Christian Nationalism or The Way of Jesus with Dr. Stephen Backhouse / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Stephen Backhouse 0:07

Well, most Christians think it's their job to make their nation great. And at the moment that following the way of Jesus interrupts the narrative of the nation, then they dropped Jesus at the first hurdle. And this happens over and over again. You can sort of maybe try and run a country according to the 10 commandments, but you can't run the country, according to the Sermon on the Mount. And you just see (that) Jesus, his way gets dropped almost immediately. And Christians do not like Jesus very much. And they get all sentimental and when weepy eyed about him, and they might sing songs all in unison, but they don't like his way at all. And instantly, the reaction I always get is pretty much “Oh, yeah, it's all very well, you know, turn the other cheek and all that stuff. But you can't run a country that way”. You know, you think of Jesus's approach to foreigners, Jesus's approach to money, and Jesus's approach to violence, all three of those things a country needs the opposite of what Jesus said and did. The attitudes that Jesus had towards foreigners, money, and violence, a country requires the opposite attitude in order to succeed.

Seth Price 1:23

Over the past, almost three years, the show has been going almost three years, I have intentionally tried very hard to not be political. Although my penchant for wanting to do podcasts started from political reasons, with some good friends of mine (I see you Awkward Rhino), however, I'm coming to think and realize that being Christian, following the way of Jesus is a political position. It doesn't mean it's a partisan one, it does mean it's a political one.

This conversation, I'm sure will upset many of you. And for that, I am sorry, actually re-listening to it a couple times in the edit, and then working on the transcript that I'm sure by the time this releases is not ready. It upsets me at times; this is the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I'm Seth. And this is one of those topics that a lot of people think should not be talked about at church, separation of church and state.

Keep my Jesus out of my voting! Keep my voting away from my Jesus! That's wrong!

So I brought on Stephen Backhouse to discuss just that. This conversation will stretch you. So let's go to roll the tape. Dr. Stephen Backhouse. It's always the hardest part in it.

Seth Price 2:50

It’s always the hardest part isn’t it, where do you start? Yeah. Dr. Stephen Backhouse. Welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. And Sean, I know you're listening. Thank you for connecting to the two of us. Thank you for connecting the two of us. Yeah, that's how you say that sentence. But Welcome to the show. Thanks for spending the afternoon or evening, I forget exactly what timezone you're with that.

Stephen Backhouse 3:09

Yeah, it’s evening for me Seth. It is dark outside, I am calling from West Sussex, which is on the south coast of England. And it's near, sort of near, the City of Brighton is the largest city that I'm near. But my accent is Canadian. So I'm a Canadian who moved to England 20, some 22 years ago. And here I am. coast of England and I love it.

Seth Price 3:31

Yeah. So the first question I usually ask people and so this will be even a little more interesting to me is kind of what are some of those things in your life that have kind of pivoted you to make you do what you do today. Whatever those are, and some people give the trite answers of you know, I'm a husband. I'm a father. Yeah, yeah. Yeah, that's fun and all but I think the real thing is like the good ones. So what are some of those kind of how did you get into what you do now? And what do you do now?

Stephen Backhouse 3:55

Okay, so what I am is I'm a political theologian. I'm a freelance political theologian, I run a thing called Tent Theology, which is, I travel around the UK, Canada, actually the states as well. And I used to before Coronavirus, locked us down I used to be a traveling theologian, and churches or networks would invite me to come and live with them for a weekend or a week. And I would teach theology open up spaces for agreeing and disagreeing Christianly with each other about all sorts of stuff.

You might be surprised to hear that churches do a bad job of teaching their Christians about Christianity. And normally, then we sort of outsource this off to the university and the seminary. Which by the way, also does a bad job of teaching Christians about Christianity, Because it separates, tends to separate, believers from their worshiping communities. And so Tent Theology was a way to try and like, take, you know, intellectually credible and serious theology into worshiping spaces. And so that's what I do. And that's what I did.

But then before that I was an academic I worked for various universities in in Canada and also in the UK. And I was used to work for St Mellitus College, which was a large Anglican Seminary in London for the last 10 years. That's what I did before I quit my job to go freelance.

Seth Price 5:24

What would cause someone to I don't know if they have tenure tracks at that college, but I would assume after 10 years, you're on a want to make a career out of this have like retirement, what would cause someone to go to heck with all that I'm just gonna go freelance.

Stephen Backhouse 5:36

I was what you'd call the core stuff I was running. I was running a master's program. I was a lecturer in social and political theology. And I also was the graduate Director of Graduate Studies. And I just spent a lot of time before that I was at Oxford University as an academic. And I've also been at McGill in Montreal. And I just got to the stage where I was looking at, I was going to conferences, or I was sitting in board meetings, or I was marking essays, and I just thought, this is what I have to do now? My career path is to run a college, or to become some sort of Professor some sort of academic.

And I looked around, I was like, it's pretty much just going to be more of this and less of teaching. So this is the dirty secret amongst academics is that you get into it, usually, because you really like teaching your subject. But the longer you do it, and the better you are at your teaching, you kind of get promoted out of that in order to become an administrator.

Seth Price 6:40

That seems unwise, take somebody something that somebody is good at, and then say, don't do that anymore.

Stephen Backhouse 6:43

Yeah. So I was like, having to do a lot of really boring paperwork in order to get into teach an hour a week or something. And I thought, actually, this isn't right. I don't want the life that I'm gonna be getting.

Seth Price 6:55

I thought that's what TA’s were for, so that you could continue to teach someone else did all the paperwork.

Stephen Backhouse 6:59

No, that doesn’t happen either.

Seth Price 7:00

But that's what the movies say. That's the things in the movies.

Stephen Backhouse 7:04

Yeah. Anyway, I mean, maybe it's good for some people. I don't want to say it's bad for everybody. I don't think just because I did it, everybody has to do it. But I myself knew this isn't me. And I, in fact, you know, I took a year, my wife wanted to go do a course she traveled around the world for me, and come to various cities, because I was gonna do a masters or a PhD. And so then she wanted to do some stuff to do with her career development in the States. And to do that meant, I would have had to put my job on hold for a year, because they weren't going to give me paid leave. And I was like, no, fair enough. She's traveled around the world for me, I'm gonna do it for her. So I took an unpaid year. And that was brilliant. That was exactly what I needed.

Because it was during that year that I was able to step back a bit and to see what I love doing what I didn't love doing. And then when I came back to my old job said, well, we've got your timetable Ready to go? And I said, Actually, I'm going to go freelance, and thank you very much. Yeah, I love that, you know, if anybody from supervisors thing, I mean, I have genuine love in my heart for the place and the people. But it wasn't the job for me and I knew that.

Seth Price 8:07

That sounds the best for both. So I want to ask you a question and it's gonna sound loaded. So because I'm here in the States, so you're in London, and then from Canada, so that you're slightly removed. I've always been fascinated by the amount of politics that people not in America, keep track of in America and like, why? And then why does that matter to the church? Because here you either have people using religion as a way to help the government control people, or vice versa, or we're not supposed to talk about it at all.

And so as a political theologian, which even that word doesn't make much sense to me, political theologian, like how does all that fit together? But I'd like to start kind of with often I have so man…I have friends in New Zealand from this podcast, and Australia and a bunch of places and they keep up with the news better than I do. And I live in Virginia. You know what I mean?

Stephen Backhouse 9:00

Yeah. Right. I don't know how much other people follow American news. I mean, for me, it's well because of my work. So my particular work is-it actually did arise from from my background. So I was I grew up in real Bible Belt Canada, like the kind of people I grew up around were self described fundamentalist evangelicals. They were very similar in culture to the kinds of people you might imagine. You know God, guns, and gays. We don’t like gays. We do like guns.

Seth Price 9:24

I saw a sign that said that today on my way to pick up my daughter. It literally said “Trump 2020: God, Guns, America”. That's literally what it said on the big blue (yard) sign.

Stephen Backhouse 9:36

Yeah, a lot of the people that I grew up with they they wish they were American so they could vote for the Republicans. And I grew up in a Christian school system, where we were taught six day creationism. We were taught rapture. All of our people were all Americans. It was James Dobson. It was, you know, Liberty University, stuff. I grew up an American evangelical.

Seth Price 10:06

In Canada.

Stephen Backhouse 10:07

Yeah, in Canada. So then I moved to England when I was 19, for an adventure. And I found that I was around a whole lot of people that didn't actually identify their Christianity with their conservative, nationalist, patriotic, politics. And they didn't have a culture warrior mindset, and they didn't think it was their job to, you know, defeat their enemies and own the liberals. You know, whatever it is that I was told I had to do to be a Christian. And it was kind of a disorienting experience for me, because I was in rooms with Christians who didn't all believe the same thing about abortion, or gay people, or patriotism, or politics, you couldn't tell. In England, it's much more integrated, so that, you know, one church will have-will just genuinely have multiple views on all these things. And they're still in one worshiping room together, right.

And the same differences, like you see in the state don't happen in and, you know, and genuine, like, disagreement about, you know, left wing or right wing politics, or climate change, or abortion or whatever, but they'll still be in one worshipping, church together. And that really blew my mind, you know, because I basically found that I was around Christians who you couldn't easily tell what culture they were part of. They didn't all belong to the same subculture. And that made me start to think about the relationship to being a follower of Jesus and your home culture that you're born into.

And so I was doing a bit of existential crisis as a 19 year old. And I discovered, I was working in a bookshop in British…this is my way of paying my way around the country and doing my adventure. I was working in a bookstore and I was using my employee discount to work my way through some of the world's classics, these books that you've always heard, never read. And so I discovered, “I discovered Seth!” I discovered Tolstoy, I discovered Dostoevsky! That was very good of me to discover Dostoevsky, but I also discovered Soren Kierkegaard who was a Danish philosopher. And I bought a copy of his book, Fear and Trembling. And here I was a 19-20 year old guy. And I read this Danish philosopher who died in 1855. And who never left Denmark, basically. And he was describing my little evangelical, nationalist, experience. And he was saying, there is a difference between being a follower of Jesus and being a good member of your nation and your tribe. And how Christendom has overtaken Christianity. And so we think of ourselves as primarily members of a civilization and not as followers of Jesus.

So that was the Kierkegaard moment. And I've described it before. It's like, the bottom of my world dropped, I actually experienced vertigo reading a book. I've only ever had that experience once before, and that was reading a Batman comic.

Seth Price 12:57

I thought you're gonna say the Bible, but Batman is fine!

Stephen Backhouse 13:01

No no no! Batman and Kierkegaard!

And as a result of that, I was like, wow, this guy is describing the kind of experience I'm feeling right now. And so then when I decided to go to university, in England, I chose the subject so that I could study more Kierkegaard, and then I ended up doing a masters on him. And then I did actually have a couple of masters Kierkegaard, which is ridiculous. And then I did my PhD,

Seth Price 12:59

Also on Kierkegaard

Stephen Backhouse 13:01

Also on Kierkegaard. Kierkegaard’s critique of Christian Nationalism. And looking at how to use Kierkegaard as a critic of this idea that your Christianity and your patriotism are the same thing; or that patriotism is a virtue.

And so that led me into political theology, because to look at Christians relationship to their nations and states, you have to start to look at what a nation state is. And I've ended up drawing from a lot of those wells of thinking politically, Christianly, about our politics.

Seth Price 13:58

So you referenced at the beginning that churches don't do a good job about teaching Christians about Christianity; and seminaries don't do a good job of teaching Christians about Christianity. And so I'm curious as to your thoughts on that, because that those are two fairly large claims. But then also, do you feel like that lack of education is what leads to the idolatry of nationalism? And I use that word with intentionality.

But how are they falling short in teaching? Because like, literally seminaries have one job, although maybe that job is just to teach people how to fit back into the system so they can continue to get funds to build payroll, but I don't know a lot about how seminaries work but just the banker part of my brain feels like that's what they are. They're the engine that drives finances, but I don't what do you mean by seminaries and churches both aren't doing a good job?

Stephen Backhouse 14:45

Well, what we've done is we've basically outsourced our Christian education our discipleship, our forming the Christian person. We've actually outsourced that to a thing called the university. And so now a young person says, “I, you know, I really feel something for Jesus and His people, I'd love to help serve his church”. And we say to her, “Well, well done, what you need to do now is you need to go to the university, and you need to get a degree. In fact, you probably need to get two degrees, and then you'll be ready to run a worshiping community”. Right? And, so then she goes off, and she's a keen young Christian, and she goes off to university. And she's taught all sorts of academic subjects, which have a place and a purpose. But they're not that good at forming the Christian discipleship.

And then she comes back, and she's totally unfit for service. And that is a story I saw all the time as well, as one working in—and then you're always trying really hard to change the system, and you are working in the university, and you're trying to instill some sort of Christian formation in people. But of course, you're always running against the furrow that you're being forced down. Because at the very end of the day, I was having to assess people based on whether they were good at writing essays or not.

That's what it really comes down to. Because the Principality that is the university says, Well, we need to assess your intellectual mind. And so you could have questions and concerns about somebody's character all you wanted, but you pretty much had to pass them and send them off back to the church if they were good at writing essays. That's kind of what it came down to.

Which was very frustrating. So that's not really equipping anybody, well, for a church leadership. But at the same time, churches then have no space within themselves for training, and intellectually seriously engaging, with Christianity, because they just outsource it to the university all the time. So I haven't found…and I’m not saying it's never the case. But like an average, as an average story, I think that just kind of happens again, and again and again.

And so then when you see like things like patriotism and stuff, now, this is where I'm influenced by your kind of Anbaptist, Stanley Hauerwas kind of stuff. I don't know if Stanley Hauerwas is a friend of the show.

Seth Price 17:15

He should be I should email him.

Stephen Backhouse 17:17

But the idea that the church can be an alternative politics, which doesn't mean a separation from the world, it means the church itself, the formation. Jesus people are themselves an expression of a form of politics which is not represented by the partisan shouting at each other or that kind of thing. So it's an alternative politics.

And what you get amongst Christians, your average Christian will grow up, actually thinking that the church's job is to make America as great as it can. The church's job is to make this country great. And that your job is to really just be, it has to kind of do whatever it takes to serve the nation, or to when the nation back for Christ and all this kind of thing. It pretty much is like William Cavanaugh, the great American Catholic political theologian, he says, “the nation has captured or colonized the imagination of the Christian”. That they basically think of their themselves as primarily—their identity is rooted in their nationality.

And that the church is just a little adjunct to that. Whereas if you really saw yourself as being formed as a person of Jesus in the kingdom of Jesus, your relationship to your nation as your primary identity fades, or it gets put back in its place. And you don't see that happen in almost any church I've ever been in. Not your average church. It happens amongst groups of followers of Jesus, for sure. So that's partly where I see the nationalism coming in. It's just people uninformed or untrained in the way of Jesus that think of Christian as being white or speaking English, or, you know, they think of it in terms of something to do with their inherited ethnicity or nationality rather than with something to do with following a way of Jesus through this world.

Seth Price 19:13

Yeah. Is this something that is just so I 100% agree that the church is … no… that the people in the church are being used for political means and political gains, and they're being used by fear, because people are afraid of whatever they're afraid of. I mean, we saw that reference the other day in one of my Facebook posts, which we won't go into here just because of privacy.

But I struggle with people when I'll tell them that and like, I'll say, you know, I'm just going to try to rest on trying to be a good Christian. And when that butts up against my politics, I'm going to defer to Christian. So I find that people look at me as a weak man or a weak American or weak because I'm not exerting power. So how does the church do that? Because I think for the church to divorce itself from politics, it's going to have to give up power, but it's going to require a lot of power to do that. So how do we ride that line? Because I don't think most churches are really equipped to do that well. The church that goes to church on Sundays only, (will say that) “I don't know what to do”.

Stephen Backhouse 20:20

Well, most Christians think it's their job to make their nation great. And at the moment that following the way of Jesus interrupts the narrative of the nation, then they drop Jesus at the first hurdle. And this happens over and over again. You can sort of maybe try and run a country according to the 10 commandments, but you can't run the country according to the Sermon on the Mount. And you just see him, Jesus’s way gets dropped almost immediately, and Christians do not like Jesus very much. They get all sentimental and weepy eyed about him, and they might sing songs all in unison, but they don't like his way at all. And instantly, the reaction I always get is pretty much “Oh, yeah, it's all very well, you know, turn the other cheek and all that stuff. But you can't run a country that way.”

You know, you think of Jesus's approach to foreigners, Jesus's approach to money, and Jesus's approach to violence, all three of those things-country needs the opposite of what Jesus said and did. The attitudes that Jesus had towards foreigners, money, and violence a country requires the opposite attitude in order to succeed. And so you run across this all the time and Christians, they will, immediately-it almost happens without fail-it's so predictable, that they will, they will immediately say, Well, yeah, but that's Jesus just as a private, it's a private ethic. But you know, publicly, in order to run a country, you need to do the opposite. And so they've justified to themselves how they can do it.

And you see that all the time that kind of thing. Or they will call themselves Christian, but what they'll be doing is just quoting the Old Testament over and over again, or Romans 13 with absolutely no context to it-to Romans 12 & Romans 14.

Seth Price 22:01

Or the whole book.

Stephen Backhouse 22:02

Jesus will not get a look in. And I’ve had to mark thousands of undergraduate essays and I am always looking for this stuff because this is my job is to look at how Christians talk about violence, for example. And it's like, without fail, you'll read some essay or some article about “Should Christians, you know, own hand guns, or should they go to war? Should they kill their enemies?” And they pretty much all start with one little paragraph where it will be something like, “yes, we know Jesus said to love your enemies, but…” and then the rest of the article will be justifying all the reasons why it's okay to disobey Jesus.

And Jesus only gets mentioned in order to be disagreed with by self-professed Christians. Nobody spends all their effort trying to figure out well, how might we try and obey Jesus? What would our world look like if we tried to live a politic that actually didn't immediately try and kill your enemies to solve a problem for example.

Seth Price 23:02

I don't even know how to imagine that because that's not the world that we live in.

Stephen Backhouse 23:07

And the fact that you can't imagine it is because your imagination has been colonized by the nation.

Seth Price 23:11

Hmm.

Stephen Backhouse 23:12

It's been colonized by the way of violence, the way of money, the way of the tribal patriotic instinct, which is, I must preserve my resources for people who look like me and sound like me as much as possible. And whatever you want to call that nationalism, patriotism, tribalism, I, they're fuzzy words around the edges, but they all basically mean, “I need to be with people who look like me and sound like me as much as possible”.

And that is the instinct that the New Testament dismantles again and again and again. The politics of the organization of people and and who you think is a valid person to give your power away to, or who you think is a valid person to spend your resources on, or who do you think it's a valid person to include in your group, those early Christian’s imagination, which was centered around Jesus in His Kingdom, that's a fundamentally political set of texts, the New Testament, and they're all about dismantling nationalism, at the expense of building a new nation, a royal priesthood. There's only one nation in all of history that hasn't been founded on the murder of enemies, and the exclusion of foreigners and that's the new nation.

Seth Price 24:29

The new nation?

Stephen Backhouse 24:30

Yeah, the nation in the New Testament. The early church saw…

Seth Price 24:36

Oh, I was running my head through geographical locations for today.

Stephen Backhouse 24:37

There is no nation, no flags, you know, open, you know, go and look up flags on Wikipedia. Every single flag, no exception is based and built on practices that were the exact opposite of anything Jesus said or did. And there's only one nation and that's the one that the Christians called themselves. They said “we're a new nation were drawn from Gentiles and foreigners and Jews, and we are a new nation's the only nation in all of history that wasn't founded on the murder of a human being”. It's based on the murder of Jesus but it wasn't based on the killing of their enemies.

Seth Price 25:13

Yeah, yeah, no, I'm with you there.

So I want to pivot to something that you said at the very beginning I don't even remember if I was hitting record yet. So you said, you know, you were doing Bible studies as you got into quarantine. And I'm sure there are many reasons for that. But you would reference President Trump tear gassing people throwing people out of the way, and posing for a photo-op as a springboard for I should really do something else here. Talk to me a bit about that, like so I that image like, what was it about that, that you're like, that's it. This is enough.

Stephen Backhouse 25:41

All right. So here I was sitting in lockdown. So I was normally supposed to be traveling around to churches, and I couldn't do that. So what I did was I started making some Bible studies. And I was recording them and then sending them out. And people were paying me for them and stuff, which is great. But then halfway through that, the making of that, Donald Trump did his thing where he used the violence arm of the state in order to violently clear out peaceful protesters in front of the church so that he could then have a photo-op holding up a book he doesn't read in front of a building, he doesn't attend, in order to, you know, give a clear message to his Christian base. And it worked. And it works over and over again. It absolutely worked.

And I was getting a whole lot of emails then because of the people that I know. And they were asking me like what's going on? People despairing. People in the UK people in America. Of all the things Trump has done that that for some reason that really touched a nerve. I think people just had enough they're going crazy with locked down, the George Floyd protests were in full swing. People were just despairing, right.

Seth Price 26:51

Still are.

Stephen Backhouse 26:53

Still are! And it's a bad, bad world. And Christians have shitted it up. They are the worst. There are people calling themselves Christians have…am I allowed to swear?

Seth Price 27:05

Absolutely. Absolutely.

Stephen Backhouse 27:07

…they are the fucking worst. The people who call themselves Christians are representing some of the worst ideas that humankind has ever produced, you know, and they are just perpetuating them. And the conspiracy theory stuff is just, they've lost their tiny minds. And like, what do you do? And I get people emailing me all the time. Like, basically, I've lost my faith! How can I be associated with these kind of people? Who are…they're not holding their nose and saying, “Wow, whoa, is us. We got to the state where we have to support Donald Trump. Oh, whoa, is us the lesser of two evils”. These are people with gleeful enthusiasm embracing the things this man says and does. And not just this man, but like the whole party, the aims of “Make America Great” and the aims and ideals and attitudes that come with hyper nationalism and racism and disdain for enemies, disstain for others, distain for the weak. You talked about that, Seth, being told you're weak. Like just the utter embrace of a bullying, domineering, power. And I get these emails from Christians going, what is going on here? Like, I'm going to stop being a Christian. And so this is where I had to start something new. And I just I kind of put the Bible study on pause and said, Look, we'll come back to this. But right now, we just got to talk about this.

And, and I started trying to talk about the difference between being a follower of The Way of Jesus and being a Christian. Because being a Christian, you can call yourself a Christian legitimately and you can say and do diametrically opposite things to other people who call themselves Christian. But it's a lot harder to call yourself a follower of The Way of Jesus and say and do a whole lot of things. Right. So it's just kind of a way of like putting a thin piece of paper between being a Christian and using that as a license to do whatever you want, you know. So yeah, I mean, that's kind of where that came from. It's just this passion to like, I still think Jesus is pretty good. And His way is really good. It just, most Christians don't like it. And so I don't like the word, I don't die on that hill anymore, I don't care. I'm not trying to defend the word “Christian”. It's indefensible.

I mean, some of the best people you'll ever meet in the world are Christian, and some of the worst. And they both call themselves Christian and there's no point getting involved in some debate about who's an authentic Christian or not, because that word is so broad now. It really does mean white English speaker and it really does mean Tutsi in Rwanda and it really does mean you know, Nigerian, it does mean Serbian genocidal maniac. Yeah, like, and it also means Mother Teresa, it also means Seth Price. It also means, you know, yeah, that word just means so many things that it basically is not a useful word for determining what you should do in life, what you think is valuable, how you should treat your enemies. So we just need to stop using it, frankly.

Seth Price 30:20

So what do you say you're a follower of Jesus?

Stephen Backhouse 30:23

Yeah, I mean, look, I don't pretend that solves all the problems. I just…I don't pretend. I didn't invent it. That was people in the book of Acts called themselves, right?

Seth Price 30:32

Yeah.

Stephen Backhouse 30:33

I mean there in the original there is a verb to it, a follower of the way. It's not a noun, it's a verb. And that just seems more useful. And it also means that I don't have to defend-I don't have to be the little culture warrior that I was brought up to be. Defending this thing called Christianity against all enemies. I don't have to do that. Some of the most potent enemies against the followers of Jesus are people who call themselves Christian and I can see that. Yeah, very clearly. It is absolutely true that Christians are persecuted in America today. just so happens, they're all persecuted by other Christians.

Seth Price 31:13

Well, that was so I have a couple of devil's advocate questions that I've written down. And so when I have a Facebook memory that keeps popping up as around this time of year, it wasn't too many days ago. And all it says is I never get more pushback from people than when I quote Jesus to them. Like just literally they just did just get mad like, Yeah, but you can't do that.

Stephen Backhouse 31:33

If you don’t demonic manifestations if you're cynical about that, if you're some really liberal and you don't believe in demonic manifestations, you go to an American church on the Fourth of July, and stand on the pulpit and say, patriotism is a vice or go around and say “don’t kill your enemies”. You will see demonic manifestation, you will see rage, you'll see spitting anger. You’ll be demonized.

Seth Price 32:33

As a follower of The Way, if there's a different Christian that diametrically believes opposite of me. And so let's call that…I don't know. Jerry Falwell, Jr., Jim Jefferies, doesn't really matter. Like so I'm just gonna use a big name because I don't want to list out any ...

Stephen Backhouse 32:50

Uncle Bob at Thanksgiving.

Seth Price 32:54

(laughs)

Yeah, yeah. So yeah, sure, Uncle Bob. So how do I stand on the side of the oppressed when the person that says that they're oppressed is believing opposite of me? And they're fully believing that they are being oppressed? What they believe in is being oppressed. How do I, as a follower of the way, step in and be like, let me reset your metric what you feel like is oppression is actually your addiction to power and patriotism? Like how do you begin that conversation to begin to unveil the layers in a way that you’ve found that maybe people can actually hear?

Because I haven't found any successful way to do that. They just dive back into it. You see, they're oppressing me. Like, they want to take away liberty. They want to tell me when I can and cannot worship at church. They want to, you know, I mean, like they feel oppressed, but not a Christian impression. And I don't know how to split those two apart and begin to speak to it.

Stephen Backhouse 33:37

Can I tell you a story? Do you have time? Can I tell you a story?

Seth Price 33:39

Yeah.

Stephen Backhouse 33:40

I discovered it from Tolstoy, probably in one of those books that I bought when I was in a bookshop. So this is the story once upon a time. Get ready, Seth, we're gonna have a storytime once upon a time…there was a peasant. And this peasant had a field. And it was time to plow the field to get it ready for putting some seed down. So he got his plow, and he was pulling the plow. And he came across a demon that was buried in the field. And this demon was buried waist deep in the mud. And he's “rrraaannnaagnn” he's throwing dirt clods at the peasant. And the peasant is like “Oh, no, I've got a demon in my field.” So he turns around he trudges home, and he and the peasant he gets his best rope and he trudges back and he approaches the demon “rrraaannnaagnn” wraps the rope around the demons shoulders, and he pulls and pulls and pulls. And he sprains his back and he breaks his rope. He trudges back and he goes to the neighbor, and he borrows the neighbor's horse and the neighbors best steel chain, it goes back “rrraaannnaagnn”. And he wraps the chain around the demon's shoulders and he attaches the chain to the horse and they pull and pull and pull and the chain breaks and the horse sprains his back. So now the neighbor is in debt. Now the peasant is in debt to the neighbor because he's broken his chain and knees and he lamed his horse. So now the peasant has to sell his own daughter into serfdom in order to pay off the debt. So now this peasant is his home, he's alone, the winter is coming. He hasn't sown his field, he doesn't have anybody to help him. He's dying of cold and hunger. And Tolstoy says, “Why didn't he just plow around and move on”.

And this is Tolstoy's story of Jesus said do not resist an evil person because sometimes resisting evil makes it worse. Sometimes, you throw all your resources at evil, and it just makes it worse.

Seth Price 35:51

So just plow around. Just leave it alone?

Stephen Backhouse 35:54

Just, sometimes, you just plow around and move on. It doesn't mean there's not evil. See Christians were really good at using the Bible to identify evil, we think we're really good at, oh, this is how you identify good from bad. We're not that good at using Jesus to show us what to do once you've identified good and bad. We think that being right is one of the fruits of the Holy Spirit. It's not one of the fruits of the Spirit.

Seth Price 36:19

Being right is the first beatitude in it? I've seen it in there. It's the first one.

Stephen Backhouse 36:24

Yeah! Beat your relatives in an argument.

Seth Price 36:28

The problem I have with that parable is in this example, close friends and or family members are the demon in the field. And I lose communion with them like community when I go around them, and I don't want to lose communion with them. You know what I mean? Like I don't…that's not what I…that's not my goal?

Stephen Backhouse 36:47

Well, alright. What do you think Jesus is talking about when he says, Who are my mother, my brother and my sisters. They're the ones who are with me. He says, at the end of in Mark. He said your mother and brothers are waiting outside. And by the way, they think you're crazy. And he says, well, who are my mother? Who's my family? It's the the ones here. You know, let the dead bury their own dead. Unless it looks like you hate your mother and father, you're not a member of the kingdom.

But if those verses, if that sentiment, has any meaning at all, it means something like not primarily identifying your relationships and your destiny with your family. That's when he says I haven't come to bring peace but a sword. It's going to divide families.

You know, and that's not violence. He's not enacting violence on them. But I don't know man, like, I think that we are so, as Christians here, I'm not talking to followers of Christ, as socialized Christians, we've been born into a world where we think it's our job to make everyone else agree with us and to follow what we think is right. That's part of the toolkit of what we're supposed to be doing in this world. And I don't think that's true.

Seth Price 38:03

You are the second person in 48 hours, it's told me that almost verbatim, almost verbatim.

Stephen Backhouse 38:09

And the reason I don't think that is because if Jesus is anything. If Jesus is the Son of God, if Jesus is the image of the invisible God, if he in any way speaks with the words of God, if he's in any way the image of God, then the first thing you learn about God is that you can kill him. You can say no to him, he never dominates you. He does a miracle in front of your eyes and then you get offended at him. And you're allowed to! It doesn't mean you're right. It just means he's not gonna beat you in an argument. That's not his job. That's not what he's doing.

Which is the kenosis right? Philippians 2, it's where he doesn't dominate with his will. But instead he empties himself; he doesn't make himself nothing but the empties himself. Which is another way of saying in Philippians 2 he withdraws his will to make space for other wills.

Seth Price 39:01

Hmm.

Stephen Backhouse 39:03

So it's this kind of ultimate act of like, non dominance, right. It's self control. It's the fruit of the Spirit of self control. Yeah. So I mean, I don't know how this works with your Uncle Bob at Thanksgiving. Because in a way, it means what you do is you look at Uncle Bob in the eye and you say, here's my will, I think this…and you can think whatever you want. I'm not going to try and change you. There's space at this table for your will.

Seth Price 39:31

With the way it's worked for me is I just haven't shown up to the table. And this is the danger of starting a darn podcast is you have to deal with them trauma in the middle of it. Yeah, yeah, I just have severed relationships that are genuinely missed. That's why I asked. Because a lot of the relationships that I've severed are because of politics, not because of religion, because most people can agree to disagree on religion, but they can't seem to disagree…

Stephen Backhouse 39:57

But dude! It is religion.

Seth Price 40:00

Politics?

Stephen Backhouse 40:01

Yeah. People go “oh patriotism can become idolatry”. It's like no, patriotism has never not been idolatry. Even your most benign patriot is still putting their destiny, and their identity, in a man made structure. Any Patriot, you ask if you say, is it legitimate to kill for your church? They go No way! And then you say, “Do you support the troops”? Oh right…so you do think it's legitimate to kill a human being for your country. But you don't think it's legitimate to kill for your religion?

So what do you ultimately believe? This is a migration of the holy. This is like, the religion what you think is sacred hasn't gone away. It's just shifted,

Seth Price 40:42

A migration of the holy, what is that?

Stephen Backhouse 40:44

Yeah. So William Cavanaugh talks about this. This is his story and I talked about, and he points out, he's like, there's a narrative out there that killing from a religious point of view is irrational. But killing for a national point of view is rational. And all that's happened is that the nation state has now become the arbiter of when it's okay to kill or not, our nation has become the ultimate, reasonablem, thing in order to take or give up your life for. And he said that it's not that the idea of the sacred hasn't disappeared, the idea of the ultimate arbiter of morality hasn't disappeared, it's just been migrated-it's moved to the nation state.

And, you know, people are still killed all the time. All that happens is it's not like there was religion and politics. It’s that there is just human groups. And they, they might be called different things. But it's always the same sort of idea that they're investing their hopes and their fears and their identity in their institutions. And all that we're seeing with this is that Christian institutions are kind of withering on the vine. They don't have the command over people's imaginations anymore.

Seth Price 41:50

Especially not in the current climate that withering is exacerbated.

Stephen Backhouse 41:55

No! Yeah, they clearly don't do that. The people who call themselves Christians in America, and also in England, are clearly like, so patently swayed by desires and fears and, you know, ideas that have nothing to do with the way of Jesus. It’s just patent right. And you just think, Oh, this is generations of people, but utterly failed to be formed in the way of Jesus.

And I think it's a result. So what we say is, so this happens in the UK, let's talk about the UK. UK people go. There's a lot of, you know, Christians here, especially sort of conservative Christians, like, Oh, this used to be a Christian nation. It's not a Christian nation anymore. And everybody's ignorant. You know, they do a poll and nobody, you know, 1% of the population knows what Easter is or something like that. So then they'll be like, “oh, we're not a Christian nation anymore. People are ignorant about the Bible. They don't know the difference between the Old and the New Testaments”. And, you know, ”Don't you wish we had the old days back again, when we were a Christian nation”. But I look at that, and I'm like, well no what we're experiencing now is the result of having a Christian nation. England was the most christianized nation that the world has ever known. And now we have generations of utter massive ignorance about Christianity. It's a totally secular nation. Even the people who call themselves Christian are utterly ignorant about the tenets of their own faith. Like this is the result. This is what happens when you overly identify being English with being Christian; this is what you get.

Seth Price 43:33

Yeah.

Stephen Backhouse 43:37

And this is what Americans are seeing now too. It's like Christianity is a thousand miles long and one inch deep and you see it it's so clear. Do you know that, you probably know this, like the different polls they do like of self professed Christians in America score worse on general knowledge about Christianity than non Christians.

Seth Price 43:56

Oh, yeah. There was a poll, Harvard, Pew Research, somebody…Barna? Somebody did a poll not long ago, I took the test. Arrogantly, I'll say I scored quite high, but I would expect myself to score high because that's literally all that I felt like I was commenting on one of your posts to that or someone pizza gate. So he said as like, I literally don't know what this is. And it's because the bulk of the time, all I read is religious books. So I just don't spend much time because you know how long it is to prepare for a podcast. You got to make sure you don't sound like an imbecile. It doesn't surprise me.

I can't tell you how many people like I was talking with someone at my work the other day, they asked me a question about a word. And I’m like but that's not what that word means. The way that they use the scriptures. Like that's not, that's not what that means. Yeah, you took it out of context. I was like, that's just not.

And they didn't know what I was talking about. They didn't even quite know what I meant by context, either. It was just like, I think I told them exactly like, you think that they wrote that to you in Charlottesville, Virginia five years ago? Like, yeah, what do you…you're gonna have to put in some work here. Even the people the day had to put in work!

Stephen Backhouse 44:56

So that person…so okay, this is partly where we were talking about education at the beginning and also nationalism. This is where these two things intersect, because evangelicals, Protestant evangelicals in the UK, but especially in America have imbibed a political notion of sovereignty. So during the Protestant, sorry, am I going on too much?

Seth Price 45:17

No! No! (and really…I mean this…no!!! Keep going)

Stephen Backhouse 45:18

During the Protestant Reformation, you know that you know, where the word Protestant came from, right?

Seth Price 45:22

No, no, no. Martin Luther just throwing out a name.

Stephen Backhouse 45:28

The word Protestant was first used because of German Princes that were protesting against the Emperor. And they were using Martin Luther’s theological reforms as a vehicle. Because they saw that Martin Luther’s attempt to carve out some space, from the Roman Catholic monolith was also part of the German princes plan to carve out space for sovereignty from the overarching Empire.

Seth Price 45:58

So it's just co opted?

Stephen Backhouse 45:59

Well, they kind of went hand in hand. So the German Princes were the patrons of Martin Luther, and Martin Luther found protection from the German princes. And what it was, was the rise of the idea of sovereignty. That different groups should be sovereign, and that the German Prince should be allowed to run his land, the little fiefdom that he was in charge of, he should be sovereign in that land. And he should have the choice to choose what religion was being followed, for example, in that land. But it's this idea of sovereignty, which is a theological idea, because in fact, only God is sovereign.

But part of the rise of the Protestant nation, or the humanistic reformation that rose as a result was that the idea of the sovereignty got migrated, it got migrated, it be stopped being a word that applied to the divine, and it started being a word that applied to your nation state. And then the sovereignty became an ideal which doesn't take long to get to individual sovereignty, and that the individual is sovereign. And you totally see the rise of individualism is happening at the same time as the rise of the Protestant evangelical reformations, right.

And so now we get a whole lot of people who are utterly convinced that the horizon begins and ends with them, individualism. That, you know, the gospel is primarily about your individual salvation. That the Bible is primarily a book that you're supposed to read by yourself in private, and that you get to interpret it for yourself. And that your opinion is as equally valid as anybody else's, including somebody who devoted all their life and their resources to studying at university. And so this is where we get a whole lot of churches, which value private or self self taught learning or Holy Spirit inspired Bible reading or something. And it seems utterly equally valid to somebody who has been a Professor of Hebrew for 50 years.

Seth Price 48:11

Yeah, let me ask you just a random question. So one of the things that has surprised me the most of the last almost three years of doing this show is how quickly professors and brilliant people have been able to just say, “yeah, sure, I'll come talk about Paul”, or whatever you want to do.

Do you feel like that's because overall, professors as a whole, are like this information is not disseminating to where it should be. And I will use any avenue possible to get this out, because somebody should know this. So because they've just been like, sure. Yeah. I'll be like, don't know who you are. Like, I emailed Tom Wright. And he's like, Yeah, sure. We'll let's do it. Okay. He doesn't know who I am. You know what I mean? Like, just totally surprising.

Stephen Backhouse 48:51

Yes. Now, I know, Tom. I mean, so people like Tom Wright and other academics they get into the game. They start as young, keen, Christians, and they love Jesus, and they realize it's intellectually satisfying, and that there's a rich, deep history to all this. And so then they go to their church, and they might go to a Bible study, and they say, feed me. And the church is totally unequipped. And so then they have to go to university to get fed. But they didn't go to university because they loved to have degrees after their name. They went to university because they love Jesus.

But now there's no home for them in their church, and they come back to their churches and their church has literally no space for somebody like them. And so now they're just stuck in universities. But what they really want to do is speak about Jesus to people yeah. Now they're being forced to pretend that they are objective. You know, a lot of theologians consider their work as an act of worship, okay. But they're in a secular university environment in which you have to pretend to be objective. But there's literally no home for these theologians.

And so part of my Then Theology as well, like I say, I always say to my academic theology friends, if I put You in a room in front of 30 people and you could say whatever you wanted, what would you say? What would you tell them? And they always have something to tell them. Yeah. It's not true that all these academic theologians are like, hoping you lose your faith and are cynically wanting to, you know, destroy Christianity—they are really not. They're just in university because there's no home for them anywhere else. And so they want to talk about it.

Seth Price 50:20

Well, yeah, I can echo that. Yeah. I've been blown away by how many people are like, yeah, let's talk. I'm like, just random, like Sister Elizabeth Johnson up at Fordham, like, just people. I'm like, Yeah, why would you say yes? And then as I come to think about it. I'm like, they just, I think they're just encouraged that somebody will listen.

I want to talk about maybe January, February of next year. So living in America, let's pretend President Biden is the president and or it's President Trump. Will things be any better if we just change that if we just change the mast from red to blue? Like, like, what's the hope there? Like, what's the point? How do I blahhh, you know, like, I don't even know how to voice that. Well, I hope you know what I'm trying to ask. Like, I just don't, I just don't understand because I just don't…

Stephen Backhouse 51:07

Okay. You're asking the wrong guy for hope, dude. (laughter)

Um, we need to start taking seriously Kirkegaard go and read his attack upon Christendom. I wrote a biography and this is a shameless plug, go and read the biography I wrote of him. Kirkegaard: A Single Life. I wrote an easy to read biography of Soren Kierkegaard which also includes summaries of everything he ever wrote. That came out a few years ago, 2017 I think. Go and read that or go and find his book he wrote called The Attack Upon Christendom, which is the thing he wrote at the end of his life.

Where we need to start taking seriously when Kirkegaard said Christendom has done away with Christianity, it no longer exists, we actually have to take that seriously. What if he was right? What if all the noisy industry, and money making, and music, and videography, and YouTube Bible studies, and churches and Super PACs, and Chick-fil-A's, and museums of the Bible what if all these things had nothing to do with the way of Jesus?

Seth Price 52:19

You leave Chick-fil-A out of this.

Stephen Backhouse 52:21

You know, what if this huge superstructure; and what if we took seriously when Jesus said, I never knew you and think about but we all shouted in unison Lord, Lord, and we did all these things. He’s like, I don't know who you are. You're not with me.

And I just think there's a lot of people who are unprepared to even sit and maybe take the hit and wonder whether there might be some truth to even those statements. Because when people say, oh, our nation! Let's make our nation Christian again, or we used to be a Christian nation. You never ever were, it never was! You never fell from some heady heights. You never turned the other cheek. You never tried to treat your enemies as better than yourselves. You never tried to deal with the problem of power by submitting to it, you know, but you asked for hope.

Seth Price 53:10

Yeah, well, I don't honestly don't think there is any. That's why I asked but because I don't see…

Stephen Backhouse 53:14

It is not my job to give false hope. I think America is a broken country. I think you're in a really bad state. I think that what mostly passes for Christianity in your country is rotten. It's really rotten. And it almost incapable of seeing the truth. The moral compass of the vast majority of people who call themselves Christian in America is spinning wildly, is demonstrably broken. And that when you actually talk about The Way of Jesus to Christians, they get spinning mad at you and they hate you. That to me is not a culture that is ready to start acting like Jesus. So what's the hope?

The hope would be that people start to actually become sober. This is the other thing Kirkegaard said. He said, just become sober. Our first job is to stop getting drunk on the numbers of Christendom, on thinking that the amount of people calling themselves Christian makes them Christian. You're drunk on the numbers, you're drunk on power, just get sober. And then maybe when the dust clears, you get a better idea of where the land lies, what you're actually dealing with. So to me, there's hope in truth. I don't think that President Biden is not going to all of a sudden mean that Trump supporting, conspiracy theory, enemy hating fake news, loving people are just going to disappear overnight. It's going to get worse. We're going to get worse than Trump. Because Trump isn't an ideologue he's just latching on to whatever ideas are giving him power. But now we're seeing the rise of people who actually believe that stuff. So now you've got a QAnon Congresswoman for the first time. So Trump is just a pure nihilist in a way he's just saying whatever it is to get him in power. But we're now seeing people who re do believe this stuff. And they are rising, so it's gonna get worse, for sure. Yeah, that is your hope.

Seth Price 55:12

Well…thank you so much.

This is a question I've been asking every single person this year. And so you can answer it go wherever you want with it. So if you were, you know, sitting across from someone, and they just randomly strike up a conversation, and you're like, I'm a follower of the way of Jesus. And they are like, Well, great. What do you even mean by that? Like, Who is God? Like? What's the point? Like? What are the words when you try to wrap your words around the divine? What do you tell people?

Stephen Backhouse 55:37

Well stop talking about God. I'm not a Godian. God is just this kind of divine gas, a benign gas in the universe. Like God is this empty word that you can put anything you want on to and most people believe in God, or they or if they don't believe in God, they have some idea of what the thing they don't believe in. And I feel a little bit like, just stop talking about God start talking more about Jesus. And it might not solve our problem. I'm not claiming this solves our problems. But at least we're now having proper Christian type problems. So that rather than talk about God all the time to everybody just talk about Jesus all the time. Talk about his way, talk about the way he dealt with power, talk about the way he dealt with foreigners, talk about what he did with violence and money. Say that you're trying to do that. And if people are offended at you well at least they're offended that Jesus they're not offended at some kind of deistic or, you know, religious thing about God. So that's one of the things I do is I just stopped talking about God, just talk about Jesus as much as I can. Because you know, God isn't invisible. God has a face. God has an accent. God had actions. God took a piss. God had bad breath. You know, like that's part of the offensiveness of being a real Christian, is that you're making God out to be some kind of human? Imagine that!

Seth Price 57:03

I've never heard…I mean, it makes logical sense, but God took a piss. I just, it's not a sentence that I've heard.

Stephen Backhouse 57:09

Every now and then this is, anyway, this is part of the offensiveness of Jesus is when he says, you know, believe in me, the word pistis. So you probably know it's not the word-faith or belief-is not a word of mental assent to a series of propositions. He's not saying, believe in the Trinity or believe in the virgin birth or explain the resurrection to a hostile audience.

Believe in me means follow me, have allegiance to me. That's what pistis means. So he's saying, don't be offended by me. The opposite of faith in the New Testament is not doubt its offense. So the point of Jesus is not that we're trying to force people to be offended by him. But what you do is you present Jesus and his way to people, and if they are offended, then at least they're offended by Jesus, right? It's not our job to make people not offended. It's just our job to present Jesus to people and they get to choose. Which is probably what I would say with your Uncle Bob at Thanksgiving, you know.

Seth Price 58:09

Definitely point people in the right spot. Where do they go? To read here, listen, all the things that Steven Backhouse is doing.

Stephen Backhouse 58:18

You want me to promote Steven Backhouse or promote some good resources? (laughter)

Seth Price 58:22

That's your call.

Stephen Backhouse 58:27

Steven Backhouse, you can easily find it tenttheology.com, which is the website for my little company that I'd have. And I also run a podcast there and the whole stuff about Trump and the Bible is you can find it through Tent Theology. And I wrote this book, Soren Kierkegaard; Kierkegaard: A Single Life. And I've done some other things here and there. I've done a lot of podcasts things on patriotism and stuff, but again, you can find it on my website. But in terms of like, resources for life, man, check out Bob Ekblad. Do you know who Bob Ekblad is?

Seth Price 58:58

No. How do you spell that last name?

Stephen Backhouse 59:02

Ekblad. Brilliant guy. Get people to go watch Liberating Fire. Somebody did a little short YouTube documentary on him. Liberating Fire, Bob Ekblad. Bob and Gracie are these lovely kind of people really doing the stuff. He's like an actual New Testament scholar who actually works with like illegal migrants and he's a political radical. Brad Jersak your listeners know already know he's very good talking about the Christ like way. Ched Myers is a brilliant commentary on the Gospel of Mark. He's an Anabaptist Mennonite scholar Ched Myers wrote, Binding the Strong Man.

There are some really good resources out there for people who are able to like see Jesus as a political, relevant political, actor today who has nothing to do with partisan ship but he's still highly political.

Seth Price 59:50

Yeah, yeah, I'll find that YouTube documentary today. I'm not I don't know who that is. But the other names I'm familiar with, but that is one that I'm not and I was like a guy

Stephen Backhouse 59:59

Yeah, Bob is a good guy. He takes oath taking very serious like he doesn't take oath. Because he sees that as buying he's even repented of his boy scout oath. He's like a god I was making an oath to is not the God of Jesus. It was an act of idolatry. Yeah, it's really interesting.

Seth Price 1:00:18

I might make the evening watch. So, Stephen, I appreciate both your ability to let my daughter interrupt us, but also your time from your family as well as all the time for the night. I really appreciate you. I'd like to have you back on I could talk politics for a long time I used to. That's all I used to talk about. But I'd like to talk about other things as well. Because I'm sure there are other parts of the Bible in Jesus, non political wise, that still scratch your itch, even if that's not what your main studies are. And so I would love to tackle some of those at some time in the future.

Stephen Backhouse 1:00:49

We will Seth. I'd love to!

Seth Price 1:00:50

Well, thank you again for tonight very much so.

Stephen Backhouse 1:00:52

Thank you for having me.

Seth Price 1:01:07

I keep thinking about a part of a book called who will be a witness from drew Hart from a while back where he writes from the Gospel of Luke that Jesus constantly laments that the people they missed the narrative. They forget the things that make peace, what the kingdom of God truly is. They miss the point of the parables. They make bad decisions.

When it comes to your politics I'm not sure what a good decision is. I do know, though, that it matters; wrestle with it. The parts of this episode that pushed you that you're like, no, that's not right. wrestle with that. I'll do the same.

I would like to thank Remedy Drive for their music in this episode. And I also want to say that this is part one of a larger conversation with Stephen, I have plans to bring him back for a part two. So stay tuned for that, because there is hope there are places we can go to. There are things that we can do.

I pray that you're safe, and that you know how beloved you are.

We'll talk soon

On The Christ with Paul Thomas Dařílek / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Paul Thomas 0:08

It's more helpful to look at the spirit of it King Cyrus from Persia is probably the most underlooked, most important, human in the formation of all civilization in some ways. The innovation that he brought over Babylon and Assyria when you’re read in your Bible, these were extraordinarily brutal kingdoms-and along comes Cyrus. So the typical thing to happen when during a coup say or when you're a conquest maybe is the better word. You kill the king, you kill their kids, you convert people to your language to your religion, you force assimilation. And the innovation to empire that Cyrus brought was radical acceptance. In fact, as you probably know, he's the guy who freed the Jews from Babylonian exile (he) gave them a choice, you want to stay here, stay here. You want to go? Guess what, you can go back to Jerusalem, all open the Royal coffers, you can use my money to build rebuild the temple. In fact, we're going to have you know, cedars from Lebanon cut down. We're going to have Phoenician sailors bring the wood for you. He was like, you want to worship your God, you worship your God, ask him to bless me while you're at it.

Seth Price 1:42

Everybody, welcome back. I am Seth, this is Can I Say This At Church podcast. Very, very pleased you're here. I welcome back my good friend Paul to the show today. And we talk a bit about Christ and the Messiah and the titling of that. And I can promise you, you're going to hear some things that you're not used to hearing. And some things that I think will open some doors, at least they have for me, with the way that I view, really the prophets. It has been a word that I've been working through recently, it's been an apocalypse for me. So talking with Paul on some of these things, and the concept of Christ and the Messiah. Those are just huge, huge things. And so stay with me.

A little bit of editor's note here, Zoom had a bad day. I don't know what was happening. But you're going to hear a few fits and starts and stops. And I did my best to fix those up in the edit. But being that I'm not a professional. It just maybe didn't happen. So bear with me on that.

And then one last call. So this is the last week for anything sold in the store to go to benefit 100% #BlackLivesMatter. So if that's something that you felt like doing, do, please do so. Here we go with Paul Thomas Dařílek.

Seth Price 3:33

All right, here we go. I'm gonna try the last name Paul. And I'm gonna leave this in the mix because I want to be authentic and honest with people. So Paul Thomas Dařílek. Did I say it right.

Paul Thomas 3:41

You said it very well, almost as well as my grandma would have.

Seth Price 3:45

But did I say it correct though?

Paul Thomas 3:47

He did as far as I know. Now. People correct me on my own name. Grandma says it’s Dařílek. Daří means “good luck”. Lek means “he who has”.

Seth Price 3:58

Oh, I like that. Well, either way. Welcome back to the podcast. I think I've been begging you to come back on for like a year and a half. So I'm glad that we finally did this.

Paul Thomas 4:07

So glad to be here. It's good to see your face on this Zoom machine.

Seth Price 4:10

Yeah, thank God for Zoom. Right? Like that's the world that we live in, or things like Zoom? It's not what's the word that was gonna say Overton window. It's not that it's basically the window, though, for how people communicate. So it's definitely not the Overton Window though. That's a different thing altogether. But what have you been up to? So it's been like two years since you were on the show, what’s new?

Paul Thomas 4:28

Goodness gracious, what's new? I've mostly been trying to make a living and trying to be a good dad, good husband. I'm working on a book that I'm ghostwriting for somebody that I'm really excited about. And it's kind of fun to be doing it in this moment. It's a book about the global church. And as we were talking about before the call there's some things about this pandemic, as inconvenient as it is, that have accelerated certain aspects of being the body of Christ in potentially interesting ways. We're Gonna see what it's like in the long haul? That’s mostly been doing these days.

Seth Price 5:04

Yeah, ghostwriting, one of these days, people get to read what you've written.

Paul Thomas 5:09

My wife and I have agreed that 2021 is the year. I've got half written manuscripts of about five books near completion. It's gonna be fun when they all start coming back out. And I hope to be back for each of them Seth.

Seth Price 5:26

What do you mean you? Oh, you mean on the show? I was like, where would you go? Where would you go? Yeah, well, one of those and then just so thank you again, for sending a while back, you sent me one on the concepts of the Cosmic Christ. Now it was a PDF form. So it's formatted a little weirdly, but I found myself fascinated and both captivated with it. And I've tackled the cosmic Christ, and read a bit about it in different scenarios.

But it was different than what you approached with. So can you just, in brief, I want to talk to you a bit about the cosmic…in brief, we're talking about Christ..so when you say cosmic Christ, and when you've been writing about cosmic Christ, and knowing that no one has read what you wrote, well, few people probably have read what you've written. What are you getting out there when you say cosmic Christ? And kind of how does that relate to the way that we view Christ today?

Paul Thomas 6:17

The challenge here, Seth, is going to be in brief. (we both laugh) But to contextualize for the listener a little bit. The book i'd shared with you previous even to that one was a big book that I've been working on for a decade, The Butterflies in God's Stomach (listen that here), which is a poetic retelling of Scripture’s story, from in the beginning-to all things new. And that's been my labor of love that I've been working on it. And it's an adventure through Scripture following a stream of water that flows from Genesis to Revelation reflecting God's love all the way. And there are certain episodes that I took a very poetic approach to it. And a literary agent suggested she said, “you know, a lot of these poems might make interesting standalone books”. So I started pulling out some of those poems, and their poems on the big topics, incarnation, resurrection, Pentecost, and drawing them out; and cosmic Christ was one of them.

And so I had this cosmic Christ poem, but I wanted to also offer a more straightforward explanation of the concept of the cosmic Christ in Scripture, as well as a little unpacking of how that was seen through Hebrew eyes, Roman eyes, you know, most early Christians were converts. So what does this sound like to Greek ears? And at the same time, also, remember you may have read Richard Rohr’s book came out I was so I was super excited for that. I'm a huge Richard Rohr fan, love the man. What was it called…Universal Christ?

Seth Price 7:53

I have it, I've yet to read it. I own it. I just have not read it.

Paul Thomas 7:56

It's lovely. And it's written, I think of father Richard Rohr, as a true spiritual adept. It's kind of written by a dude who's 1000 steps along the way. That's not to say it goes over my head, it's a lot of things, I think, are very elementary to him that he didn't bother to unpack. So you end up with feeling like, you know, “I'm the Christ, you're the Christ, my dog is the Christ”! You can come out of it with a little bit of a “woowoo feeling”. And I'm not closed off to woowoo stuff. The book resonates probably great to for people who've just tried psychedelic mushrooms for the first time. And they're like, yes! But I thought that it just lacked a little bit of rootedness, um, that I would have liked to have seen. So I added that to the book that I bounced off of you and have since rewritten.

So I don't know how we want to look at that. But one approach might be just to unpack the roots of the term cosmic Christ, or the Christ and follow it all the way forward. And if we do that, I think that provides a interesting trajectory of what we mean when we say the Christ. But what we also mean when we say, when we talk about, Jesus of Nazareth, as Christ. Does that sound good?

Seth Price 9:19

Yeah, that sounds great. And if I remember, right, and it's been like, what a year? I feel like it was last fall when you sent that. I feel like that's what you did there to like, I think you went back to the concept of Christ and like, drilled it all the way back to like pre-Israel or pre… (you) drilled it all the way back in history. And pre-Israel's probably not right. So can we start there? Because I think that that concept is what fascinated me the most.

Paul Thomas 9:39

Yeah, it goes right back to the very roots of Israel. So Christ, as many listeners I'm sure know, isn't Jesus last name. It's our translation of the word that means “the anointed one” just means anointed. So the Hebrew word for the Anointed One, I don't pronounce Hebrew well, I just know if you put (sound of throat noise thingy) in there, some people will believe you. Messiah (pronounced this way). But it's the word from which we get the word, Messiah, the same word in Greek. So if you're writing in the New Testament writing Greek, the same word is Christós, it just means anointed. So the Christ, the Messiah, the Anointed One, they're all the same word. And originally, they just refer to the King of Israel.

When Israel, beginning in the beginning, there was an anointing with oil, a literal oil, anointing on the head, and then that is the anointed one that symbolizes God's favor. So then, in the time of David, you can read in your Bible, God promises Israel, that there will be an anointed one in the throne for all time. And for 400 years, that was the case. And so for all that time, the Anointed One, the Messiah, the Christ, just meant “the king”. It was, um, you know, a religious and political role.

But then, you know, 400 years later, along comes Babylon. And you know, the story, there's the whole exile. So in 589 BCE, Babylon invades Judah, they destroy Jerusalem, burn the temple, remove the Davidic King from the throne, gouge out his eyeballs, and torture his children to death, right in front of him, and then gouge out his eyeballs to make sure that's the last thing he's ever seen. So you can just imagine the crisis now of faith with God's promise that there will always be an anointed one. So certain streams of the Hebrew tradition, well they were trying to ask themselves, "how can we make sense of this now?” And this the focus shifts from Anointed One in the throne, to the coming of a future Anointed One of the Lord.

And as many know, that Anointed One of the Lord is announced by the prophet Isaiah, as King Cyrus. So a Persian king from Zoroastrian Persia is being proclaimed by the most prominent Hebrew prophet of the day, as God's Anointed One. There is a tangent, we could go down on that one because some people very inaccurately correlate that to Trump.

Seth Price 12:17

Yeah, really? Yeah, let's go…what! Say that again? Yeah, let's go down that.

Paul Thomas 12:23

You want to?

Seth Price 12:25

Yeah. What?

Paul Thomas 12:26

You know, in seeing some of Donald Trump's less Christian looking behavior, a lot of Christians, some strands of Christians, said, “Well, you know, the Lord can use anyone. Just look in the Bible. The Lord used pagan Cyrus for his ends”. And that is true, it's more helpful to look at the spirit of it. King Cyrus from Persia is probably the most underlooked, most important, human in the formation of all civilization in some ways. The innovation that he brought over Babylon and Assyria when you’re read in your Bible, these were extraordinarily brutal kingdoms-and along comes Cyrus. So the typical thing to happen when during a coup say or when you're a conquest maybe is the better word. You kill the king, you kill their kids, you convert people to your language to your religion, you force assimilation. And the innovation to empire that Cyrus brought was radical acceptance. In fact, as you probably know, he's the guy who freed the Jews from Babylonian exile (he) gave them a choice, you want to stay here, stay here. You want to go? Guess what, you can go back to Jerusalem, all open the Royal coffers, you can use my money to build rebuild the temple. In fact, we're going to have you know, cedars from Lebanon cut down. We're going to have Phoenician sailors bring the wood for you. He was like, you want to worship your God, you worship your God, ask him to bless me while you're at it.

And in that increased openness in that opening of borders in that accepting of other religious traditions, other ethnicities. It's that radical acceptance and wide embrace that made Cyrus who he was. Draw your own conclusions regarding whether or not the current administration is opening that embrace to immigrants and foreigners more or not.

Seth Price 14:44

Yeah. Well, and it also seems similar to the way that in the New Testament Rome as their conquering one, not necessarily in the New Testament, just in history. They would show up and be like you worship wherever you want to worship. It's just Caesar's also God, but you do what you want to do on the side just as long as we're cool, that I'm also God. You do what you want to do, wherever you want to do it.

Paul Thomas 15:01

Totally you can draw a line Rome inherits that from Cyrus. Yeah. In the epithet, the great, Alexander the Great took that indifference to his hero. Pompey the Great is the Roman conqueror who conquered Judea and then incorporated Judea into Rome. And he, you know, he took the same epithet as Pompey the Great an imitation of Alexander the Great an imitation of Cyrus the Great. So that’s Messiah for awhile.

Seth Price 15:30

Huh. So…

Paul Thomas 15:31

Go ahead.

Seth Price 15:32

So how does a messiah then get converted from a foreign King coming in liberating people, allowing them to worship, into a I'm going to have my own king that is not a foreign King? Like how does that get converted into that?

Paul Thomas 15:48

Right, right.

So really all they're saying all what Isaiah is principally saying is, here's the one…and by the way, the Babylonian prophets of Marduk were saying the same thing. There are similar Babylonian writings where the prophets are saying, “Here he comes! The liberator! The liberating king!”

Seth Price 16:09

of Cyrus.

Paul Thomas 16:10

They were saying this of Cyrus. Because word on the street was, and they would hear this in Babylon, which was everybody thought it was too big to fail, and too well fortified to fail. My favorite story how Cyrus got in was, Herodotus says that his men diverted the Euphrates River, they went in under left, the city walls gaping, went under, and took over the whole city while the King of Babylon was drunk. And there was no bloodshed whatsoever. You can always look to Herodotus for the most fun version of stories and when you know many were accessible to him.

So anyway, all they're saying at that point is here comes our liberator, he is anointed by God to liberate us. They're liberated. And then it kind of becomes a question of where does the tradition go from there? So Cyrus is the Christ, but in no way does it feel like our story ends there. And so we start to see, through the prophets, and through visions like those of Isaiah, we start to see, think of his wheels in the sky vision. Intersecting wheels that move at speed of thought, wherever his thoughts go, there it already is. And it's filled with temple imagery. And it's covered with eyes. It's all seeing all knowing it's in every way a symbol of God. But what's surprising about that to the contemporary hearer of the prophecy is that this is happening in Babylon in the land of Marduk. That's the strange thing. Previously, and you'll see this even among Hebrew people previous to the exile, the belief is a belief in regional gods. So Ra rules over Egypt. Marduk rules over Babylon here. And part of the meaning of Ezekiel’s prophecy is, no, I'm seeing a God who is the God of all and of the entire universe. And kind of that becomes what's unique.

So then, after Cyrus, the next big event in world history, you know, at the end of the day, Cyrus is just killed in battle. Again, you can look to Herodotus, for the most fun version of it, he says that the Queen Tomyris after a battle said, you know, “where is Cyrus's body” and then she wouldn't found it cut off his head and stuck it in a skin full of blood and said “you have your fill of blood!” That's the most colorful version of his end. What enemy King do you want to just die of COVID-19?

Seth Price 18:46

Before you go from there, so I know that you also listen to Dan Carlin's Hardcore History when he quotes Herodotus, he really has a good time with it. You can tell He's like, listen to me. Let me tell you what happened. It is so good.

Paul Thomas 19:05

Another, now, this might not be directly related to the term the Christ, but its formative in a lot of ways. After Cyrus dies, the next big, big, conqueror who captured the Hebrew imagination, and unless you know what you're looking for, you might not see this in the Bible, though it is there, is Alexander the Great. King from Macedon takes over Greece, takes over Asia for the first time. You know how in the Bible, Israel and Judah, they're always vacillating between the East and the West. Between Egypt and Syria, Egypt and Babylon, Egypt and Persia. And this entire history of the world for them is this like, “oh, which stronger power do we give our allegiance to?” You know, minus this very brief time of autonomous, semi autonomous, power under like growing under David and then coming to its greatest height under Solomon.

So then you've got Alexander the Great, who you know is said to have been the son of his Virgin Mother Olympias who was impregnated by Zeus. You know, there's a story of her husband, King Philip, seeing her sleeping with snakes as she did in devotion to Dionysus. And he catches her before they're married. And anyway, in Ptolemy and in other stories, you see the this colorful story of her impregnation before she was married to King Philip. And Alexander is said by some to be the son of Zeus. He's said to be the fulfillment of the prophecies of the oracles of his culture.

He comes in as a king and he unites east and west and for the first time, and he when he marched into Jerusalem, he was just welcomed. They threw open the city gates, and they just bowed to their new King Alexander. For the first time the dream shifts to a dream may be one king really can rule over all creation. And Alexander had this, you know, when he went to Egypt, he was greeted as a god and given the double crown of Upper and Lower Egypt. Everywhere he meant he seemed unstoppable. That's why a lot of people thought maybe this dude really is the son of Zeus, Achilles incarnate, Achilles, the war hero wrote from the Iliad. They also said he was an incarnation of Pericles.

And so anyway, the main thing here is the way in which prophetic imagination shifts rule of one king of kings who rules not only over Israel and Judah, but the entire world. So that starts to capture the imagination. So what is that King gonna look like? And everyone, as most Christians know, expected a king who would come and conquer in the way that all kings had. David, Solomon, I mean, Alexander, the Roman kings. You know, Tiberias, who, you know, was the king say, from like, Jesus teenage years on. And so anyway, Alexander captures the imagination in every way that any religious figure of the world ever had. He's deified within his lifetime. That's where you get the Roman tradition of deifying Kings. Within a year of Julius Caesar's death, his nephew, you know, steps into power, Octavian Augustus, and declares Julius a god.

There was this amazing comet that was visible day and night. And everybody said, “See, there's Julius joining the gods” and everybody just says, “I guess so”. And, you know, on the coins that Jesus carried in his pocket, they would say, Augustus Caesar, Divi filius, son of God. So then messianic expectation splinters. Some people think it'll be a political thing like all of these things. Others think it's going to be a great priest, and others still dared to imagine that this Nazarene who preached only love, who didn't fight with the sword, who relied fully on the father, that he was king. And that he was worthy of usurping all of those titles. King of King, Lord of Lords, Prince of Peace.

Some of those “King Kings, Lord of Lords”, that goes backwards through all the Roman emperors, through Alexander the Great, through Cyrus. Prince of Peace that was a title that went to Augustus Caesar, the king who was king when Jesus was born. Because he too, and he got in a fight with Mark Antony united, the east and west united .Mark Antony was ruling Egypt. He was ruling Rome he avoided Civil War, and there you go.

Seth Price 24:22

A question I have, and I didn't think about this prior, is there this and I don't want to say obsession lightly, but I'm just gonna use the word obsession because I can't come up with a better one, outside of like Israel, Hebrew, are the other civilizations at the time because you've referenced you know, Babylon and other Oracle's are they also always expectantly looking for a messiah or for a Christ type figure? Or does that kind of tail off as civilization moves pass that form of religion?

Paul Thomas 24:47

In my reading, and I'm not the world's authority on this, but the unique thing that Hebrew Scripture has is this amazing staying power. So if you go through a study of Babylonian literature it is completely over the moment Cyrus invaded-Babylon is no more. It had been for 1000 years and it's gone forever at that moment. And nothing made Hebrew culture be gone forever.

And I would argue it's the power of their literature, the power of their poetry, their poets and prophets and they don't need a throne all of the time. So what we do see, say in Babylon, is a political situation in Babylon, where a king who wasn't principally devoted to Marduk, the national god of Babylon, but rather to the sun god. He somehow becomes king. Babylon, you know, he's doing things like kings, do. Babylon’s fortunes then declines and people are saying, Oh, no, it's because Marduk is disrespected. And then they started looking forward to the liberating king who had set them free. But it's not an ongoing thing that keeps going millennia after millennia, because the culture doesn't. And when you're riding high you don't feel like you need a king to save you from your situation.

Seth Price 26:09

So how does that then zoom out to a cosmic version of the Christ like, where does that switch get flipped?

Paul Thomas 26:17

It gets switched, mostly climatically, in the writings of the Apostle Paul and the authors of the Johannine corpus; referring to the Gospel of John, the Epistles of John, and Revelation. And those are the places where you can see, and you kind of have to imagine Paul as an outsider. You know, I think we sometimes might forget, you know, he was rocking big theatres in Ephesus, like a real cultural hub of Greek culture. You know, when Cleopatra’s sister had to hide out she went to Ephesus. And it was home to the Temple of Artemis, one of the seven wonders of the world. And it's also easy for us to forget what a small voice some itinerant Jew would have been, you know. Though, in Rome, the estimates vary, I think I'm seeing like 7-8% in all of Rome was Jewish. Most of those were like Sadducees and Pharisees, they were kind of serving the Roman Empire. Rome was ruling through them. So is a tiny voice.

And they are making sense of the died and resurrected Hebrew teacher, prophet, rabbi, kind of trickster in a way that Jesus was. You know, you've heard me talk about, you know, the guerilla theater of the staging of Palm Sunday. You know, he's a public figure, but in a very theatrical way. And guess what I want to bring it home: so the consistent mission of the cosmic Christ is that the cosmic Christ refers to that aspect of God that pervades all of creation. So if you understand it that then you can, in light of Paul and John, then you look back and you go, which kind of Christ it is? You know, is it the kings and etc, or is it the love demonstrated on the cross that is going to be the Messiah, the anointed one, who's come to save us—meaning all of us. No longer meaning Jerusalem or Israel, but the entire planet!

And here's what I think makes it interesting. First, I've have just a personal Christian affinity for Jesus, the one who relies on love, no matter what, even as he marches into Jerusalem to be crowned king. The second person, you know, the next person like since Solomon to be crowned. But in Jesus’ day the recent memory of Jewish kings, they’d all go to Rome to be crowned. And it is said, this might be Herodotus too, that say, Herod, king of the Jews, was crowned king of the Jews, by Augustus Caesar, who was then Octavian Caesar and Mark Antony, on the steps of the temple of Jupiter. So even Jesus going to Jerusalem to go (and say) this is where a real King is crowned. He's the fulfillment of a promise of God that there would always be a descendant of David on the throne. He's going to his throne, little does anybody know that his commitment to a God who is love would necessitate that crown being one of thorns. His crowning is becoming the very symbol of self sacrificial love, the means through which God is at work today, saving the world through the body of Christ.

So when you say “cosmic Christ” and you zoom out, you're thinking about the widening trajectory. And when you do it through the lens of the words of Jesus, who says, whatever you’ve done to your brothers, that you've done to me”. When you do that through the lens of people like Paul, who just referr to the church, us, as the body of Christ, one body, many members. Oh, okay! From that cosmic perspective, we are to partner with God, the Creator of the universe, for the salvation of the world. And what makes it cool and fun in the 21st century is, dude, now we're talking about it in an era in which we actually have all the tools we need to end our whole story in death and destruction. Whether that's through nuclear war, environmental degradation, artificial intelligence run amok, a global pandemic—or we end our story in the vision that John of Patmos had in the vision, in the very last scene, of Revelation-heaven coming to join Earth and God and His Bride, who is the church are one at last. And all things are made new and restored to a God who is love. So you can see how important that trajectory is because it is just the visionary responsibility for people like us, we got to figure out how to save the world!

Seth Price 31:44

We do. So I want to pivot to that. So you said we had all the tools to possibly, you know, rectify things. And so when we spoke earlier, you talked about, or in a text message, talking a bit about framing this in a framework of the pandemic that we're in, and some of Phyllis Tickle’s stuff and etc, some of that stuff. And you said, you also wanted my input, which I don't get my input often on the show. So what were you talking about there?

Paul Thomas 32:11

I think that this endeavor of looking at these big picture things that I've kind of trained myself to do through the process of spending 10 years looking at the big story of Scripture, it becomes fun to then take that zoomed out bird's eye view. And something about thinking about this long view context reminded me of, you just mentioned of our departed friend Phyllis Tickle, who wrote a book called The Great Emergence. And she talked about these 500 year rummage sales that the church has. And just for listeners who might not be aware, she points out in that book, you know, 500 years ago was the Protestant Reformation. 500 years before that, in 1000, was the Great Schism, the split between the East and Western churches. 500 years before that Rome falls and Germanic tribes just come in. And whereas the church had been preserved through the machination of the Roman Empire. [But now] monastic communities had to take up the slack when Rome was gone so that they preserved the tradition through monasteries, and convents. And then 500 years before that is Jesus.

And reading that book, I thought, oh, interesting! I bet you could keep going and backwards by 500 year increments. So I decided to do that. So 500 years before Jesus is roughly when the Babylonian exile happens. 500 years before that, well, that's when King David ascended to the throne. That's a big, big milestone! 500 years before David, in so far as bothered to estimate these things, that’s roughly the time of Moses. And, you know, there's debate whether these things are oral traditions or historic ones but people who historically say, you know that's about where you'd find Moses. And 500 years before that is Abraham.

Now let's come back forward. A lot of these big shifts that happen in tradition happen as the result of communications revolutions. So in the time of David in the kings, that's when Hebrew culture adapts alphabetic language. So it's around 100 BCE that is when the Paleo-Hebraic alphabet emerges from a more symbol based on hieroglyphic like writing system. And so now you can start keeping things like legal codes that you see in the books of Deuteronomy and Leviticus, etc, etc. My mind just went a month with like three different things that people would protest right there and like three different dialogues split off. Anyway, around the time of the Babylonian exile there's another big communications revolution, or not the Babylonian exile, the next one, I guess I would point to is the one that's responsible for the birth of the Christian tradition in the first place, which is use of the Codex. So whereas texts used to be in scrolls, they started accordion style folding those scrolls and binding them and cutting off the edges; and this is the precursor to a book. And it was an inexpensive way to replicate written materials.

And it's in this form, that the materials that form the New Testament circulated. So without that wider ability for circulation, [that was] potentially aided by the Codex, who knows you would these epistles have gotten around? Would these gospels have gotten around? Would they have disappeared before they were put to writing? A lot of scholars attribute that communications revolution. And then, you know, we need not go deep into the Protestant revolution being potentially created by the printing press.

And here we are, brother, in the day of the internet, what is happening?! And there's a lot of speculation.

And I'm not sure, but I speculate that this COVID-19 pandemic is accelerating whatever we're in the midst of. And as a podcaster you're kind of a synthesizer of ideas. You're kind of a home to listeners who might not be able to say something at church and have these discussions. I guess, I'm a little curious how you're perceiving what's happening. Do you have any speculation as to what's happening with the church as a result of this the world we find ourselves in?

Seth Price 37:17

Yeah, um, I could speculate, I don't know that I'm qualified to but I'm happy to, but I don't think I'm qualified to So when I look at it of two minds, so I talk to so many people. And then I also get quite a few emails and private messages and Instagram messages, which I'm weeks delayed in answering because I'm just never on Instagram, you know. So I do talk with quite a few people. And from what I can see, both from the banking mindset, as well as being involved in my local church, like I was chair of stewardship for some time and that type of stuff. So like, and I used this in a past interview a few weeks ago, like the church is in hospice car. Like, pastors and ministers are basically, it's just palliative care for a dying form of institutionalized church. But that doesn't mean that the church is dying. It's just this institution of it is, and I think that unemployment compounded with fear compounded with idolatry of that fear and or of the buildings of our church. Those are all being, if it's going to take 100 years, I think it's only going to take 10 or 15. Like, there's only so much in endowment funds, you know what I mean? So, I don't know what the church looks like going forward. But I do know, like, I can go and read Ephraim, like, I can just go and in read some of the early Syriac church fathers. And I couldn't do that 20 years ago, they just didn't exist. The other day, I just read some of the sermons of George MacDonald, because I felt like it and they were free. You know what I mean? Like, I could just read those I can go read translations of Tertullian or all of these other things that didn't exist outside of seminaries. And so I think there is a radical shift overall of the consciousness of a youthful church, to ideas that are not bound to use your Codex metaphor, inside the binding of my 66 book Bible, if that makes any sense. I don't know what that means for the institution of the church, though. I have no idea.

Paul Thomas 39:19

Right!

Well, that totally makes sense. I mean, it's amazing. When you think about it, from Adam and Eve to the Renaissance people in our Hebrew Christian tradition, Judeo-Christian tradition, or whatever you want to call it, didn't even have access to the scriptures. Like it's only five hundred years ago, that printed Bibles, if some native tongues, even existed. Like how many 20 year generations is that? It's not very many. But then you're reading it through this, like, lens of, you know, indoctrination by what had been the institutional church until then. And it's only like, say, in my parents generation where, you know, you might start buying books to understand the Bible or going to seminary, but that's a really small (number of people). And then suddenly, in our lifetime, we've all got free online, searchable Bibles, and every translation we want. We’ve got Greek and Hebrew dictionaries, words, commentaries, cross references, we buy books with the click of a button on Amazon.,I mean I'm Facebook friends with some of the world's knowledgeable scholars, it's this planetary treasuring of thought from the whole world, and every age in the world is suddenly available at our fingertips.

And what I think you're seeing in a lot of your listeners are seeing, you know, among people who are deconstructing at his notion of like, suddenly, you could click and suddenly you have this audio book going wait a minute, this doesn't sound like what my pastor told me in Sunday school! And, you know, it causes in a lot of individuals, some real and trauma and we get tripped up over the whole process, which is kind of a tragedy, you know?

There's this period of deep pain and it seems like we are holding onto it and I just kind of wondered, you know, with, say, with pandemic, you know, there's the issue of like, yeah, the real estate; most churches are struggling to stay around. You know, you see the small churches and God bless them, you know. I do know, people are getting healed in those, and will they even be around? You’ve also got people missing church and finding out that they don't really miss church when they miss? Yeah and what do we do? And you see these nexus(es) of interaction online. How does that translate in this world? It really hard to see the truly novel innovations.

So before Facebook and Twitter existed, nobody's going “If only there was this page where I could have my picture and say what's on your mind?” Nobody was really looking at that. And it's not like when the printing press was invented, it's not like nobody said, “Oh, now there's going to be 30,000 Christian denominations!”, like the real big things are always so hard to see. So it is fun to speculate.

Seth Price 42:26

Yeah, I mean, every day, like I was just researching the other day, and I don't remember where I heard it, or where I read it, because I the amount of stuff I read, I honestly, sometimes forget. I what I remember what I read, but I have no idea who said it, which is really a dangerous thing. because I'm constantly afraid of plagiarism. So, um, but I read something and you referenced it earlier, like, you know, Jesus is being anointed as king in Jerusalem…and then it was in a conversation about the parables, it might have actually been on the Bible Project now that I think about it. But either way, they're talking about yeah, Jesus is telling a parable about a king that goes away, to become king, and then comes back.

And I never read it that way. And they were saying, well, it's just so subversive, because basically, what he's trying to do is the parables aren't about what we think about the parable. The parable is about what he's trying to do. So he's telling the story of I'm King here, not like the Kings that go away, to be anointed as King. I'm just King. I was like, I never thought about that context at all. So every day, it's like, there's new context to words that I read my entire life, which didn't exist 20 years ago for me.

Paul Thomas 43:36

It's really interesting. So for the early listeners of the oral tradition of that story there King, you know that there was great enthusiasm about being emperor of Rome during the lifetimes of Julius Caesar and Augustus Caesar. By the time you get to type Tiberius he's a little lukewarm about the role. He goes off and he's an absent King. He spends most of it on this island in the Mediterranean, you know, just kind of in this distant thing. Just got a message that my internet connection is unstable. Sorry about that.

Seth Price 44:13

(Through laughter)

That is true! That is accurate.

Paul Thomas 44:18

Darn! I don’t know what it is!

Seth Price 44:21

No, telling one of your kids is probably streaming Netflix it doesn't matter. It's fine either way. But um, but yeah, I don't know what the I have no idea what the church will look like for my children. I don't actually know what it'll look like 10 years from now. I know personally, how many churches stayed afloat with staff salary because of the Payroll Protection Loans that are quickly coming into the end of their two and a half months of getting them. And I don't know that the giving has ticked up in the last two and a half months because the unemployment rate is so high. Like it's literally just a mathematical equation. Which I kind of like that that type of institution of churches dying because it's forcing Christians to actually be Christians, as opposed to a social club. But I don't know that the church is ready for that. I don't know that the church, and by church I mean you and I, like I don't know that the church is ready for that confrontation.

Paul Thomas 45:19

That’s one of the hopes, you know, in that big literary effort, The Butterflies in God's Stomach, the idea of understanding Scripture as the love story of God wooing humankind to be his bride in a world where we've lost the plot. In my own personal thought the reframing there that is important is instead of understanding the Christ or Christianity in terms of church attendance. And I don’t mean to have a cynical view of the institutional church. I've had a blast inside churches of all denominations, and I've worked with all of them to help save the world. But at the same time, maybe it's time we question that the church is or ought to be a Sunday motivational speaking business. Which is not what it looks like. And I don't mean that you know, pejoratively, but if I have a legacy, I would love to reframe our understanding of what the Bible is, as a love story that we find ourselves in and get engaged. Everybody engaged!

And increasingly, my personal trajectory is to less and less see the church…I think traditionally people have seen the church as well, as it's the accumulation of all those people who go to those Sunday morning motivational speeches, right? Or professed Christians, if you accepted Jesus as your Savior, you're on the inside, everyone else is on the outside. The more I take, in some ways, a more literal view of Scripture, salvation, or soteriology, if you want to use the big word, it actually is for the salvation of the whole human endeavor with and through people partnering with the God who is love to bring that about.

So, you know, it's harder and harder in life for me to imagine God, you know, going like, “finally, this one's in! He accepted Jesus as Savior!” Maybe all along, we're supposed to be loving God back by caring for the gift God gave us, which is creation and each other.

Seth Price 47:36

Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. I think that's a good place to stop it for two reasons. I need to feed my children. And really, it's just that reason. I need to go feed my children. But yeah, no, I think that is right. But um, but yeah, I'm gonna hold you accountable to 2021. I'm just gonna keep releasing this over and over again in 2021. Every week, every episode is this until you publish the books.

Paul Thomas 48:02

Anyway is great! Just keep me accountable.

Seth Price 48:05

Yeah. Thank you so much, Paul. I really enjoyed it. Oh, I didn't ask you the same question that I asked everyone. Oh, my gosh, I almost forgot! Try your best, so when you say, Paul, to your children to your neighbor, hey, when I say God, is this? What words would you try to wrap around that?

Paul Thomas 48:25

I think I start with just a real big definition. And it is God is that upon which everything depends for existence. So I'm happy to start there. And then we have conditions through which we aim to understand that God. And I think it's noteworthy to note that the prophets and it's all traditions, there's not a lot that they agree on. But one thing seems that they do agree on is that every mystic who has a direct experience of God says that experience is one of them. And I think that's worth noting. I mean, hey, we’ve got it in the Bible. God is love. We got those words directly. It's worth noting that on a planet wide basis people noticed that. Listen, I like to start there. And then the rest is details.

Seth Price 49:25

Yeah, I like that. That it's Yeah, I like that. I'm gonna try to restate it but I can't do it better than you. Point people to where they should go to get in touch with you do all the things with you. Where do you want people to go if you want them to go anywhere?

Paul Thomas 49:41

If you want to go anywhere, you can find me on Facebook Paul Thomas Dařílek and other pages. Paul Thomas Author. If you want a free gift from me, you can get an old free gift that is the introduction and some sample chapters. So that book I mentionedThe Butterflies in God's Stomach, and you can get audio or in PDF on butterfliesbook.com. It's just my free gift. It'll be fun to listen to them so that you can hear how it changes when the real thing comes out next year.

Seth Price 50:14

Perfect. Perfect. Paul, thank you so much, very much. So I've enjoyed it, man.

Paul Thomas 50:19

Thank you.

Seth Price 50:23

Today's episode was brought to you from people like Josh and Patrick Antil patrons of this show, make it go. And so not only to those two, but to every single person that does that. Thank you. Thank you, thank you could not do this without you. If you haven't done that, and you get anything at all from the show, consider doing so. At different levels, you'll get different things. So some people get to see the video version of the show other people hopefully if I'm on my game, and lately with COVID and school, I have not been as on my game in all honesty. I'm so humbled by the support of so many people. So we'd love to count you among them. Huge thank you, to Salt of the Sound for your music again in this episode.

As we enter into fall. I really pray that your faith grows and stretches beyond measure and that you deal well with that pain and you find safe places to hold it. Know that your beloved.

Talk with you next week.

The Satan and Demons with Brad Jersak / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Brad 0:07

Did God create Satan? No, we created a phenomenon of evil that becomes bigger than us, possesses us, scoops us up. And you can use a good analogy from let's say Hitlerism where the people of Germany generate this kind of spirit, this evil spirit, that then begins to control them. And so you see it on a smaller scale in a mob mentality, right? When a mob gathers, something bigger than the sum of the parts, is generated from them. And so maybe in the old days, we would have said, well, they're evil so it called in this evil spirit. And now maybe we're saying, Well, really, the root of this is human sin. We're generating this evil spirit that takes on a life of its own and then turns on us.

Seth Price 1:24

What does it mean when we say the word the devil, insert whatever noun you want to here, when you mean that concept. I have no earthly idea. In my training and upbringing in the church, the devil for me was a mcguffin, that was used to propel the narrative of the Gospel forward. Instead of love it was fear. Instead of compassion and grace, it was hate and judgment and a really big hope that I didn't screw up, and somehow just burn for forever. Which you'll hear me reference later in the show is not what I believe anymore. Welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I as always are Seth, you are still you and I'm ready to rock and roll. But a few housekeeping things soon. Maybe today really depends on what time you're listening to this, I'm going to refresh the store, a friend of mine said we should call these things the Can We Wear this at Church type of merchandise, and I like that, I'm going to do that. So that's going to be rebranded. But I'm adding in, I realized I don't have anything for the winter or for the fall, except for some beanies, which I will say are quite warm. And if you've seen me on social media, I'm quite bald. And so those are very helpful to me. But I'm going to refresh some of the stuff, make sure that there's some long sleeved things in there. And just make sure that we're all prepared for what appears if the weather today is right is going to be really cold, at least for me. So click there. If that is something that interests you, that's another way to support the show.

Another reminder, as people are listening, so between now in the next two and a half to three weeks, every single dollar made in profit on anything bought in the store, whether that be the new justice, taken from the text of Amos shirts, or anything in there, all of that money is being combined and gathered and donated to Black Lives Matter. I've reached out to a handful of people that I trust to give me vehicles to give that money to; to hopefully try some small part to affect some form of change or to help fund that change. So consider doing that if you've been on the fence or like yeah, I want to do that. Click that button, that money is not going to the show. It is not going to me. It is literally hopefully going to do more good than that. I don't want to add any more filler here for you. So I really hope that this conversation does as much for you as it does for me on the concept of Satan, fear, tears, war, and just the Gospel with Brad Jersak.

Seth Price 4:10

Brad, I'm gonna forego the last name because I think you're like four times on the show now. And so Brad, welcome back to the show. I'm glad to welcome you back. I'm terrified for the conversation today because I know very little about it. But welcome back.

Brad 4:23

Yeah, welcome to the whole range of demonology that we know very little about and what we think we know we don't necessarily know but I'm glad to be with you and it’s good to see you again.

Seth Price 4:37

In past episodes I've asked you to go over what's new a little bit about you and again we're gonna forego all of that because people can they can just search the feed, they can go back in here all of that. Although today I got an email, or no it was tagged, that that episode that we did like three years ago on atonement still consistently happens to be, almost every week, it outperforms most of the other episodes. I don't know why.

Brad 5:00

Well the cross is important, right? It's really important. If I could say one thing. Right now, Paul Young, who wrote The Shack and I have just released a brand new little novel. It's my first work of fiction and we're excited. It's called The Pastor: A Crisis, so I did think I should make a plug about that. People can preorder it on Amazon, and it's a composite character of people I've actually known who absolutely crashed on their fundamentalism. And this guy ends up in a psych ward and ends up having to deal with his demons. So I bring the book up in the context of this story, just to say, you know, that metaphor we've used, of you know wrestling with my demons. Maybe that is a good approach to the whole topic. And so it connects in that way.

Seth Price 5:49

That's out in a few weeks, right? A few weeks. Correct? Because I haven't pre ordered but it hasn't been delivered.

Brad 6:00

Right. So there's gonna be a hard copy. There's an amazing audio book version of it with voice actors. And then of course, Kindle. So when it finally rolls out, you know, I think people will love the the audio version.

Seth Price 6:18

Are you one of the audio actors?

Brad 6:20

No, no, we had professional actors, except for my youngest son, Dominic. He stepped into one of the parts and he just nailed it. So that's the funnest part for me. And of course, co writing something with Paul Young; what a privilege.

Seth Price 6:39

He's great. Yeah, yeah, his work has been; I've really enjoyed his work. So I wanted to bring you on to talk about demons, Satan, the Satan, I don't know why I putting the word “the” in front of Satan (matters). But apparently, from what I put on Facebook today doing that changes everything. And let me just be honest about my ignorance on the record here. So growing up in the church, Satan, for me was the demonic fallen angel version of Elf on the Shelf, for lack of a better metaphor that was just going to be like a cosmic snitch, and possibly keep me from getting to heaven. It was used as like a fear tactic like a, you know, don't give in to Satan or the devil. And I never did anything else with that, like, we didn't talk about it ever. It was just used as a blunt force object to correct behavior. So can we just start at a really basically low level, like when we say like, are those even all the same things? demon, Satan? The Satan? The devil?

Brad 7:35

Yeah, let's begin with what we had learned traditionally, right. And this was the dominant view for much of church history that Satan is what we call the fallen angel Lucifer, who is the you know, the prince of the angels who defied God and fell out of heaven. We typically then also identified Satan with the term the devil, and also the serpent in the Garden of Eden.

Satan is a character that appears in in various stories like at the prologue of the book of Job where he appears before God somehow, and he sets up this test of whether Job will pass the test, and God bets on Job right. And then he appears again, later in the temptations of Jesus in the wilderness. And then Christ says some odd things about Satan,

I saw Satan fall like lightning from heaven,

He says to Peter,

Get behind Me, Satan!

which is a scary thing to have Jesus call you Satan. And then really, it all comes to convergence, because up to then we might have said, Satan, the devil, and the serpent are all different things. But there is a verse in the Book of Revelation, where it kind of conflates all of those stories.

So we grew up with that. And the idea was, in Satan's rebellion, one third of the angels fell with them, and then they become the demons. Which, by the way, is not the origin story of the demons in Jewish literature. So, so starting from there then I also became very involved in what we call deliverance ministry in the early 90s. And so then we learned, well you know, we've got to identify demons, confront them and cast them out. And so we did deliverance ministry in that way. Which was sometimes effective even if, as a spiritual authority, I'm imposing that model on someone. And then they respond to the model.

And I can see elements of that model now at work in the secular realm with psychologists who are externalizing evil in child predators. So it's very interesting that we're kind of coming around to that model again. The question is, is that what the Bible is even talking about?

Seth Price 10:15

Yeah, you know, when you say imposing a model, you mean imposing a demon on to a person or imposing Satan into a person, like, what do you mean when you say imposing a model?

Brad 10:25

No, what I'm saying is that when we look at somebody who is desperate for help, and are struggling in their lives with let's say, anxiety, or obsessive thoughts, or whatever, we bring a worldview to that moment. We bring a model to that moment. And so imposing the model might be saying, “Oh, I'm going to identify what's wrong with you as a demon”, because I'm a spiritual authority, and they are a desperate person, they're going to accept that analysis. And then I can proceed with trying to cast that demon out.

The weird thing is, sometimes it works! And so is it working because that's really what's happening or is it working because people in need are responsive to whatever model I bring it's just which model is the most effective? So the very same person, maybe I would come to them and I'd say, “Oh, no, these aren't demons, these are dissociative parts of you”. And and we need to deal with it that way. Or maybe I'd come with another model like Jungian psychology and say, “Well, no, this is really your shadow side, and you need to embrace it.” Or maybe I would come and do a Gestalt theory and have them sit on two chairs, and take turns switching chairs to talk to themselves. And all of these are models and desperate people respond to model, it's just sometimes the demon model actually kind of helps. And sometimes it's super traumatic and destructive. And I feel like I'm always wanting to find the best way forward.

So I believe the Lord brought me out of it because of the damage I was potentially doing. Brought me out of a deliverance model into inner healing model and the 12 step model. And so on the same issues those seem more effective, much more effective, and there's less risk of damaging the client so called.

Seth Price 12:25

Yeah, one of the questions actually deals with that. When the first question is asked was with your experience in kind of the inner healing in your previous stuff, you know, with with exorcisms or whatever you want to call that. The question was, how has your eschatology changed in the way that you view the spiritual realm as the way that you've kind of switched models to more of an inner healing 12 step type process?

Brad 12:50

The eschatology like, endtimes stuff?

Seth Price 12:54

His question not mine.

Brad 12:55

Yeah, I wouldn't normally see them as directly connected. But since he asked, I have also gone from sort of that old style dispensational, rapture, Great Tribulation, Armageddon, that kind of model, to I'm now in the Eastern Orthodox Church, where where our vision of the second, the glorious Second Coming, we still believe in a second coming. We just don't know what it looks like. But our vision of it is derived not from the book of Revelation, but from the Mount of Transfiguration. And so on the Mount of Transfiguration, we see Elijah and Moses glorified, so they kind of represent those who've departed already. And we see Peter, James, and John and they're hitting the deck because the glory is so intense. But Christ comess and glory, but it's not like this destructive thing where he's lopping heads off with a sword out of his mouth and all of that. So that's the vision of it, the Mount of Transfiguration.

And the theology of it is more focused on 1 Corinthians 15, where at the end of this age, we pass through a judgment but finally into the end of the ages where God is all in all in Christ is victorious and eradicates all evil in the universe, including Satan; apparently. There is a time coming when there will be no evil. And so what does that mean, right.

Seth Price 14:23

Yeah. So is Satan, a thing of being, a deity, an ethereal presence, is it something I'm creating? Like, what what is that because like for Peter to be Satan is a snake Satan, and Revelation, I think it's like 7 or 12 or maybe it's 12 seven or one of those like, Satan's a dragon and then a snake, like, what the heck is Satan? Because again, for me, Satan is that Dante's Inferno pitchfork thing, which is not also probably accurate in any way, shape, or form.

Brad 14:58

Yeah, well, we might even have to say that the idea of Satan develops right within the scriptures. So it's not a uniform image or vision or function. So I want to start out by saying that in the Bible, our whole idea that Satan is the fallen Angel Lucifer, who then leads the armies of the kingdom of darkness. That vision is very thin Biblically, like there's not actual, we read so much into some of these passages. So we've got an Isaiah passage, which is not actually addressing Satan, it's talking about a king. It's talking about an emperor who's raised himself up and he's like this bright morning star is going to crash. Nowhere in there, does it say that it’s a fallen angel or anything like that. It's a judgment of a particular King. So to in Ezekiel I think it's the king of Tyre is mentioned. And we've applied that to Satan. And we're like, well, this is about Satan. Nowhere does it say that.

And so then suddenly, you're like, wait a minute, where do we get an ontology of Satan from the Bible? And there's just not a lot going on there. Ontology means “being”. In the early church, they began to resist the idea that this is even that “being” is quite the right being or entity is quite the right way to refer to Satan. Satan is a function, literally “the accuser”. And so it seems to be that this accuser is given voice, is given persona, in the Bible. Like let's say, when Satan is tempting Jesus, in the wilderness, or through Peter, what's going on there? Oh, it's it's not just an accuser, but it's an opponent and opposing voice, the accusing voice. It's real. But what does real mean? Does real mean a real being or…so I like how Brian Zahnd, he's the guy you should be talking to about this, because but we've we've worked this out together a lot. And he would say it this way, that the Satan, we just say the Satan, because it's given the, you know, there's an article in the Greek but it's same with God, you know, it just it the article in the Greek makes it a name sometimes.

But he would say

that the Satan is less than a person and more than a principal.

So he wouldn't see Satan having personality, like an actual Angel, or a human would, or some sentient being. It's not that but it's more than just personification of evil or principle of evil. He would say it's a real phenomenon in this world that functions on a global scale to manifest the sins of humankind. In other words, if you think about, like, did God create Satan? No, we created a phenomenon of evil that becomes bigger than us, possesses us, scoops us up. And you can use a good analogy from let's say Hitlerism where the people of Germany generate this kind of spirit, this evil spirit, that then begins to control them. And so you see it on a smaller scale in a mob mentality, right? When a mob gathers, something bigger than the sum of the parts, is generated from them. And so maybe in the old days, we would have said, well, they're evil so it called in this evil spirit. And now maybe we're saying, well, really, the root of this is human sin. We're generating this evil spirit that takes on a life of its own and then turns on us.

And that's how my son when he was nine described what he was seeing in terms of demons. So let's say you're an addict and out of your addiction, or out of greed, or out of fear, you generate this spirit that then really begins to rule you and hold you in bondage. In that sense, does it matter? So what I don't want people to hear is that I don't believe in Satan or demons. Of course I do! I've dealt with them all my life! I'm just questioning our narrative for their backstory. And I'm saying the Biblical narrative does not support the mythology we've generated largely. And why does it matter? It matters because there are ways of helping people become free, that are abusive, and don't really free them. And there are ways of helping people that can actually nurture them and not re traumatize them.

So that's why I'm saying, yeah, while I believe my 12 step step brothers and sisters, they're right when they're say they're wrestling with their demons, but how are they doing it? Oh, they're doing it through surrender to the care of a loving God. We're not having exorcisms. They are doing their fearless moral inventory and confessing their sins and they're in community. And that actually is working to set them free in ways that we had hoped we could just cast out. I think that was the big problem. We thought if we can just identify this thing and yell at it, and then then it'll leave and they won't be under this obsession, or oppression, anymore. And frankly, that's pretty rare.

Seth Price 20:43

Yeah, your son's definition and I'll find the quote and I'll like put it in the beginning I won't you set it on multiple places. And it's, it's, it's worth the effort for someone else to try to find I won't, I won't make you rehash it here.

Brad 20:55

I can say the one sentence and he said,

demons are created by humans out of the ashes of war, the tears of those who are afraid, and the stuff people want that doesn't belong to them, then they take on a life of their own and turn on you and torment you.

Seth 21:12

Hmm.

Brad 21:12

Yeah, that was his exact word.

Seth Price 21:13

Is that how he usually speaks?

Brad 21:14

No.

Seth Price 21:15

Because that's just the part that blew me away. Like when I heard you say that…I'm like, I have an 11 year old it doesn't talk like that.

Brad 21:21

No, he was nine at the time. And that's absolutely not how he talks. It was out of the blue. Like, who told you that? And he said, “Jesus”, and I'm like “when” (and he says) “just now”.

So it flowed. He wasn't like composing something he was playing with Lego or something.

Seth Price 21:39

Just absently speaking.

Brad 21:42

Yeah, well, yeah, and then when I presented that to people like Brian Zahnd and Michael Hardin, who are kind of experts on this, I mean, their hair just stood up on end. Because they're like, "we've never heard what we believe already articulated so clearly, by anybody. And there's a Girardian element to it. For those who study René Girard. There's, you know, all of that stuff. So it was a moment, right, where it shifted my thinking and made more sense what we were already being led to do, which was inner healing work.

Seth Price 22:13

One of these questions. I'm not real good on the verse of, you know, second temple literature, you know, first and like, I'm just not there. One of the questions, though, does intrigued me. So the question is, how do we factor in views of demons and their origins like in reference to second temple literature? And I'm not even really sure what that question means, either. But a lot of people seem to think it was an applicable question. I just don't even know what it means.

Brad 22:39

Okay, I can tell you fairly simply. I have studied enough to be able to reduce it.

First of all, what we mean by second temple is Herod's temple and Second Temple Judaism would be the teachings of rabbis during the time of Herod's temple, which is the one Jesus was in. One of the problems with that very statement is it assumes “a” Second Temple Judaism, when in fact, don't you remember, there was Pharisees, there were Sadducees, there were zealots, there were Essenes, all of that. And we're not talking about one generation, we're talking over a period of time. So there isn't a single second temple position on this.

Second, we should not assume that Jesus adopt(ed) Second Temple Judaism. He come to overthrow it. And he's very subversive in many ways when he's addressing the other rabbis.

That said, I'll give you one example. When we talk Second Temple Judaism, sometimes we're referring to mythologies that were adopted in the intertestamental period, in books like Enoch, and Esdras and others. And so within those books, you start getting, and they were, I mean, Enoch was not a Bible book. It was not what we even now call apocryphal. But it was a very popular book during that time. And people were reading it, and Jude even refers to it, although Paul refers to the Hymn to Zeus twice, so don't take too much from that. But in some of that literature, you have different mythologies. I'm going to amalgamate them into one story for you very quickly and then we'll ask ourselves, really? We want to adopt all of that, and on what basis are we adopting part of it?

So in this story, you have anywhere from two, up to six, Satan's. And at least one of them begins to tempt a brand of angels that is mentioned once in Daniel called the watchers, and is in that Noah movie with Russell Crowe; the watchers. So these watchers are in heaven, and Satan, or some Satan's, tempt them to come down to earth and to have sex with women; human women. So some of the watchers come down, and they procreate with women and these become the Nephilim . And so then we have the Nephilim and these are like giants in the earth and their superpowers and all of that. And in this mythology, where the Bible says “human violence ruined the earth”, and that's why we had the flood in this myth mythology, it's actually the naphthalene who ruin the earth. And so Noah comes along, and he's praying to God, “Lord, deliver us from the destruction of the world by these Nephilim”. So in the Bible, God is doing a recreation of a ruined world. But in this mythology he's not. What he's doing is he needs to drown the Nephilim. And he ends up drowning everyone. So then the Nephilim drown, all of them. So I don't know why people are still looking for them in Hillary Clinton or something that's unbelievable! Can I just say that there's no Nephilim around! Read your Bible!

Seth Price 26:05

So emphatic!

Brad 26:06

And certainly not in one of your American political parties, like come on! So the Nephilim drown but what happens is when they drown their spirits appeal to God not to send them to Tartarus, which was where the Greek gods like Zeus and those guys, when they defeated the Titans, they bound them up in Tartarus.

Alright, so now we've got these spirits of the drowned naphthalene begging God not to be sent to Tartarus, which Peter mentioned once he's borrowing their mythology. So now we're in a big mess. So these spirits beg God, please don't send us to Tartarus! So God has mercy on 1/10th of them. He says 90% of them to Tartarus and he sends 10% of them to the earth, and that's the demons. Okay. All right. So I'm gonna go with my son on this one. That what he described seems a lot more like even what we would see in the Bible.

So does Jesus casting out demons verify a literalist view that says these are fallen angels, or the Second Temple view that these are 10% of the spirits of the drought Nephilim? No! It just means in the worldview of people in the first century, they identified certain maladies and addictions and so on, with demonic spirits. Now, even then, I'm okay to call them demonic spirits. I just don't know what that means. I don't believe it's a disembodied angel taking over you and controlling you. But somehow an unclean spirit, what would be an unclean spirit? It would be my compulsion to act out in addictive behavior. I think that'd be fair to call it an unclean spirit.

Seth Price 28:05

Yeah.

Brad 28:06

And then the question is, but when Jesus drives them out like is he even doing what the exorcists do? It seems to me he's just speaking to people. And I love the story of Legion because I think what Jesus says to the gathering of demons, what's your name? And he's not asking the demon to identify himself. He's asking the guy what his name is. He's humanizing this fellow. And but then this voice pops out and is like “we are legion” blah, blah, blah. And like, the human psyche is amazing, it's giving voice to something there that may even have been now bigger than that guy. And I don't entirely get it.

Seth Price 29:10

Would it be fair to call chemical imbalancesn the same thing as demons if we were to rewrite things today? Like, would you put those two in the same categories?

Brad 29:19

I don’t think always but maybe sometimes, you know, like, I just wouldn't I've been bit by labeling too easily. Right. And so, but I do want to give you an example of where modern psychology is, has explored this.

So I was talking to a counselor who works with everything from sex addicts to children who are showing signs of being predatorial. And so I said, like, so what happens when you get like a six year old that's starting to molest other children, does anything work on that? And she said, “Well, one thing seems to. And that is when you personify the impulse”.

So let's say a little child has an impulse to molest his sister. And you personify that impulse and you say, let's give that impulse a name. So we'll call it you know, “nasty” or something. Okay, so when “nasty” comes, you feel like you need to do something to your sister? Yeah, I do. Okay. Can you feel when nasty is coming? Yes. Oh! So even before you're doing something, you can feel nasty coming? Yes. Okay. So let's see how you're externalizing the evil and then she says, “Now what are some of the weapons we could use to protect you from nasty?”

This is like secular psychology, doing spiritual warfare. And what we would maybe say from our old Christian point of view is “Oh, she's discovering the reality of demons”. And the reality of spiritual weapons. It's like, well, no, she's using a metaphor. And so as Jesus, and so as Paul. And we know this, because in Ephesiansm 6, he identifies what the weapons are. It's like truth. You know, you don't have an invisible sword. You have your truth. So that an interesting approach.

Seth Price 31:18

(my dog barking in the background)

So one of the things that I've always struggled with in demons, and one of the Scriptures I was come back is so Jesus cast out demons into like the pigs, the pigs run off the cliff. And that makes no sense if we're personifying something that I'm personally struggling with. Like something inside me. So what the heck is leaving me and going into the animals? Can animals even be demon possessed? Is that even a conversation that is a real one? Does that make any sense at all? I hope so.

Brad 31:45

Yeah. Yeah, I've little idea of what what's going on in that story and why it's told that way, except that we know that the gathering area was occupied by Roman soldiers. So the idea of Legion seems to be there's a centralizing of a regional evil into this man. And when it's released from him where does that evil go? And it seems to go into pigs, which Jews had no business raising. You know, like, so I don't know if these are these Gentiles raising the pigs as a Jews raising the pigs for the Roman legions? And so this gets really murky in the sense that you could have an individual who is demonized by their own stuff. But let's say it's a kind of Imperial chaos and violence that's happening and that it's not just him that it's, you know. So this chaos is released from this guy, and then it like enters the pigs.

I think anyone who knows for sure what that means is lying. (Seth laughs) You know, like, I think let's be humble. And I think this is a good approach is, let's go to the gospel stories that become problematic. And we don't have answers we have more questions. So a good one is, who is talking to Jesus when he's being tempted in the wilderness? Are these ideas are these global ideas of domination and glory that die want to divert him from the cross and he tells his disciple, the temptations he had faced. And he said, those temptations, that impulse to bypass the cross-and the way of the cross-in order to attain my kingdom, that's the satan. That doesn't mean that the guy in the red suit came. It could be ideas that are presented, Michael Hardin says, maybe we could even call it Jesus potential shadow side. That is, when Christ becomes human, he actually assumes human flesh, fallen human flesh, in order to overcome it. So in the incarnation of Christ, the potential for him to disobey his father presents itself. The temptation for him to abandon the way of the cross presents itself. And he overcomes that and eradicates it. So that'd be one possibility.

So that's an issue. The pigs are an issue. And other issues like what's the deal with him calling Peter Satan? And then is this same Satan, the Prince of the World, that Jesus says, he drove out on Good Friday? Now the Prince of this World is driven out. What’s that mean? Driven out of where…the world? So then what are we worried about now? And yet, you've got Peter in his Epistles saying, well, “Satan's prowling around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour.”

So on the one hand, you have two different theologies there. John is saying that the cross drove out the Prince of this World, Peter’s saying he's still prowling around. Are they even talking about the same thing? So what I'm trying to do right now is I am problematizing our harmonizing of all these passages into one into one division, they just don't harmonize so easily.

Seth Price 35:06

So on my list of people that I want to talk to one of these days is Michael Heiser, because of his work that he's done on like the divine Council. I remember the first time I read that I was like…what, just all of that doesn't make any sense! But where does a concept of Satan fit into a divine council? Or would it be fair to say that, in that culture and in that context, it's in the divine council, or no?

Brad 35:29

Yeah, you know, I think that's all coming just from the story of Job and it's a story. And, you know, would we say literally, that the “Fallen Angel, Satan”, who apparently walks in and out of the presence of God sits on the Council of God gets a challenge God like that and make bets with Him? And it's like, no! If we literalize that I think we're in back into silly territory. But the function of the Satan in that story is to say, Where does the accuser show up?

Well, in the mythology he shows up in the presence of God to accuse Job (but) in actuality he shows up in the friends who begin to accuse him. And in his wife, and in Job, who begin to accuse God Himself.

Yeah, the thing is, I'm not averse to mythology. I think it delivers truth in ways that just always speaking in concrete terms cannot do. However, the problem is they didn't literalize this stuff back, then we did it! You know, we became literalistic, in modern times. So it's a modernist problem of reading these stories so literally.

I don't even believe Dante thought literally. Dante is not the problem. He's writing a poem to apply cosmic imagery to real world politics. And then we come along, hundreds of years later, and literalize it and then blame Dante, right‽ And so Dante would probably go like, “What the hell are you doing with my poem! Have you completely missed the point!”

As would the author of Job right. And so I think about that, and I think myth can help us. So myth, if we understand what myth is about, myth tells us how things came to be. The myth of Genesis One is not about a science lesson it is the truth of how the world came to be. It came to be through a loving God who creates a place for us to live.

How does evil come to be? Well, Paul, reflects on Genesis 2&3, Paul's reflection is that it's through one man that sin entered the world, not through the serpent, and not through the woman. So that's interesting. And so it's about how sin came to be how death came to be, and all of these things. And so we just have to learn how to read these according to the Spirit rather than the letter. And fundamentalism got hung up on the letter, just like the Pharisees.

Seth Price 38:12

I want to ask two questions, one of which is just way out of left field. And if it's not a good question, you tell me and I'll pivot to something else. But before I get there, now, I'll just ask that question. So what is it when we have someone worshipping Satan? So if Satan is something that is like an accusatory spirit, something that I'm able to manifest, you know, a bad part of a part of me, that's me that I need to learn how to claim and you know, surrender, give to God, you know, get healing with. What is it when people are literally setting up churches that worship Satan? Like, what are they worshiping? And how does that relate to the Satan of the Bible, or those two entirely separate things?

Brad 38:52

Yeah, I mean, it's entirely separate things.

My friend Ken the satanist, who became Ken the Christian Satanist, who then found Satan to be redundant. He said, you need to understand that at least the Satan worship he was into had nothing to do with the Satan of evangelical Biblicism. For them, Satanism was about the autonomy of the self, basically saying, I am God. And in that sense, very Biblical. What is the Satan doing in the story of the fall?Iit is Adam asserting autonomy, so that he can be godlike, without reference to surrender to the living God. I am God in that model. And that's what modern Satanism generally purports to be. And basically says, we reject this idea of surrendering to God, because I am God. And so it's an assertion of absolute autonomy. Now you might have dabblers who are playing around making up their own little thing and you know, but that's not authentic Satanism today.

Seth Price 40:02

The correlation to Satan, Beelzebub, whatever word you want to use, and hell, or Gehenna, or Hades, or Sheol, or whatever we want to give it, do those two belong together the way that many fundamentalists have put them together? Where one is in control of that, because, and the reason I ask is my view of hell, I'm certain is heretical. And maybe it's not. Like, I think that hell is something that I'm actively creating, when I choose to volitiously make actions that break shalom. And that I'm generating hell. Yeah, that's what I think. Not that I'm going somewhere, but that I'm creating something that you and I are both experiencing, and it's hellish.

Or I could do the opposite, which would be the Kingdom of Heaven. And with the way that I view Hell, I really struggle to figure out how Satan has anything to do with that outside of my action. So I'm curious, Biblically, what does Satan, or any of those other words you want to put on Satan or demonic influence have to do with hell?

Brad 41:03

Yeah, well, even within the Bible, the word Gehenna that we typically translate into “Hell” is not used uniformly. So for example, perhaps so the Valley of the Sons of Hinnom was outside of Jerusalem. And so Hinnom, or Gehenna, in Jeremiah's time represented the destruction of Jerusalem by foreign armies. That's Gehenna, that's hell.

Jerusalem under siege, on fire, eating their own babies, because they're starving to death. That's hell, and they had generated it in that sense, through rebellion. And then in the intertestamental period, they begin to adopt an idea that hell is like the afterlife, and it's the fiery inferno. And that's in Judaism, but they're borrowing heavily from, let's say, from Greek mythology, the Greek mythology of Hades there. And in that sense, Hades is both the place of the dead in the underworld, but it's also the ruler of the underworld.

So in the early church they've got arguments between Hades and Beelzebub about whether it'll let Jesus into Hades. Because if he goes there, he might rescue everyone. Right? So you got that. But then you got the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus talking about Gehenna, and there it's like, hard to tell what he's talking about. It could be to do with a final judgment or something like that. But then in James, and this connects-you're using it more like James does-instead of thinking of Ghana as a future afterlife, destiny of punishment, James is talking about it as a kingdom. And he says, when slander comes out of your mouth your tongue is set on fire by the flames of Gehenna.

In other words, when I slander somebody, I am participating in the kingdom of darkness, the kingdom of Gehenna, and what Paul calls the kingdom of darkness in Colossians 1.

So that's quite different then right? So you got a whole range from Jerusalem burning, to an afterlife judgment, to the kingdom of darkness active in me today as I participate in evil. If you go with that James model, which I could also then call a Seth model.

Seth Price 43:19

I didn't know there was a James model. I feel good about this. You have no idea how. I'm gonna go back and read James.

Brad 43:26

Yeah, So you instinctively had it right. So connect James’ use of Gehenna with Colossians use of Kingdom of Darkness, and then say, Okay, if we're going to use Gehenna, or hell, as a metaphor for the kingdom of darkness, which I participate in and generate through my sin, then we can also use one of those models of Satan as Satan is the phenomenon of evil in the kingdom that I generate through my sin. I and we, because there's this corporate element to it that's huge, right? Which we might call principalities or okay, let's say nationalism as a principality is a kingdom in competition with Christ, and the way of Christ. And in that sense, nationalism then becomes an example of both The Satan and of the Kingdom of Hell. And we generate that and we participate in it. And then we are tormented and bound up by that. And Christ come to expose that to drive it out and set us free from it.

To me, then, the mythological languages into threat, you just have to know what you're kind of talking about.

Seth Price 44:37

How prescient is that as a depiction of the planet that we live on today? Yeah, yeah. Just last four sentences that you said there. Yeah, gracious.

Let me pivot a bit. So at the beginning, the word I wrote down that you said is with your book, because again, haven't read it, you said “it's dealing with a pastor and ‘his demons’”. So I want to spend a bit of time just in the next 10-15 minutes that I’ve got you. What are you getting at with that? Like, pastors and their demons? Because again, I'm 100% ignorance here, like, yeah, where are you going with it? Like what's kind of the narrative without giving the book away?

Brad 45:11

So, I can give this much away that when I say that he's dealing with his demons, and that he has to pass through hell to do so, now we're using mythological language. But in the context of the novel, which is really drawn from real life suffering of people I love, by demons. In his case, it would be (that) the demons are memories of harm that he has caused, and harm that's been done to him that is rooted into his heart as shame. And he's tried to cope with his actions, and even the ways he's been victimized. His way of coping with that is through self will, which only makes it worse, because that's actually the root of our whole problem. Self will got us into this problem in the first place. And in that sense, it is Satan as self will, you see, and so his demons are like shame, but they manifest to him in certain ways through visitations of those from his past.

And so in that sense, it's a little bit like my son, Dominic, he said that this novel, it's sort of like an F’d up version of the Christmas Carol by Dickinson. And so he's got a face, his fears, and his shame and all of that, that's what I mean by wrestling with his demons. So in the context of a novel, you can personify that a little bit, although it's not like a Dante sort of personification it's connected with people.

And so there's a heavy element to this, the idea that passing through hell means the fire of the love of God that cleanses us of those demons. The love of God feels like hell to those who must pass through it to face who they been, what they've done, what they've experienced. And the way out is through surrender and letting go and forgiveness. The question is, can this guy do it? And who will oppose it, who will help him and all of that?

Seth Price 47:07

Yeah, when you say the love of God that way and I'm gonna borrow from CS Lewis. So I've been reading the books with my daughter, my youngest daughter. And so we're reading the original one like The Magician's Nephew, I think, where the kids are still going in and out (of the world). And there's a part in there. And the way you describe the love of God really reminds me of the part where Aslan is singing creation into being. I don't know if you remember those books or not, but it's just, we just read the chapter a few nights ago. And for everyone else though they are like this is the worst song I've ever heard like nails on a chalkboard, and to all the kids, and people that are partaking in the splendor, they are like this is the best song I've ever heard! And then the result is they can hear things, they have ears to hear. And the other people that that are going through hell just don't have any ears to hear. But when I hear you describing the love of God, the fire of hell there for some reason that draws up for me.

Brad 47:52

That's exactly right. And it's sort of like, our orientation towards the love of God determines whether we experience His love his warmth, and protection and comfort or fiery torment and darkness and storm. Sort of like the difference between the Egyptians and the Israelites in the wilderness in their orientation toward the pillar of fire. It's the same pillar but they're having a different experience of it. And, yeah, and Lewis picks up on that really beautifully.

It's also the gospel itself. So Paul will say the same thing sort of as Lewis does, while Lewis is drawing from Paul I think, when he said that the gospel, to some, it's a fragrant aroma, and to others, it's the stench of death. So same idea, right? Two orientations to the same truth, but you experience it as salvation or as condemnation in our minds. When in reality this is the love of God. And I'm very hopeful that the love of God is effective in transforming even the hardest part.

Seth Price 48:55

Hmm, I want to ask you one last question. I've asked it of everyone this year, I think so if you were to try to wrap words around the divine, the concept of the Divine, and explain that to someone, what would you say?

Brad 49:07

Yeah, the way I say it. This is typically how I share the gospel, I would say if there's a God. And I say, if, not as a doubt statement but as a faith statement, because I don't prove these things in a courtroom or a laboratory. So if there is a God, that God is infinite love. And I might add today, a mercy that endures forever for my Muslim friends, the All Merciful One. And then I would say and if you want to know what that love looks like, instead of just infusing your own broken notions of love. If you want to know the reality of what that love looks like, we look at the person of Christ who embodied it perfectly. And we watch how it comes into clearest focus at the cross, where Christ reveals the divine to be self giving radically forgiving, co-suffering love. And then that comes with an invitation, we're invited to experience that, and to experience that is eternal life.

It's not heaven when you die someday, although that could be an extension of it. But right now in this life, the most broken people I know, although we're not broken, your shirt says. Those who struggle on a daily basis just to get out of bed and live another day with their demons they know eternal life when they experienced that love, and its transformative character just verifies the reality of the Divine for them.

Seth Price 50:47

For those that can't see the video that aren't subscribers on Patreon, the shirt that Brad's referencing is that you're not broken shirt that I have. So this is specifically because I don't know if you can see the rainbow or not on there. Like when people tell people that are gay that they're broken or they're unreconcilable. Yeah, that's what I mean. Like, that's, that's entirely a lie. That's entirely a lie.

Brad 51:07

I get that. Yeah!

Seth Price 51:09

Yeah, though I do have it in not in a rainbow doesn't matter. Um, so plug the places. So you have a you have like, you've had like 17 books come out this year. And that's an exaggeration. But that's what it feels like. So where do you want people to go? What do you want them to get? Click on read, listen to where would you send people to Brad?

Brad 51:25

Right now I'd send them to Amazon to pick up The Pastor: A Crisis with Paul. They can also find my other books on Amazon. But they should search Bradley Jersak not Brad necessarily. Because it didn't merge those two very well. I've written a recent book called IN: Incarnation & Inclusion, Abba & Lamb that doesn't have the traction I'd like to see considering it's, I think important work on inclusion. That says we don't need to minimize or ditch Christ in order to see that the love of God is wider, higher, longer, and deeper than we ever could grasp. So that's the two I plug right now mainly on Amazon. Or you can visit me at Bradjersak.com. Or I'm on Facebook and Instagram and Twitter, all the places as Brad Jersak, yeah.

Seth Price 52:18

Yeah. There's only Bradley on Amazon. Yeah. Perfect. Well, thanks again for sharing your Saturday afternoon with me, literally at the drop of a hat. I appreciate it so so much.

Brad 52:28

Yeah, my pleasure. It was fun.

Seth Price 52:45

Upon further listening to this, as I edited it, my heart is so warmed. When Brad kind of connected my views on hell in a way that I hadn't considered probably because of the books that I read. That I've connected James to some other parts of the gospel. And I've been digging into that. And I can't tell you how excited I am to talk to you all at a later date about that. But I would be remiss if I didn't thank the patrons of the show, for actually producing the show, this show was recorded and edited in my basement, but produced and paid for by the patrons of the show, I would love to count you among them. Whether you have edited your pledge recently, which many of you have, or if you're new to the community. Thank you so very much! It means more than you know, and continues to make this thing be a thing, consider supporting the show through the merchandise as that money again is being donated. A very special thanks to Young Oceans, for giving me permission to use your music in the show. Guys, I want to reset some contexts there. So you can follow the Spotify playlist for all of the music used in these shows. And I believe someone has actually converted that also into an apple music playlist, though I don't know how to find that. But a lot of these artists, so I don't pay for these, they are giving this because they believe their music matters. And I think hopefully they also agree that the conversations here matter, but I need you to consider supporting them. So stream their music, like they get paid small amounts for that. But maybe also track them down, anyone that's been on the show prior and engage with their music, tell some friends about it, support them, because really in these times that we're in right now, they're not doing what they normally would do. They're not touring, and all that stuff. And that really affects them. So consider supporting not only Young Oceans, but anyone that's been on the show pass if you're like man, that music that hit me that music was something.

I'll talk to you next week. I hope that you understand how amazingly beloved you are. Be blessed.