43 - Fat and Faithful with Nicole Morgan / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Nicole 0:00

I say that our bodies have inherent value one because from the very beginning the Scriptures tell us that it's created in the image of God. And so the Christian faith teaches that, you know, we have our one God and God made humans and God shows up on the earth through the people of God. So, if we're supposed to be representing God, and our actual bodies are made in God's image, then our bodies have something to offer in all of the unique ways that they exist in this world. And so I think we miss out on being able to see part of that image of God. We just treat our bodies like this hassle that we have to deal with while we're working on purifying our soul.

Seth Intro 1:19

Hello family. Welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. You guys blow me away each month. I'm continually surprised by the growth of the show the emails that come in. And honestly, it's mind blowing, and it's humbling. And so I thank each and every one of you for downloading the show. And if you haven't yet, share it with your friends. tell people about it. Pick an episode that you love and just have someone else listen to it. I appreciate it.

Today I spoke with Nicole Morgan who's a fellow podcaster and an author. She had a book that came out in August, called Fat and Faithful in that we deal or she deals with topics of body image and the way that culture treats humanity, if they don't think they fit into the mold that we have created for people to fit into. That somehow we're not good enough. We're not enough. We don't measure up if we don't hit some arbitrarily inflated version of beauty, and that's awful. I'm so thankful for this book, and I would encourage each and every one of you to go get it. Nicole has really hit on something here that speaks to me as I see my oldest begin to deal with his weight. And I hear him say things and it breaks my heart. And sometimes I say things and I try to catch myself and that's awful, but it's honest. And that's true. I can't wait for y'all to hear it. Here we go. Nicole Morgan

Seth 3:20

Nicole Morgan, thank you so much for being here on the Can I Say This At Church podcast, I have to think that you've done quite a few of these with your book launch. Thanks for making the time to come on tonight.

Nicole 3:27

Absolutely. Thanks so much for inviting me. I'm looking forward to it.

Seth 3:30

I normally start with a little bit about you. But I'm also curious because I also know that you run another podcast or at least, I think you do. And so I'd like you to talk about both of those kind of a little bit about you for those listening and kind of what you do on the side besides the book.

Nicole 3:44

Um, yeah, so my name is Nicole Morgan, and I am a Christian fat acceptance advocate. As you just mentioned, my book just came out August 1, 2018. It's called Fat and Faithful Learning to Love our Bodies, Our Neighbors and Ourselves. So the work that I do in Christian fat acceptance is advocating on behalf of people who are fat or plus size or overweight or whatever term people use to call themselves about, that their bodies are made in the image of God, and that they, as people, as Christians, as people of faith, still have all of the same worth and dignity and value and ability to participate in the life of the church and to serve God fully and to love their neighbors, just as they are and to kind of fight the body shame that happens both in culture but also in our church.

So that's that what I do here in Atlanta, Georgia and work on that. And then as you mentioned, I also host a podcast by the same name I co host that with a woman named Amanda Martinez Beck, who is a size dignity activist and she works also with within the Christian faith specifically from a Catholic background and She has a book coming out later this year as well. So it's a great year for body diversity books and faith.

And so that podcast we talk about just various issues that come up with bodies, and culture and faith and the politics and what that looks like to both accept ourselves in practical ways, and how do we take that understanding of ourselves as made in the image of God and transfer that view to everyone around us, both neighbors and enemies to use that church terminology. And how does that make us be a better church, when we can love ourselves and and love our neighbors as ourselves?

Seth 5:38

I think the church would be so much better if we could learn to do that not just around body image around around all the things, everything that you argue about on Facebook, or Twitter or Snapchat or some other social media that I'm not aware of that the kids don't, quote, unquote, participate in. So you alluded to it. So there's another book coming out from a friend of yours, co host with but so why now? As I scan Amazon, which, oddly enough, I'm sure you're aware of, there's only a handful of your books left in stock as of as of right now. So that's, that's, that's did

Nicole 6:11

Oh! I did not realize that!

Seth 6:12

17 or 16, or something like that. So that's, that's a great thing. Yeah, you're doing it. So why now? Because as you as I scan, TV, as I scan social media, there seems to be a big movement for this not just in the church. So why do you think it is now? The conversation about acceptance of the body and what you were created in is more than fine? Then you are what you are? Why, why now?

Nicole 6:43

Yeah, I think in many ways, it's funny. You mentioned social media because I think in many ways social media has been a part of fat people and other marginalized people having a voice that is heard. The fat acceptance movement in the secular Like American modern world started in the 70s. But in the secular mainstream world that's really become a prominent topic in our media, like loving your body and accepting yourself has been a much more talked about topic even than like 15 years ago, which is when I first heard about it. And I think a large part of that is Twitter or Facebook, people are allowed to present themselves as they want to be presented both in voice and picture.

All the selfies you see on Instagram all the time. Sometimes they get a bad rap but it's powerful to be able to present your image the world in the way that you see yourself, or just the reality of yourself. So often depictions of fat people in movies or tv or even like pictures that go with news articles are very dehumanizing often, if you'll notice if you're reading a news article about what you know I'm air quotes here obesity epidemic or anything related to fatness there's this phenomenon we call the “headless fatty”. And it's always like the person never has a face. It's just like their fat body, very dehumanizing. But social media has allowed fat people to present their selfies and their pictures of themselves during their life. And just to amplify that, and I think that's why we're finally kind of ready to hear it because we've come to know people who are fat and heard their stories.

Seth 8:24

So as I was reading your book, so I read it one and a half times I read it one time, and then I wanted to go back to a few chapters, specifically, and and I, and I want to end on one portion as we get later to our time, but you talk in your book about bodies being inherently valuable. And normally when I talk about inherent value, at least for a good portion of my year, I've looked at other religions as having truth and value. I've looked at other ethnicities is having truth and value but if I'm honest I don't usually look at bodies as having any inherent value. But you talk quite well to that. So why are our bodies that are not I want I don't want to sound crass. There's a part of me that thinks, well, this is going to die anyway, this isn't really me. And if it's throwaway if I get to have it for just a handful of years and an infinite eternity of being, why is it valuable?

Nicole 9:25

Yeah, and that whole like it is gonna die anyways, thing I hear.

Seth 9:30

I don't say that is as “Alright, so now I'm gonna go shoot up some heroin and do whatever. I don't want it in that way.”

Nicole 9:37

It just have less value than your eternal soul or whatever. Yeah, yeah. And I think that's a pretty common belief going back into the history of Christianity. I say that value bodies have inherent value one because from the very beginning, like the Scriptures tell us that it's created in the image of God. And so the Christian faith teaches that we have our one God and God made humans and God shows up on the earth through the people of God.

So, if we're supposed to be representing God, and our actual bodies are made in God's image, then these our bodies have something to offer in all of the unique ways that they exist in this world. And so I think we miss out on being able to see part of that image of God, when we just treat our bodies like these, this hassle that we have to deal with while we're working on purifying our soul.

And like I talked about in the book that like when I started to try to find the image of God in my body, the thing that sticks out that is most obvious and apparent to me and my body is just warmth and softness and comfort. And so I have like nieces and nephews and like they in particular, like just love to cuddle and they find me comforting And so they love to just snuggle in. And that's not the entirety of who God is but that's a part of who God is. And my body shows that in a unique way that thin bodies don't. That's not a bad thing, thin body show other parts of God. But we have to be able to see everyone, and to see that image of God and everyone and our bodies are a big part of that. And then that just continues when Jesus shows up, Jesus chooses the human body to show up on earth and experiences, the pain and the joy of the human body, he feast, and he cries, and he's crucified and all of that, and that suffering and that joy and that life is a part of how we can relate to Jesus.

I'm a big believer that a Christian faith is about modeling the life and work of Jesus Christ and following that Christocentric as they call it, a very Christocentric faith and so, just knowing that Jesus existed and he body just connects me to that so much more when I think about how my body exists in the world and feels pain and joy and feasting, and all those things.

Seth 12:11

Do you think that the way that we treat and I'm going to borrow I think it's a title of chapter one of your title of Adele, gosh, I can't talk I'm going to edit all that out. I'm going to borrow the title of one of the chapters in your book, I believe it's called thinness is next to godliness. And I could be wrong. But I studied art in college quite a bit. And it doesn't seem like until now until around now, quote unquote, air quotes now that we cared about thinness as much as we do or about carnality as much as we do. As you look back, you know it old sculptures and old beautiful masterpieces in old paintings. There was no issue with any form of plump there was no issue with fat, not there. may have been an issue for the people that live there. I didn't live there. But there may have been. So why do you think it's now that our culture our country specifically has made I guess what I would call an idol out of being, thin?

Nicole 13:13

Yeah, I think a lot of it has to do. I mean, there's always a larger socio political thing going on. And so, it used to be that the people who had the access to the most resources who are most wealthy, that they were on the larger side, just because of what could they can afford, they didn't do as much physical labor as others. And so your size was a signifier of your wealth and your status. And that is almost completely opposite, and are in America, at least in order to access you know, personal trainers or gym memberships or explore the juice cleanse or grapes? Yes. Or grapes or all your organic, whatever GMO produce that I don't even know like that requires access to wealth and privilege and time and resources.

And so a slim body is a marker of status in our society now and so our human desire to look like we have it all together hasn't changed but the way that we have it all together and what that means about our lived life is definitely evolved over the course of human history, but it's still about trying to be better than your neighbors in the way that your body looks or like somehow having achieved some greater status.

Seth 14:41

Well, I will say I have three small children and well and my wife and myself but when we try to eat healthfully if that's a word I feel like that is a word health will say it's a word. Sure. It's it is now I'm gonna Yeah, well, it'll make it happen. If I want to buy you know boxes of Oreos or boxes of anything that are pre made pre packaged, you know lean cuisines or Lunchables or any of that garbage. It is extremely cheaper or entirely entirely cheaper to just buy something packed full of sodium or something you know already pre made in a you know in a vacuum seal somewhere.

But if I want to buy say, a pound of grapes, it's more than two or three gallons of gasoline. It boggles my mind how if we want to even try to force them to eat vegetables. There is a cost even buying them to get them to stub their noses at it.

Nicole 15:39

Right and then on top of all of that, if you go to a fast food restaurant and buy a combo meal, your meal is hot and ready. You're going to eat the whole thing you don't need to store leftovers. If you go to the grocery store and buy all the ingredients to make a hamburger and you know bake some fries in the oven. You need to time to cook it, where's the store it you need access to the appliances to make it and that's not always accessible to everyone, especially the time to do that. So the people who work multiple jobs and all of that so the levels of privilege involved in what we call healthy eating is many and layered.

Seth 16:22

Yeah, the um, I saw an article not long ago about that called food deserts is what they call it, where I guess they survey how close you are to something that isn't fast food, like your accessibility within walking distance. And the town of the country that was in what we call a food desert is awful. And I also don't find it coincidentally, I find it odd that it's always socio-economically depressed populations of our cities that are in those quote unquote food deserts. It's not the suburbs. It's it's the densely populated. I'm curious and this is this not a fair question. Why? Why would you ever teach English I read that in your book and I stopped and I paused. I feel like I Why would anyone…

Nicole 17:15

I don't know. I enjoyed teaching with like working with this begins but it was really just the default thing that I did after high school like I was like, I'll go to college get a teaching degree. I like English and then you know, you graduate college and you get a job. And you teach and I taught for three years.

Seth 17:38

Do you miss it?

Nicole 17:40

I miss working with like teenagers and students. I don't miss teaching. I just Yeah, I was. I was a good teacher.

Seth 17:48

I read that. So tomorrow for a time of recording is back to school for my kids. And so I was reading that I was like, you could not pay me enough money to substitute teach. You couldn't pay…Don't want…I have No, no reason to ever want to do that I would rather stand in traffic with a sign.

Nicole 18:07

Oh, the kids are great. It's just

Seth 18:09

Don't lie to me.

Nicole 18:10

It’s the politics and all the craziness that gets ya.

Seth 18:14

In your book, you have a chapter on Gnosticism, which I feel like we’ll have to unpack what that is to begin with. But I had never really given much thought of the concepts of Gnosticism and how that relates to our bodies, how we respect our bodies, how we treat our bodies. Can you unpack that a bit? And I guess we should probably start with what Gnosticism is?

Nicole 18:38

Yeah, so Gnosticism is, depending on who you ask, either a heresy of the Christian faith or an entirely different faiths all together. And it one of its primary I can't think of the word tenants or beliefs is this idea like that the soul is the important part and your body is what has to be conquered. This is like dualism like soul and body are two different things. And so Gnosticism really devalues the body at the saying that it needs to be conquered or tamed or discipline in order to elevate the soul so that it can be pure and holy, and you can achieve your oneness with God. And so that's a very brief focused definition on body image, specifically, but you'll see people mention it a lot these days. Like once you hear that's one of those words you hear all the time. But that's what they're talking about this idea that like, your soul is this holy thing that is separate from the rest of you.

Seth 19:42

What sounds kind of similar to what I alluded to in the beginning, and I don't know that I would call myself a Gnostic Christian.

Nicole 19:49

Yeah, I think my belief is that like these gnostic thoughts are very much kind of, there's these little strands of them that I'm sure information treated like modern day American Christianity, and that you kind of have to like pay attention to pick them out. Otherwise, they're just there. And maybe they don't make too big of an impact on you. They're just kind of there and you kind of accept them as true without really thinking about them much.

But yeah, so Gnosticism dualism, this idea that bodies are bad souls are good. And they're these two opposing forces, is what I say is an incorrect belief and not a thing that God desires for us to treat our bodies like

Seth 20:32

So how does that relate them to the way that we view our bodies today in the church and in the way that we, you know, we teach our children.

Nicole 20:45

So, in the church growing up I heard a lot was like every week, but frequently enough that it was common for me to hear like you'd hear sermons about the verses where you like run the good race and discipline and all of that, and the illustration was always, you know, look, you exercise and watch what you eat that you can, you know, be thin or not look good that our pastors would say I don't want to be a fat lazy preacher. And so it was this idea that your body was somehow working against you and your faith, and that your body was some kind of symbol of how strong your faith was. And if your body didn't line up with what we had decided was good, then you didn't have enough faith and that your body was winning over your soul, or over your fruit of your spirit is what was usually sad in in my context.

And so, we don't say, wasn't body and soul so much that God said when in the church experience I had, but it was faith and flesh and that flesh was this thing you had to conquer, and then included the literal size of your body and that if you trusted God and had self discipline, then you could honor your temple which is another biblical keyword and look thin.

And that's because our culture has taught us that there's this one, or at least a very narrow range of what a healthy body looks like, or an acceptable body. And I think in culture at large, we see this Gnosticism idea. I think that's the root of things like anorexia. This is not a thing that I have struggled with personally. And so like, should definitely hear about that from people who live that experience. But from the reading I've done, I hear frequently, that they're, often the motivation is you just want to be last you want to make your body less because that's the thing that can somehow free up some other parts of your brain or psyche or internal being. And so this whole idea of like literally carving away your body, through restriction and discipline, in order that some other element of who you are can be elevated and so that's a very like kind of gnostic idea of our bodies and our souls are our our internal being who we are.

Seth 23:12

The temple texts that you're talking about. I always heard, that was always preached to me, and it may be preached differently to a woman than a man I'm coming as I get older I'm realizing that youth pastors in specific the same versus used in a different way with a different intent depending on your gender, which is insulting..

Nicole 23:38

(Sarcasm) There’s not a boys and girls section of the Bible‽

Seth 23:39

No well, it's in the Apocrypha from what I hear. So when I heard honoring the temple it was it was more sexual based. It wasn't more you know, you here honoring the temple and that's why we don't have sex before marriage and we honor the temple and that's why we don't do drugs. That's why we don't do tattoos. That's why you don't. You know, that's why you don't treat people poorly because you're honoring the temple. It was never, never told to me in a way that was that was food related.

Nicole 24:13

Yeah, I think I mean, I heard all those other things as well. And this could have just been like my own perception that highlighted the part about, you know, your body needs to be healthy and 10 and everything. Right, that was definitely part of the teaching. And then if you look at the there's two, two different verses that talk about like the temple or the body of, of God, and I always forget which reference is where, but when the context does have to do with like this idea of sexual morality and what that means sexual ethics. And another one is talking about the actual church like the church as a whole, our whole everyone together like as a collective group of people, not individual people.

Which to me is a totally different thing like so why am I talk like to focus on individual purity or righteousness or whatever word you're going to use when you're actually supposed to be talking about how everything impacts around you and that community as a whole, and our ability to do the mission of God to love, love others and love our neighbors and love enemies. That's a totally different conversation. And I think we lose out on so much. And we've so focused on individual instead of the community.

Seth 25:36

So, there's a portion of me and my son's at that age now he just turned nine. And you can see him and if I'm honest, sometimes it's my fault, say, but we can't eat that we need to eat an apple, just because I know he just spent the weekend at Grandma's and all they ate was donuts. And I know this because that's grandma's and so how do we as a church and then and then How do you think we as parents can better? I don't want to stigmatize my son where he's afraid of food. If he's like me when he gets older, he'll go screw you, dad. I'm doing. I'm eating the donuts. You can't stop me. I'm almost a full grown man. Yeah, totally. Yeah. Well, you know what I mean? He's fairly tall. He is. But how do we do it better than what we've been doing? How do we not abuse those scriptures? How do we not abuse emotional influence?

Nicole 26:33

Yeah, I think there's a few different ways to focus on one is just and how you talk about or notice other bodies. One thing with kids is that they notice of their bodies and they will comment. And so as they comment, or, or notice, especially other fat bodies, like just being able to say, Yeah, like, make it very neutral. That's their body. God made them and that their body is okay. And whatever age appropriate way to address that with kids, oftentimes, like kids will say stuff directly to me and almost every other fat person I know we don't care when kids say stuff to us, we know it's just like natural curiosity and they have questions. And those of us who are like in the fat acceptance movement are happy to just kind of do that nonchalant Yeah, I am fat answer and just be positive about it, which is really, I think, for kids really impactful.

In terms of like food specifically, I always advise whether it's food or like exercise or anything else, like the goal is to do it in a weight neutral way. And so it makes complete sense to help them learn how to eat intuitively. And by that I mean connecting, like the food they eat with how they feel later. So, hey, you had all of those snacks at Grandma's like you are super, super, like, hyper at night and had a hard time falling asleep. And just like connecting all those dots for them, or, hey, we're gonna go, you know, whatever your activity is for that afternoon, they might need some energy for these kinds of foods give you energy usually. So let's eat this and see how you feel later. And just modeling what that looks like to pay attention to the nutrients that are in their food and what that does, and that can also be worried a birthday party. We're gonna celebrate any cake. It tastes good. Isn't it fun to eat this thing that tastes good while we're celebrating? And yeah, I think it's just really important to not give food moral value. Some people will call it like, “always food and sometimes food” which I'm kind of ambivalent about.

Seth 28:48

What does that even mean?

Nicole 28:50

Always food would be like, you can always have vegetables or you know, like the things that we call in the sometimes food is like sometimes we have k Sometimes we have ice cream. Yeah. And like that's a better option than a lot of things sometimes I'm like I don't know that I don't have kids so

Seth 29:07

yeah, well for me my always food would be we eat at home because it's overall cheaper for me to feed all of you in the crock pot. And the sometimes food is anything that is not within these four walls, because I can’t afford you.

Seth 29:52

That brings me to this point. So you speak on Health at Every Size and and I know that That's possible and, but I don't. I can understand here's this is a little more personal than I normally get on any episode. So my father currently has cancer. He's actually checked in today to do an experimental treatment in Houston. For his, his uh, this is our last shot. Let's see what happens kind of thing, which is a fantastic place to be in. I hope the sarcasm is coming through there for everybody listening. That's how I deal. That's how I deal with stress. Yeah, Houston, we had problem.

Um, so he's six foot four, and at the time a few years ago was over 400 pounds. He wasn't always that way. I have no idea why he got as big as he was, but I honestly didn't care. But when he started to get sick, he would go to the doctor and doctor would look at him spend 15 minutes with him and send him on his way. We're going to need to regulate your diet.

Few months goes later. He's still sick. A few months goes later. He's still sick. Years passed by still sick until eventually on a Black Friday, he ends up having to go to the emergency room with jaundice apparently he has had an extremely slow growing cancer that no one ever thought to look for. Because all they see is a tall, extremely big man. Of course, that's why you have diabetes, if you would just stop lying about sticking to your diet, it would go away, you could be better! When really his pancreas has been shredded over the course of years, because people only see his body.

So Ah, that makes me so mad. So how, how do we differentiate or how do we learn to see people as a health base as opposed to a? Here's how much clothing you have on your skin or here's how much skin you have on your bones?

Nicole 31:50

Yeah, so there's so many levels to that and I'm so sorry about your dad. That story is far too common that people being just like diagnosed as fat and sent away from the doctor and never having actual medical care provided to them. So on one level trying to break down the answer here.

So on one level, there's actual medical professionals. Studies have shown that if medical professionals receive even just like the slightest bit of weight bias training, while they're in school, that the way that they treat fat patients is better, that they are less likely to view fat patients is like non compliant and stupid and all of that, which is a thing that happens frequently even in the medical profession was there's just those biases against fat people from medical professionals. So that's one part of it is educating them on fat bias and what that means.

And then another part is just letting fat people know what their rights are at the doctor's office. So many things it's scary to go because so many of us like your dad show up. And we have real problems and we know something is wrong and all they keep saying is lose weight and they won't do anything else. And so you just stopped going. And so many fat people will just not do annual checkups. And they will ignore their health, because they know it's pointless to show up or they fear that it's pointless to show up. So giving that people tools to walk into the doctor's office and say, I know that I need this size of blood pressure cuff, and here's my complaints. And if you told me to lose weight, I'm going to keep pressuring you. I'm going to look for another doctor and just empowering people to make to advocate for themselves on that level is important. A woman named Reagan has a great resource for that but I have links on my blog and everything.

Seth 33:57

I will find that and I will post it. So what does help Look like then for someone that's quote unquote, overweight, you know, based on that nice little chart that also says I'm overweight. Yeah, which is fine. I'm fine with that. Why not?

Nicole 34:12

Yeah, I should have clarified earlier Health at Every Size doesn't mean that everyone will be healthy always it means that everyone no matter their size can make steps towards health if that's what they desire to do. And so I there's a study out, it's fairly old now, but it was lots of data, lots of people and they show there's four contributing factors that if you did these four things, your likelihood of getting you know, this host of diseases or dying early was low, and the four things were like, Don't smoke, no excessive use of alcohol, eat lots of fruits and veggies and like, do 30 minutes of exercise three times a week.

And so kind of like those four things. I'm like, if you want, if that's someone's goal is to work towards a healthy lifestyle. I'm like, aim for those for first, like, because there's some studies out that show no matter your size, those four things, make vast improvements. And then I think also for fat people in particular, health is really about showing up for your annual checkups and like taking that step and that courage to show up at a doctor's office and find one that's going to listen to you. And that's a lot of work for fat people to find a doctor that will listen and not dismiss them. But once people are ready for that step, that's a very brave step for many people and what I very much encourage.

Seth 35:40

So there's a difference between being fat and being gluttonous. And you talk about this quite a bit your book and the reason I bring this up is I have friends that can eat an entire Papa John's pizza, and I would call that gluttony. And then I have other friends that eat barely anything, and it doesn't really seem to affect their weight and I don't mean that to say that you can't obviously over eat at a consistent level and gain weight. That's easy enough to do because calories are just math. But what is the difference between fatness and gluttony?

Nicole 36:13

Yeah, the amount people eat some fact every single body different ways. That's never a good indicator size in terms of gluttony. So fatness is just your body size, what you look like or how much fat is on your body. gluttony is about consumption. And I argue that gluttony is consumption at the expense of others, especially the marginalized people. So if you look at our modern context, and we look at the food that we consume, one thing that I think about a lot is quinoa, which was like this huge craze, and I think everyone still eats it, and I still eat it on occasion. But I read an article probably four or five years ago now, that was talking about how The communities who had been growing and eating and harvesting quinoa for generations as a staple in their diet, their economy was suddenly devastated by the US quinoa demand.

We all wanted it as the next health food, easy protein. And it just hurt these people who had been eating it forever. And it was communities that had less financial resources. And so to me, consuming quinoa without at least thinking about that or considering it or monitoring like how much you eat of it—that's gluttony. Like when you don't even care about how your food choices affect other people. And there's Biblical examples of that one, the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, which people are normally familiar with and associated with other things, but in a Ezekiel there's a verse that says that the sin of Sodom was that they were overfed and unconcerned for the poor. And if you go back and you look at the story of Sodom and Gomorrah, in Genesis, you just see this pattern where they didn't care about the people around them. They trying to remember the story, I always get the order mixed up, but there's the visitors to the town and the townspeople demand that they come out so that they can use them sexually, and then lot offers up his daughters instead.

Seth 38:29

Father of the year.

Nicole 38:30

Right? Yeah, like this general disregard for anyone else's humanity, everyone else who wants something, consume whatever they want, no matter the cost to other people. And so that is gluttony, not being fat, because God tells us to feast feast or all over the Bible, so feasting can't be gluttony, in and of itself, I think has to be about motivation and how it impacts people around us just much harder to figure out than just saying no to do the whole Paba John's pizza.

Seth 39:02

Yeah, well, and I guess gluttony can then be, can be any. It doesn't have to be food. You can be gluttonous in anything, I guess. Yeah,

Nicole 39:11

yeah, we're certainly all guilty of it at any point during the day and the way that we live in America, like it's fairly impossible to escape with just our standard life.

Seth 39:22

So, I grew up in the early 90s, where every youth pastor that I know, said, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and my smokin hot wife, and you would hear that everywhere you go. And then I went to Liberty and met many women that were on their what we call the “Mrs. degree”, and that was a word they told me, I have to hope that you're familiar with that…

Nicole 39:47

Oh yeah! Ring by spring, all that. Yeah. Yeah.

Seth 39:50

We used to have a secondary part of that or if you failed, there was a new stanza and I can't remember what it is anymore. But you so there's a chapter your new book for is called fat girls and righteous boxes. And as you break that down, but from a point of view that I've never considered, I can't help but think how many times I was told that and that I then, especially early on in my college career echoed the same thing.

Like if I'm approaching a woman because I think she's quote unquote, beautiful, it's probably her fault. And I can remember one time a specific Professor saying, ladies, I don't want you to jump into your pants from the top bunk, that's too tight. This is a seminary. We are here to study Scripture, stop it, and that was at Liberty. And so I kept hearing all of that echo around in my head as I read that chapter and that is one of the ones that I read multiple times. As I lived in the beginning, just because I've never heard the point. I've never heard the damage that that attitude towards anybody, but it's Specifically female bodies can do, which is extremely sexist.

Nicole 41:07

Yeah, there is this huge movement. It's called parody culture a lot when it gets talked about these days when people critiquing it that as girls we were often taught that we weren't supposed to focus on our outward beauty. Because that was not the important thing that we are supposed to be so close to God and so righteous that like our inward beauty would shine out and then men we're supposed to see our inward beauty and not our outward beauty and then that's how you you know, you ever hear the old joke like run towards God and then if someone's already next to you, that's the one? That was repeated phrase, you run, you run your ride, and then someone ends up running next to you And anyway, that's the thing. So, but for me, so like this whole beauty thing was very confusing one to be told not to look work on your beauty but also to focus on your beauty. But one was outward and one was inward. And we never really talked about how that actually looked any different.

But as a fat teenager sitting there listening to all of this, I really did like I believed them. And so kind of I tuned out all of the warnings about like needing to not focus on my outward beauty because I'm like, well, that's easy, done check, like, no one's like finding me beautiful, which was, you know, my teenage thoughts. And so it really left me vulnerable to people who would, who could see that I didn't have that self confidence and wanted to manipulate that and abuse that and ended I ended up in a really bad relationship in college, partially due, I think to that. And then at the same time, I was just extremely like confused. The relationship that I got into in college like I was convinced that Oh, it worked. Finally, finally, someone saw my inner beauty and clearly this is the one God sent along, because he saw it when I had this like, really like shell that only that no one would want except the person who saw the inner beauty.

And so yeah, for me, in particular, that was kind of how that whole message got twisted up in my head. And I know for many other people just don't focus on your looks, but do focus on your beauty. And it's really confusing and I'm sure, I don't know like you as a male if you ever got told to look for inner beauty instead of outer beauty or what you thought that meant…

Seth 43:54

No, and that's why I read that chapter. So many times. Like what I was told was, if, if for some reason I screw up and I do it wrong, it's pretty much her fault. Because she should have done it better, she should have guarded her body better. To put it poorly. She should have dressed like an Amish or Mennonite way. This is totally her fault. You can't help yourself. This is the way that we were made. And, and you what you need to find this is someone that will help you control yourself is is now that may just be my upbringing. And then I compounded it by going to an extremely conservative school. But that I mean,

Nicole 44:42

Yeah that sounds familiar as well, like I remember when I was in college, our pastor did an entire series on sex and he he definitely said that it was a woman's job to stop it before I got too far because men lacked the ability to have that kind of self control. So Yeah,

Seth 45:00

Yeah. Which which from the male side gives me permission to not have any self control.

Nicole 45:05

Yeah, push it as far as she'll let you go cuz she's supposed to be the one to…

Seth 45:09

Yeah, yeah women are not supposed to be inherent sexual or purity police officers. So at least so part of what broke a lot of this open for me is is having daughters, I, I really struggled like like my daughter is very I'ma say beautiful, but I'm biased because she's my daughter, but she wanted a bikini for her birthday. And we bought her one because she's six, whatever. But I can't stand it. There's still a portion of me that's like someone is going to look at her in a way that's inappropriate. And I'm sure they're not; she's six. But there's still something very deep in me pounded in there that wants her to cover herself—like it's her job to do so. And then there's the other part of me that's like no, she can wear a bikini.

Nicole 46:00

Yeah, it's hard and part of that is teaching her that she is in control of her body and that she's not responsible for anyone else's actions.

Seth 46:11

I want to end with this is so if we can as a church as a culture as spouses as brothers and sisters and nieces and uncles and whatever if we can move past weight, and height, and sex and gender, and orientation of other you know, human beings, what, biblically, do you think beauty should look like?

Nicole 46:38

I mean, I don't know if there's like a one answer to that. I use Song of Solomon and my book, which is like, the metaphors are, you know, swans and yolks and all of that. But I mean, I think I think beauty Gosh, I've never been asked this before. Um, I know I'm okay with everyone having different ideas of what, like beauty or attractiveness like looks like physically. I'm not one of those people who needs to say that every single person is physically beautiful because I don't think that's the most important thing about us. And saying, like, inner beauty gets super, super confusing, as I've talked about. But I guess if I'm speaking like, figuratively, in our beauty, it's like, you know, you see the image of God and people and how do you honor that in everybody? So if you want to honor the beauty and someone to see and to name, where you see the image of God in them and to honor that, yeah, so answer the question.

Seth 47:48

Where can people engage with you? I know I like your pictures on Instagram. Often I enjoy your pictures. They're different. I'm tired of seeing dogs and whatnot. So I Enjoy, enjoy. It isn't everything doesn't need to be a sunset. So, the book is on Amazon. The book is at Fortress Press. But how can people engage with you?

Nicole 48:11

Yeah, so Instagram and Twitter I am J Nicole Morgan, Nikolas and also my website JNicoleMorgan.com where I blog and post stuff. The podcast that I co host with Amanda Martinez back is fat and faithful as well you can find on iTunes or wherever you get your podcasts, which we should be starting our third season of that soon. And yes, you can look there's a Facebook group called all bodies are good bodies, which is a I think it's a closed group, whichever one you can find, but then the membership is closed. But you can search for that if you want to join which is a lot of different people talking about bodies and faith and all of this how it intersects but I am active there as well.

Seth 48:57

If for some reason you feel led to dig in more or you feel Feel convicted or you feel like you want to try to put yourself in a mind place to do this better, at least for today so that you can try again tomorrow. I've asked Nicole to lead the prayer that she has at the end of her book and so situate yourself somewhere pull over if you're driving. I think it's fantastic. So Nicole, whenever you're ready,

Nicole 49:20

Creator God, I acknowledge that my body is made in your image. I am enough, and not too much. I seek and hope that I will find life abundant in the body. I am habit at this moment. I confess that I have believed the lie that a thin body is a better body and that you God will prefer us then at any cost. I praise you for the way our bodies take up space in a variety of ways. I commit today to be mindful of the ways the bodies I see around me reflect your image. I give thanks for a God who gives us purpose and meaning no matter the size or ability of our body. I pray for ears to hear the lies about our worth and a voice to speak truth into the world. May my life and witness make enough space for all together at the table. Amen

Seth 50:15

Beautiful. Thank you again Nicole so much.

Nicole 50:17

Absolutely. Thank you.

Seth Outro 51:03

That’s a big topic. Body image shame and what true beauty is, I genuinely pray that we can begin to overcome this version of hit the small view of humanity, that somehow we think we're not good enough. Because we are, we always have been and we always will be good enough and we were made whole. And there's nothing to be ashamed of the way that we were made, regardless of what that looks like.

Thank you so much to the supporters of the show on Patreon. If you haven't yet do that, that continues to help the show be sustaining to be a show. And next year, I would love to take some of my vacation time or personal days into a live version of the show. I would love to meet some of you all that has a small cost to it for space and travel. I would love to meet guests where they are and do live Q and A's and have you all involved in it. I think that would be fantastic for you to ask your own questions directly to the guest and I would floor me So consider that.

Remember to rate the show, share it on iTunes and everywhere else that you listen to it a very big special thank you to the music of the many that was used in this show. And so a little bit about them. They are an uncommon and intentionally diverse collective making music for people to sing together about peace and justice in a world where we all belong. Go to the mini are here calm. There are so many resources and just beautiful, intentional music about different topics. I promise you if you do it like I did, you will be lost in music for hours to comment it is entirely worth it. But please do that support the musicians that lend their music to this show.

I can't wait to talk with you next week.

42 - Genesis, Creation, and the Lost World of Scripture with Dr. John Walton / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Dr. Walton Intro 0:00

What I'm doing is asking the story, what part of the story of creation does the Bible want to tell? Because you can do it different ways. And one of the examples that I use, I didn't use it in Lost World of Genesis. I hadn't thought of it yet. But one of the examples I use is that when we talk about the place we live in, we could talk about its origins as a house or we could talk about it origins as our home. Both of them are origin stories. Both of them have some significance. Certainly you can't have the home without the house. And you wouldn't want to have just a house that wasn't the home. So they're both origin stories, but you can choose to tell one story or the other.

In our scientific world, we always want to tell the house story of the cosmos, how God made the material stuff. That to us is what origins and creation are. I think suggested in the ancient world, they always want to tell the “Home Story”, because they consider that much more important that deals with God's purposes and what God's up to. In that sense in the ancient world, their creation account, a “Home Story” is all about God's agency and God's purposes. Whereas in our modern world, the house story is all about the material stuff. It's about the mechanisms and the scientific processes. They can both be true, but they're different kinds of stories. And the Bible doesn't have to tell the whole story just because we like it better.

Seth 1:50

Oh, man, welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast! I'm Seth, you are you and I am excited that you're here today. Thank you for taking the time to download or listen or stream the show. Before we get started, hit pause for me real quick. And wherever you downloaded this show, just please leave the show rating of each and every one of you left one. I can't tell you how grateful I would be for the 47 seconds that that took. And that will help more people hear the conversations that we're having here on the podcast. Today I spoke with Dr. John Walton, who is an author, professor and an Old Testament scholar currently residing at Wheaton College. He specializes in the Ancient Near East (ANE) and you'll hear us call that in the conversation as he specifically in the Old Testament and Genesis, and Joshua and the Canaanites and he is a scholar on many things that we were not able to discuss, but he's written a series of books called The Lost World and each of them deals with a different topic. So, John was not on my radar of people to talk to. And now one of the listeners had sent it in as a recommendation and said, “Hey, you should really talk with john and the more that I researched John”, I can say that I'm glad that I did. And I look forward to hopefully talking with him again.

So a little bit of what you can expect. We're going to talk quite a bit about Genesis, and creation, and canon and how the Bible at least the Hebrew Scriptures are interpreted and how they were put together and why that matters for when we read them now. And you'll also hear me really struggling with…with Genesis. I didn't realize until I listened to back to the episode in editing that I am really still not at a healthy place with Genesis and I'm gonna have to do some more wrestling with that. And that's okay. But I hope you enjoy it. I know I enjoyed having the conversation. Here we go. Dr. John Walton

Seth 4:09

John, thank you so much for being able to join the show today. I appreciate your willingness to come on. And I'm excited to talk about the Old Testament, primarily for two reasons. One, I feel like most churches spend entirely too much time in the New Testament. And as such to our detriment, many of us don't know anything outside of those placating answers that we were taught in Sunday School growing up. And I may not be right on that. But that's what at least where I come from, I think. And so I appreciate you making the time to come on today.

Dr. Walton 4:37

Glad to be here. Happy to talk about the Old Testament.

Seth 4:40

Let's start with that. What's a bit about you? And the question I always like to ask is, kind of what was your upbringing in the church or if there was one and what brought you to doing the work that you do today? And then and then we'll dive off from there because the books that you've written surrounding the you know, the title of the Lost World, I feel like we could talk about for many, many, many hours, which we don't have. And so hopefully this will be the beginning of many conversations. But um, what is kind of that foundational upbringing that has impacted the way that you are now in the way that you teach, and in what you believe?

Dr. Walton 5:13

Well, I was raised in the church in a very religious family. So Bible and theology, we're very much a part of our home part of our church experience. I was raised in it, I was taught it early and project thoroughly. And so I have a very deep roots in the Bible and in theology. I always loved the Old Testament. It's hard to figure out why that was my preference. I tend to think that when I was growing up, lots of what we did with the Bible involved in some part trivia, and the Old Testament as a whole lot more trivia, and I learned the trivia well, and so as a result, I felt like I really knew the Old Testament. Well. First, we all know that the Old Testament is far more than the trivia People in places and dates, but that was my start. Of course, that's you have to start somewhere. And so I developed a love for the Old Testament. But I never saw that as a career track. I just couldn't think of anything, you know, being a pastor, a missionary isn't a career track for an Old Testament interest. So I majored in business in college, and just never thought about the Old Testament as a way to move on into life. But somewhere near the end of my college career, it suddenly occurred to me that, number one, I wasn't really that much interested in business. And number two, there's such a thing as teaching the Old Testament, which was an interesting possibility. And so at that point, that's the direction that I went.

Seth 6:45

Yeah and you're at Wheaton now? Correct?

Dr. Walton 6:49

Correct.

Seth 6:50

And so I went to liberty. So where is Wheaton that on the scale of, I guess, looking at something like who do we always pick on, Bob Jones, to someone I guess that's on the other spectrum, what a Fuller or something that kind of that. So whereas we can kind of in that in that spectrum?

Dr. Walton 7:06

Well, certainly we're not in the category of Bob Jones, and really not even the same category as Liberty. For instance, I suspect is much more traditional, although I'm, you know, some professors are different than other professors. Unlike a place like Fuller, we do have inerrancy in our statement of faith. And so we all signed to belief in inerrancy. So, we don't have particularly denominational aspects to our statement of faith, as many schools do. We are broadly interdenominational. And so it's on the spectrum probably closer to Fuller than it is to Bob Jones.

Seth 7:50

That's good. Yeah, I hear the name and you'll see it on the back of you know, book jackets or other things and I just, just not extremely familiar with it as a as a University. So what do you find is what drew you to wanting to teach the Old Testament? What about it besides trivia, speaks to you in a way that you're like, no, this is this is what I am called to do. This is what I was designed to do is to teach this to people. What is that?

Dr. Walton 8:19

Well, I came to recognize as you started off the show with the idea that lots of churches don't give much attention to the Old Testament. And I came to believe that that was their loss, that there's so much in the Old Testament that we need to understand better, that it's God's word. It's God's revelation. It's authoritative, how can we neglect it? It has things that we need to learn. Our Christian faith certainly has a lot of focus on Jesus, but it's not really only about Jesus. There's a trinity out there.

We've got the Father and God, the Holy Spirit, and that, you know, our attention needs to focus on all of that. When God spoke to the Israelites, even though Jesus had not yet come, he was giving authoritative revelation to them. And therefore it is worth our time and effort to read it. But I felt like lots of people were misunderstanding it because they were unable to read it in its own context. And unable to think about the the contribution that it made to theology outside of just what Jesus is as important as Jesus is.

Seth 9:31

What do you mean in its own context? And I assume, by that when i when i read some of your writing and what you'll say, you know, on Biologos, or other places, you'll say an abbreviation of ANE, which I assume means Ancient Near East, I assume that's right.

Dr. Walton 9:47

Yeah.

Seth 9:48

And so how does…how, what, do you mean when you say context?

Dr. Walton 9:52

Well, the Bible is written in a language. It's not everybody's language. It was the language of the Israelites. And when you write in a language, you also are writing within a context. The Ancient World context is a lot different than ours. I call it the Cultural River. You know, we've got things like: democracy and freedom and rights and market economy and the expanding universe and naturalism, individualism, consumerism, social network, those are all part of our cultural river. Ancient Israel had none of those, and they wouldn't understand those. And so God communicates to them in their cultural river. And their cultural river is made up of a lot of things that we don't understand. The significance of idols. The idea that the gods, or God, are involved in every aspect of what happens in this world. The importance of kingship and the relationship of the king to the gods. The importance of magic.

Some parts of our world today have much more understanding of that that we have in our Western culture. But still those are elements that are unfamiliar to us. And we have to read the Bible in light of them, because that was the reality for an Israelite.

Seth 11:17

If I think about context. And so when I hear you say that, what I can hear is, you know, 500 years from now, someone can go back and look at public posts on Facebook or Twitter or blog posts, things that have been printed out or stored on a hard drive somewhere. And we don't have that for the Old Testament.

Dr. Walton 11:36

That's right.

Seth 11:37

How can we then know that what we're reading is contextually accurate? Like what, where do we even start foundationally like someone like myself that does not have a huge library of knowledge or the infrastructure to even know what what interstate I need to get on to get there how do I begin that?

Dr. Walton 11:56

Well, of course, the only reason why we have all of this access to the ancient world is because of the texts that have been found in archaeological excavation. That means that this information is for the most part less than 100 years old. But it's those texts which give us a window to the ancient world so that we can understand beyond the Bible how people tended to think in the ancient world.

Now still, while Christian saying in the church might feel like well, I'm not going to go read texts from the Syria or Babylon or Egypt. I have no access to that. How would I get to that? Well, fortunately, those of us who do study those areas have begun to publish tools that people in the church can use.

So for example, most recently, I was the general editor for the Old Testament for the cultural background study Bible. And all the study notes are background notes. They talk about history or archaeology or geography or Ancient manners and customs, ancient literature, and just basically the way people thought in the ancient world. And so, in that way, we're able to make that information accessible. Just like theologians make theology accessible even though the people who read it might not be theologians.

Seth 13:19

Yeah. You know, I agree and, and I wonder if that's maybe why churches lean more towards the New Testament? Because there's there seems to be more works for you know, Rome, and all the things that are surrounding that time period. Maybe there's not, maybe I'm ignorant of that. But I wonder if that's not why they do that just because it's easier to get source material to cross reference and further examples, as opposed to just quoting the Bible to prove the Bible.

Dr. Walton 13:43

Not only is it easier to get those source materials, but also the Greco Roman culture is closer to our own Western culture than the ancient Near East is; there still, of course, very important differences, but it's closer so it feels a little more familiar.

Seth 13:57

So I'm curious. So in in preparing for this. And one of the questions that I'm that I would love your perspective on is how the Old Testament is, is come together. And so there, from what I can tell, there's like three, I believe there's three hypotheses or theories for how the Torah came together. And so you got the documentary, the supplementary, and another one that I can't remember…Which one do you hold and why?

Dr. Walton 14:28

It's probably some very complicated combination of many of those things. The fact is, we don't know much about how it's come together. We put together models that either have supplementation or kind of a gathering together of sources or all of these things, and probably some things in the history of the compilation of the text touched on lots of those different ways of thinking. But again, we only have models, it's very difficult to delve tell from the documents we have in from the history that we know how those models came into play in the actual compilation of Scripture. So all we can do with the models is to say, here's some things that are possibilities. And that may lead us to be more cautious about some of the traditional ways we might think like, the writers of Scripture went into a quasi-trance while the Holy Spirit dictated to them.

You know, that's a model too, but it's one that is less and less accepted. But then so, how did it happen? And again, lots that we don't know we know that the chronicler used sources because he tells us he did. We know that the culture was typically a hearing dominant culture, not a text dominant culture. So in a hearing dominant culture, what you hear has more authority than what you read. And of course, lots of people could not read, or could not read well, and therefore documents were not made widely available for them to read, because that wasn't how society worked. I've written about these things in a book that I did with Brent Sandy called The Lost World of Scripture, which explores some of the the models and the possibilities.

Seth 16:25 Yeah, that's not one that I've read. I believe that I'm gonna it's gonna get order today. I have fallen in love with your last World books very much. So because you bring up a lot of things that I question all the time in a way that I can understand as someone that does not have a degree in theology. When we talk about Genesis, or when you write about Genesis, I want to make a distinction because it's something I had not really given much thought about until I read what you wrote about it. So you kind of propose that there is no material creation and that there’s some form of a cosmic, I'm going to say this wrong. Can you speak a bit? Which when you mean in for Genesis one into the I don't want to say it wrong (laughter from John) and not correctly? The material creation versus the cosmic temple?

Dr. Walton 17:14

Yeah, thank you for that (my reluctance to say it incorrectly). What I propose is that in the ancient world when they thought about God, or the gods, creating they thought of something very different than what we think. We're in a scientific world and therefore we think about creation or origins, we tend to think automatically in scientific terms. I proposed that in the ancient world when I try to demonstrate both in the Bible and outside the Bible that in the ancient world, they thought of creation primarily in terms of ordering.

Certainly, they believe that the gods made the physical cosmos, but that's just not a very big issue to them. The fact that he orders it, sustains it, maintains it, makes it work, set it up to work the way you wanted it to. Those are all much more important things. And that comes out in terms of like naming and separating which both the Bible and other Ancient Near Eastern texts have. Those are all matters of ordering. It doesn't mean that God didn't create the material world. Basically, what I'm doing is asking the story, what part of the story of creation does the Bible want to tell? Because you can do it different ways. And one of the examples that I use, I didn't use it in Lost World of Genesis one. I hadn't thought of it yet. But one of the examples I use is that when we talk about the place we live in, we could talk about its origins as a house, or we could talk about it origins as our home.

Both of them are origin stories. Both of them have some significance. Certainly you can't have the home without the house and you wouldn’t want to have just a house that wasn't a home. So they're both origin stories, but you can choose to tell one story or the other. In our scientific world, we always want to tell the house story of the cosmos, how God made the material stuff. That to us is what origins and creation are.

I suggest that in the ancient world, they always want to tell the Home Story, because they consider that much more important; that deals with God's purposes, and what God's up to. In that sense in the ancient world, their creation account, a Home Story is all about God's agency and God's purposes. Whereas in our modern world, the house story is all about the material stuff. It's about the mechanisms and the scientific processes. They can both be true, but they're different kinds of stories. And the Bible doesn't have to tell the whole story just because we like it better.

Seth 20:00

In a different interview, and I can’t remember which one I think it was one with Alexander Shaia, he had said when I asked him a similar question, he's trained in anthropology and he was talking about the Gospels. But he had said that, that when they tried to write about truth or speak truth in you know, in the ancient Judaism, in ancient Israel culture, they weren't speaking in a truth or a history the way that you and I would read an accounting of one of the Korean wars or the election that they were trying to speak a truth to get you to realize the intent and the emotion behind it, not a quote unquote, factual accounting. And I'm probably saying that wrong, is that kind of where you're getting at with that, that it's not about…

Dr. Walton 20:43

It's the same kind of thing. We have to define our terms carefully. They were much more interested, for instance, in outcomes than in the events themselves, and they constructed their interpretation of events to highlight the outcomes. That doesn't mean that they're false or made up or fictional. It's just a way of trying to get at the truth of what's taking place.

Seth 21:11

When I read Genesis, am I reading it as six literal 24 hour days, which in there's a portion of my mind that knows that the Greco Roman Gregorian calendar didn't exist when the Genesis was written? And so who knows what a day was? But am I supposed to read it in a literal six days seven day rest? Is Adam an actual person? Or is it all myth? Like? How do I then ride that line of knowing what to read with what I need to feel and what to read? And how to read with what I need to act upon?

Dr. Walton 21:44

You can't read a text any more literally, than to read it precisely how the author intended it to be read, what he expected his audience to understand. So I'm always on the quest to be a faithful interpreter by being accountable to what the author intended. If the author intended something as a metaphor, we better read it as a metaphor. If he intended to do the parable, we'd better read as a parable. That's what literal reading is. It's our accountability to the author's intention. So when I read Genesis 1, I want to get a sense of what the author intended that involves the words that he chose the literary structures that he set up and the cultural context in which he's in.

Now to the specific questions you ask, do I believe that the author is intending us to think of six literal days? Seven literal days? Yes, I do. And I think that the evidence is pretty clear that that's what the author intends for us. What's less clear is what is he suggesting took place in those 7-24 hour days. Is he thinking that the house was built in the 24 hour 6-24 hour days, or that the home was being made, that's a big difference.

Okay, so when we think about our houses being built its foundation, its framing its roof. It's the, you know, interior walls, it's the furnace, the air conditioning, the plumbing, the electricity, that's the house being built. But then the home being made, is when you come in with your boxes and unpack and set up the furniture, you could understand that you might be able to make your home in seven days, but they're not going to build your house in seven days.

So they're both origin stories, which story is the text telling. I think that they are intending us to read them as literal days, 24 hour days, but the literal reading would be that this is a Home Story, and therefore that's a different set of things that happens In those days, if it's a Home Story and not a health story, then those seven days say nothing whatsoever about the age of the Earth, because age of the Earth is a health story question.

Seth 24:13

So I recently read Ask the Beasts Darwin and the God of Love from Elizabeth Johnson and and she was saying that that creation and evolution can coexist and that the two don't necessarily believing in one doesn't break the other for any for many reasons. And so, so the house story then of evolution, does it not, or the theory of evolution? I'd hate to say that that's a fact. don't hear me say that. I don't think anybody can prove that it is or isn't. Where does where does science then where does that tension begin to nuance in the center? How can someone listening to this that is, you know, an atheist or someone that's listening to this that doesn't believe in six literal days because it just logically can't work in their brain. Can't evolution Or do you think evolution can be true or the premise of it and still hold those six days being that I guess when you say the literal is the house? Are you saying that that it's the temple that it's the people that are being created in those six literal days? Or am I way off?

Dr. Walton 25:23

Okay, that was too many questions at once. So when we think about the, the literal reading of the text, if that's accountable to the author, and if the author did not intend a house story, then the house story is not the literal reading. The house story is a scientific reading from today. It's not a literal reading if the author intended otherwise (and) if I am right that the author intended to Home Story, then that really says nothing much about the house story. And since evolutionism is a proposal for a house story the Bible not talking about the house story, then the two can't really come into conflict.

Okay, if the home story is true, then I propose that the Home Story is that God is ordering this world to be sacred space. By sacred space I mean, it's the place where he tends to dwell among his people. He intends to be with us. He intends to be in relationship with us. He intends to dwell among us. That is his purpose and that is why he sets up this home. It's a home that functions for us because he doesn't have any needs but it's a home which he intends to share with us. That's all Home Story. And I believe that's a literal reading of the text because that's what I believe the author intends.

Seth 27:46

When would you say then that the creation story in Genesis was written? During Babylonian exile or during a different time altogether?

Dr. Walton 27:56

I really have no idea since the text doesn't tell us, we have no information on that. If I mean, to me, it is likely something that maybe didn't find its final form until late in Israelite history. But that's the writing part writing comes at the end, not at the beginning, because they're hearing dominant culture.

So these traditions, these stories, these accounts, these narratives could have been circulating and accumulating all through the period of the Old Testament. Maybe they weren't put together in the writing form that we know that till later on in the process, but that doesn't mean that they were just kind of invented that are made up then they represent the accumulated traditions of the Israelites whenever they were written. Maybe they were written early, maybe not.

I don't know.

Seth 28:51

Yeah. So am I wrong then in saying that Genesis 1 and I want and the reason I want to clarify is because of the next question. I'm is a creation story of the of the, of the temple, cosmically of the purpose for Israel, correct? Or am I getting it wrong?

Dr. Walton 29:10

The purpose is that it's God dwelling among his people. Israel is not the only one, that thinks god's dwell among the people. So that's not limited to a purely Israelite type of view. Although again, the Israelites framed that a little bit differently than others. But this is a book written by Israelites to Israelites.

Seth 29:32

If I think about its purposes is to tell me about God coming to dwell among me, how then and I would have to infer that the people writing the text would be some form of a of a priestly. Someone with the knowledge base to do so. I can't see, you know, someone like myself writing a book of the Bible. I don't, I can't do that.

And so if when I think about a flood narrative and just a destruction of everything that was created chapters prior, how can the question arises? To me, and maybe it's a bad question is when I read up this total destruction of a temple that I created, but I, here's the reason I'm creating it, I can't seem to reconcile the two.

So what is the purpose then for you know, Genesis 7 when we think about you know, the purpose of Genesis one and two in correlation there?

Dr. Walton 30:21

When Genesis 1 conveys its message that God has brought order to the cosmos that his creation. He has brought order to the cosmos and that order has to do with him dwelling there that is he's preparing it to be a place for his dwelling, because he is the center and source of order. And so when he takes up his dwelling place there, resting, in this world his rest is his rule. And so he is maintaining order, yet people choose their own way of ordering the world around themselves. That's Genesis 3, and it doesn't go well. That's Genesis 4-7.

So at that point already people have lost access to God's presence, though what he's doing with regard to the cosmos in terms of this dwelling place, we don't know. It's not going to be reestablished until the tabernacle in Exodus 40. But at that point, people are kind of pursuing order their own way and that doesn't work so well and so we end up with the flood. The flood returns, creation, the terrestrial cosmos, to a non-ordered state, just like Genesis 1-2 all water and then God recreates. This is a recapitulation of ordering, if we understand creation as ordering, this is a recapitulation of creation.

And so God reestablishes order in the cosmo, the dry land emerges, people come forth from the ark. In this case, animals come forth. The Blessing is reiterated all of this. Now we talked about this in the last World of the flood, all this is lined out there and that just came out last month. So in that way, this is a recapitulation of creation. But there is still some disruptions of order as we read in the Tower of Babel narrative. And that leads to God pursuing order through the covenant, which launches us then into Genesis 12.

Seth 32:39

You said something earlier of “gods” and I want to make sure wasn't a slip of the tongue. So and I've read a bit about this and other places, and I'm at an nanscent level of knowledge about it. And so I assume when you say that there's gods and some form of court of heavenly host and who creates what and who gets to be worshipped is it was there a time That the Israelites worshiped more than one God but just elevated, quote unquote, Yahweh to a different level, or is it always just been one?

Dr. Walton 33:09

Oh the Bible tells us that they worship other gods in Egypt. The Bible tells us that Abraham's family came from a polytheistic family. During the Judges period that was one of the recurring problems over and over. They worshiped other gods. So they weren't supposed to, at least in the Judges, period, once you get the covenant, it's the covenant which lays out the idea that you are in relationship with me, I am suser, you are vassal, you do not have loyalty to anyone else. And so it's the covenant that frames that more exclusive relationship and of course that happens with Abraham. But again, we know that the Israelites continued to worship other gods much to their loss. So I mentioned other gods because I was also talking about the literature of people like the Babylonians, the Egyptians, and they saw their gods doing the same thing that Israel saw their God doing. So that's why I kind of expanded that to both.

Seth 34:14

When I think about a creation story with the intent of putting things into order, that in my mind presupposes those things. were already there. So I just showed up at this building side of the house. And how did this stuff get there or is that a question worth asking?

Dr. Walton 34:37

Well, there's no question that the Biblical authors Old and New Testament believe that even the material stuff, the house, was something that God did. But still, there's which question are you asking which question are you answering? You know, when I have students over at my place for dinner, they might ask us about our place and they don't want me to describe the electricity in the plumbing. They want me to talk about how we made it our home. And so I don't talk about the electricity, the plumbing there is electricity and plumbing. But I don't talk about it. Because that's just not the question on the table.

And so there's no question in the ancient world that God, or the gods again, whether it's Israel of the others, were the ones who if I could say it this way, “manufactured the material cosmos”, but they're not interested in that. It's just like, you know, we rarely when we pull out our laptops or our iPads, we rarely ask questions about the you know, who wired the motherboard or, you know, what kind of materials-chemistry-polymers are in the casing. We don't care. We know it's there. And if somebody asks, you say, “Well, yeah, I know that”, but that's not the thing. We're interested in apps and operating systems and things of that sort. How do I use it? So again, it's a matter of what questions you're asking.

Seth 36:01

Right, and, I apologize to keep going back to that. But I think that is one of my biggest struggles personally. And it's something that I see most often spoken back to me or preached on, or the and that's the questions that I most often get from younger kids, including my own. And so there's a part of my brain that I can't shut off with that but I do want to try to switch gears.

So how do I…how should we deal with with with God as as a supreme, divine, kind of warrior? And I think of that in terms of just the violence that's involved in Passover, and in texts like Joshua 5, how do I sit with that? Because I struggle to reconcile that with with with Jesus?

Dr. Walton 36:50

As well, you should I mean, people struggle with that all the time. Again, another of the last road books is Lost World of the Israelite conquest. My son and I wrote that together and tackled that topic, at least on the conquest issue. Lots of the other places in Scripture, where God is seen as bringing about death. That's considered a justifiable act of judgment that the people brought on themselves.

And so you find that now you look at the Passover, you say, wait a minute, those are just kids. So what, what did they bring on themselves? And again, then you have to recognize this is operating within an ancient world context where they thought differently about identity. They thought differently about, you know, corporate identity, and the solidarity of a family, and that they all kind of operate together. So, again, you've got a different worldview there.

But when you look at things like Sodom and Gomorrah, or the Amalekites with Saul, those are places where its judgment, even the destruction of Jerusalem, where many of the Israelites were killed by the Babylonian invaders, yet this is God's judgment and punishment on them. You know, we can't remove from God's profile that he's carries out justice and that that sometimes means punishment. Now, my son and I tried to build the case that that is not the same with the Israelite conquest.

We suggest that the reasons that people think the Canaanites are being punished, cannot be substantiated in the text, and that there's a different sort of thing going on there. So, not every situation falls into that category. But still, you know, Jesus dries out the money changers. Jesus is us very strong words about the destruction of his of the destruction of body and soul. I mean, Jesus is a pretty strong words of judgment and how seriously we should take judgment.

Seth 39:09

Thinking about, you know, all of the Bible, when people speak about the issues that are plaguing this century, you know, justice and reconciliation and slavery and apathy, and sex trafficking—everyone tends to quote the New Testament at excess, which is fine, it's fine. How can we infer text from the Old Testament though into the issues that are dealing with us for this century, this one now, not ancient Israel?

Dr. Walton 39:37

Well, it's really difficult because the Old Testament is framed and addressed toward ancient Israel. I have a book coming out early next year called Lost World of the Torah. And we talked about this very issue because people in the church are very willing to grab a verse from the from the Torah from Exodus or Leviticus because it says what they want to say. But they tend to neglect all the other verses in those books and they end up being very selective. And we can't do that we have to use a consistent method. And so the question of, do any of those things from the Old Testament carry any kind of weight for us, and if so, watching, how do you get at it?

And that's what that book is trying to work on, to try to have a consistent hermeneutic. The fact is, all of the Torah is within the framework of the Israelite covenant. Israelite covenant was made with them, not with everybody. And while we might suspect that it contains some morally important ideas, how do you figure out what's morally important and what's not? If you only use the criteria of what I already believe; well, that is not the Bible that's establishing that.

So the idea that the Bible, the Torah, is situated is in an ancient context, in a covenant relationship, and in the context of Israel living in sacred space, God dwelling in their midst, all of those make it very different from what we have today. So it requires a much more complicated process. And again, that's why we tried to write a book to clarify.

Seth 41:20

I want to end with this final question which which may be broken into two parts, because that seems to be my thing today. Being that you get students coming to you, and they've got a certain level of knowledge base. And I have to think there are some commonalities as they approach you, or they wouldn't be, you know, going to study courses in Old Testament. So what would be something that you would say, “All right, I'm going to get all of the pastors that have taught these kids growing up, you have got to let this go. This is not helpful for teaching people about theology or about the God that we worship!”

What would be that thing that you would say no stop teaching this this is horribly, horribly unethical? Is there anything that would fall into that category that would then make it easier to not have to break down a bunch of foundations to then rebuild?

Dr. Walton 42:16

There are kind of loads of things in that category! You know, in general, we've already talked about the idea that we don't read our modern cultural context back into the text. That is we don't treat the text for instance, as a science text, that's teaching science.

But I think the one that I would emphasize most is that, this happens from little kids all the way up into our our church context, when people read Old Testament narrative, they tend to treat it as if it's number one, a compilation of role models that we are supposed to follow. Be a leader like Nehemiah, be bold like Daniel or that it's behavioral objective that we should follow. Abraham let Lot choose first. So are you letting other people choose first? And we use them those ways. And that's all we ever do with them.

And I would want to help Sunday school teachers, and parents, and pastors, and youth pastors understand, that's not what we're supposed to be doing with Old Testament narrative. Now, I wrote about that in a book called The Bible Story Handbook, where we talked about exactly what we do with Bible stories. And is there a way to do it wrong?

Yes there is!

What is the way to do we actually get God's message, instead of kind of making things up that we shouldn't be doing. So I think that's, that's what shows up day after day after day, week after week, year after year in curriculum and in sermons that use the Old Testament.

Seth 43:53

And I asked that for a very specific reason. So I do have young kids that asked me questions constantly and I do teach Sunday school to middle schoolers. And so I, one of my biggest fears is they'll ask me a question that I don't know how to answer. And I'm realizing that not answering and just telling them, I don't know, is a fine answer.

But I can't, I can't leave it at that. And I also don't want to, I don't know, I'm not a pastor, like, I'm not trained for this. I don't want to…I don't want to break something that doesn't need to be broken. And I don't want to build up something that should have never been there. So for those listening, I have bounced around and if you haven't noticed many of John's books. So John, where would you direct people to engage in a knowledge of Ancient Near East culture so they can better read, you know, the Scriptures and then how would they engage with you?

Dr. Walton 44:49

Well, engaging with with me, they can just Google my name on YouTube. And you'll find all kinds of things that I've talked about. My books are all on Amazon, you know, they're about 30 of them by now. And they can go into Amazon and find lots of those, if they want to engage in the Ancient Near East. I already mentioned the cultural background study Bible, which is available in NIV translation and KJV version, and is in preparation for the NRSV version; so of variety of translations. So that's where they could get some of that if you didn't want to get a study Bible, the IVP Bible Backgrounds Bommentary, the Old Testament one I did with a couple friends and the New Testament, Craig Keener did, so they could get into it on that as well.

Seth 45:42

If I learned anything doing this show and in the lead up to the show, it's that learning about the culture and who was Paul was writing to and who Nehemiah was listening…everybody matters and we can't read it in a vacuum. And I can't stress enough that as I've gone through this, I humbly have learned to admit how very little I know about anything, which is frightening, to say the least, but truthful.

Dr. Walton 46:11

We're all learning. We're all on the learning curve. And we just try to get as much as we can.

Seth 46:18

Well, John, thank you so much for today. I enjoyed it, even though I know my questions were scatterbrained.

Dr. Walton 46:24

You're quite welcome. Glad to do it.

Seth Outro 46:47

So there we have it. History, context, scripture, Empire, idolatry, everything that we still yell and argue about today. Everything that matters About the Bible is present in the Old Testament and is worth engaging in, in a way that is hard and healthy. I know for me, I'm gonna have to do some more wrestling with some of these texts.

I'm not at a place that I can adequately answer. Even the questions that I'm asking, or the next question that comes after. It's fine to be in a place for that, that I think is healthy to be in a place that you're still searching for truth. And I know that the truth is there. And I know that with consistent prayer and study and willingness to press into hard spaces, I'll arrive at a place that I am comfortable with and that I believe in. And that is beautiful. And that is holy. And I hope the same for you.

If you haven't yet, as you heard in previous episodes, I've got big plans for the show, and we need your support on Patreon for that to happen. You will find links to that at www.CanIsaythisatchurch.com top right of the website.

Today's music was provided by The Silver Pages again, thank you for that to support their music. You can find everything for that at silver pages com. I look forward to talking to you. I look forward to your feedback on the show and I will speak with you next week.

41 - Falling Towards our Soul Child with Barrett Owen / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Barrett 0:00

Your soul child is your essence. That essence is the part of you that is incorruptible, the part of you that's made in the divine image of God. It makes me think of so many different Scripture passages. So we're in the middle of a Psalm series right now, so I can't help but think of the Psalm 42. It's a very interesting Psalm that says, as the dear pants for streams of water so my soul pants for you, O Lord.

The Psalm speak to this nature, that we all have a soul that connects to God in a spiritual way that either the physical world can't, or our mind can't. Jesus talks about this as the greatest commandment to love the Lord your God with all your heart and your soul and your mind and your strength. What we were doing in this Vacation Bible School is singling out the idea that you're so is embedded deep within you. It is at the core level of every single person from all across the globe.

Seth Intro 1:15

Welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I'm Seth, your host. I am excited that you're here. I'm so thankful that you decided to download and listen to the episode. Before we get started, please email me your thoughts on any of the episodes that you've ever heard. And if this is your first one, welcome to the show. I really do want your feedback. That email address is CanISayThisAtchurch@gmail.com. Please remember to rate and review the show on iTunes. on Apple podcasts on Google Play. Spotify, SoundCloud wherever you happen to be listening, please rate and review the show. It really does help tremendous thank you to the support of our patrons. The blessed few of you that continue to drive the engine of this show. If you were listening, you felt at all mood in any of the prior episodes. I don't even know what number I'm on anymore half the time. please consider donating as little as $1 to the furthering of this show. I am appreciative.

I would extend to thank you in advance today is more personal for me than many of the episodes. I have become acquaintances and friends with many of the people that I've interviewed on the show. However, today's interview is with someone that I am a physical, personal, weekly, interactional friendship with. So I was able to speak with my own pastor from my church at First Baptist here in Waynesboro, we talked about when we're born, that there is an essence that is me. That the Seth that exists right now is not the same Seth that was birthed, and was created in this universe; and that each and every interaction that I have or anything that causes me joy or pain or anger, or grief, or strife, I begin to build a shell around myself to protect me from being hurt again the next time. That act changes who we are and part of the process of reconnecting in a very deep way with who we are called to be, is unraveling that. So Barrett Owen, and and I sat down and we discussed that a bit. I very much enjoyed this conversation. Here we go.

Seth 3:49

Barrett, my pastor, so excited to have you on the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I know you and I have discussed doing this for I don't know the better part of the year I haven't been doing the show for a year. But as long as I've been doing the show, I've been talking about trying to do this. And so I'm glad that we're finally in the middle of the year making it happen. But thank you for coming on.

Barrett 4:11

Oh, you're welcome. Seth, I love this podcast. I love the energy behind it. I love all of the conversations that you're having. So it is an honor to be here.

Seth 4:19

You want extra tithe money. I see how this is going.

Barrett 4:23

I do need that, I do.

Seth 4:25

(laughter) As I said earlier, so you're my pastor at my church, and everyone else that listens to this show has heard me reference you in a bad sentence that I tried to say that you say about unasked questions and bad answers. And that it's okay to say those. And so, for those listening, kind of tell us a bit about yourself. What would you want people to know that way they when they hear me say that again will kind of know the man behind that madness?

Barrett 4:55

Oh, sure. Well, I grew up as a preacher's kid. Who grew up as a preacher's kids, I'm a third generation Baptist pastor. And I like to think that my calling was my own, but I'm sure I had some influence of watching my granddad and father do it and my brother is also a Baptist minister.

So it runs in the family, for sure. I love the church, grew up in the church. Definitely have process and wounds that I had experienced because of the church. But I never have allowed that to be a universal pain that was always just a localized contextual angst that I have seen within either the church in the west or my own church growing up, or racism in church, different things have caused the church to be a problem. But I have always had this underlying hope that the church is still a necessary presence in the world. And so I followed that call to college and became a Christian Leadership major, started interning at Baptist churches, fell in love with it, became a minister, when I was a senior in college started preaching summer camps during the summer and fell in love with preaching. Gell in love with the stories of the gospel, fell in love with the historical critical method, I was fortunate to go to a very, a very progressive in the sense of biblical education, college that introduced me to historical critical method. Introduced me to how to think critically about paradoxical thoughts and ideas, Christian doctrine, and then also to apply a parallel spiritual road that allowed me to think about my own spirituality in the midst of this new conversation of Biblical studies and theological discourse.

That propelled me into seminary and I have never stopped loving the church. It is the best expression of the Kingdom of God on earth when healthy. And so I have found a great sense of joy to be involved in the local church and to participate in offering other people glimpses of that joy.

Seth 7:15

What is the history…what did you call it? The historical Biblical…

Barrett 7:17

The historical critical method?

Seth 7:20

What is that?

Barrett 7:23

That is taking science, reason, literary structures and literary study resources, and applying them to the Biblical text. It is a catch all title that scholars use to help frame conversations like if you're doing a social scientific study of Scripture, if you're doing a form criticism, study of Scripture or a canonical approach to studying Scripture. Each of those are different ways of approaching the Biblical text and they have since fit under this framework of a phrase that scholars use called the historical critical method, you use history and criticisms and apply it to your Biblical Studies.

Seth 8:07

And the opposite of that would be, quote unquote, what I would call it a flat reading of the Bible of this is what it says! Absolutely, six days has always meant six days.

Barrett 8:18

Right? Even though the idea of what we understand to be a day didn't start till day four. So what was the first three days? You know, those type of questions are in the Hebrew Bible, there's no, you know, definite article, so it could be read in a beginning, or what does that mean? You know, so it's a, it just sends you down these roads of questions that you use criticisms and very structured, intellectual criticisms that help you make sense of Scripture.

Seth 8:44

Yeah, I like that. Oddly enough, I hadn't planned on saying that but on the way up, I was listening to a different Hebrew scholar and talk about just on the way up, I say that on the way up, so I just came back for those listening from vacation and so on the way back while everyone was asleep, If I was, as the nerd that I am, I was listening to Hebrew theology. And and the man was talking about how Amos when they're talking about Edom, and the prophetic words to Israel as it relates to Edom, that the Hebrew texts for Adam are the same letters for Adam or Adam. And so when Paul is talking about those later in Acts, and in Galatians, and in Ephesians, he's talking about you know, you can take the words from Amos and then say that you know, what the reconciliation and the grace and the hope and all the different prophetic talking in Amos, instead of just Edom also works for Adam. And I hear that when when when you say, you know, context and cultural in the history…

Barrett 9:50

Well, you're doing the historical critical method right there. You're taking word studies you're looking at root words, comparing them to other forms of root words in other locations of Scripture and and just asking the question, “What do we do with this?”

Does it matter that it exists? That this new thing that I now know exists? And does it change the way that I read the Bible?

Seth 10:07

It does, but it usually makes it harder and prettier at the same time. So

Barrett 10:14

Oh, absolutely!

Seth 10:15

Yeah, about a year ago, last summer. So during our vacation Bible school, we did an adult version of Bible School, which I like, cuz I'd never done it before. And we talked about a lot of things in that and one of the things that we talked about was, there's a nice diagram and for those listening, I will link that in the show notes, but you probably do want to hit pause, go and at least get it printed out, hand draw it if you want. It's not a hard diagram, but basically, that there's a center line, and in that center line is me. And then I can either go to the north of that line or to the south of that line, but either way, I'm going to go one way or another. And I'm saying all that poorly. So talk to me a bit about what that means if I can fall upward. What that center line represents and kind of that idea around that.

Barrett 11:05

Full disclosure. The larger conversation we were attempting to have was we were, we were making a very theological claim, Vacation Bible School, that every human being has a soul. Which seems silly at first to say that that, of course, every everybody has a soul. But we even took it a step further and to make the theological claim that every single person in the world was born with what some scholars call a “soul child”. That you have an inner being, that is pure essence.

It is the part of you that is made from the same material as the stars. It's the part of you that God intended to be in this world. It is the full reflection of the Divine and it is in everyone. So I'll pause there and say, that's a big claim. And essentially, what we're arguing is that every human being, because of their soul, or their soul child, they are made in the image of God, the Imago Dei—they matter. They are made of divine matter, they are an extension of God's presence in the world.

As Christians, we say we are little Christ. And that plays exactly into what we're saying here that we are an extension of the Divine, or at least from birth. We were made from that same substance of the Divine. That fits really well into Adam and Eve, the story of obviously, the first two humans to walk the earth and that they were made in the image of God. That they were breathed out of the dust that God created and so we're making that claim that every single human being matters. Now, that is the line that you were talking about, the horizontal line. It represents your soul or your soul child. And if you were to live a perfect, sin free life, or at least a pain free life, you would just ride out that timeline until your death.

Your soul child is your essence. That essence is the part of you that is incorruptible, the part of you that's made in the divine image of God. It makes me think of so many different Scripture passages. So we're in the middle of a Psalm series right now, so I can't help but think of the Psalm 42. It's a very interesting Psalm that says, as the dear pants for streams of water so my soul pants for you, O Lord.

The Psalm speak to this nature, that we all have a soul that connects to God in a spiritual way that either the physical world can't, or our mind can't. Jesus talks about this as the greatest commandment to love the Lord your God with all your heart and your soul and your mind and your strength. What we were doing in this Vacation Bible School is singling out the idea that you're so is embedded deep within you. It is at the core level of every single person from all across the globe.

And so if you can develop good practices, if you can develop a spirituality of faith that gives you the tools, it is possible to return and to connect with that soul that is assuming you have disconnected from it. So that is where you are saying that you can either go above or below the line.

Seth 15:09

You said a minute ago that you could stay in the center of the line if you could somehow you know live a perfect life. Which I can't…just not gonna happen or avoid pain. Why does that matter? Why should pain play into this?

Barrett 15:26

Yeah, I your soul is…it does not wrestle. It connects with God. It is very delicate. It needs to be protected. And when you first introduce pain into your life, all of a sudden your soul becomes exposed. You feel like you need to protect it. And pain is one of those…it is…I have to figure out how to say that right it is one of the quintessential moments of our life, in which we introduce the ego. And so playing off like people like Richard Rohr, playing off people like Henry Nouwen, really integrated spiritualists, that speak through things like the enneagram. They would argue that every single person has an ego.

It is that outer shell that we build that is not made out of divine matter. It is not made from the image of God. It is made out of the self. We build it. It's not from God, it's human made, but we build it to protect into encase the fragility of our soul, because we feel like we have to. And so that ego is birthed out of pain. So, I'll give you a really quick, funny, kind of funny story, but my very first memory in the world. I am two years old, and I am apparently sleeping in a twin size bed. I don't know what my parents were thinking. But I'm already transitioned to a twin sized bed because the nature of our house and our how many kids we had sharing room with my brother who was three.

So I'm two years old. My very first memory is one of just extreme pain. I wake up in the middle of the night and cannot go back to sleep. Because I cannot forgive my parents or cannot understand why my brother gets to sleep in the soft bed and I have to sleep on a hard mattress. It is uncomfortable! And I felt wronged for that. I had memories of this I have intense memories of feeling. I'm not getting what my brothers getting and it is painful. That is the earliest memory I have.

I bet if you ask any single person, ask yourself, your wife, your kids, what their first memory is, I've done this 100 times, nine out of 10 of them will tell you a story of pain. Why? Pain is memorable. Pain, it hurts. Pain exposes our weaknesses. And so we try to cover them up. And so that's a funny story. But it gets a lot worse when you start dealing with significant traumas in your life. You start in encapsulating your soul with a very thick callous layer that Freud or anybody would call your ego.

Seth 18:42

Well, if I think back as you say that and, and I've given this a lot of thought since last summer, I have four or five first memories and they're all hurtful, not emotionally hurtful. They're all physically hurtful, like I didn't feel wronged.

Barrett 18:55

Yeah, and so I mean, so the argument here is pain introduces you to the damage that life can bring. It's is the eating of the fruit by Adam and Eve it is noticing that sin exists or that the world carries evil. It is the wrestling of death or divorce or trauma or abuse in some way. And you're left with figuring out with “Who am I, I thought I was this precious soul child that was connected to God, but apparently, pain exists and it can infiltrate my soul and it hurts”. So you cover it up, you try to protect it.

Seth 19:38

If I build a husk around my, my essence, two questions on that is, how can that not be sinful because I'm building it. And from that young of an age, I don't know that you have enough wisdom to build a good show. If you're thinking about foundationally, a two year old or four year old or a five year old just can't have the knowledge required to make something I think lasting and good? And then secondly, how can I trust that then if if I know that the five year old version of myself was probably intelligent, but not very smart, and I think that's a good, a good distinction?

Barrett 20:14

Yeah. I mean, I think that's it's great. I mean, those are those are very, those are very logical questions that a two year olds not going to ask. But ego fixation is the sin, that you become so preoccupied with making sure you protect that outer shell, that you just start investing in a false image of who you are. I mean, it's the parable of the prodigal son, you just take what's yours, you leave you form your own identity, and all he's doing out in the world is just encapsulating that soul. He's too fearful to go home. He's too fearful to be a part of what his soul child longs for to be reconnected with his dad. So he builds an ego stays fixed on it until it just all destroys. That fixation is the sin.

Ego is not a sin, ego is is the human condition. It is the natural response to being in pain. I mean, it's no different than an animal who fears pain and runs away. I mean, it just, it is a mechanism that we all apply in order to try to protect ourselves in the world. Because we think our soul needs to be or we're not trained to connect with what our essence really is. So we think we have to build an ego because the world is too scary otherwise.i

Seth 21:48

Is it necessary because I hear that and think I should do everything in my power, as a human, to protect my children from all pain. Is it now necessary that I shouldn't do that because a: disclosure I'm not gonna do that. I'm pretty, pretty terse with my kids. You've seen that. But I feel like some hearing that will hear Okay, so if pain is the problem and pain is what builds that shell that can be a bad interpretation of us. Should I not? Am I not called in to protect my dependents from that?

Barrett 22:20

Yeah, I mean, that's a really good question. I mean, you know, these metaphors to break down some points. But I think what I would say to what I hear you saying is like, not kid is I'm gonna watch him experience pain, what role do I have and to help protect him from that? And is that not also creating some sort of fail or ego around his soul child? And yeah, I mean, it is it ego is not the sin. I can't stress that enough. Like we have to live in the world, just like we have skin over our bones like there is going to be a layer that emerges that protects us or keeps confined in this world. I think we develop that at a subconscious certain level early in childhood.

I mean, any sort of adolescence studies, I mean, you're gonna, you're going to bump into this by the time kids turn seven to nine years old, they start wearing their hair the same, they start dressing alike because they finally have arrived at an emotional and mental space where they start seeing themselves as the world sees them. Previous to that, they just don't have the ability to see themselves as the world sees them. So it's not their fault that they're building an ego, but they're doing it subconsciously or unconsciously. Because pain still exists, because three year olds still know what it's like to be told. No, you can't play on my phone or you can't play Nintendo we and all of a sudden, you're the worst parent ever. Absolutely.

Seth 23:49

I'm a bully. So getting back to the charts and which paths is the good one?

Barrett 23:57

And so your question is which path should you take?

Seth 24:02

Well…which one's better? Is there one that's inherently good? Should I care?

Barrett 24:06

Yes, so for people listening it. The way that diagram is drawn is that as soon as you are traveling along your, your kind of x axis, your horizontal line, you experience a bout of pain. It's so intense that you have to develop an ego and that ego distances you from the soul child, it becomes a new horizontal line, a new alternative way of living, that protects you from that initial burst of pain. And so, you just take a like worst case scenario, that child loses a parent, either to divorce or death and creates a callus around who they are they become a different entity in the world because of this pain. And so they're left to figure out what is life look like they're never going to forget that pain, but they will move forward in life, trying to figure out, how can I protect myself from experiencing it again. So the way that that drawing is-you have two options. You go north, where you go south, the South is the path of the oppressed. And that's typically a feminine approach. And I'll explain that in a minute. Or you go north, and that's the path of the privileged. And that is typically seen as a more masculine approach. So you tell me which way you want to go?

Seth 25:39

Let's go feminine because I always talk to the male aspect being that I am one.

Barrett 25:44

Yeah. And so I mean, you see this quite a bit in women, but it definitely manifests itself in men as well. It's not a male female thing. The path oppression is that when someone experiences a jolt in life or a painful moment that is so increasingly difficult that they fixate on the ego, they move further away from their soul child, and they fixate on a new identity. And this identity could be something like the obedient wife. It could be someone who just doesn't have an opinion and chooses to live, however submissive that they need to live, to suppress all of their gut instincts and just be the obedient, dutiful wife.

What that does, is it creates a safe way of living that is not intended to be the way God wanted you to live. But it's safe, and it avoids the pain of whatever you experienced. But it is a human created way of living, it is distancing yourself from your essence. And it's really sad.

You know, I've heard Richard Rohr actually, Parker Palmer, I've read in Let Your Life Speak. He makes a quote that says

it is possible to live a life other than your own.

And that is a very depressing thought that you could live out the time you have on this earth, you could live it out, and you could live a life that was not intended for you to live. And I would argue with this image is that pain forces that on you, because you your essence gets damaged, and you become a new ego fixation, and you forget who you originally were born to be. And so you become a persona like the obedient housewife or subservient employee. Someone who just takes it on the chin every time who just always is number two, and just give up their self interest for the interest of the group to a point where it destroys their soul. That way of being is tragic. But it happens all the time.

Seth 28:17

So that sounds a lot like, hopefully what the SBC will not be any more under JD Greer. But will who knows that that sounds a lot like that. And it also sounds a lot like the way our economy is driven, that you're married to your family or to your spouse and you're a family man or family woman. But the expectation is that if your boss calls you come to work, just drop everything and you come to work. You bend the knee to the paycheck.

Barrett 28:44

Yeah, what I would say is, as your ego would say, of course you do. Yes. That's the way you have to live to sustain some level of stability or some level of pain free living. Because the goal of the ego is to not experience pain. Even if you have to build a false idol, even if you have to create a God in your own image, and hide behind that image forever and always, it least keeps you from experiencing pain. And pain is the destroyer of, of our being connected to that soul child.

Seth 29:20

If the feminine is taking on the pain, learning how to deal with it, and learning how to just put on a happy face, and just, you know, keep calm and carry on what is the masculine version of that? Or is it not necessarily a version? Is it just different altogether?

Barrett 29:34

Yeah, no, well, it's…I think I think every single person goes path of the oppressed or the path of the privilege depending on the type of pain or the context that you're in.

So let's say that you're traveling down your soul child you experience an unhealthy amount of pain to the point where you have to feel like your ego needs to fixate on it, cover it up, and you take on the form of the path of the privileged. These are your ego testicle narcissists, that instead of feeling oppressed, they feel enraged, they feel empowered, they feel that they can create a whole new system that avoids the pain that they were led into. And then they somehow convince others of it. And they are lifted up because of this ego fixation. And so there's there's a zillion examples. But does that make sense the difference between the two? it does, but

Seth 30:38

It does but…

Barrett 30:38

You’re talking about the response to the pain, you either you either fold, or you balloon and you become a narcissist.

Seth 30:49

Maybe this is maybe this is because that path speaks more to me but it seems like a person that goes that way be either male or female, can abuse that narcissism and I assume that person has to be charismatic because the other person is meak and then I can they abuse that position of power to make the other person even more subservient?

Barrett 31:08

Yeah, and their abuse takes on so many forms. I mean, you can just be verbal abuse, physical abuse and their their narcissism can can lead to very unhealthy relationships and unhealthy systems and patterns and family dynamics and it can take on different personas of alcoholism or, or sexism or men, there's just a million different, just different anxieties that can be produced because of it.

But here's where I think this kind of research that I'm talking about is so fascinating is that both paths are born out of woundedness. Narcissists at the core of who they are, are wounded because of a pain in their life that separated them from the person they were meant to be. And they are lashing out at the world forcing us to live by rules that we were never intended to live back, but so are the path of the oppressed. They also are living out of their woundedness. But instead of fighting back and creating a false sense of self, they just fold and they become a shadow of themselves.

Seth 33:00

If pain is what causes the formation of an ego, and I agree with you, I think it does. So when I say if I just I'm trying to collect my thoughts, that's, that's my ‘um’ for the evening. So when that happens, so it's been my experience and I would like to hope that some portion of my life I've begun to shed whatever bad versions of myself existed 10 years ago or 20 years ago. I find that the moment that something changes in your mind and you can't see things the way you used to that that is painful because you the basement falls out. So how then does that not want to say it right, how does that not further exacerbate the problem? I feel like when the basement falls out, I can get worse. And I'm not 100% certain that I can fall closer to center.

Barrett 33:53

Yeah, here's the, and what I think is helpful about this research in this image, is every single time you expect serious pain, you move further, either south or further north, from that x axis and you become an even smaller version of your essence. And you form a new identity. But here's the thing about ego. It's not God made it is man or human made and we intend it to be a false idol. Because we are trying to mask where are we are in this world so we can protect whatever view of ourselves we're trying to protect or woundedness that we have. But every time we experience pain, we move another click further away from that x axis. And if you experience enough pain, or enough recreating of this self and your own image, you can get so far gone that you don't even know where your essence is.

You are so gone to sin that you could never get back yourself. It makes me love the Scripture passages of Jesus who leaves the 99 and goes out and finds that one sheep and brings them back to the fold. When we are so far, fixated on our ego, we become that lost sheep, we can never return on our own. We need Jesus, we need a shepherd to come and find us and bring us back. And so it does not matter how far gone you get from your soul child. You're never too far gone for you to experience the grace of Jesus. Jesus can find you no matter how far you've gone, but you can't find you eventually you lose sight of who you really were. You become something you no one wanted you to be people who I mean, just think pedophiles or child abusers or you think of parents who gave too little too late to mid they are living out of this narcissism or this oppressiveness that is forcing them to live a life that is not their own. And it's sad. Now Jesus can save them. That's, that's the Christian claim, Jesus can come find you. But you're so far gone, you're not going to be able to redeem yourself.

Seth 36:28

I had a conversation recently via email with a listener. And they asked me when deconstructing any worldview, but faith is what we were talking about, but anything and when it was enough, I said, well, eventually you have to stop or you're going to make it where you you can't have faith and hardly anything like you have you have to stop. And so I hear that same caution here that eventually you just got to give it up and have some faith in the redemption, grace, of Christ. Is there is there a culture that does it better that inherently has less ego?

Barrett 37:04

Oh, I hope that because we here we are quite egotistical in America and in the West, so I would, I would maybe a different time period had it better. Maybe I mean, I'm just not a world traveler enough to know. But I would, I would assume this is the human condition that add that makes a lot of sense to me that every culture across the globe struggles with ego fixation. Yhat they mask their woundedness and that masking becomes human may distances themselves from their soul child and that causes them to distance their relationship with the divine.

Seth 37:42

You and I have discussed the enneagram in the past, and you referenced it at the beginning, and I am begrudgingly learning that I think that they're more than more than enough portions of it that are true that it it. Here's the thing, Barrett it pisses me off because I read it and I don't like labels. When they're pointed at me.

Barrett 38:03

Yep, and it's spot on man, you are a 5! (I’d like to note that Barrett saw this way before I did…like years before)

Seth 38:05

I'm sometimes a five apparently and eight, five and a two. When I talked about this with Suzanne Stabile, and she's like, well, and she rattled it off and I was like, I don't, I don't, you don't know me well enough to be talking about me like you do, and I don't appreciate you. So which so if we think about those that have engaged in the enneagram and that is a lot of people today because it's become in en vogue, which I would caution people, as Suzanne does it, it's not a parlor trick if you're going to do it, do it, do it.

Barrett 38:36

Right. And I shouldn't have said you are a five you should never label someone.

Seth 38:39

I'm happy to be a five because yeah, I think I'm a five when I get stressed. Is that number my soul child if to get very simple, or is that my ego?

Barrett 38:50

Yeah, that's a great…that is a…that's the million dollar question. And so I will full disclosure, I'm a part of a cohort with the Institute For Conscious Being where we are taking the enneagram and studying it in depth and applying it to spirituality. I think the enneagram is inherently spiritual, but you don't have to use it that way. It can just be a fun tool personality tool for group dynamics or staffing and that's fine if you use it for that, but I think there's so many layers to it. I think that enneagram introduces you to levels of consciousness that that's when it becomes spiritual, that you can be a disintegrated number and that's very egotistical.

I'm a three and when I am disintegrated with who I am, I'm still a three but I'm acting out of my threeness with very manipulative behaviors. And so the root sin of three. Well, there's a lot of them mainly, we will see just deceit. But we will lie, cheat, and steal to control the narrative. We are the kind of leaders, the CEO types. And if lying keeps the narrative consistent to what it should be in our mind, then we have no qualms about it; we’ll just lie. So that is a very disintegrated three.

Now I could be an integrated three. And when I'm integrated, that is a different level of consciousness. And I'm experiencing the grace of vision and hope and eyes to see something beyond themselves. And when I'm living integrated, and so that's why I never want to say that your number is the ego. But I do believe this and all the research that I've done. I think your essence is the fluidity of being able to move in and out of the enneagram I think the most brilliant part of the anagram. It's built on a circle. There's no beginning there's no end. It just keeps flowing. It is a spiraled like spiral dynamics.

It is just intended for you to keep moving through the spectrum of life, and engaging the different aspects of what life can bring. There are different holy ideas that are connected with different numbers. And so I think a fully integrated person, or someone who's living out of their soul child to connect these ideas, is living out of all nine of the enneagram types. Your number is the entry point. But it doesn't mean I mean, an integrated person would say, I think I'm a father two and an eight, a disintegrated person would say I'm a five and I'm nothing else. But the fact that you've been said that you are an eight and a two shows that you're willing to take on the giftedness and what other entry points offer.

Seth 41:40

Well, I don't know that I'm willing to say that I am. I am begrudgingly admitting it appears that I am.

Barrett 41:47

Yeah, it’s the level of consciousness that separates that from me. So it's not just linear that it is vertical too.

Seth 41:56

Yeah. So the reason I asked that is I was going to follow it up and I don't think it makes sense anymore. I was going to see the soul child is zero, before anything has been impacted, but it doesn't know it that's maybe it is I don't know,

Barrett 42:11

If you follow, if you really get into enneagram studies and you follow your research and you've already you follow the research and and you start really buying into the idea of the triads and arrows and what you know if you're a gut or heart or head triad, and then you start paying attention to where you integrate and disintegrate to with the arrows. Anytime you see a picture of the enneagram there's always lines like a triangle in the middle and then there's a five line star like thing.

And so it it's moving you on a path. I've had someone tell me this and I think this is fascinating that I'm a three and so when I am when I'm integrated down, move to a six and become a loyalist. And I really am loyal to the system, I'm loyal to the people in the system. And so my, my leadership then takes on a new form of identity and I find strength in numbers. I find strength in, in the church, it’s why I love the church so much from the very beginning. Not because I want to necessarily lead it. Now my ego wants to lead the church, for the best parts of me, the integrated parts of me wants to participate with others in the kingdom of God. And that to me is the local church that move wherever you think your number is, what you would integrate towards is your soul child number.

So I would be a six. My soul child wanted to be a six, pain came to me in the world so I had to move to three to protect myself. Does that make sense?

Seth 43:53

Yeah it does.

Barrett 43:56

I have to be the CEO or the pastor because if I were anything else, pain would still exist. I can trolled the pain with the role that I play in my number.

Seth 44:07

Oddly enough, that makes me think so I asked a 90 year old a couple years ago, on his 60th wedding anniversary, it was the month of that. And I asked him at my desk, I said, How do you stay married that long? He said, First off, I just don't argue anymore. It's not worth it. But he said, secondly, it's realizing that the first thing she says isn't true. The second thing that she says is what she actually wants and needs.

Barrett 44:25

Yeah, that’s exactly right. Yeah, it's a great connection.

Seth 44:28

Last question, but for people that are willing to wrestle with shedding the worst parts of themselves. How do I know when I've come to a place that I'm close to being where I need to be.

Barrett 44:42

Yeah, to be…this is going to sound paradoxical or maybe oxymoronic. That you know, you were doing it when you start reliving the pain that you tried to mask in the past.

Seth 45:01

I don’t like this…

Barrett 45:03

I know.

So let me explain. If you use the image, this makes sense that towards the end of the of the x axis towards the end of your life, the way that it's drawn is that you can return to your soul child. Here's the problem. If you're going to do that hard work of returning towards your soul child, you're going to be the prodigal son who comes home. You have to face the pain of what you became when you decided to leave home.

So the son has to, he has to, he has to walk the that shameful road home and he has to stare at his father who he abused and left and betrayed. He has to face the betrayal to get to the redemption. The same is true for us. If you're going to return to your soul child you have to return through the pain of each of those levels. I mean think about grief. I mean, if someone suppresses all of their anxiety or all of their fear, and then if you're going to be redeemed from that, you're going to have to face your fears.

I mean, this is no different than what you see in movies when heroes have to overcome some, some cosmic battle. And it has they have to do some sort of inner work in order to accomplish something or discover something about themselves that propels them to move beyond whatever the the evil forces that they're trying to overcome. I mean, movies depict this beautifully, but the reality is, if you want to return to your soul, child, you've got to re-enter those points of pain, work through them, realize they don't control you. Seek healing from them, or repent of them if they're sinful, and you will begin moving back towards your soul child. It gets easier as you go but you have to re confront those things that you tried to avoid so desperately in life.

So think about the path of the oppressed, the feminine path where you become the oppressive housewife or subservient employee, you are going to have to re-engage with the pain that made you feel not good enough. You are going to have to re engage with the anxieties that forced you to become a shell of your identity. This is, if you really love Richard Rohr, this is what he means by the phrase falling upward. You have to go north, you have to return to your soul child. And the way you do that is by accepting your belovedness. Reclaiming that there was a soul child in you to begin with. Reclaiming a sense of identity and owning that as I am a child of God. Just like in mark one when Jesus was baptized and the heavens opened and a dove like Spirit said, that Jesus was God's child and whom God is well pleased. You are reclaiming that Seth, God is saying the same thing to you, and you have to return; and you have to do the path of the ascent, you have to go up, and reclaim more of who you are. That you have buried so much of you, that you are going to have to regain it and claim it. And it's hard. It's very hard when you spend an entire life feeling like you don't matter. You don't measure up, that you don't belong in human existence, that you live with some neurosis of some psychic manifestation that you should be rejected at all cost.

You're going to have to claim your belovedness that's very Henri Nouwen. Now take the the path of the of the privileged now, this is what redemption is seeking through forgiveness. If you are so narcissistic, or you have created this ego, that is so out of bounds with what everyone else is experiencing, and you're forcing your worldview onto others where you're a bully. You're just an aggressive narcissist that has no empathy at all. You have to return through all those painful moments, the rejection of your parents, or the the divorce of your spouse, or whatever caused you to create this ego. And you have to repent of all of the ways in which you have tried to rise above that pain.

You have to repent of the person that you become You do not take a path of ascent, but you have to fall. And that's where like, you go to the foot of the cross. That's where you admit that you have sinned before God and that you lay it at the feet of Jesus. And so the path of descent is one where you have to seek forgiveness. The path of ascent is where you have to claim your belovedness.

So there's, I think, throughout church, I think especially in the evangelical world, we really fixated on the descent path. And we've told everybody, you just need to be forgiven, be forgiven, you need to ask God to forgive your sins. You're just a really sinful person. What we were doing was was causing people to create an ego fixation that went south, that denied themselves—denied the beauty of who they are, and we were telling them you need to be as subservient employee before God, and then you also need to seek forgiveness. So the resolution we were telling people who had lost all form of their soul child was to go further south. And that only strips you further from your soul or your essence. And so I think that's where the evangelical world has really gotten it wrong.

We told people they needed to feel oppressed, because they weren't good enough and they were sinful. And then we told them, the path that they could be forgiven for that is by going further south, and asking for more forgiveness. And it just creates this cycle of oppressiveness. The way in which you return when you are on the feminine path is by ascent, you reclaiming that you do have a soul and it is beautiful, and it is made in the image of God evangelical world and know what to do with that.

Seth 51:57

So where should people go then so there's Falling Upward. by Richard Rohr…and where else would you point people to, to begin to do this work because it's not, it's not a weekend job,

Barrett 52:11

You know, like the enneagram, you're going to enter into this conversation for different entry points. So it just really depends on where you are. It none of this matters, (laughter from Seth) this whole hour of conversation does not matter if you can't get on board with the fact that you were made in the image of God.

And that that image is good, and it is a light that is still within you. If you can't get on board with that. I would read Henry Nouwen’s Life of the Beloved. That's where I would start. If you're already on board. I think Everything Belongs by Richard or would be a better entry point than Falling Upward, Falling Upward is a very astute form of spirituality that any anybody can get to? I just wouldn't start there. So that, uh gosh, there's so many…there's so many good reads. I think you just you buy one of those books and then go to the bibliography and and read all of those books. Which you would do…you're a five you would love to do that!

Seth 53:17

That's that is actually what I do. Barrett it has been a pleasure. I know we've talked around this in the hallways at church off and on in bits and pieces, but thank you for your time. And for those listening, I really hope that that you do engage with this because if our country is going, if evangelicalism, or the church is going to succeed in the future, our children have already shown that they have no interest in the the way that we do it now; and it's going to cause us to have to face the monster that we've created.

Barrett 53:55

To fit with a narrative evangelicalism is the ego fixation that we have crafted to force an ideology that is that isn't distant from our soul child. I'm not interested in raising and creating a system or a least feeding system that our kids are forced into a brand like evangelicalism. I want our kids as they grow up in church to realize that they are made in the image of God. And that image is a lovely one, and they can connect to it. And they can be connected to the deepest parts of this world, and that they can want to live by Christ in the world.

You know, I mean, if they become more evangelical because of that experience, that's fine. I don't care. I'm just not interested in the brand. Evangelicalism is the ego.

Seth 54:43

Well Barrett. Thank you again, so so much, I appreciate it.

Barrett 54:46

Oh, you're so welcome Seth. Thanks so much.

Seth Outro 55:10

So there you go.

What are we called to do? The work of unraveling pain and hurt is hard. The work of recognizing narcissism and bad tendencies in ourselves is hard. But recognizing naming it and working through it is sanctification in some way, shape and form it is making us and our relationships and this world that we live in and interact in a better place. So let's do that. I encourage you to wrestle with the concepts of a soul child to think on it and try to remember back at different stages of your Life, the portions of your life that have impacted you in a way that you still remember that you dwell on to think on the changed you. And let's work through that.

The music throughout the episode was provided by the Silver Pages with permission, extremely appreciative for their allowance of their work in this production, I'll talk with you next week.

Blessings to you all.