or to white peoples that we can take on all the harm the anger, and almost, you know, the frustration, and we just yell at people that aren't where we are. And we forget that we went on a journey, you know, so I came from a fairly conservative Phantom, you know, really loved people, but how to really consider the theology. And I had to go through a journey. And how did I get there, I had people who were patient with me, who had conversations, who challenged me in spaces who shared this story, who didn't exclude shame, or, you know, condemn me, but actually, all with me through a journey. And often we, you know, when we, when we take our steps on that journey, we forget that we had to take those steps, right. So for me, it's about everything I do, I have this phrase lovers, the way that sort of like grounds me in my advocacy in my work, that love is the path that we should walk. And that actually, you know, when we're trying to wrestle against these big issues and challenges and systems and narratives that are causing harm to people, we still got to see the humanity of the person who stands in front of us, even that person that we believe holds theology, or worldviews or politics that are extremely harmful, they store human being, and that idea that they may hold that it's harming someone else, is very often harming them as well. You know, there's whole narratives of, you know, homophobia, and what white supremacy, all that, that that harms us, you know, we can't truly be human with the meaning and degrading someone else. So the place to start is with love, you know, to see the humanity of another, and then to engage them where they are. And so I'll start a very different conversation with someone who's never had this conversation, then I'll start with someone who's maybe had this a few other times, like what is their concerns? What are the things the narratives that they're bringing up and addressing those narratives, and then talking them through exploring the logic of them, you know, drawing on our collective values, and trying to engage a conversation rather than just throwing stones. If that makes sense?

Seth Price 30:00

Yeah, we can't truly be human, if what we're doing is not loving other people. I like that. That's, that's, that's, that's powerful.

A.J. Hendry 30:10

One of the things I've learned from what I've learned a lot, from really a lot of people, color activists, theologians, you know, people like, you know, model f king, yes, but name a ticket and if you know him, but he was a liberation theologian and Palestine, you know, so, you know, a community that are oppressed on every end, you know, hated by the Christians in America, and the West in general, hated by, you know, Muslims hated by their own brothers and sisters, let his, you know, learnt to love through that one of the things he talks about in his, you know, resistance against, you know, their Israeli state, and their oppression that they experienced at the hands of Israel was to actually see the humanity of those people say, Yes, we're going to actively non violently resist it, we're gonna do it in love, we are not going to hate these people, because we actually recognize that they need to be liberated from this hatred that they have of us that, hey, we may be physically oppressed, but they are spiritually mentally oppressed as well. And so the act of resistance, the act of, you know, advocacy, and rebellion against these narratives is also in the hopes that we can redeem and restore those who uphold those narratives who uphold the systems of oppression back into their full humanity also,

Seth Price 31:23

yeah, who are so for your website when lambs are silent? When lambs are silent? That's how you say that word. Whoo, who were the lamps? And then, yeah, who were the lamps?

A.J. Hendry 31:37

Yeah. I named this so long ago. And I do get people ask that question. I use that a lot. That imagery I was thinking about was that when, you know, those who are in a position of runnability, or have been marginally, you know, structurally marginalized in our society, those who, you know, in one sense are innocent of the oppression that they're experiencing are silenced. You know, that's when, you know, evil prevails in our society, when those voices aren't elevated when those voices aren't heard. That is when you know, we lose our way. So, you know, when I was assigned, that really came from my frustration that at the time, the general narratives in our society were being set by people who were just completely removed from the suffering of our people, you know, like, wealthy, white men who had huge platform, because of, you know, the way that things are structured, and who were trying to tell us all what it meant to be poor, and why people were poor, and why people were suffering, and that it was just their lack of personal responsibility and their lack of morals. And I wanted to try to create a space where we could start to chair challenge that narrative and start to provide opportunities for other voices to be heard. So you know, I do a lot of writing on it. But I'm always trying to find an open space for others to have the, you know, those those those voices and stories to be elevated.

Seth Price 33:01

Is it just you because it like you like post, like every two or three days? Is it just you or is there like a team there?

A.J. Hendry 33:08

Just me that runs it. But you know, I reached out to people I tried to get people writing, and do that sort of thing. But yeah, just myself that sort of got off the ground. That's a lot.

Seth Price 33:17

That's a lot of it's a lot of work. I know how quickly a hobby can become work. That's a lot of work. Yeah, yeah. Yeah. So a couple final questions, I want to give you back to your family. What are one or two things that you feel like need to be focused on and allowed to be discussed in faith communities? And if not, there's not really a point of having them.

A.J. Hendry 33:45

Awesome. By Christian, I mean, we could go a lot of ways. Look, and I know that there's this though, people will be in different spaces. I don't know where you sit with this, bro. But, you know, like, one of the things that I think we really need to be examining is, is the way that, you know, I believe that faith has very much been co opted by a neoliberal ideology, right? We see it ourselves and in these in a lot of ways where, you know, the Christian church, rather than being communities of resistance that can push back against some of these dominant narratives that are in our society, they end up just sort of supporting the status quo. You know, you talked about sort of that individuality, individual responsibility that I mean, even yourself mentioned that you feel like what can I do? Now? Even that is a neoliberal idea, this idea of individuals needing to get involved and make change. We're actually faith with the Christian faith is about a community. It's about people. And I think the story of Christianity once again, has this opportunity to offer resistance in that, you know, the, the idea of the churches to be this alternative community in the heart of the Empire. So what their conversation I think we need to be asking ourselves What does it mean to be this alternative community? What does it mean to be a community that that lives as us that divine dream? Where reality today? You know, how do we restructure our communities, so that we can realize that dream, you know, and in my vision of the Divine dream, when I look at the way that Christ loved, and walked and taught, is that it's a world with poverty doesn't exist, where homelessness isn't a thing, we actually care for people on planet, we put that at the center of what we do. It's not just about going to church and having an individualized sermon, individualized message, and then going back and trying to individually apply it to ourselves and to our communities and you know, go to work and then come back to but how do we form communities of resistance? How do we form a community centered on love for people and planet that actually bring healing and restoration and hope? You know, that's a big question of the big conversation. We need to start start racing, what

Seth Price 35:49

I like, I like big questions, and I wanted to find a neoliberalism, Nero, oh, my god, Neo liberalism for those and you can correct me if I'm wrong in this, it's been a long time since I was at school, and studied that, and it is not what I do now. So neoliberalism is like a reduction in government spending and like deregulation, right? Like free market capitalism, deregulate everything, the free market will figure it out, like trickle down economics, that kind of stuff. But what's funny is if if my definition is right, economies and governments built on neoliberalism apparently do not believe in not spending more on the military, and defense spending just on everything else. Maybe I'm wrong, that is neoliberalism, correct? Because I wanted to kind of Yeah, I

A.J. Hendry 36:36

think one of the one of the aspects of neoliberalism and once again, Angela Davis writes a lot about this. I mentioned the book, Bruce Rogers Bourne talks about neoliberalism and the key if assault, and really argues that actually, neoliberalism is more than about economics, it's become a culture and ideology, which has permeated the globe. And when we look at a lot of those narratives, there's narratives about, you know, a colorblind society around personal responsibility about, you know, meritocracy, that you know, that we all just need to work out, and we'll get hit. Those are all part and parcel with, you know, neoliberal ideology, and all sort of comes in and under that. And I think learning to name that is hard, because, you know, because of the depths of some of those stories that we've been told about our society and culture, what it means to be human, it does, it does take a bit to try to name those stories, and then figure out how do we resist and push back

Seth Price 37:32

on them? Yeah, yeah. Yeah, there are actually other things that people want to do the Googles. So there are other options, so you can read about socialism. You could talk about Keynesianism. And we're not going to talk about this because this is primarily a theological podcast. But although Keynesianism, I could have a conversation on that, because it's an economic system. And that's what I do for a living. But anyway, when you, Erin, try to wrap words around the divine. What is that?

A.J. Hendry 38:04

The simplest, simplest way I say is like the Divine is love, you know, that love is Who and What God is. And that love is experienced in the world through, you know, our connections with one another, but also a powerful force that is working towards justice and liberation across the globe.

Seth Price 38:25

Where do you want people to go? And do the things is, as it is related to what you're doing? On the internet? Yeah. Yeah, I mean, we're not on the internet, maybe there. Who knows? Like, go wherever they want to go?

A.J. Hendry 38:41

Yeah, I mean, follow me on my lambs are solid. Both Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, as well. Got a podcast also, sort of talk about some of the stuff. And then I have sort of my personal Instagram and Facebook page, which is AJ Hendry. Writer, I think.

Seth Price 38:58

Yeah. He said, I think I don't even know what the name is. Maybe it has writer maybe, maybe it doesn't. Man, I appreciate you making time to make this work. I know, this was, um, I know, it was hard to find the time to make work. I appreciate you

A.J. Hendry 39:11

know, thanks for having me on. It's great to watch it.

Seth Price 39:21

Now, I haven't added it up. But there are hundreds of 1000s if not millions of podcasts on the internet, and I am humbled that you continue to download this one. If this is your first time here. Please know that there are transcripts of these shows. Not always in real time, but I do my best. And if you go back in the logs, you can find transcripts for pretty much any episode that you'd like. The show is recorded and edited by me, but it is produced by the patron supporters of the show. That is one of the best, if not the best way that you can support the show. If you get anything at all out of these episodes, if you think on them, or if you you know, you're out and about and you tell your friends about it or..hey, mom, dad, brother, sister, friend, boss, pastor, here's what I heard, what are your thoughts on that? If this is helping you in any way, and it is helping me, consider supporting the show in that manner. It is extremely inexpensive, but collectively, it is so very much helpful.

Now for you. I pray that you are blessed, and you know that you're cherished and beloved. We'll talk soon.

Talking about Atonement with Mako Nagasawa / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening and is transcribed from Patreon version of the conversation. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the audio


Mako Nagasawa 0:00

Judaism was the first linear story in history. Thomas Cahill talks about this in the gifts of the Jews. And so the Jesus story is, is really the only understanding of that, that I think fully makes sense that you can have a loving God who is who loves us and didn't cause the problem. But he figures out a way to still be the hero and overcome the villain by by actually providing a way for the villain to be transformed. And that's

Unknown 0:37

always been shown

Seth Price 0:52

Hello, hello. Hello. I am curious when you have been told what to believe, about atonement, what does that word mean? Like literally, that word is it's not a big word, but it's a funky word like we don't use it. But it matters because it affects the way that we view people humans policies, politics, communities, families, churches, workplaces. Insert, now and here. And with that in mind, I brought on Mako Nagasawa. He is from the and I'm gonna get this wrong. He's from the anastasius Center in Mako I'm sure you're listening, and I'm sure I can't get that name, right. Because in my brain, it's Anna stasis. And I also know that that's probably wrong. But he does a lot of things. He's written a couple books, and he has some amazing blogs and teachings, you can find them all over the internet. But I came across him through a Facebook friend. And man, I just quickly fell in love with what he was doing, started reading some of his writing, invite him on the show to talk about atonement. And this is the result of that. And I don't want to be too long with this intro because it's a little bit longer of an episode, but I really enjoy the episode. Before that, though, I want to say thank you, there has been three or four people that are supporting the show have added into the community there over on Patreon. And I'm very thankful for each and every one of you. You will you know hear that plea in my fake quote unquote air quotes here ad in the middle of the episode. Right at a pivotal moment this week. I really smiled and laughed literally out loud at my kitchen table as I edited right where I put that in. I can't wait for you to hear it. Anyway. All of that to the side. And here we go.

Unknown 2:50

The way you build a bridge with the cords that they spend with Nine Inch Nails cement bricks, and hope that at the end of this I made my peace

Unknown 3:02

as well good and bad myself

Seth Price 3:20

recording in progress, we did it. Alright, here we are. This is always the hardest part in the Mako. Like it's always just beginning. So here we go. Mako Nagasawa. Right. Did it. Yes. Excellent. Welcome to the show. We were already starting out correct because I got the names right, which is the most stressful part of any episode. It doesn't matter what the name is. But I'm glad that you're here. Thanks for saying yes to some random idiot on the internet on the Twitter, which is a great place to meet people. You know, that's is you know, I could have been selling you a timeshare and you would have never known

Mako Nagasawa 3:52

that would be much less fun. But

Seth Price 3:57

yeah, and so what's funny is I saw you from Rick Pidcock, who writes a lot of stuff for Baptist who's global and I can't even remember what the post was. Because once someone had posted a screenshot of something you'd said to something that someone else said I don't even remember. I fell down a rabbit hole. I was like, alright, timeout enough of the rabbit hole. Let's just get in the hole with Mako. So when people are unfamiliar with you, and you try to explain like what or who you are, or why you are what is that?

Mako Nagasawa 4:28

Well, online, I'm a displaced California and I now live in Boston with my wife and kids. The the online content I tend to put out most has to do with early church thinking and action about Christian restorative justice and healing atonement. And I'm the director of the Nasus Center for Christian education and ministry and I founded this organization. We have a small team and it's a lot of fun We put out curriculum and do training on those two subjects. Usually restorative justice and healing a ton. Yeah.

Seth Price 5:06

Do you miss California?

Mako Nagasawa 5:09

I do. I I really miss the Pacific Ocean and good Korean and Mexican

Seth Price 5:14

food. I do miss good Mexican food. So I'm from Texas, and I now live in Virginia. And the Mexican food here is is bland when I take my family home to Texas. So like it's too spicy, tastes different, like but but it's actually Mexican food. It's not whatever the heck you call,

Mako Nagasawa 5:30

right? Our authentic Mexican food is? Yeah.

Seth Price 5:33

It's Tex Mex. But it's more authentic than whatever the heck they're serving just down the street. It's way more than that. Right? You talk about atonement theory, which is a topic that are you talking about a lot of things, abortion as well, I bought your book the other day, I haven't began reading it yet. So but with all of the things on the news about this, that and the other and Supreme Court justices and Roe v Wade on stuff, I was like, Well, let me he wrote a book. Let me just buy this one because it's I'm already looking into stuff. So I don't know if you touch on that in there. But I'm gonna find out here soon. But not while you're here today. Okay. So as I was diving into everything, I realized that your view of atonement seems to be entirely different than I think what the default, quote unquote orthodoxy of the United States is. And I don't know if it's the default orthodoxy of Christianity as a whole. But it's been like five or six years, since I talked about Orthodoxy, which at that time, I had Brad juris back on. And we talked about kind of a Christus Victor model. Yes. Which I'm not sure what the differences are, the similarities between your two views are not but what is the only correct interpretation of atonement theory.

Mako Nagasawa 6:49

The earliest one, as expressed by Iran as the most important second century century writer writing, a writer of Christian thought, he was a bishop of a point, who was mentored by Polycarp of Smyrna. And it who was mentored by John the writer of the gospel and Revelation. So I mean, this guy was, you know, two degrees of separation from Jesus. And Athanasius, who defended the deity of the divinity of Jesus gave us the and defended the Nicene Creed. And what they believed was about atonement was that Jesus shared in our fallen human nature that we might share in his heels, human nature, they had a medical understanding of atonement, and that he took on our fallen human nature in order to fight his way through to faithfulness, and, and then that faithfulness impacted his human nature. But he invested the Holy Spirit into every cell in his humanity, and killed the thing that was killing us in His death. And then in his resurrection, emerged with a god soaked, God drenched new humanity, which he shares with us by His Spirit. Right, that understanding is that the earliest understanding of atonement, and it's that we have on paper and that undergirds Christus Victor because it it emphasizes Jesus's victory over sin or or sinfulness, which, which is logically prior to victory over Satan, the victory over death of victory over even the law of Sinai covenant, although that is not quite what they would say about it. But if we're, if we're thinking in terms of how Luther Martin Luther articulated, Christus Victor, then yeah, there's a logical sequence. So that that's that, that is the best way to think about atone. Yeah,

Seth Price 9:03

and that's the only one that's accurate. All the others are wrong. Correct?

Mako Nagasawa 9:08

Well, the, what it depends on what you mean by all the others, the So

Seth Price 9:12

the most common, I think, is what you would hear preached from the pulpit and the bulk of, or at least not the most common in the United States, because this this podcast is listened to, I think, on every continent. So for me, you were born deprived. And because of that, you owe a debt. And if you don't pay it, you're gonna burn forever, which I also don't think that I believe that Hell is a place that we go to, I think it's a place that we, you and I make with the consequences of our actions, but that's, again, a different conversation. Um, and so because of that, someone needs to show up basically, and make the mortgage payment for my son, so that I can go to live in a better house, right, which seems to be entirely different from what you just said, because you use words healing, which is not in what is preached in many churches each Sunday. De here in the United States. Correct? Or am I hearing? Am I wrong? That's right.

Mako Nagasawa 10:05

That's right. Yeah. So CS Lewis talks about how punishment and debt payment are really kind of the same thing. They're a transposition of, of conceptual categories. Others would use the court with the Western courtroom metaphor, right, which is the God as a judge, we have broken this law. And so we, he, the punishment is His death, Jesus interpose it he enters the courtroom, and interposes himself. And so he takes the punishment. And and so the, instead of us and and so that's how God as a judge can forgive us. The the idea, that's called penal substitution. And what you describe is, is that, I think what CS Lewis calls fiscal substitution, right? Like that we owe a debt of obedience, or a debt of suffering. And God is a currency exchanger. So if he doesn't get repaid in the currency of obedience, he will extract payment from us and the currency of suffering. And, and essentially, yeah, it points the same idea.

Seth Price 11:20

I don't think that anybody's ever called it a fiscal substitution. But when you said it, I realized how much of what I do for a living has bled into past memories of atonement. Yeah, working in a bank, like that literally makes a lot of sense. Nobody's ever said that out loud to me. I'm actually kind of guilt. Isn't the word embarrassed that I never recognized it before now. Yeah, I guess. So. You were raised then, in this Iranian version of atonement theory? Correct. Is that Is that what you call home? Is this always been your view or?

Mako Nagasawa 11:57

Well, I, I, I mean, I came to Jesus in the context of a Japanese Free Methodist church out in California, still connected to that community of I live out here in Boston, went to went to college. And I had mentors who were five point Calvinists. And that's when I started to ask a lot of questions. I mean, hearing about the quote, unquote, five points of Calvinism was interesting, I think I had the most difficulty with the idea of limited atonement, because that was the most difficult one to square with, with scripture. You know, that God so loved the world that in he desires that, that no one be lost. And there's all kinds of, you know, things that would indicate that what God would not limit the atonement on his end. Yeah. So how could that be so? You know, basically, make a long answer short, it got exposed to the Calvinism. Arminianism debates thought, Hmm, this seems like you're just selecting versus, and and then explaining why you could do that. I'm not particularly compelled by that, because I really enjoyed scripture itself. And so exegesis or Biblical Studies was what I really enjoyed, I enjoyed preaching, expository preaching. And when you do that, I, you know, I felt like I, I want to know, like, what is the emotional response that Jesus or Paul was calling for? Because penal substitution, which is what we described the courtroom that the Western courtroom metaphor, evokes survival emotions, right, it's, I feel guilt and fear. And then after considering Jesus, I feel relief and gratitude and and basically, my entire survival was at stake and now i It's not and so I was asked to teach once Romans six and I found that I, I didn't know what Paul was saying, because of different things. I'm not sure how much you want me to go into the detail of all of it, but

Seth Price 14:32

all of it as far as you as far as you want to, there are no time limits on this show. One was three hours long, which I edited into two parts. Yeah, that so I don't want to do that. So I literally looked at my memory card and was like so you have five minutes after that. I don't know what happens when the memory card is full. And he's like, okay, so you go in as much or as little as you want. I have a few parts that I really had the biggest questions on but go as far as deep into Romans six as you want, because Romans I think, is a text that many in the church use as a weapon as a way to be as opposed Anyway, anyway, so go as much as you'd like.

Mako Nagasawa 15:14

Sure. So I was asked to teach Romans six, one through 11, where Paul says, You have died and risen with Christ. And that's the motivation for not continuing to sin. And I thought, well, this is this is a different motivation than what I would expect. Because if penal substitution were true, he would say, because Jesus died instead of you, but here, he says, Jesus died ahead of you, and you died and rose with him. At the time I was, I thought I was going to be a high school teacher. And anecdotally, I'd heard different ways that teachers motivate students that struggle with, with their academics. And so, you know, one of one of the worst ways that that teachers can speak to struggling students is to say, what are these grades? Are you dumb, you know, or, also not effective? Is what are these grades? Don't you know how much I'm sacrificing for you. Because that just builds resentment on the part of the students, the best thing for a teacher to say is, what are these grades, this isn't who you are, that's just the best thing to say, in different ways and inflections, of course, but the the idea is you can separate the behavior, from the identity, on on some level, right, like on on a fundamental level. And it doesn't mean that the person is not responsible, but it means that there's something different within the person and identity obligation becomes the, the motivation to do better to try harder. And I could see that the apostle Paul was using that motivation, but in a much richer, deeper, more profound way. He was saying, you've changed, this isn't who you are. And so he doesn't say, Don't you know, how much, you know, suffering Jesus took, or how much he sacrificed or the pain that he endured? All of which was kind of haunting me for different reasons. And, and then I just, I said, this is, this is not what I expected. How, how does he motivate his, you know, his Christians, his churches, as a pastor in other letters, and I found that in Ephesians, Colossians, two and three, you know, Second Corinthians three, four, and five, I mean, he is really landing and working from a foundation of your identities different. And, and, and so I thought, Okay. How do people then do evangelism? Do they use penal substitution in evangelism? And I saw I read all of the book of Acts, and they don't, no one uses that language that those categories, and they're not looking to evoke that emotion. So they might make an argument from creation or fulfilled scripture or whatever. But it's different. And, you know, there are two places maybe Galatians three and First Corinthians one where you could interpret Paul as if he had done evangelism using penal substitutionary atonement, like, you better escape the wrath of God in a retributive justice sense. And, and in Jesus interpose himself, that's the only way out. But really, no, because what he says about the resurrection is you have to participate in the resurrection. And the only way to do that is to participate also in Christ death, so you die and rise with Christ. Same thing as as Roman six. So from the standpoint of Look, I I loved mentoring people got a chance to preach every now and then. And so I thought, I guess I don't really have to believe in penal substitution. It's not clearly taught in the text. It's more super imposed on it. And, and, you know, there's other things as you mentioned, other parts of Romans get bent out of shape by by some people who want to defend that paradigm. Yeah. Yeah, that that was how I started down this journey. And about 10 years later, I took a class in theology, and my teacher had been kind of himself been a student of TF Torrance and JB Torrance. They had studied under Carl, Bart, who and they were all reading Athanasius. They were all realizing that there were certain shortcomings in the Protestant Reformation. And Athanasius had not gotten enough attention. And they were all trying to go back to Athanasius because he was a consistent Trinitarian thinker.

Seth Price 20:26

Yeah, when I so I people know that I do the podcast as a, as a hobby. Like, it's it's not a kept secret, including it work and some of my clients even know, etc. And so they'll ask questions from time to time when I talk about atonement, I will say what I believe, which is kind of a blend of a lot of different things, because some of the things rattling around in my head, but it is not what I was raised with. And they'll always say, well, that's just beautiful. Like, that seems. That seems good. Which Yeah, that does seem like the gospel. Yeah, funny, but I don't. And then that's it, though, they go on about believing what they've always believed. So how, how would How would one if you wanted to talk about atonement in new lights, dive into some easy reading, that can begin to get your feet wet? Or to if you're a toddler in this way of thinking, you know, how would How would someone begin to dive into that? Because I'm not real sure how we got to where we're at, at least in the Western Church guy, it doesn't make any sense why you would take something good and be like, you know, what we could do to this will make it horrible, we could make it a horror flick, this would be a mate that here's, here's how we're going to sell it to people, we're gonna we're gonna make them so terrified. That they'll have to say yes, instead of look at it and wonder be like, absolutely, that is, yes. Why would I not partner in to becoming a new thing like that? So where would you direct people to, to kind of begin down that down that work?

Mako Nagasawa 21:54

Well, I tried to make a lot of material accessible and easy to read up on my organization's website, and so on not stasis. center.org is a place that I would encourage people to go, I can break it down further, depending on people's interest, okay. So, you know, if you're someone who would really like to see this in Scripture, then check out our notes on Matthew or Luke, and, and also Hebrews, because what Jesus did with the human nature that he took on, that's what that story is about that. And so I would refer to that. If, if you're looking to, to understand kind of the journey of a human being and human becoming throughout Scripture, there's, there's a lot, there's a lot of notes related to that. I think because of Augustine, and his influence, mediated through Martin Luther and John Calvin, we tend to think of human nature as relatively fixed. And, as you mentioned, the the depravity doctrine is that we can only send a lot. Right? I mean, it's, it is it's, I mean, the country always apply. And it's, it's a way to be emotionally unintelligent, you know, when it comes to actual human relationships, it's a way of dismissing any residual, well, the image of God in, in us that produces that it's a way of God maintaining kind of a touch point with us and, and continuing to call out to us and, and it's why we, we actually do demonstrate love and beauty and an interest in justice and goodness and order and all these things. So we just can't dismiss that there's a very rich tradition there that you could call it. You could call it Jewish virtue ethics or Christian virtue ethics, the idea that our choices shape our own human nature that we are human beings and human becomings. And, and so the, I think there's great promise in neuroscience and what neuroscience and in Christian faith are doing, or the intersection point of those two areas of engagement because Neuroscience tells us that, you know, if that our choices, and also the things done to us actually do shape our neurology, our neural circuits, yeah. And that influences what I want to do tomorrow. It's not deterministic, but it does strongly reinforce this virtue ethics paradigm. I would say that if you're looking for early Church material, probably the easiest thing is to read efficacious on the incarnation. It's a wonderful book, very easy to read. CS Lewis wrote a beautiful introduction to that. And if you want to see parallels, like just how to understand atonement in this patristic paradigm, conceptually, there's, there's all kinds of stories and analogies and illustrations that I've tried to collect. So for example, if your Lord of the Rings fan, you know, this is Frodo taking on the ring, struggling against it, and then trying to cast it into the fire, mean Tolkien was, was creating a parallel to Jesus and Jesus took on human nature struggled against it, and actually was successful at casting it into the fire in a manner of speaking, the fire of the Holy Spirit just throughout his life, and, and then, again, overcoming the evil or the fallenness, in the sinfulness that that had become embedded into human nature. That yes, it influenced us towards sin and selfishness and self centeredness. It's not the only thing that's true about us, but it needed to be overcome and human nature needed to be healed. So I'd say that if you're interested in a more practitioners standpoint, from evangelism or Bible study, materials are up on the website. And and also this leads into a whole different restorative justice paradigm for Christian Social ethics and social justice. Yeah. And that's really important because our our society, especially in the US, is modeled on the on the or based on the principle of retributive justice, not restorative justice, or to put it in full terms, meritocratic retributive justice, where it's, it's all about what you can do as an individual to what you merit or demerit. Yeah. And that is not the actual biblical definition of justice, both in the Hebrew and the Greek terms. And so, so there's a lot of

Seth Price 27:20

application. Yeah, that's one of the things I wanted to talk to you about is the way that the way that our view of atonement influences our politics and our policies and the way that we live. But before I ask that, you said a couple of things there, and then one of the resources on your website, if you could just in brief, like one, two minutes, walk me through why it's a sentence that exists. So there's a part on circumcision and atonement, which is not a sentence before I read it. And for those that haven't read it, like they hear me say that again, I'll say it again, for that person in the back. That wasn't listening. Yes, zoned out circumcision and atonement. Why is that? Why does that anyway? Why is that a thing? Like how would somebody listening to it hasn't read it be like, wait, what, how? Why, when, like, I don't know if that makes you know, any, I can't I don't know how to say it better than that. Do you remember like last year, I had all those weird ad breaks, like he would just randomly be something, we're not doing that. Instead, I thought I'd do this, I need your help. If you're able to head on over to the website for the show, there are two things that you can do. One is you head over the website, you click the Patreon button or support button, I forget what I call it, and you jump in there, those people help make the show a thing so that you can listen to it right now, to the easier one, you could just leave a rating and a review on the podcast app of choice that you currently use. Either one of those is fine. But I would love it if you would do either one, specifically the rating and reviewing it's an exponential thing, that the algorithms pick it up. And that's just math. It's just compounding on top of itself. Anyway, all that to say I was at that was the ad break. And now we're going to get back into it.

Unknown 29:10

I don't know. Diabetes. In between, somewhere in between it all. In between. In between, because somewhere in between. Somewhere in between No. in between?

Mako Nagasawa 29:36

Exactly. Exactly. What well, let's, let's start with this. Jesus says in Matthew five that he came to fulfill everything about the law and the prophets. Right? Right. We should we should all be able to agree about that thing. So in Deuteronomy 10, verse 16, God says circumcise your hearts. Oh, Israel. How and what does that mean? Well, it means cut something away from your human nature, like from the human heart, figuratively speaking, you're human nature. So there's an internal problem. And and God had called Israel to himself in order to be like a medical focus group, because he was a he's a good physician, right. And he's working with all humanity, which, in general there, a patient population that resists the treatment. So even today, even to today, oh, there's lots of analogies there. But the but so he called Israel to himself in different ways and, and said, I want you to receive the treatment, right? There's this really demanding spiritual health regimen, here are these commandments. And if you do them, you will have health, you will have a life. And you'll be able to cut away this thing that has now lodged itself in your human nature, because it's part of everyone's human nature. And, and by doing that, you'll be partnering with God, and so circumcise your hearts. That phrase, and idea gets repeated over and over again. But let's just talk about the pentatonic, right, Moses, through his long leadership of Israel realizes, you're not going to be able to do this, like even he himself wasn't able to do that. And and so in Deuteronomy 30, verse six, he says, The Lord will circumcise your hearts, there'll be some way in which God Himself does He, God will resolve the problem of evil within human nature. Why? Well, because he's good. And he's got to do it in a good way, a loving way, a way that honors our human partnership. Why? Because he's loving, wisely that because he's triune, right? He's a Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And so his very nature is love. So sorry, I backed out from Scripture into more systematic theology but but you get the idea via this, this language was in Scripture. Everywhere, Jeremiah four, four, Jeremiah says that Jeremiah, 926, and 27, he repeats that circumcise your hearts, or the hardest uncircumcised, and then later in Jeremiah 31, God will write his law in your hearts, He zekiel says, it will give you a heart of flesh in place of a heart of stone, same idea, different idiom, having to do with like, the tablets and so forth. But But I mean, the same idea. David, in Psalm 51 says, Create for me a clean heart, because you want truth in the inmost being so all throughout the Hebrew Scriptures, there's there's a call out to God to resolve this problem in us. It's not God, we recognize you're angry, Could you could you please pour your anger out on someone else? There's nothing like that. Yes. And that's not what the prophets wanted. The prophets wanted for the underlying problem to be healed. And so Jesus comes along and quotes that sometimes he says, like, all the problems come from the human heart. And, and then that his Transfiguration, he shows that the impact of his faithfulness is showing up, right? It's human nature in himself is being transfigured. It's being glorified. It's being it's becoming transparent to the love of the Father, by the power of the Holy Spirit. And then, through His death and resurrection, he finalizes that movement. Paul and Romans two says, What does it mean to be a true Jew, it's to be circumcised of heart by the Spirit. Right and, and then in Romans six, six, that our old self died in Christ, and Romans eight three, what the law was in unable to do, weakened as it was by the flesh of Israel. Right because it the health regimen was good. It's not bad. It I mean, and also that the law, God did not give the law simply to, like, condemn Israel, right. Otherwise, Paul would have said, For the Law was powerful, because it worked against the flesh was, but no, he says, the law was good and it but it was unable to partner to be fully partnered with because of the weakness of the flesh of the Israelites. Yeah. So what it got to God did it he He condemned sin in the flesh of Christ. Yeah. Yes. How by Coming as Jesus and Jesus never sending. Yeah, yeah. So you keep Jesus pressed faithfulness into his humanity. And so he shared in our fallen humanity that we might share in his healed humanity.

Seth Price 35:14

Yeah, I will say for those listening, I'll link to this in the transcripts, and maybe even in the show notes. There's a six part series there. But as I was scrolling through, yes, at the beginning, yeah, that was the first thing that popped into my mind of there was that just the title itself? You know, you're like, wait, what? No, I'm upset already. Haven't ready yet no set. Anyway. So and then you said another thing about Frodo and the Lord of the Rings and that type of stuff. So as I read some of your words, and you've done some other lectures, or books, or PDFs, or whatever you want to call it on, like, um, you know, The Lion, the Witch, and the wardrobe and a lot of the work of CS Lewis, you've done some stuff with Harry Potter, and a little bit of atonement. And so I'm curious, do you would you say that another way to talk about atonement theory would be the atonement of the hero's journey, or a theology of the hero's journey, talking about Joseph Campbell, because you have to be familiar with that. But I always find a lot of theological implications of call and response. You change, you go over a precipice, you know, something that you need help for, and then you come back a different person, which kind of relates to what you said a minute ago of, we're human beings, and human becomings, which is just like an endless circle of just? Or is that a bad way to paraphrase some of the work that you've done there? Because not a lot of people will do you know, the Bible and Harry Potter together. Matter of fact, depending on your denomination, you're not allowed to read Harry Potter. So that's, am I am I, am I putting correlations there that are maybe incorrect? Or what would you say to that?

Mako Nagasawa 36:51

The atonement of the hero's journey is exactly it. Because now, I mean, Joseph Campbell's work is interesting. But But essentially, there, there are two types of stories, linear stories and circular stories. And so in circular stories, there is no happy ending ever. Right? It just, you wind up depressed? Yeah, it's just

Seth Price 37:12

black mirror over and over, you begin to show it's interesting. At the end, you're like, I can't I was an hour that hurt me.

Mako Nagasawa 37:18

Right. Right. And, you know, maybe it's like, okay, I guess I learned something. But I feel sad. Yeah. Versus a linear story is, it is the hero's journey. And in a linear story, there's good defeats evil in some way, as opposed to in a circular story, good and evil, are either locked in eternal battle. And so there's never a real resolution. And and then the stories start to feel totally repetitive. Or good and evil are actually the same thing, as in many Eastern religions. I mean, Hinduism and Buddhism, I had some Buddhist background, in my family. And and so that was a real concern, like, well, there's never really been a social justice movement that arises out of Hinduism or Buddhism. Why is that? Well, because you have to have real hope, and a hope of good triumphing over evil that you want to participate in. And so the Abrahamic traditions have at least that framework of good triumphs over evil in some way. That those are the world changing paradigms. And so now, but if you do have a linear story, or if you claim to have one, then the issue is does it make sense? Like, who's the villain, then? What are what is the problem that needs to be fixed? And then who's the real hero. And just to make a long story short, I mean, Judaism was the first linear story in history. Thomas Cahill talks about this in the gifts of the Jews. And so the Jesus story is, is really the only understanding of that, that I think fully makes sense that you can have a loving God who is who loves us and didn't cause the problem. But he figures out a way to still be the hero and overcome the villain by by actually providing a way for the villain to be transformed. And that's us. So it doesn't necessarily mean that everyone avails themselves, themselves have that opportunity, but the love is consistent right from from God. And so, Jesus steps into human nature in order to fix the problem of human nature. And so every other linear story, I think, externalizes the problem of evil makes it not really a part of human nature. And so it's part of society or As part of laws or, you know, European colonialism made it? Well, it's a problem of other people's cultures. And so we, if they just change their cultures, then they would be better or if Adam Smith right talks about the Wealth of Nations, like it starts here in England. And if everyone did things our way, we would be fine. We this undergirds the idea that we could just put democracy in Iraq, in Afghanistan, and all the problems will be fixed. Well,

Seth Price 40:30

always seems to always work every time we've tried it.

Mako Nagasawa 40:33

100% 100% good track record. Yeah. The the, the, the basic ideas, those are actually parodies of the Christian story. Right, because it's there, there has been a solution that has been worked out somewhere, in this case in someone in Jesus of Nazareth. And we then become missionaries in order to tell the story and to participate in the working out of that story. That's what colonialism is in the key, it's transposed into the key of A parody. And it's externalize the problem as a social system and other people's social systems need to change in any case, the the hero's journey coming back to that is absolutely true. And Jesus retells everything that was good about the the heroes of the scriptures but fills in all for all of their failures. Yeah. Right. And so he is this is a dynamic that is that is common in stories and and we should recognize it, like in Star Wars. Here's another common one because George Lucas consulted with Joseph Campbell. And so Luke Skywalker has to retell the story of Anna Qin Skywalker, right? Compare Empire Strikes Back and what's what the second move I forget?

Seth Price 42:08

The second cycle, I can't remember. Yeah, if I said the second set when I was, you write the ones that nobody likes? Or I think it is Attack of the Clones, because Phantom Menace is the first one. Right? Yeah.

Mako Nagasawa 42:20

Right. And so if you watch the duel, like the great dual in each of these movies, what is it? It's Luke in Empire in the dark, battling with Darth Vader that he's wielding a blue lightsaber, Darth Vader's wielding a red lightsaber, and in the end, Luke gets his hand right hand cut off. Well, in episode two Anniken actually is wielding a blue lightsaber, which is Obi ones, right? His original was green. But so now he's building blue, he cuts the light, power, the power, so all descends into darkness. And he's fighting Count Dooku wielding the red lightsaber. And they do the same moves the same reflections on their faces. And in the end Anniken gets his right hand cut off. Why is this happening? Well, it's because Luke has to step into the story of Anniken Skywalker, in order to retell it but but succeed where his father had failed, right, he has to resist the temptation to fall to the dark side. And because he's able to do that he can redeem his father and his father's story. Well, Jesus retold Israel's origin story a bit. Why? Because Israel blew it from the start, right? I mean, they go through water, and then wilderness and come to a mountain. Well, Jesus comes through water, and then wilderness for 40 days, and then comes to a mountain. But he is successful. He's faithful at fighting at resisting the temptation, and burning the commandments of God into his human nature. He is the one who is circumcising his heart. He's a he's a true Israelite, who is fulfilling the law. So well, and why does he have to do this? Because? Well, because the story needed to be corrected. And it would be similar is, you know, in principle, if, if Jesus truly got on, it was in England and sailed across the Atlantic, to North America to to Plymouth, Massachusetts, in a ship called the Mayflower and got off and and started to treat the Native Americans there kindly and fairly. And what would he be doing? He would be re embodying the the origin story of the United States. Yeah, but doing it faithfully. And why would he need to do that? Well, because because we didn't worry got started wrong, right? There were flaws woven in at that at the beginning. And so, you know, ultimately Jesus is a new atom. That's the language of Paul in Romans five. And in First Corinthians 15. The the idea that he, he retells Adam and Eve story faithfully, not just Israel's, but he goes all the way back there in order to do what they should have done, but didn't, which is to give their human nature over to God and receive life into themselves. So yes, that is that that's a great way to put it, the hero's

Seth Price 45:38

journey. Earlier, you said retributive justice versus restorative justice. And I think that we inherently understand retributive justice, just by way of living where we live here in the United States, like that's, that's just the default. And so I think sometimes we don't even realize it. But if things were to blink, and the way that we see justice was more aligned to would you call it earlier, a healing atonement theory? I can't remember it also have to take I have to cheat and take notes. What would what would change? So we all know what today looks like, you know, with the way that we do prisons, the way that we do courtrooms the way that we hold people to account for decisions that they've made that break the rules of society that, you know, are are the way that they are? For there, there are many ways that you could go with that, as well. But what would change like overnight if if our country and our churches said no, no, we're doing it a new way. We misunderstood what needed to be circumcised, and we thought it was you people. And instead, it's something different, because we're no longer going to cut away humans from the body of Christ, we're going and lock them away somewhere, we're going to do a new thing. What would change? Like, what would that look like?

Mako Nagasawa 46:56

It if you're talking about criminal justice, reform,

Seth Price 46:58

it already have it really. Yeah, yeah,

Mako Nagasawa 47:01

that's the that is a really important place to start. Although I would also say, you know, we could come back to this, it really should affect a whole bunch of other areas of life, it should affect our housing policy, our interaction, the land and our ecology. So because the bigger issue that restorative justice raises is, well, what does restoration mean? Like what type of relationship should we have with one another? Not just when someone does something wrong, but just in general? And so will, how are we responsible to God and one another, in in that paradigm, and this raises bigger questions, but criminal justice reform is a good place to start because independently of biblical scholarship, this this question emerged, well, actually has deep roots. But obviously, we have a mass incarceration problem here in the United States. Because our principle, our primary principle of justice is meritocratic. retributive. And so the idea there is, it's offender centric, if if I do something wrong, then something ROPs something should be done to me that's proportional or whatever, hopefully proportional. And in restorative justice, it's victim centric. It's not offender centric. And so the first question, if, if I do something to hurt you, the first question is, what do you need in order to move on? And to recover from the harm and and heal? And how can I participate in that? So I asked the offender, and there may be other, you know, stakeholders, like the community at large. So restorative justice asks a fundamentally different question. And it, it does mean that there are consequences for the offender. And so I want to clear up that as a misconception. Like some people think, oh, it's, it's good. It goes light on the offender. No, it doesn't. It, it often is emotionally more challenging for the offender. Because it makes me grow, or it invites me to, it places a demand on me to do something that draws me out of myself. And so I could point to examples of that, but But essentially, part of the reason why this is being talked about here in the US is well, because our system is bonkers right now, and and also because restorative justice has been tried in other countries in different forms. And it's been shown to to actually produce things that we, we say we want so For instance, in Africa, and also Northern Europe, you know, the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa and also similar things, Uganda, Rwanda post conflict situations where you can't like physically lock up all the people that did something wrong because you bankrupt your country. So how how do you bring closure to folks? Well, you have victim offender dialogue, and I wouldn't say they're done or that that's the only thing to do. But that's a step. In Scandinavian countries, they have implemented restorative justice paradigms so that people offenders do go to prison. Although sometimes they they do more community service, but if they go to prison, they are treated humanely. There's more limitations on what can happen in prison, like overcrowding or things that people in Germany, they bring their own clothes, and they, they, they dress normally, because they're, they're preparing to reengage society in, in in a new way, already as citizens but but with an awareness of what they have done. And when they have a social worker or an equivalent or work with a psychologist, sometimes they're already structuring victim offender dialogue meetings while they're in prison, but it's essentially and sometimes they're learning a skill. But essentially, this has been shown to reduce recidivism. You have shorter prison sentences. And, and and everything we say we want. Yeah. And so, you know, like Sweden has had the problem of they need to convert former prisons into condominiums, because they don't they no longer have as many prisoners. Like, wouldn't that be a good problem? Yeah. Yeah.

Seth Price 51:59

Like, that's profitable, though. Then our system here in the United States, because, yes, you lock people away for money. Right? Yeah. What would it mean for some of our other? Yeah, yeah, well, yeah, yeah, yeah, we out we abolish slavery, except for people that we incarcerate and then we'll just incarcerate the same people. And we'll call it solved. Yeah, um, what would that cause for some of our communities, though, unrelated to criminal justice reform? So you alluded to it, it would do some other things. So what would a restorative atonement theory kind of flesh out for the way that we live in community with one another, like, what would what would be different their

Mako Nagasawa 52:38

housing policy would be very different. So for instance, God has a housing first policy, right, he built the Garden of Eden and then put Adam and Eve there. So we have a meritocratic housing policy where it's proof that prove to me or prove to us that you're a productive citizen, and that you make enough money that you deserve to live here. And so the gated community is, is the most extreme example of that. But But essentially, this comes from John Locke's theory, the meritocratic theory of land conquest, that if you're more productive than the last guy, then you can take his land, and that was deployed by English settlers, and then you, you know, all kinds of people against Native Americans by misrepresenting Native Americans. But it's essentially that idea to really took hold here. And so we, we don't have a really good housing policy, even though the pandemic has now linked public health with housing. Right? I mean, how do you tell people to shelter in place or to stay at home if they don't have a home? Yeah, and, and we've allowed BlackRock and now private equity firms to become America's landlord and continue driving the price of housing up because now we have to compete not only with one another for scarce commodity like housing, but also with private equity firms. And this goes back to it's a form of plantation capitalism which wanted to divide the labor force into white and black so that the the elites didn't have to pay a lot of wages right because if you make labor compete with one another and break up into factions then that's that's what you get. You get to pay low wages because they're competing with one another so that's really what how race started and and then California's realtors and others in a book called freedom to discriminate by Jean Slater and and then Richard Ross seems color of law. Those are just must reads and talks about America's housing policy. We took the model of dividing the labor force from plantation capitalism, and we mapped it onto residential segregation. And once that's in place, then all the differential outcomes follow, right people's experience of schooling is different, based on their zip code where they live, people's experience of policing is different. So housing policy, let's say, in Germany, or in in Austria, like the city of Vienna, I've really appreciated there's one article in Forbes, about Germany's housing policy. And there's a video done by the Gravelle Institute on Vienna's housing policy, which talks about how they think about housing more as an investment in people and it's part of the labor market. Why is that? Well, for a couple reasons, obviously, it's because children are part of the future labor market, and they are educated in communities in neighborhoods, and schools are tied to neighborhoods. So it's an investment in people. So they, they want to make things more equal. They want to control you know how unequal things can get, and, and that's really important. And then secondly, they don't want people sinking into sinking into debt. Because as we learned in 2008 2009, if if I get a job, you know, in some other city, I might want to take that shot. But if my mortgage is underwater, and I can't sell, yeah, and so I'm stuck. So the economy becomes dysfunctional, even to itself, even in this present generation, where people are not flexible enough to move we have become because of white supremacy, becoming become invested in the idea that our primary asset should be our home, which is preserved by neighborhood property values, which is preserved by the perception of where this house is and who lives among, in this area. Yeah. And so we have created inequality problem, a justice problem, and also a sustainability problem. You know, because we've made car dependent suburbs that are unsustainable. And so housing policy would be a really good place to start. Housing is something that everyone needs.

Seth Price 57:29

Your answer there reminds me so much of the two questions that I asked him before we started recording. As you're talking, I'm like, yes, yes. Yes. Yes. Absolutely. Yeah. Because as I told you earlier, like, I need the neighbor's kids to be good and do well. And when I say be good, I mean, like, flourish. Like, and because they're gonna take care of me one day, as I'm supposed to take care of them right now. Like, that's, that's how it works. Um, yeah. Yeah. Last question, kind of existential because why not? What, no, go ahead.

Mako Nagasawa 58:07

Although, although, you know, you just a few days ago, Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin said, Not society's job to take care of other people's children. It's like what we do?

Seth Price 58:18

Yeah, of course, of course, it is. Like, of course, it is. Like, I forget who said it is somebody that's been on the show where I read it somewhere. I've read so many books. We're talking about like faith as a politic and not a politic as a party, like as a as a polis as a people's, and that sometimes Mako, like, I can't do this anymore, like I am, I'm done with God today, like I am, I'm done, I'm done. I can't do it. And then community, you, you basically say, it's fine, I have all of those burdens. Let me carry them for a minute. It's fine. And when you're ready to come back to them, I'm still here. And you're still in a good spot, I've made sure that you're good. And so when you're ready to win, you're in a better spot. Here's your faith. And it's just as healthy as it ever was. And I'm probably saying that badly. But like, that's what it is to live in community with one another of you need something. Okay. I can do that. And then one day, I will break down, and I will need something. And there's no quid pro quo. We just live here together. Like that's what we do this. That's what it is to be human. And I'm probably badly paraphrasing three different people together, because there's so much junk in my head. But how could it not be my problem to take care of the people that I live next to? I don't know how that could not be true.

Mako Nagasawa 59:34

Exactly. Exactly. I mean, you might start a small business and want to hire someone besides your own kids.

Seth Price 59:40

Yeah, yeah. And expect them to be educated enough to do well at the job so that I could then redirect those resources into the community. You know, like I said, that part needs to be rebuilt. Oh, your kids use the park. I'll pay for it's not a big deal. It's fine. Let's go play. Let's go play. Because when people laugh, they're healthy. Just make the kids laugh anyway. Anyway. Yeah, I'm not voting for that guy, but I don't live there. So, if you were to try to garb or robe words around what the Divine is, what is that for you?

Mako Nagasawa 1:00:16

What's the Divine is?

Seth Price 1:00:17

Yeah, if you were trying to like wrap words around that, what is that? Like? What is God?

Mako Nagasawa 1:00:22

Oh, what is God? Well, he is a love, he is a community, he is unity. He is and he is family, he is friendship. What that means is, those are, those are English words that describe Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Because in order, we can't just say God is Love without persons anchoring that love. Otherwise, if you if you have a God, who is what is the right word? Who is not try personal, you know, a mon ad, right? Or just a big dot? Then, you know, what is that God? Well? We don't know. We're not really sure. Because if that God didn't have to create it, well, you know, did God have that kind of God have to create then, then that God didn't have to also love but even with a Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, we have love and all these other things, beauty goodness, and even before that God created. And so God is these things, right? It, it's a predicate nominative in if we're thinking about God is love that. And we're trying to understand, like, what does it mean it, it's not simply that God does love or if God happens to love. I mean, I happen to love but I happen to do a lot of other things too, because I'm a fallen human being. And that doesn't make me the most consistent person all the time. And so for, for us to say as First John four eight says, God is love that gut, God, that is his nature. And so everything God does, has to flow out of that nature, and is an expression of that nature. That makes a lot of sense to me from how this all fits together, and how we can have a coherent story of good triumphing over evil and so forth. And, and why the atonement must be a healing atonement. And and why a loving, good God has found a way to heal human nature in a loving and good way, by never overriding our, our partnership with him, and why justice has to be restorative, because in the net, in the end, you know, his love and goodness, have to be the goal, and also the process. So, so I don't know if that answers your question, or gets out the gist of it. But

Seth Price 1:03:24

if that's my favorite question, because the answers are all over the place, and then and I love it, so and you don't know as Mako but but now you will. So I take all those answers. And I mix them together into an episode that has none of my voice in it at the end of the year. Except for to say, I asked all these people this question and here's it is, and it always ends up being something beautiful, just like back to back to back of people trying to say what God is it ends up being? I don't know, it ends it's it's powerful in a way that I can't recreate if that makes any sense. I love it. I love it. That's one of my favorite questions, because the answers are so all over the place. And I love it. So no, it's financer perfectly answer. I look forward to that. Yeah. If people want to dive more into what you're doing, because they've decided to, you know, just just try to grow a little bit. Where would you want people to do or go to, to kind of follow along to the work that you're doing? Where would you direct people?

Mako Nagasawa 1:04:24

Easiest thing is the our webpage www dot Gnosticism. Center, a n a s t. a s i s. I make sure I get spell it. Last assist center.org. And people can can find ways to connect there. I'm on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. So if people prefer that, although I am I am 49 And I'm not the most regular person there but but I do put out content there. So, if folks want to subscribe to the blog, right now, I'm I'm in a series on emotional development and atonement theology. Like how does the one How does atonement theology, namely penal substitution versus medical substitution or healing atonement? How do these theories affect us emotionally in different ways? I think that's a really, really important area, especially as we try to be trauma informed and emotionally healthy. So,

Seth Price 1:05:33

yeah. Excellent. Excellent. Thank you for coming on. And if you're willing, you don't have to say yes, but after I finished reading your book on abortion, if you're willing, let's do it again. Why not?

Mako Nagasawa 1:05:43

I would love to do that. And I would really appreciate it, Seth. I think these these are really important times for us to revisit the issue even though people think it's only and that we only get to dead ends by talking about abortion. I the book, as I've researched it, it's it's far from them.

Seth Price 1:06:03

Yeah. Excellent. Excellent. Thank you again, for your time this morning, very much. So

Mako Nagasawa 1:06:06

thanks so much.

Seth Price 1:06:19

Now, I haven't added it up. But there are hundreds of 1000s if not millions of podcasts on the internet, and I am humbled that you continue to download this one. If this is your first time here. Please know that there are transcripts of these shows. Not always in real time, but I do my best. And if you go back in the logs, you can find transcripts for pretty much any episode that you'd like. The show is recorded and edited by me, but it is produced by the patron supporters of the show. That is one of the best, if not the best way that you can support the show. If you get anything at all out of these episodes, if you think on them, or if you you know, you're out and about and you tell your friends about it or..hey, mom, dad, brother, sister, friend, boss, pastor, here's what I heard, what are your thoughts on that? If this is helping you in any way, and it is helping me, consider supporting the show in that manner. It is extremely inexpensive, but collectively, it is so very much helpful.

Now for you. I pray that you are blessed, and you know that you're cherished and beloved. We'll talk soon.