The End Times and Trauma with Dan Koch / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Dan 0:00

I think that one factor of what pastors and church systems end up doing, whether or not they have bad intentions, is that they find when they use fear that their messages more effectively received. And they find that organically, they don't have to want it to be that way. It just is that way because the way our brains are wired, so it's effective, so they repeat it. They are acting on incentives just like everybody else is. And they need their building paid for, and they need this ministry that they really believe in to be funded and this is how it has worked; and also they might themselves be afraid. So there's also if there are actually and i'm not i'm not psychoanalyzing any one person here, but if they are afraid of God, at their core, if the really primary thing they feel towards God is fear, and I don't mean awe and wonder, as in fear the Lord, I mean, be afraid of the Lord then they're going to pass that on. Because at the end of the day, that's going to be the most primal thing.

Seth Intro 1:10

Today, you're in for a treat. So I chatted with fellow podcaster Dan Koch, who uses, or uses, who has a podcast called, You Have Permission, which you'll hear and talk about the name of this show. But I also like that one, because there are a lot of things in life that you had been told that you don't have permission to do, to talk about, to ask to say, to think, to believe, and that matters a lot when you're talking about God in prayer, and the church, and science and astrophysics, and grief and loss and fill in anything that you feel like you don't have permission to say.

And so Dan and I, we talk about eschatology, which is not a topic that really gets a lot of discussion on this show, and maybe something that I should address. We talked about atonement, and we talked about panic attacks and anxiety and kind of the church's role in that and how psychology and theology kind of all mesh together, why it should matter.

And so, in lieu of the normal, subscribe, rate and review, support the show on either glow, or Patreon, because you know that you should have done that already. And I've already said thank you for that right now. Thank you for doing that to the person that just clicked the button. Let's get into this conversation with Dan Koch.

Seth 2:43

Dan Koch, welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast, live and in color. I'm excited to talk with you, man. How are you?

Dan 2:50

I'm good. I have two things to say before we start here, for patrons who are watching the video on this. Yes, it's messy in here. It's all Is this messy? I don't have an excuse. I can live with quite a bit of chaos. And then the other thing I got to tell you, Seth, Can I Say This At Church is just elite podcast naming.

You just, I don't know about you know, we could debate everything else. But you've got me beat on branding for sure. Now, when I saw that I was like, Oh, damn, that's brilliant. Way to go. You did it. Got the name! So good!

Seth 3:26

Well…thanks. It took a while to come up with that. I had actually had a friend that kept responding back to me. I would give him random Hey, what do you think about this movie about this? He's like, trash, trash. No, kinda like it. But a friend with a very he's very sarcastic. He's like, you know what? You can't say any of this crap at church. And I'm like, that's it. I'm taking it. So I can’t really give credit for that, he did it.

Dan 3:52

Yeah, you saw it for what it was.

Seth 3:53

I was like, Oh, it was taking that he's like taking what? I was like nothing! Taking nothing you don't know what you said.

Dan 3:59

Do it. It's so much harder to name a podcast than people think having started three of my own it's hard to name.

Seth 4:06

So what are your three?

Dan 4:08

So I don't really do the other two anymore. Reconstruct, which I did with a buddy John. And then Depolarize which was more about politics and psychology and whatnot.

Seth 4:21

Reconstruct…is that like white with a green logo?

Dan 4:24

It's, no it's like a classical artwork background and like romantic painting and then white “Reconstruct.” I think it might have had different artwork for the last few episodes.

Seth 4:32

Why did you stop doing those?

Dan 4:38

Reconstructs was a two person project and that, like the other my co-host moved to California, I'm up in Seattle, and his interest kind of shifted. And then Depolarize I stopped doing because, frankly, politics just makes me anxious and doesn't really feel like my calling, if I can call it that. So You Have permission is like, right down the pipe of what I think I'm supposed to be doing.

Seth 5:08

You like it?

Dan 5:10

Yeah, I'm you know, I mean you can tell us. You have to like it to do it every week all year long.

Seth 5:17

(laughter) You do it every week, don't you?

Dan 5:19

Yeah. So I like it. Yeah, just like you must like it, otherwise you wouldn't be doing this.

Seth 5:22

Well, part of it is I really do enjoy it. The other part is, I've done it for so long now. I feel like I'd have to have a really good reason to just “guys, I'm done”. Like, there would have to be like, I would have to wind it down intentionally.

But I had a conversation with a guy that listens to the show earlier of what kind of my thoughts are for the year, what I want to do. And he's like, so you're not done anytime soon. I'm like, I still have more things that I want to learn. So yeah, let's do it.

Let's do it in real time. I get to be ignorant in front of everybody. This will be fun!

Dan 5:52

I mean, the personal learning and personal growth aspect is is probably the thing that people think of the least that is the big difference between how important people would imagine it is and how important it actually is. Yeah, it's probably, you know, my number one number two reason for doing it. But I don't talk about that very often. I don't even think about it very often, but when I do, I'm like, Oh my gosh, I have been able to have like, I've been able to kind of talk through everything I think is interesting. with people who know what they're talking about.

Seth 6:19

Yes.

Dan 6:20

And I just get to do that. You know, I mean, it's incredible that they’ll just say yes.

Seth 6:25

Yeah, I agree. Yeah, everyone is extremely generous with their time. What Dan's not telling you is that is not messy. I showed messy and I'm not going to put that on video earlier before we started recording, because I'm sitting in the basement full of …ugh…just stuff.

Dan 6:39

But Kid Toys don't. These are adult toys. These are guitars…

Seth 6:45

That's not messy though

Dan 6:48

That’s a snare drum. Well, there's like, shit on the ground. There's a blanket on this chair. I don't know. It's not…I think my chair is blocking the two extra chairs..

Seth 6:52

He's buried the lead. He live plays the music for his intro on his podcast. Every song!!

Dan 7:01

No! Oh my gosh. Oh my gosh, I did compose it all though. So if you like music…I mean, not like, yeah, it's there's some tricks of the trade, because that's my day job is I write music for, like commercial music for ads and whatnot.

Seth 7:17

Cool.

Dan 7:19

So there's some tricks so that it’s not as hard as it sounds to do. But yeah, it's all it's all my music.

Seth 7:23

Let’s transition from there. It's like you do this professionally. What is…whom is Dan Koch? Like it's my favorite question I ask is what makes you you what do you do what makes you tick? And we can take that whatever direction you want to, but when people say yeah, what are you doing? What do you say?

Dan 7:41

Well, I am, I think I've always been a little bit of an exhibitionist, not in the sexual sense, but in the kind of, I'm an open book, here's what I'm working on; respond to it publicly kind of a thing. You know, since I was in punk bands when I was 14, you know, I've always been drawn to that. I think I liked I'm sure I like the attention. I'm an extrovert. I'm a verbal processor. So that's kind of the personality aspect of it that leads one to start three separate podcasts and do it for years.

And then in terms of theologically, I grew up kind of moderate, nondenominational, in California. So I don't have a lot of the baggage that many of my Southern and Midwestern friends have. But I was nearby enough of it to have some baggage. And also, I have struggled with panic disorder for most of my life. It's in remission right now. I mean, I'm old enough and know enough now to kind of know how to deal with it, but really like my childhood, junior high high school, college and 20s it was a major factor. And so we're going to talk some more about that stuff and I'll tell a little bit of that story later.

And then I guess the final bit is like nowadays I feel, you know, I feel called to a kind of a ministry. But what I have seen, in my own experience and in my conversations with with friends and other people and, and people I met in those years in my 20s, when I was playing in a band called Sherwood touring the country. There are a lot of really good intentioned people, well, meaning people who repeat canned answers to really difficult questions, and they do it in the church setting. And because it's the church setting, and because the canned answers came from someone with perceived or actual spiritual authority, those canned answers are deemed sufficient. And then of course, as you know, there are people for whom they are insufficient, and they need another place to talk about this stuff. And a little bit of fire in the belly for me comes when I recognize just how canned the answers are and that they're not even really, that thoughtful a lot of the times like, if you ask your pastor about penal substitutionary atonement, and you're like, “Did Jesus really have to die to like appease of blood thing” like that? Most of the time, your pastor either forgot, because they learned it in seminary and forgot it, or don't even know (that) there are six other atonement theories.

And I don't think any of them may be Satisfaction Theory, but other than that, none of them require blood in like the Israelites sense of sacrifice needing blood to cleanse sin, but like, they don't even know that. And they'll say, “hey, that's not the kind of thing we ask around here” or they'll very politely kind of give you the runaround, you know, whatever, you know, you know, this isn't so to your listeners.

So, I try to present probably very similar to what you do, just trying to present different perspectives and just to kind of free people up from feeling forced to take those kind of kind of bad answers to good questions.

Seth 11:11

Yes, my pastor, and I'm going to say it back because I'm….it's been a while since I paraphrased it. And I'm sure he stole it from someone else. I'm pretty sure that he's told me that. But he said something similar. And he said it in church one time of, unasked questions are much more dangerous than badly answered questions or something like that. And then he dovetailed it down to so for real like when I say something, you have a question, just ask it if you could. And if I can answer it here, we will get together and we will talk about it. And when I find when I've done that with him, he'd be like, well, I'm gonna ask you the questions then. Like you asked me one question Dan asked me 26 I'm like, I came here to ask you the questions. Yeah, that's not how this pastoral thing is going to work. That's not how that should work.

Dan 11:56

Interesting. Sounds like a good guy.

Seth 11:58 Y

eah, most of the time. Most time not only there were more, don't tell him he’ll get a big head. Don’t tell him.

Dan 12:06

This is public, Seth I hate to break it to you.

Seth 12:06

Well, he'll probably listen and then we'll joke about it on Sunday whenever, whenever this releases. So you are also a PhD candidate, student. How does that work.

Dan 12:17

Yea it’s actually a Psy D, but it's a doctor. It's a psychology doctor. And it's just a little bit more focused on counseling than research. I mean, I'm just in grad school, I just I'm like half a year in so I don't know a lot about psychology yet.

I do not speak as any sort of expert or licensed psychologist, but five years or so from now I will be one. And in terms of like, academic work, I plan to work at the intersection of psychology and theology. That's something that I'm really interested in and, and then my own private practice, I plan to focus on people who have suffered some kind of spiritual abuse, or for whom change in their faith or change in their spouses, faith or whatever, is something that they want to talk about in therapy.

Seth 13:02

Yeah. So, gosh, when did you email me? I'm gonna cheat and look. Two months ago! I'm….I am. So for those that are just watching or listening, I'm the most tardy person when it comes to email.

Dan 13:17

Hey at least you wrote me back.

Seth 13:19

I literally responded to a guy that emailed me the same day you did, today. I was like, I'm so sorry. I'm really bad at email. I told him, here's my cell phone number, just call me because I'm really bad at email. My wife will tell you is like I think I have 800 unread emails right now I'm just really bad.

Dan 13:36

I'm looking at my inbox has 3014 unread emails, so I might have you beat.

Seth 13:43

The problem is, I'm not gonna respond to any of those. But I'm also equally bad at social media and responding to messages. And when people tag me like, I just, I don't, I just don't, I don't really want to.

Dan 13:53

Sounds like you're a healthy person is what I'm hearing, it’s great!

Seth 13:57

Most of it's like, oh, I shouldn't say something. When I'm done with this. And then I get done with it. I get done with this. And I'm like, what was I supposed to do? Whatever, on to the next thing. So you had said in that email, though, that you recently conducted 25 interviews around the topic of End Times theology and its relationship to mental health issues.

I don't even know what that means. Like, I understand what those words mean. But walk me through. I don't know if any of those have released have any of those?

Dan 14:27

No, I was just working on them yesterday. They will…so we're expecting a baby in about six weeks. So they may come after? I don't think they'll come before the probably come out in the spring. But yeah, so it's four episodes like a four part thing. So okay, what does that mean? What it means is, so obviously, let's break it down and times theology…In particular, we're looking at the kind of Zeitgeisty, Left Behind Series, the kind of stuff that was popular in evangelicalism in the 80s and 90s. Especially, I mean, it started in the 60s and 70s. But, you know, I grew up in that you and I are roughly the same age, I can just tell visually. So, you know, the kind of thing that a lot of us grew up around, right? I have a line at one point, like, if you grew up evangelical, you can close your eyes and picture the cover of the Left Behind book, black background…

Seth 15:24

I can remember the first one came out.

Dan 15:26

So it's basically talking about that vision of the end times, which is also really tied up with Zionism and you know, all that stuff. And then asking, like, what, what are the mental health implications of basically what that was, and how that was lived out in about 20 people's lives. So not all the interviews, some of the interviews were like, you know, side material to help me understand the situation. But about 20 of them were people's lives stories and yeah, I probably could have done 10, it is a lot more work. And then eventually this is going to go toward my dissertation. So there has to be like a serious psychological element to that. I don't exactly know what that's going to be. But basically, you know, like were people anxious or depressed before they learned about this stuff.

A lot of kids got this stuff from the earliest age possible. They never knew a time in their Christian upbringing where Jesus is imminent return was not a part of it. What did it say about God? How did it interact with people's OCD symptoms or their panic attacks? You know, kind of stuff along those lines.

Seth 16:39

So I am 38… (not 38)

Dan 16:42

Yes. Okay. I'm 36

Seth 16:44

Yeah, no, 37…I’ll be 38 in a few months, whatever. Close enough. Yeah, so similar. Yeah, I can remember reading the left behind series. And I finished them up when I was at Liberty and at Liberty you could, at Liberty University, you could walk across the street to the Barnes and Noble and then if you're a student need any money, they have these really nice chairs, and you can just read the whole book…

Dan 17:07

Big time college habit of mine as well. Yeah

Seth 17:08

I read a lot of books that way, including, including textbooks.

Dan 17:12

No way that's elite!

Seth 17:15

It's probably illegal, but I don't know. But I just didn't have the money. But I can remember reading all those. And so you said just a minute ago that you said it causes anxiety, and that many people from a young age don't know any different? Can you talk about those two things, but as opposed to starting with anxiety? What do you mean, they don't know any different? Like, what are they being fed because I feel like a lot of people listening here. And because of the emails and the private messages that I get, they are still quasi one foot in, because I think that's still very common place. Just turn on any channel of preaching on Sunday morning, and all you'll get is fear and trembling and fire, and brimstone and, God you're so lucky that he just didn't quite he enough to kill you all the way.

And you're the elect, we're going to do it. So can you kind of break that apart of it? And then we'll delve into anxiety?

Dan 18:08

Yeah, so. Okay, there's a couple things. So for instance, I was introduced to end times thinking in sixth grade. But before sixth grade, I knew that Jesus loved me. I knew that he died for my sins. Like I had a concept of the Gospel of the Christian story that did not include the End Times.

A lot of people I interviewed never had that period. So from the earliest they can remember, it's like, Jesus loves you. He died for your sins, and he's coming back any day. So you got to get right with Him. Like that was baked in for them. And most of those people grew up in the south or the Midwest. I think there is a cultural sort of statistical likelihood, right? That's a little different than the West Coast, where I grew up. So that's that's one bit about it. The other thing you said was shooting….i'm kind of blinking was the last thing you said before I started?

Seth 19:01

uh…we could dovetail into anxiety but a lot of people listening here they send me messages and they are living in both avenues right now like their mom and dad still are there and they show up at Thanksgiving Christmas and they're like, I can't talk about this.

Dan 19:14

Oh, yeah. So one of the one of the women I interviewed, she her family's still every holiday, they will say things like, Well, yeah, but probably next year, we won't be here. And then she's like, you said that last year and the year before and she's been awakening to like, these unmet expectations. And I asked her a lot of follow ups about that because that's so interesting to me. And, she's actually in Washington, I thought about like asking to join for a family holiday sometimes just to like, like, talk to them a bit. Like, how can you think this year after year whenever you're you're, you're still here and many of you are in your 50s and 60s now; but there is something very sticky, I think about some of those ideas for people.

I mean, I don't know how else to describe it, because it's clearly irrational in like a technical sense. But if it's in the water you're swimming in, and if you don't perceive it as separable from the rest of the gospel, then I think you just go, Well, I guess this is just time. You know, you hear people say, like, live as if he could come tomorrow, but who knows if he's coming tomorrow? I think some people just think, well, this is how you do that. You expect him at any moment. Even if you're wrong for your entire life.

I tend to think that seems like a bad way to plan for the future. Just like kind of common sense, but not everybody shares that opinion. But the other thing you said that I wanted to hit on was basically combining this with like damnation and fear of hell and and kind of total depravity style theology. That was also a huge strain in these interviews is like, and it really varied because it varied on the kind of gospel you were taught as a kid. And this is kinda what we talked about the very beginning.

There are variations, variations exist. So some people had panic attacks about going to hell, or family members going to hell or whatever. And they already had that and, and the end time stuff, what it mostly did was sort of multiply the intensity because it's “soon”. So one way to describe it and one of the episodes is like, here's a common belief from a teenager. In one of these scenarios. Hell exists. Some people go there, some people go to heaven. I need to be right with God so that I go to heaven. But I'm a teenager, I'm not gonna die anytime soon. almost definitely I have a 2% chance of dying before my 60s. But if Jesus is coming back, then I may die much sooner. So I really better be right with God now, that's like, I heard that a bunch.

Seth 22:11

Out of the 25 people was was it like 23 out of 25? Or what was the other option that wasn't in the bunch of what people would have to think about that type of mindset?

Dan 22:22

No, so it doesn't really, one thing I should say. It's not a representative sample. So I can't do, I can't, with any sort of confidence, give any number, like any percentages, because I just did a Facebook call and said, Hey, did you have these experiences? If so, I'd like to interview you. So I have no idea in the general population.

Seth 22:46

Yeah. I mean, how many people deal with it? Yeah, I mean, of the people that you don't, that you spoke with.

Dan 22:51

It was quite a range, but I would say the idea of this is very so at least like 5 out of 20 had a you could lose your salvation type of a theology. So they literally, you know, somebody said, I could be driving down the road, get in a car accident. And if I said “shit”, right before I died, I go to hell because that's an unforgiven sin, and I can't die with any unforgiven sin on me. That's probably the extreme end. But that was the theology that he was raised with.

And then all the way up to people who, like myself would have said, no, I never was worried about losing my salvation. But, you know, my own anxiety was more about not getting to live my life and feeling panicky about that, or other people saying, I was taught that I couldn't lose it. But there was always things that were said like, but even the righteous will fall away. So that's some of the language that the end times people will quote, and they would say like one one person said even this one person in our life, who I thought was such a solid Christian, my mom would say, even that person could fall away.

So there's a real range, right, I would say, pretty evenly split, maybe among those type of options.

Seth 24:15

I'm curious, Dan, because you've got, you said five months, a semester, basically, of grad school under the belt in there.

Dan 24:24

Yeah, I have one semester under my belt.

Seth 24:26

So you already have the master's degree in something correct? Or is this the beginning of the masters?

Dan 24:28

No, I will get my masters like year three.

Seth 24:31

So it's part of the whole thing. Gotcha.

Dan 24:32

It's a long five year thing

Seth 24:34

As a college graduate, (laughter from Dan) because I want to try to qualify the answer, knowing that as I spoke to other people that are in the psychology field, they are very reticent to say something that could be inferred as representing a larger hole, which you've already done. So I just want to make sure that I give enough caveat there that you're free to answer.

So why in your experience, and in these interviews, and in some of probably some of the thoughts process personally behind it, why do you feel like and I'm gonna use the word addicted, the Church is addicted to this type of gospel.

Dan 25:09

Which type of gospel do you mean? Do you mean specifically related to the End Times or the kind of penal substitutionary atonement, Calvinism.

Seth 25:16

So, both of those I would say relate to fear. So one is fear of stay “right”. Stay in the church, do what I told you when I told you tithe 15% if you want to be extra special, you know, and that's, I know that I am overgeneralizing that, but I, those are some of the churches I grew up in some of the churches I still interact with, not my church. But, so there I think both of those both total depravity, penal substitution, that's also bound in fear. So I would root it down both to fear.

Dan 25:47

I guess I'd say anytime it's fear based. It's because it works. So here's some real basic neuroscience, our amygdala and the the part of our brain that we share with lizards. And all, you know many mammals, all mammals and many other animals, is it the base of our brain, that is our fight or flight stuff, that's our adrenaline gets pumped in, and you get the hell out of there. Or if you live in the modern world, and there's nowhere to run, and there's no bear, there's no actual bear to run from, you just get a panic attack and you have to leave the room and you get sweaty palms and you know, you have to smoke a cigarette, if you're a smoker, you know, whatever the thing is, right?

So if that's firing, the further away parts of your brain like your prefrontal cortex, where you do planning and decision making and rational choice, that's not firing. And in fact, your amygdala is blocking the route to your nervous system. It's calling the shots, and it's like standing in front, right? It's like literally getting in front of the rational part of you so that it can't work. So fear is really effective.

So first of all, fear is like totalizing. It keeps other parts of your brain from functioning.

Seth 27:08

Is that what that's called “totalizing”?

Dan 27:11

I mean, I'm just kind of using that I like it's, it's, yeah, it takes over when it's active. And it's also really effective. I mean, you could look at political speeches, you can look at, whatever. Whenever you want to really motivate people you make them afraid.

I think that one factor of what pastors and church systems end up doing, whether or not they have bad intentions, is that they find when they use fear that their messages more effectively received. And they find that organically, they don't have to want it to be that way. It just is that way because the way our brains are wired, so it's effective, so they repeat it. They are acting on incentives just like everybody else is. And they need their building paid for, and they need this ministry that they really believe in to be funded and this is how it has worked; and also they might themselves be afraid. So there's also if there are actually and I'm not psychoanalyzing any one person here, but if they are afraid of God, at their core, if the really primary thing they feel towards God is fear, and I don't mean awe and wonder, as in fear the Lord, I mean, be afraid of the Lord then they're going to pass that on. Because at the end of the day, that's going to be the most primal thing.

You might think “it would be so wonderful to be gay affirming”, but all the way back here. God will send me to hell if I’m wrong. But once you have that thought, you can't you can't go back to that it would be wonderful to be affirming thing. And I'm using that because I believe you have a T-shirt on that's referencing that issue.

Seth 28:52

Yeah.

Dan 28:53

So, you know, that's broad strokes what I would think but I'm not a psychologist, yet.

Seth 29:00

Sure fair enough. That's why I tried to give enough caveats there at the beginning. (music)

Seth 29:27

Earlier you said and I do want to dovetail back into it. So I, here's why it's taken me 27 minutes to get here. So currently my son struggles from anxiety that often is debilitating. And we're working through that with him, and we did counseling for years, just recently started other options and I've seen personally and for me it doesn't make any sense like the the lack of logic of panic, and I don't have a better way to see that where I look at it and I'm genuinely baffled of what to say, to help in this situation? And so I just usually punt to my wife. And I hope that one of us knows what to do. And usually she does because I something, Dan in my brain, just breaks were like, I don't understand how this is the thing right now. And because I don't understand how it's a thing, I also don't know how to do anything with it. If that makes any sense at all?

Dan 30:23

of course,

Seth 30:24

Which makes me feel like just an awful dad; and maybe in that moment, I am being one its probably something I need to get better at. But you talked about struggling with a panic disorder. And so if you're comfortable, can you kind of walk through like what was that for you, what is that?

Dan 30:38

My earliest memories of it are in third grade. And this is before I was introduced and time stuff. I somehow got a trigger, about thunder, and I was petrified of thunder. I would basically I would get a panic attack if Thunder happened. Now the thing about panic disorder that is different than generalized anxiety disorder, which is more like you're a worrywart, like you are a person who's kind of constantly worrying if things will go well, that's generalized anxiety. Panic disorder, primarily, your anxiety is about having more anxiety. So even though I wouldn't have been able to say that in third grade, I can look back on my behavior and say, I was worried about having one of these panic attacks.


So I would watch the weather report every morning before walking to school, I would play games on a sunny day with my friend called let's see if we can find a cloud to sort of calm my own anxiety about that there might be thunder later while I'm at school, and I don't have any there's nothing I could do about it.

Seth 31:40

The goal being no clouds

Dan 31:42

The goal being clouds. So it's totally irrational. And the funny thing is, I liked lightning, and I liked rain. So it wasn't like you don't mean it, just that's the way that panic works is you get a trigger, and then that neural pathway is created and it's a trigger for a long time I happen now I love thunder, I love thunderstorms, but for many years, it would freak me out. And the irrationality is part of it even when I got older, and I would have other, you know, in my 20s or whatever, I was still having panic attacks about people claiming to be the Antichrist or whatever.

And I already knew I didn't believe in an antichrist. But it doesn't matter the pathway was there already in my brain from sixth grade, and eighth grade. And you know, we can get into as many of that story as you want to, but like it was already well worn. And so once it's there, it doesn't matter that it doesn't make sense. And then the other thing that's irrational as well is that once the panic attack triggers that beginning of that release of adrenaline and other hormones that has been triggered, those are going to go in and they are going to take their time to work your way through your system.

My dad, who's a therapist, helped me a lot in my 20s describing it, it's like, it's like riding a wave, that wave is going to crest. And it's just going to take a while. But eventually it's going to subside because it's a chemical thing. You now have 50 times or whatever the number is more adrenaline than you need in your system. And an hour from now, you'll have 10 times the adrenaline, and three hours from now you'll have two times you don't you know, whatever it is. Those don't, those aren't real numbers.

The fact that it's irrational is what makes it a panic attack. Often panic attacks come out of nowhere for people they don't even know what caused it; and that's just well documented, that happens.

Seth 33:42

Yeah, that's been my wife and I's experience with our son. We're just saying they're like, Yeah, what just what just happened there….on clarify on that neural pathway thing. So the pathway is for the trigger response of panic, not the thing that triggered the response, but the actual panic Highway, for lack of a really bad metaphor?

Dan 34:02

Yeah, actually, that's a great question. I don't know the answer to that. I don't know enough neuroscience. All I'm saying is that you something about it is is dug in, in a sense where once you have a trigger any other time you see that thing, it will trigger a similar release of hormones. Over time it can drop. But still, if I saw a headline today, you know, this man claims to be the Antichrist and his followers are getting 666 tattooed on their hands. I would still feel like just saying that out loud. I felt a tiny bit anxious

Seth 34:41

Right now?

Dan 34:43

Yeah, not not bad. Yeah, I mean, I'm fine.

Seth 34:44

Are you good to talk about that a bit?

Dan 34:48

Oh, totally.

Seth 34:49

Why the Antichrist for you?

Dan 34:49

So, yeah, so I think what it is, actually no one's ever asked me that. So that just happened to be something that happened when I was 23. This guy in in Miami area was making headlines about claiming to be Jesus. He was claiming to be the Antichrist, but he was also saying that was a good thing. It's very weird. He's a cult leader. He's dead now. But, and he was driving around and Rolls Royces. You know, he was a typical cult leader in a lot of ways. to backtrack in sixth grade, I was given a book. I think it was a book, it might have been a fancy pamphlet. It was a reworking of a very famous pamphlet called 88 reasons why the rapture will occur in 1988. This one was for 1996 I was 13 or 12 maybe. I freaked out.

I was like, Jesus is coming back in five months. I am only 12 I have never been naked with a woman. I've never had kids. I've never gotten married. never kissed a girl, at 12 all my life goals involved with women.

Seth 36:00

I mean, you could do all of that except for have the baby in five months though.
(laughter from both)

Dan 36:05

(Uhhh) I might not have been able to yet, but I don't have a precise puberty memory, puberty recall…

Seth 36:16

Its not required!

Dan 36:19

Anyway, um (laughs) so I had panic attacks, a bunch of them I couldn't sleep for…I had a hard time falling asleep for a month or two straight. So, once I did that for that long, then in eighth grade, we studied n times and my Christian/evangelical junior high, and we did it for a whole semester in Bible class.

So then, every other day I have Bible class, I'm reworking…I'm just feeling anxious about this and white knuckling it. What I should have done is talk to my parents and they could have exempted me from my class that would have been better. I didn't know that then. I didn't think that was an option and then by the time I hit 23, or whatever, and this this news story breaks, it's just so in there and also I, the the larger story of that is I had been drinking a bunch of caffeine and caffeine is not good for people with panic disorder and, and I was like increasing my caffeine because I thought it was soothing myself and it wasn't. And then the story hits on Dateline or 20/20 or something. And I just flip out!

I was in LA working on a buddy's record, I was co-producing it, I believe, before it was finished, and let the main producer finish it. I didn't sing any of my background vocals. I didn't. I wasn't there for his vocals. I just it was like one of the worst nights of my life. And so I don't know, this is a roundabout way of talking about it, but basically, it's it's once you get one trigger, then you have other ones. In 2008, a year later, I'm off caffeine (and) we're traveling in England on tour and our managers with us. And I asked him what he thinks about Obama because it's the election here. And he says he seems like a good guy. But politically, I think he's the end of the world. And I had panic attacks for a week. I mean, it's like it doesn'tI didn't think Obama was the end of the world. But hearing someone say that it reminded me and then, you know, some people said he would be the Antichrist. Of course, they say that about everybody.

Oddly, no one thinks that Trump could be…that's interesting. (laughter from Seth)

But like, you know, so that kind of stuff would just trigger me it just, it just does. I now understand it well enough that it won't trigger me for long. But once it's there, it's kind of there. And so one thing you may find with your son is that some of the same things might start giving him those attacks and one thing he'll eventually have to learn to do is recognize that those are triggers and sort of think and work through and exercise his way out of it. I mean, it's, it's not an easy thing to have but there are a lot worse things

Seth 39:00

Yeah, you talked about it being in remission is that just basically that recognizing this is happening? (And) I know how to handle this.

Dan 39:09

Yeah, I just mean, I don't really get panic attacks anymore. And that's partly therapy and medication. It's also, when I do start to get them, I'm just so much more aware of what they are. And so I can mentally I can kind of stop them in their tracks. And I have just much better coping skills now that I'm older. And I started getting those skills after that episode at 23. And you know, now it's 13 years later, and I just recognize it, more easily now

Seth 39:36

The 25 people, or any of those still engaged in faith, or do they all just kind of, you know, I can't do this. I'm done. I'm so done. Done with all this. I'm going to be with you at Christmas and the rest of the time you shut your mouth. I'm not coming back.

Dan 39:49

Yeah, great question. I asked everybody that if they're still Christian today, I also asked them if the end time stuff was a legitimate obstacle to their continuing in faith? I don't have the numbers in front of me. I haven't actually done the tallying, yet, but I want to say two thirds, half too two thirds are still Christians. And the rest are not anymore and it was an obstacle for a lot of them, but not all of them.

Seth 40:21

For me personally and I need to do an entire series on eschatology, because you're right there is the one Jerry B. Jenkins, Tim LaHay, Kirk Cameron, badly acted Nicolas Cage remake of Nikolai Carpathia, which is a great name by the way. It's fantastic.

But that's only one view of eschatology. There's so many others that aren't pre-tribulation and I should probably do that. The problem is for me Dan, eschatology holds so little, I just don't really care.

Because I don't see…for me eschatology when I was growing up in church was always used as a way to have just as much care for today, but with absolutely zero care for what I needed to do tomorrow; as in relation to those that are in community around me. And by community, I mean, ecological community, global community, school community, church community, because I've got to make it that right for today and tomorrow will quote unquote “worry about itself”.

Versus now I feel more like antichrist is anyone that is acting in a way opposed to the shalom of God. And even that could possibly, probably, get me branded as a heretic by a lot of people and I don't care anymore…

Dan 41:38

Sounds like NT Wright to me.

Seth 41:42

Well he’s a smart guy…

Dan 41:43

I don't think he's a heretic, right. People don't think he's a heretic do they?

Seth 41:48

On certain things I guess. I mean, I think somebody is everybody's heretic, right?

Dan 41:52

Yeah, maybe KJV only people would think Wright’s are heretic; but everybody is to them.

Seth 42:00

What do psychology and theology have to contribute to one another? Like, why is that something that interests you at the intersection there?

Dan 42:07

Yeah, well, I guess the main autobiographical reason is that around the time of the election, or actually probably the GOP nomination, I was like, “What's going on here, this is interesting?” Just kind of that basic idea that like, oh, a lot of these people that raised me, said very opposite things about Bill Clinton, than they're saying about Donald Trump.

And I just thought, that is a puzzling psychological phenomenon, and I went to, or just societal phenomenon. And I found this book, The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt, somebody must have recommended it to me. And I read that book and I just had a light bulb moment. I just, I read it and I thought, this is a better explanation than any theological explanation I might come up with, about, you know, using some theological language for why they've fallen from the path or I've fallen from the path; or what I was like, no, it's in, in a sense, it's just psychology at work.

Now, I would say there's no such thing as just psychology. I think psychology is theological, in the sense of, it tells us the kind of beings that God created. But I found the psychological answer so much more satisfying, in a much more elegant way, that explained my experience better. And yet, I am forever interested in theology because I am a person of faith. I have an active faith, I have a prayer life. All the things that are most important to me, in some way connect back to my relationship with God.

And so if psychology is getting me better explanations, then that is a tool in service of what…the things of value, right, which are theological in nature, at least, you know, they're not systematic theology or whatever, but they are, they are theological in that they relate to the ultimate things. So that's kind of one way of saying it.

Seth 44:22

You brought up three things that I hadn't, well, one of these I had planned on asking you, but two things. And I guess you brought them up, and they were words that I wasn't expecting to get into today.

One of which is a definition of the gospel, because you talked about the gospel without this specific end time theology. So I do want to know what that is. And then you've also brought up the word atonement, which I've done, I think an episode on atonement way back, like Episode 20. For those that want to go in the Wayback Machine although it is still probably the number two or number three episode of the entire podcast…

Dan 44:58

Mine is too, mine is up there. Yeah, the top

Seth 45:01

Yeah, the top center (around) hell, hell, atonement, hell, hell. And then NT Wright; because it’s NT Wright.

Dan 45:10

I just did this and I don't do a lot of repeated ones but mine's gay, gay affirming, and can non Christians can be saved. And then two purity culture(s) in a row.

I did do two on that. And that's three and four. Yeah, but atonement theories, which was one of my first ones to is in the top five or six or whatever.

Seth 45:32

Yeah, for Dan Koch, what is the gospel then if you're going to say, this version of the gospel with this end times theory about here's one of the reasons that you get saved, so that you don't, you know, sit you don't burn in hell or whatever. However, that's going to be preaching and don't, don't get left behind twinkling of an eye, etc, etc. What is the gospel?

Dan 45:53

Well, so the one that I was taught before I was exposed to end times thinking was just kind of standing penal substitution, although not in a Calvinist strain, we were a nondenominational church. I'm sure there were some Calvinists and some non Calvinists in the church. I don't think any of the staff members were Calvinist that was never kind of heavy. So just kind of a standard four spiritual laws kind of a thing. If you know what those you know, there's the chasm. Jesus is the bridge. You go across the bridge, so you can be with God. So that's what I was given then. But it sounds more like you're curious what I think it is now?

Seth 46:34

Yes, today.

Dan 46:37

Okay. So, in terms of atonement, there are two different ways of thinking about what the atonement signifies. And maybe you could say it's both but it could be one or the other. The first camp is it does something ontologically, metaphysically, there is, in some sense, literally a separation. And it accomplishes removing the separation. So that would be, that's one way of seeing the atonement.

Seth 47:12

And that separation is me and the divine?

Dan 47:14

Me and the divine, yeah. So there is something that happens with Christ's resurrection, or the moment that someone you know, accepts Christ or something, where a status is shifted in the cosmos, in some sense in the mind of God in some sense.

The other view is that the atonement shows us what God is like. So God wants to explain to humanity what God is like, and the atonement or the events that lead to atonement, you know, so the death and resurrection or what have you; the incarnation is a big part of that are sort of God trying to tell us what God's like.

I'm more in the latter camp. And there's kind of complicated reasons for that. One of those reasons is that I don't, I can't really understand…I've never understood the blood sacrifice thing I've never understood how a God who could create the universe, possibly many universes, each containing billions of galaxies, which each galaxy has billions of stars in it, would like require blood on this planet made from red blood cells….you know what I'm saying? It just seems like the kind of thing that early people would have thought was true, but probably isn't true.

And I'm not trying to be a chronological snob or l anything, it just, they didn't understand the size of the universe in understand what blood was, you know, whatever. It's beautiful poetry that in that sense. And then the other thing is, I think about people on other creatures on other planets. You know, like, I don't, I can't imagine that like Christ's resurrection. On Earth affects some sort of universal cosmological change on other planets. And there's so many other planets that like, there's probably other creatures that God loves. Given how creative our God is. I don't know that to be true. I don't think there are any in the Milky Way. For instance, I'm not like an aliens truther.

I think the Fermi paradox is true, like, they should be around if they were in the Milky Way by now. So they're probably not but the Milky Way is one of billions of billions. Or I guess the Milky Way is one of billions of galaxies, so do that math. I feel like I just got real nerdy there….

Seth 49:42

I'm with you. So I love it. So first off sci-fi is my jam, sci-fi and theology is my jam. I just finished it at the end of November I chatted with Paul Wallace. He wrote a book called Love and Quasars. The dude is literally an atomic physicist and I he also teaches at a seminary. And we talked about that one of the most mind blowing parts of his whole book is he tried to give scale just to our galaxy.

And he's like, you know, and he gave everything like, this is a pea, and this is a blueberry and this would be a beach ball. And so he started at the Washington Monument, and that would be the sun. And then like, Earth is at I think the Abraham Lincoln Memorial and it's like the size of an acorn.

And he's like, you know, the next closest star, Proxima Centauri, I think is what it's called, or Proxima something, is basically on the beach on the west end of Hawaii. Like if you give it to scale, and it's the size of a beach ball, I'm like that's the scale and that's just have the closest star in the Milky Way for the billions of stars. And the Milky Way is just one little bitty arm of this entire huge thing that we're….anyway so yeah, nerd out all you want. I'm with it….

Dan 50:58

Yeah. So I mean, I think the Gospel for me is something like the creator of the universe knows and loves you. That's the gospel.

And I know that a lot of Christians are not satisfied with that. But I am. I don't think I need anything more than that. I experience that God through the Christian tradition, which includes things like Trinitarian doctrine and the death and resurrection of Christ, and I affirm all that stuff it is part of the tradition. But ultimately, for me, it all comes down to wait, God loves me? God wants to be in some sort of relationship with me? There's just nothing crazier than that. Or better than that. That's it. And that's the only real thing. I want to make sure if I'm trying to preach the gospel that people understand. You know?

I am an evangelist in a sense of just like you are; we do these shows and we obviously care about getting stuff out there.

Seth 51:55

Does this make me an evangelist, is that what you're saying?

Dan 51:57

I mean, yeah. Like you are evangelical, small e.

Seth 52:03

I’m just not happy with that word or at least what's happened with the word. So it's like calling me a Browns fan who wants to be a Browns fan?

Dan 52:13

Well, it's pretty good being a Niners fan these days.

Seth 52:18

Oh man, yeah, I'm a Cowboys fan. me and my boss were joking. He's a Eagles fan. And we were joking, you know which one of us is going to lose our way into the playoffs? And I was like, yeah that's about right.

Dan 52:29

yeah. That was rough (the season) for you guys.

Seth 52:30

Final question and answer it however you want. And there's a method to the madness of this question. Although I don't know I've said it out loud-why. And so I plan to interview other faiths intentionally this season, as many other faiths as I possibly can.

And I have a certain set of questions because the goal is to not be stupid, and to learn something, because I don't think I have any stranglehold, nor does my faith tradition, on truth, or other facets of God. And so I'm going to ask them, when you say the word, God, what is that for you? And so I'm going to ask you, like if someone said, Yeah, I understand you saying, God knows me. But when you say God, what are you actually saying, as best as you can say, which I'm aware of how big of a question that is?

Dan 53:18

Yeah, it's a it's, it's a lot. God is…God is the entity, mind, agent, whatever you want to call it, that is capable of bringing the universe into existence. And that is present to every creature at every moment, luring us toward rightness towards goodness towards love and beauty and justice, and pervading and I don't know, like, like that old classic doctrine of God sustaining the universe at every moment is…I think that's right.

And I mean, I would consider myself a pen theist at this point, which is that, like, everything in the universe is within God. But God is also more than the universe. And so yeah, or I guess it's hard to know what to think about matter. And, you know, all that stuff. So I'll just say that. Is that a pretty good answer?

Seth 54:28

It's your answer. They're all going to be great answers. Yeah. Yeah. Just a little side note, I didn't want to. I wanted to make sure that listeners of the show knew that I wasn't asking people that weren't Christian.

Dan 54:44

Yeah, you want to ask them too.

Seth 54:46

I want to make sure that we're gonna be fair here. And I'm actually really excited to see what all these answers are.

Dan 54:50

So I think that's so cool, man. I'm uh, I am what I call a robust pluralist. So I think that God is absolute interacting with people and other faiths on the regular, just like he's interacting with Christians. And so I think that would be very cool, to learn more about that it's a little outside the scope of my own show. So maybe I'll have to listen to yours to get that.

Seth 55:15

Absolutely. There's a few that are already recorded for January. And so I didn't get the answer in those. But whatever I can change the fiscal year. I'm the CEO. Do what I want to do. So I'm a big fan of puns.

And so here we go. I want to make sure as people hear the last of you that I give you and just let you know you have permission to go ahead and tell them where they need to go to get a hold of more of you.

Dan 55:42

(Laughter)

Yeah, the podcast is called You Have Permission. You can get it anywhere you listen to podcasts. Youhavepermissionpod.com. Yeah, that's, that's about it, man.

Seth 55:53

Perfect. Well, Dan, thank you so much. I really appreciate it.

Dan 55:55

Thank you so much Seth.

Seth Outro 56:02

I want to read you something from Dan's website. And you'll hear this as you go down and you click subscribe to his podcast because I listened to about 15 of his episodes before I chatted with him, and they're really good. Dan is a great conversationalist, and he has some really important questions. Here's what he says.

For anyone that finds themselves asking difficult questions about God, science, prayer, fate, suffering, and so many other things. So many things that you've been given bad answers to, you need to know that those are important questions. So you have permission to take both Christianity and the modern world very seriously.

And I really love that. And if you listen to the show, you'll hear him say that at the beginning of each episode, but I think that's important. What we believe about what happens when we die absolutely matters. It matters for then, and it matters for now, and it matters for the way that we treat one another today and tomorrow. how that affects us mentally matters how it affects our church mentally matters.

Because as it affects us each individually that is how it's going to affect the congregations and the church globally for everyone else. How we engage in thoughts about the end times are deeply important. So I really hope that this scratched an itch for the beginning of some of you. I know I think it did for me, that I really need to dig in more into the concepts of eschatology, and end times. Because to be honest, I haven't given it much thought in many, many years, I read all of those Left Behind books and listen to a lot of those sermons. And the left behind books were entertainment for me, and I really enjoyed reading them, but they didn't really have any hold over me but I realize I'm just one person. I'm an engagement it further. I don't know when but I'll try to make sure that I do that.

The music from today is as many of the past have been from the Salt of the Sound. stuff is great. find links to them in the show notes. They're doing some amazing things. You'll also find links to Dan’s stuff in the show notes well.

Be blessed everybody and I'll talk to you next week.


Blind Eyes Opened / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Geoffrey 0:00

That's a worldwide Yeah, that's a worldwide statistic. And where that comes from is the International Labor Organization that recently identified 41 million victims of human trafficking worldwide. But what we did is we took out forced marriage from that number and landed on the 27 million, there's about 15 million forced marriages. And so we zeroed in on that 27 million number. So that's a global number that includes sex trafficking, that includes labor trafficking, other types of forced labor, etc. And so that's where that number comes from. The other statistic that you just mentioned, the other data point is that the United States is identified as one of the or the greatest consumer of human trafficking worldwide. So we are driving that demand.

Seth Intro 0:50

Everybody, welcome back to the show. I am Seth. This is the Can I Say This At Church podcast. today's conversation is one To give you a heads up on I, we we broach upon the topic of not necessarily in detail, but just the overarching topics of sex trafficking. And so if that is something that you're uncomfortable with, I might would recommend, do just delaying this. Well, I'm I would recommend skipping this one. But I do want to say that topic very much matters. It is most certainly a very real thing. And as I prepared for this conversation, I was tremendously heartbroken. And so with that in mind, I don't really have much to say for an introduction. I'm excited for you to hear this conversation that I had with two of the people that were behind a documentary that comes out on I think January 23, called blind eyes opened, which is a movie about the truth around sex trafficking specifically in America. And, yeah, here we go.

Seth 2:20

Jeff and Carrie Rogers, welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast, from what I understand you're in a much nicer area of the United States than I am. I live on the Blue Ridge Parkway, and it's like seven outside. And so I'm unhappy to hear that you're in Florida. And I'm quite jealous, because I'm sure it's not seven there. But Welcome to the show. I'm excited that you're here. And I am slightly intimidated by the conversation that will have about the topic of what you some of the work that you're doing. But I will table that for a minute. And so for those that are listening, what would you want us to know about you kind of each of you, what makes you you, what makes you tick, and kind of how did you get into what you're doing? doing right now?

Unknown Speaker 3:01

What do you go first? You omega? Sure?

Karrie 3:04 Um, well, okay, um, it was 2011. And my husband, where he can explain us from the corporate world, and I was kind of already a mother of two, I had my third child, three boys. And we really felt like God was calling us to do something with media. And neither one of us are from that background at all. I did dental hygiene, and had to be God, because it was something totally would never do. And, I mean, my personal story was, and I think it's kind of cool. So, um, you know, you kind of play these games with God, you're like, Well, God, if this is you, then kind of ask God like a sign. And so I gotta, this is you. And this is really he'd been kind of working on my heart and I think he was working on my husband's heart, but he was preparing mine, because I was going to have to like support what he was going to ask to do. And we can get to that a little later. But I remember I was like literally feeding my third child. He was nine months old. And I was having this conversation with God in my head. And I was like, okay, God, if this is really you, then just having quit his job right now and walk through the door. And it was like 90 seconds later, the door opens and a normal wife's reaction would be like, Oh, hey, Honey, you're home. But for me, I was like, I was like 15 in the afternoon, I remember the time because I looked at the clock. And I said, What are you doing home? And he looked at me and he's like, and literally, my thought in my head was just having quit his job right now. If this is your Lord hadn't just quit his job walk to the door. So the next words out of his mouth were I quit my job. I was like, instantly happy like, Oh my gosh, I heard from you, Lord, but then Fear was like, What have I asked for? Like, I was like, I asked her this. And now I'm like, gonna have to go through this trial. And so then he laughed and said, I'm just kidding. I can only close because I got to go out to dinner tonight. And I was so relieved, because I was like, Thank you, God, that you were merciful enough to like, make it a joke. But that's all I needed. From that moment on. I was in. I mean, they were my exact words, make him quit his job. And so for me, and I'm just kind of giving you the exchange for me. I was like, I don't care what's coming next. I'm going to say yes, yeah. Yes, Lord. Yeah. And then I'll kind of let him take off from there because that's just my little personal nugget. That was my god wink. Seth Price 5:49 Jeff, how often do you quit your job on a whim?

Geoffrey 5:53 That's a good question. It actually wasn't a window. I'll tell you what. It's been a journey. I mean, I had 15 years in the corporate world. About 13 and a half of them at IBM, and just an incredibly blessed career, but they, at the time, our desire and chasing after God was really just exploding. And so for me, the way I like to describe it is, it's like, every rung on that corporate ladder became more and more hollow for me. And so we really did know over a period of time that something was come in. I mean, we even began to plan our finances accordingly, and really felt like there was a calling of God that was coming upon us. And then it was through a series of events that it finally did get to the point where we agreed, you know what, we are going to do this, we are, I am going to leave the corporate world. And we're going to go into ministry. And I do like to say that God only shows you a very small portion of what's around the next corner to get you to turn that corner because, you know, had we known what would happen over the last 9889 years now. It's been a journey. It's been an incredible road. So it certainly wasn't on a whim, but it it's been Calling and it it was a major decision for our family that's for sure.

Seth Price 7:06

We've used the word it. Can you either one of you kind of tell me what it is? If we were to give that a name? What is it?

Geoffrey 7:15

So the calling has been when we left the corporate world, we started the organization now the ministry that we're running called the ships of Tarshish. And so that comes from Isaiah 60. And the calling with that ministry is to use media, to engage in what we would deem to be critical social issues that we really feel like the church needs to pay more attention to needs to get involved in. And so in 2011, that's the journey that we started when we say it is working with the shift of tortious ministry to do just that.

Seth Price 7:52

Yeah. What are some of those issues? Geoffrey 7:56 So the first project that we focused on, it's called surrender the secret And so what surrender the secret was, or is is a 10 episode Christian reality TV series focused on post abortion recovery. And so we filmed five women in Charlotte, North Carolina, we hired a professional crew, we hired a professional producer, because we're not from this industry. We certainly don't know what it takes to produce stuff like this. So we hire professionals to do that. And so we hot we hired this crew and film these women as they went through a Bible study, helping them through the healing transformation of Jesus Christ dealing with the pain of the past abortion. And so that was the very first project that we did. Is there anything you wanted to add on that?

Carrie 8:45

Well, I was just gonna say that, um, I'm growing up in the church. I have a huge bloodline of pastors, Sunday school teachers from church God and I know for me In my past that testimony story, that I chose an abortion when I was 17. And I have I had, I've lived with that because being a child of the church that was going to really shame on a family. Yeah. And so as we kind of started having this radical movement of the Lord Jesus in our family and our hearts and just being set free from that myself, we really felt called to see the I realized in church on sanctity for human life Sunday, they said here in Tampa, there was over 8000 babies aborted that year. And the Lord showed me the women. It was the first time I realized there was more than one woman in this hiding. And so it was like there was this awakening like I have to do something about This but I didn't know what that meant. So as my husband was being kind of called as well into this type of like, it was like a like a like a calling like a career change, we begin to Lord begin to show us as we sort we kind of like we're supporting pro life pregnancy centers and we're starting to get involved and we realized, with this platform of this media, the multitude of women that could be reached was unlimited. And so we didn't know that's what the Lord the first show the Lord was going to do. Was take us at that was like our founding a ministry foundational piece. And so, um, that was like, for us, looking back, I can see how that was God setting us up to where we even come into now, but we really wanted to help the church reaches when Because I'm not a young woman, I mean, and I'm thinking nobody's offered anything for the woman that's had that choice. Yeah. And so we recognize why isn't the church talking about this? And I still think pastors know how I agree. No, when we show this show, I mean, we've had thousands of women, right. And thank you for producing the show. Women who have suffered in silence, they have not been able to forgive themselves. And they're watching these women go through transformation, forgiveness, they're watching them go through anger, and they're like, Wait a second, I can go to the walk for life. You know, a lot of women won't go. There's one in four women who've had an abortion, and they may get pregnant without the man. So there's men suffering, too. So there's really a breakdown a lot of Lost Children, you know, and broken families. And so, we felt like when we made this show like it would be A tool for pastors that maybe didn't know how to talk about it to know about it to say watch this show or and and then they can get into these groups themselves and go through it if they want themselves some women don't want to go through they'd rather watch somebody else and and just get free that way. But so it was really a personal mission that I didn't know the Lord was going to take and expand it with the media. We didn't know that was gonna be the first show.

Seth Price 12:27

It's it's a small first show. I would agree as well. Yeah, small air quotes small. Yeah. A lot of pastors and I've been privileged to speak with so many from this show, but then also talking deeply with my pastors. I think often they'll admit, you know, they don't we get all this seminary training in this hermeneutical training and exegetical training and all this other training, but we don't really get traumatic training and a lot of times the the members of the church need counseling, that a pastor is not always the best person to give another they don't need come alongside that meant that that that discussion, but not the only part of it. Yeah, yeah, I fully agree. Yeah, it's people don't I feel like that's why people don't talk about it in church, because how can you literally how can I, which is kind of, again, thematically some of the reasoning for the name of the Church of this show, is know, these conversations matter. The topics are bigger, and they're worth time. So I want to pivot to the reason that you're here. So you have a Is it a documentary or a movie or a blend of the two? What would you call your documentary? That is called blind eyes open? I think that's what it's called from and I didn't write that down. I think, is that what it's called blind eyes open? Yes, yes. I'll be honest. So the young lady that said that coordinated this meeting today. She sent it to me and said, You know, it would probably make more sense if you watched it ahead of time. And so I tried to watch it and I got about 30 minutes in And I just got so depressed. And so I had to close the laptop. I tried to go to bed, couldn't go to bed went into work the next day, and even my staff was like, you, you look sick as I didn't sleep well. And they're asking why. And I tried to tell them why. And they were like, That's awful. And then they kept asking questions, and I didn't have any answers. And so I tried the next day to watch more, it took me a full three and a half, four days to watch what normally I can sit down and watch TV for an hour and a half, two hours most of the time when it's something that doesn't really have any impact. So I want to talk a bit about that document because I think it's just some of the stats in there. The stories in there from the women that are in there like it's I don't know there's there's really not a lot of words. Can you tell us either one of you a bit about kind of the genesis of Why? Because blind eyes open is talking about sex trafficking in America and so why like why that topic? Why now Like, kind of walk me through that?

Geoffrey 15:03

Well, the way we got into that topic is we talked about surrender the secret, that first reality series we did, and the distribution of that really took off and went into tremendous number of homes in the United States and then internationally as well. But as the distribution of it began to taper down, we talked with our board of directors and really began to pray, God, what's our next topic, and one of the board members introduced us to this topic of human trafficking that we didn't know anything about. And so I remember going to the first seminar we went to and began to learn some of these truths, and probably quite like you. The first time I ever went to a seminar and began to learn some of these real statistics. It's just jaw dropping, and how can I not know this before? Yes, but once I learn it, I can't unlearn that. And so very quickly, we got together and our board of directors agreed. You know what, we really do. Believe like this is the next topic for us to focus on. And so we began the production of blind eyes open, which is a Christian documentary about the truth of sex trafficking in America. And so and again, it's to reach the church, just like with the first this is to engage the church engage Christians around the country, in this topic, to make sure First of all, that they understand the truth of what's happening here in America. Most people when they learn about sex trafficking or human trafficking, most times they're thinking it's something overseas, right? In Thailand or Indonesia, or somewhere over there, right, like a lot of the movies portray? Yes, more and more people are becoming aware of the truth, that it's a major problem here inside of the United States. And so from the very beginning six years ago, this production, the sole focus has been to uncover and show the truth of what's happening here inside of our own borders, with our own children in our own nation. being purchased, bought and sold and raped and US citizens. And so it's an epidemic portion problem here in the United States. It's growing more rapidly than it's declining. And so that's really the truth of what we're trying to expose through this documentary.

Seth Price 17:16

What are some of those statistics like? So I wrote and I can't remember if you said it at the beginning, or if it was one of the opening salvos there of texts, but there's what did it say 27 million people in slavery, and that the United States is one of the largest consumers of human trafficking. So is that 27 million in America or worldwide? Like

Geoffrey 17:39

how does worldwide Yeah, that's a worldwide statistic. And where that comes from is the International Labor Organization that recently identified 41 million victims of human trafficking worldwide. But what we did is we took out forced marriage from that number and landed on the 27 million, there's about 15 million forced marriages and so was zeroed in on that 27 million number. So that's a global number that includes sex trafficking that includes labor, trafficking, other types of forced labor, etc. And so that's where that number comes from the other statistic that you just mentioned, the other data point is that the United States is identified as one of the or the greatest consumer of human trafficking worldwide. So we are driving that demand. And so those are a couple of global numbers. But when we talk about what's happening here inside the United States, we identify there are well over 100,000 kids in America, these are American kids that are in America being purchased for sex every single day. So it's a major major problem. 60 to 70% of those kids are coming out of foster care. Yeah. So foster care is the major major feeder for this problem.

Seth Price 18:52

So Carrie, from, from what I understand you helped script the documentary correct or you did script the documentary He wrote, Well,

Carrie 19:00

I'll tell you, we all worked on it. Because I had the we have a volunteer board. And I think because I was the one that was already home, it kind of became my main project. So um, yeah, yeah. But we all worked on it. But yes, it was. It fell back on my lap. Probably the most. Seth Price 19:28 Yeah. So how do you approach a topic like that when you want to make something so you said it took six years so how do you how do you approach a top How do you even begin to put together a project like that like, just from not from a production standpoint, but from like a heart set? Like how, how do you do that?

Carrie 19:47

Well, I'll tell you what, God definitely did it. Anybody who knows us in our board will tell you this was a miracle. I think it was probably went through At least seven scripts. And God just blew everyone up. I think the script laid on my floor for three years and little teeny pieces. And it was probably written. Well, I don't know, do you want to like tell them what we had to kind of go through? Like it was a lot of spiritual warfare.

Unknown Speaker 20:26

And was

Geoffrey 20:29

a lot of ups and downs. I mean, there was some legal issues that we got into with the former producer that was resolved amicably. So it's just really been, I mean, it's been an absolute journey over the last six years. And so like, like Kerry said, I mean, it was multiple iterations of a script. We started with kind of a treatment. So when the production began, we, we didn't just kind of go out there with a camera and just start filming people. I mean, there was a tremendous amount of prayer that went into it. Tremendous amount of planning, identifying who it was. That we really felt called to be part of the documentary. And then, in the beginning had a show treatment where we kind of described how we thought the show would flow. And so that was kind of the basis of where it started. But from that point on, though, it just really took on almost a life of its own. And we filmed six survivors from around the country. Yeah, that are really the mouthpiece of, of telling their stories. And then we have other people in freeze different churches, different organizations, etc, that really feed in some commentary around those stories, but it's really the survivor stories that are the red kind of a common thread throughout. And so they really helped to lead the process as well, I think, for Carrie to write this but I will tell you just watching her labor on putting this thing together, it was an extraordinary thing because we're we had over 50 interviews with each interview being an hour and a half, maybe an hour

Unknown Speaker 21:57

or two one with four Yeah,

Geoffrey 21:58

one was for but On average, probably an hour to two hours. So we're talking over 100 hours of interview footage, that I truly think that she memorized to the point where she could identify, okay, what's going to come next? So it was, it was just an incredible process to see this come together, but absolutely, Holy Spirit led. And I think at the end of the day, the the main objective was to be obedient to what God had called her to do, and called our board to do to put this story together. Yeah. So

Unknown Speaker 22:30

yeah, before

Carrie 22:31

I do want to share, this is a cool thing. So the way the way the Lord guided me This is a cool story. I would go to bed and it would like run in my head. And he would give me literally he showed me a clip come together with another clip. So I would wake up the next morning and I would go and I would find that clip. And I would dig through the transcript. And I knew kind of where it was. And I would piece that. And I remember pacifically, the two people he showed me, and I pieced them together. And then I would work and work and work. And I knew I was on track when I got to those two pieces, they made sense. And that's how it lasted for a long, long time, and I couldn't make it come until it was ready. Yeah. And then I would go and I because I, you know, I had I was homeschooling. So I would work on this, between 3am and seven. And I would stay up and he'd go to bed and he'd be like, I'm going to bed and if you like getting to 12 o'clock at night,

Seth Price 23:48

you know, like I'm almost there. I'm almost there.

Carrie 23:51

And so I am so glad to be able to sleep. I couldn't get it and I would pray and go God, please give it to me. I would recognize it was always a tiny and that's what made it fun and enjoyable. But then it made it miserable, really honest, because I just wanted to be done. But God wouldn't let me it was in May.

Seth Price 24:42

I can't imagine constantly going to bed thinking about the subject matter for that many days in a row like, honestly. I can't Yeah, yeah, I can't, I can't imagine. So I want to ask. So from what you have gathered all the information over all those years in the interview, that Ours and all the different ministries because throughout the documentary there are some of the survivors have gone on to create their own ministries which I found beautiful that out of it just found it beautiful. But why if you could flip a switch or four switches tomorrow and somehow or another shine a spotlight on it, what would change like in our churches or in our industries or in our I don't even know what the industries are like with with the knowledge that you have like how but besides talking about it for that one month out of the year, you know when we everybody says ended like what actually would need to change to move the needle to both lower consumption but also possibly change hearts to make the need for consumption also decrease.

Carrie 25:50

Okay, the key is the heart that we saw even on this film, it has been From the day we started the heart. And we've all had to go through just our own hearts and what we were willing to take on and what we weren't in the trust with God. So I feel like for this film, it has always been the heart, like God is trying to reach the hearts and until there's like a heart change. Yeah, we're not going to end this problem. And only Jesus can do that. That's why he is really the answer are survivors and I know you didn't get to watch it all. But the survivors in there, they get into their piece where they talk about how God worked in their heart. Seth Price 26:41 I finished it. Oh, you did? I didn't finish it. Yeah, I just couldn't do it in one sitting. And just a bit of context, the way that I consume media, so I can read like a 300 page book in two and a half hours and retain most of it. College was never really difficult and thinking of like transition of like, I'm transcribing all the episodes of this show, like I can almost to the second usually drill down to when somebody said something. I did finish it. It just I, I don't do well with emotions. And I watched it 14 feet from both of my daughters while they slept. And yeah, and

Carrie 27:21

it's real.

Seth Price 27:22

Yeah, I yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But so I hear that. And so as I talked with, so I've been talking about this with a few friends, some of which aren't Christian, and they won't accept the Jesus answer. And just because they're not Christian, not that that's right or wrong. That is where they're at. However, there is not just Christians that consume sex trafficking. And so what do you think from what you've learned? We could actually like if they had something needs to change, it's black and white, be it regulatory Be it shining a light on this, that or the other like, what is it that would make it change? because things change when the light gets shine on, you know, you have, you know, the metoo movement in the church, you have the metoo movement outside of the church like things have changed, or at least they seem to have. And so what would that be like, for this issue? Like what, what needs to be that?

Geoffrey 28:18

Well, one thing I'll mention, it comes from the name right blind eyes open. It's very intentional, why it's called that it's because we find so many people across the country today, either intentionally or unintentionally, are turning a blind eye to this issue. A lot of times, it's just because it's such a horrific issue they just don't want to pay attention to Yes, the problem is, with blind eyes turn, the problem continues to perpetuate. And so we've got to get eyes open to the reality of what's happening. And so awareness is obviously key. But then, what's one of the things the church can do to get involved in will certainly not only raising awareness within the congregation but also engaging in victim services. This is Very important that people and organizations and churches can understand who are working, who are already working within their community, to help reach victims of sex trafficking within their own community, and to engage with them and help those organizations to thrive. So on one end of the spectrum, which we call the back end of the spectrum, it's helping to rescue helping to restore those who have been rescued out of this. But we also recognize that we can't open enough safe homes, we can't have enough victim services in this country to end the problem, because it's really, when we look at this, it's a supply answer to a demand problem. So the real reason we have sex trafficking is because there is the demand. And so what can we do to begin to curtail that demand? Well, one of the things that church can do is to talk about it. So again, gauging people in the discussion, to have them aware, but also to make them aware of where do you think truly find one of the roots of why this is occurring in the United States. Why do we have an insatiable desire for sex growing with children? Where's that coming from? And we can identify the number one fueling factor to this problem in the United States is pornography. And we call it the downward spiral into depravity we address this also in the film, but back that pornography is really fueling this problem across the country. Because just like with drugs, studies are now showing that pornography is highly addictive physiologically in the brain. And at the same pornography doesn't provide the same level of arousal after being viewed once. And so what we have is really this what we call this downward spiral into depravity where individuals who are consuming porn on a regular basis, they feel a need to digest and consume more violent, more deviant and younger pornography and so it's the downward spiral into this depravity. That they then can't get out of. And there's a certain portion of those individuals then who want to actualize what they've been visualizing. And so that's why really, we see this problem increasing, because we've said many times that a man doesn't wake up one day when he's 40 years old and decide to have sex with a 12 year old. But that's not how it happens. There's a process over a period of years that occurs to where that begins to happen. And so, on the topic of pornography, there it is, again, the church has got to grab hold of this topic, and address this from the pulpit because we know statistically 60 to 70% of men in America are literally looking at pornography, or addicted to it. And that statistic is the same inside the church and outside the church. And so it's 30% of women. And so it's time really that the church also begins to engage in that topic. If we can get ahold of that one, we can save the next generation from even becoming addicted and driving the demand in the first place. So really, this is a generational issue, much like abortion. And obviously that was our first topic that we focused on so much like abortion, we really believe this is a societal issue. And it's a generational problem that is likely going to take generations or decades to really begin to make substantial differences in this country. But we believe that that can be done or we wouldn't be doing this. We truly believe that with the church engaging in this magnitude, that something can really be done about this. What would you if if I was a social services person or a foster parent or something like that in those circles if a lot of these children are coming out of the foster care system, and I don't know the statistics there, and if it was in the video, I don't I don't remember it. How could we address that? Because the social services are already overworked. Like I don't know how to. I just don't understand how to fix it. So what would you what would either of you do to kind of say, Hey, this is something that is impactful. It's something That's already regulated. It's something that already has accountability. Here's what we should tweak to help these children that are in the foster care system that are being taken advantage of. In the statistic there is about 70%. So about seven out of foster care, yes, about 70% of the kids just say this correctly, about 70% of the kids that are trafficked in America are coming out of the foster care system. And so one of the things I would say is for the church to get involved in the foster care system for individuals, for families, to either foster kids, or adopt kids, we've heard this statistic before that if every church in America could adopt one child that's in the foster care system, you wouldn't need the foster care system tomorrow. Really and so when people say that Yeah, adoptive child or, or fostering a child, I always like to say you know what you're doing probably the most important work to stop sex trafficking in America. Because it's a loving home, that they can bring that child in and care for that child in a way that they need to be cared for. So they're not so at risk to be victimized in this way. Seth Price 34:10 Yeah, I want to ask a pastoral question. And so if I, if I go back to my church and I say, here's what we're talking about, we need to spend months, because it's it's a it's a topic that matters. If the church is called to do anything, it is to bring shalom to the world like to move towards the kingdom of God. And sex trafficking of minors or sex trafficking period is definitely not that it's it's the opposite of that. How does the church not break apart because churches are really good about arguing, and they're really good about making committees and really good about making a plan, and not often really good about doing anything about it. And so how would a pastor or church go about doing that, besides doing some form of false like, how do you prepare a church to not just lose its members? I can see the Pastor in the back going, Yeah, we should talk about that on a Sunday night that's attended by 10% of the people that come to church because I'm, I got a light bill. I got I got food I need to buy, like, how how would you approach that?

Carrie 35:15

Well, actually, so when we actually produced surrender the secret there was already a tool that was in place for the church. So we just showed that, you know, through media, so with blind eyes open, there wasn't really a tool. So right now our board is actually making a Bible curriculum that's going to shadow the film after it's released. It'll be seven hours that can be done during Sunday school time. Our hope is that it's going to help the pastors and the leadership and anyone who's wanting to get engaged, actually, and the best way I can describe this is like if you're on an airplane, You need to oxygen, you put it on yourself, and then you can turn and put it on your child. So we're actually producing right now this curriculum that's going to in somewhat help deal with different parts, we're breaking down the film, it's going to deal with broken families, it's going to deal with, you know, vulnerability, really around human trafficking. But when we look at it as a whole, it's just the broken family. It's addiction. And then it's kind of getting into that transformation piece, and then actually helping the church engage with those who want to get involved, and what that looks like sort of some churches, it may just be organized in your intercessory prayer group, and other churches, it may be, well, it's going to help them we're gonna have resources through their sections that may help them hey, there's a couple ministries here in our hometown that we can actually help support because they are out feeding and going going in, and they're dealing with poverty because it runs together. And they're helping find those kids that are trapped in those low income hotels. And so we're kind of trying to work on that plan right now because we realize this is going to open up, you know, different pieces that I think not one church can really handle. But, yeah, that particular church handles just maybe in their area what they can. Yeah. And so, um, that was my

Seth Price 37:31

question. Like, when I finished watching, I'm like, Okay, so now what? You know, I was like, okay,

Geoffrey 37:39

okay. Yes, that's why I asked. Yeah. I had very few questions. I wanted to make sure that I asked but that was on the list. There's another one that want to make sure I asked. So the film focuses primarily on females. What is kind of the statistics or other any, it can't just be female. So what does it look like for males in Sex Trafficking here in the United States is when we, when we look at girls versus boys, for example, one DOJ funded study that we cite comp commonly. You remember when I said there's about 100,000 plus kids that are trafficked in America for sex, X percent of those are boys. And so that's a statistic that's also shocking to people. Because when most people think about sex trafficking, they are not thinking about boys. They're not thinking about men. Yeah. And so that is a whole nother dynamic. We do actually address that in the film as well that boys are trafficked to Yeah, but the six survivors that are featured in the film are all

Seth Price 38:42

want to talk about two more things before our time and one is and I think Brooke is the one that brings it up the emotional bondage to the captor can either of you kind of speak to what that looks like? And then for me, it had a big correlation to the concept of great rooming. And as I was talking about this with friends, and as I began talking about it with my wife, you know, I have two beautiful girls and many people have two beautiful girls or one beautiful or beautiful boys doesn't matter beautiful children. I don't actually understand what I need to be looking for. And so how does how does a captor that is lowered my child into this if if someone listening I mean those statistics are huge. So somebody listening knows somebody that this is happening to statistically that the numbers of the show are big enough that that is 100% likely, how does that emotional bondage kind of what can you look for? And then kind of how does that relate to the grooming?

Geoffrey 39:42

Well, I'll start and then you can even add in also. So the number one way that kids are trapped into sex trafficking in America is through what we call a Romeo pimp or a Romeo trafficker. And so these are guys who are extremely skilled at how to identify Young kids that are very, very vulnerable. Unfortunately, you can actually go on to Amazon today. And you can buy a book on how to become a violent sex trafficker. And it's actually prime. So they'll deliver it to you on Sunday, they'll deliver in a couple days. So, I mean, you think about the implications of that, and what that really shows about our society, that you can buy a book on how to do this. And so the guys that are doing this, mostly men, I mean, there are women as well, but the ones that are doing this, especially the Romeos, they're incredibly skilled at first of all where to go so they know where to go. They go to the shopping mall, they go to the bus station, they go to places where runaway kids are, they also go mainly also to social media. And so what they're looking for are young girls that are extremely low self esteem, very vulnerable. So they've grown up in a home where they haven't had unconditional love from the parents. Maybe they don't have a dad that's around a split family. They just haven't felt loved At home and so that young kid is looking for love elsewhere. And so these traffickers know what to look for. They're looking for the downtrodden, the the one that's kind of fallen behind the group, and they engage with that young child and basically start to show her attention. And in some ways, the first attention she's ever received like that before. And even though he's older man, he's engaging with her this this, you know, young teenager, but starting to show her this affection, maybe buying her gifts, etc. And then at a certain point begins to basically say that you know what, I'm your boyfriend, I love you. Well, that she's never heard that before either. So she falls madly in love with this guy. And so there's a grooming you mentioned, the word grooming, there's a grooming period, that it takes place, maybe six to nine months. And over that period of time, she ends up to the point where she'll do anything for him. And at a certain point in time, he'll flip a switch and basically so you work for me now. And at that point, it's kind of past the point of no return. It's what they call a stop. coma syndrome, or a trauma bond that exists where even though she's being victimized, unbelievably, she's still in love with this guy and will do anything for him so that the scenario we just painted is the most common scenario of how girls are lowered into the sex trafficking industry inside the United States.

Seth Price 42:21

How do I know when that's happening? Like if I'm listening, and I have a 16 year old 1415 year old daughter or son, like what am I looking for? To go? Okay, this is different. Like we need to like something has changed here. Because if you wait till March seven, I don't you know, you like rioted at week one? That's right,

Geoffrey 42:41

one, seven. Right. And you know, it's signs that parents can look for, but it's also signs that teachers can look for, or youth pastors can like pastors and churches, they can look for certain signs. And so some of those signs are a child who all of a sudden has a cell phone that didn't have a cell phone Before and if you're a parent, you don't know where that kid got the cell phone, what is that or they're showing up with jewelry, they're showing up with gifts and you don't know where they're getting them or truancy at school. So they're going to school, but then you're receiving truancy reports that you know what they're not they're not staying at school, they're going somewhere else, are children whose grades have been really, really good, really positive. And immediately all of a sudden drop off the map, something's going on. They're not always sex trafficking, but there's something going on there, or children that are extraordinarily tired during the day because they're, they're out all night. So these are some of the common signs and one thing I'd say to parents is just understand the dangers of social media. That is where most of these kids are lowered. And so it's understanding what social media platforms your kids are on and who they're talking to.

Seth Price 43:52

This may not be a fair question, but I do want to make it my last one. How has going through both of these topics, but specifically, this one has been Going through this change the way that you parent, neither one of you

Carrie 44:04

are perfect parents.

Geoffrey 44:06

Absolutely, absolutely.

Carrie 44:12

Um, I just started doing Facebook really about three months ago because I really haven't felt led to, to, to put my children on there. And I realized, like, I'm kind of losing connection with, with friends and my own family. So I've kind of gotten past all that. But um, I mean, we've had a lot of conversations with our kids. I mean, we mean they, I mean, our middle son is playing these games now. And these people come on and they talk. And one of the guys actually started asking some questions and he knew, like, I think for us, because we've been so involved in this and we've had so many conversations and our home and they've been exposed to almost every conversation and We're probably my kids are probably the kids that some parents don't want their kids are hanging around, but at least they're in. But, you know, he he reported a guy because he asked where your mom was. He thought that was inappropriate. Ask a What did he ask? He said, Where are you? Yeah, he asked where he was and then he asked what your mom's name was. So he reported him there's I guess there's a hotline with the these games they play, you can report like suspicious people. And so I was really surprised because he's a love it. I'm surprised he knew to do that. I was really glad that he's paying attention to that. Um, we don't let our kids go to the bathroom by themselves. They always have to have a buddy like we don't let our kids go into the restrooms by themselves. I feel like we keep a pretty close eye on them, but I have kind of moved out. I don't want them to be scared and live and so kind of at this point where, like, where, you know, I haven't given me any reason not to trust them. But we we do monitor, we have protections on all their devices. Every now and then my husband takes my older son's phone, and, you know, he checks to see what conversations are taking place. So we've got all the parental guards. And I think we just honestly, we really talk about it a lot. I mean, we inform them, you know, when we go to the mall, I mean, we just sometimes if someone looks not right, I might say like, hey, I want you to stay kind of close by me. I'm not really sure about that person. And they know what that means. Because we talk about it.

Geoffrey 46:44

Yeah. Yeah, but one thing I'd say is we're very open with them. And because when we talk about this publicly, a lot of times parents will come up and say, you know, is what you're gonna say appropriate for my child? And my answer has always been if your child is old enough Understand what we're talking about, your kid needs to understand it. And if they're too young and it just goes over their head, then it's not going to affect them anyway. But I mean, young kids, when they start to be able to understand this topic really do need to be educated on this because that's when they're at that Prime age of vulnerability. And I'll tell you, we do have like, almost like a titanium bubble around our house when it comes to the technology. But I was preparing for talking at a convention one time and I was doing some more research on the pornography topic. And I read something and it stopped me in my tracks. Because what it said is you can have the tightest restrictions in your own home on all your kids tablets and their phones and everything. And you think it's all button solid. But all it takes is one friend. And right then it was like oh my goodness, what I'd never thought about that. Yeah. And that night, a couple of years ago, I talked to our oldest son, and I just said to him, Hey, and we started talking a little bit. And I said, Well, what about your friends, and he actually had an instance where one of the Friends tried to show him something that was very inappropriate on cell phone. But I do believe that he was telling me the truth when he said, Dad, I didn't look. Yeah. And that's because we've been able to share with them. The reality of what happens that yeah, it might even be desirable, but not to look at this stuff because it's a trap. And so I think probably the biggest way like Carrie says is just open lines of communication and being completely open with them about the truth of what's happening.

Seth Price 48:26

Yeah, more information is if you can understand the information, it's not a bad thing to have it gives you power. It gives the person that is possibly getting taken advantage of power, and the scenario there so we'll good I think that's a good spot to leave. Thank you for taking the time to create the documentary. I do think it as well as a handful of other topics are the topics that matter for for my kids, like I like it matters. It matters for the country. It matters for my kids, that master my neighbors, kids. It's matters and when the church refuses to engage in things that matter, I genuinely think the world is a much worse off place. So thank you for helping to push that envelope a bit. And I really do hope that churches will come alongside as well as things that are not in the church as well and come alongside and, and try to help move the needle a bit. But, but thank you so much for coming on to both of you. I really appreciate it.

Geoffrey 49:22

Well, sir, thank you very much. Really appreciate you taking the time to address this topic. It's not an easy one. No, but

Seth Price 49:27

no, I don't get nervous for a lot of conversations, but I was nervous for this one. Yeah, I'm happy to get in the weeds on theology and hermeneutics, but this one it just it just hits close to home like i've you know, just hits close to home, so well thank Unknown Speaker 49:56 so the numbers are staggering

Seth Outro 49:57

27 million in slavery, in bondage from this, 27 million people with an average age of those people being 11 sold into sex trafficking, for whatever the reason is, it's just not acceptable. Now I really struggled to watch the documentary. Yeah, it took me days to get through it. And the stories in it and we briefly touched on it in the episode I highly recommend, if this is something that you feel like you should engage with, do so. You can find a bit more about the show over at ships of Tarshish which that website is ships. TV sh IP s tv.org. Thank you again for the salt of the sound for their music using this episode. I pray that each of you has a fantastic week. Be blessed

Love and Quasars with Paul Wallace / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode


Paul 0:03

What science has taught me and what relatively few scientists will say, although it motivates them every day, is that with everything that we know about stuff, the more we know, it's like knowledge is not a closed system. It's not like, “Oh, we know that now we can put that on the shelf”. Every time we think that's true, we come to realize that that is not true and that that needs to be taken down because there are more questions, questions multiply as fast or faster than our knowledge does. And so, looking out and and seeing things that you might be able to understand is a pleasure but you have to also admit the pleasure of not knowing what's beyond what you know.

Seth Intro 1:11

Hey there everyone. I am Seth, welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. Short answer to that question. Yeah, you can say that at church and you should. I'm excited that you're here today is episode, I think it is Episode 113, which is crazy. Right? That's, that's a lot of hours. And thank you for those of you that have been here since the beginning. And also thank you to those of you that this is the first time you're listening. I hope that you'll stick around and see what you hear. And let me know what you hear what speaks to you. I'm excited for today. I thought back on the years that I've been doing this and I just want to say thank you so much to the Patreon supporters of the show. To those of you that rated and reviewed the show, so much, so, so much. Thank you, it is literally not possible, literally impossible, to do this without you people and I'll be honest, sometimes I get discouraged. And I chat with many of you and y'all are a blessing in my life. And so thank you.

If you haven't supported the show, consider doing that like literally one of the new things that I'm doing actually starting with this episode is you can see at a I forget what level I think I call it salty, the song book. Which, if you grew up in the church are familiar with it. That'll make you laugh just right there and if not, go to YouTube, and type in Salty The Song Book. But anyway, you can see the video of the conversation that Paul and I had today and I'm going to try to record every single one of these that I can this year. I won't promise they'll all be available to be recorded on the video because that's just not always the case. Some of these are done via phone and etc. However, this one is and so those of you in that Patreon tier, you will find that today I think it's a couple bucks a month, I forget which one it is, you can watch that and I hope you already have. Science, if you grew up in the type of church that I did, or the type of school that I did, has been relegated to something that apparently is out to make God small; is out to break faith, is out to do so many things that are detrimental to the health of you and me as a person. That's just not true, it's just not.

I chatted with Paul Wallace, who wrote a book called Love and Quasars and I bought his book a few months back and I loved it like it is so good. The way that it's put together the the metaphors, the the usage of science, it really, really is so good. And so it was my privilege to talk to Paul a bit about sound What the heck a quasar is? How we should read the Bible what wonder and mystery looks like to someone that has been trained, like in planetary, atomic, new killer science like just literally what someone that has that much knowledge. Like what wonder do they see in what God do they see when they look out, because they just got a different foundation than I do. And so I really hope that you enjoyed this conversation with Paul Wallace. Let's do this thing.

Seth 4:45

Paul Wallace, welcome to the Can I Say This At Church podcast! I'm happy you're here. I wish I don't have cup of coffee or I would cheers with you there. I just finished it. So I'm excited that you're here and thanks for making the time. on what day is it Thursday. Thanks for making it on this Thursday, to pop onto the show.

Paul 5:03

You're welcome.

Seth 5:05

So I like to start off with the same question because I think background context matters when we talk about faith and your, your story implies everything that you do now, if someone asked, you know, Paul, kind of walk me through what makes you..and you go through that really in brief in your book, but what would you say are kind of those high points that you're like, Yeah, when I when I reflect back, like, these are the things that matter, and they're why I do what I do today.

Paul 5:30

Okay. Well, I guess the main thing to know is that I grew up in a scientifically literate Baptist household, and which I think there's probably there were probably more of them at the time than there are now but what that meant to me was my dad was a was a professor at Georgia Tech, and knew a lot of science and talked about science a lot. There were a lot of science books around the house. And we also went to church every time the doors were open, which was more often in those days than it is now. I was there in church, probably three times a week and I loved it. I loved church growing up, it was a place that I felt most at home outside my own house. And all my best friends, all through my growing up years, all my best friends were at church. And so I grew up with both these things hand in hand and began to wonder about how science and sort of God or faith worked at a pretty early or pretty early age, I began to wonder about it. So that's kind of the background as far as the book goes.

Seth 6:49

What about so what about your background apart from the book, so you hold two hats now? So you're a professor, right? You're obviously extremely intelligent because you have like seventeen PhDs and that's, hyperbolic but…

Paul 7:04

(laughter) …it feels like 17 but only got one

Seth 7:05

So you got an M Div, you have a PhD in what astrophysics?

Paul 7:11

Nope, my PhD was actually in nuclear physics, but my research after graduate school was in astrophysics.

Seth 7:18

I don't really know enough about either of those to know the distinction. But I'm curious now. So how did those break apart?

Paul 7:26

Well, nuclear physics is the study of atomic nuclei.

Seth 7:30

Okay.

Paul 7:31

And it involves, my work, involves working in a lab, in what's called particle accelerator, proton accelerator.

Seth 7:41

That's like the Large Hadron Collider, right? Like a particle accelerator?

Paul 7:44

It’s like that but it was smaller. It was smaller. It was the size of about an average size gymnasium, roughly. So it was a smaller place, but it was experimental work and it was investigating atomic nuclei very small scale. And then when I graduated, got my PhD and went on, and started doing research after that, I started doing astrophysics.

Now there was a link between the two, they weren't completely separate. I started doing astrophysics and started studying things, you know, on the largest possible scale. So I went from the super tiny to the super large.

Seth 8:23

So you'll see me a reference back down to the notes here. So there is a part at the beginning of your book, and I buried the lead. So the name of your book is Love and Quasars. And so I had this yesterday, I was rereading it. So I've read it twice now, because it's an easy read, and it's not insanely long. And so I really appreciate that.

Paul 8:42

Those are both highly intentional.

Seth 8:45

Well, yeah. Because science can get. I mean, my wife is a nurse, and sometimes she'll say things and I'm like, if you want me to talk like a banker I can

Paul 8:52

My wife is too and I experienced exactly the same thing. Like I don't know what you just said,

Seth 8:58

Oh shoot! Your wife's a nurse.

Paul 9:00

Yes.

Seth 8:59

Yeah, yeah. She'll say things and I'm like, are they okay? What does that mean? I don't…everybody's alive. It was a good day as a bit I don't understand. Yeah. And then I'll often tell her like, you know, if you want, I could just start talking and banking terms, which is what I do for a living. But she she equally gets like the I don't know what you're talking about right now.

Paul 9:20

Yeah, language barrier.

Seth 9:21

Yeah. So my son asked me yesterday, we're at the doctor, and he asked me, he's like, what's a quasar? And so I pulled up a YouTube video. And I tried to show him that and he was bored. I kept fast forwarding and then we just saw some artist rendering. And he goes, “so it's just a flashlight?” I was like, No…but that's what that picture; that's what the pictures look like. I really wanted to know. So how would you explain a quasar to a 10 year old? Because honestly, I have about that education level when it comes to quasars.

Paul 9:50

Okay, let's start with the Milky Way. Okay, Milky Way's a galaxy.

Seth 9:53

Okay? Yes, I’m with you.

Paul 9:57

Now, the galaxy didn't always exist. There was a time earlier in it’s life when it was much younger, just like you and me, right, there was a time we were born. But it turns out that when a galaxy is formed when the galaxy is born, is extremely bright. It pumps out a lot of energy when it's very young, kind of like people right though they tend to lose the energy as they get older. And so what a quasar is, is basically a galaxy in its very early stages of formation.

Now, the deal is though, and this is where it gets a little bit head trippy is that the only galaxies that we see forming these days are the ones that are very, very far away, because we're seeing the light from them and the light that we see has been traveling for billions of years. The big galaxy forming stage and the universe was billions of years ago. So the only things that we're seeing that are the only galaxies that we see that are still forming ones that were formed billions of years ago. And we're just now seeing the light from them.

So the bottom line of all that, the clip didn’t say is that all you need to know, is that quasars are among not only the brightest things we can see, but the most distant things that we can see. All quasars that we see are extremely far away on a cosmic scale.

Seth 11:23

Yeah. And I do want to ask you about scale because you break down in the Washington Monument a bit about scale, but I want to get there a minute. So when I'm looking at the night sky, realistically, every star that I see is…I always understood as a sun. Some of those could be quasars, I guess, as well or can I not see them?

Paul 11:43

Not as individual stars, no. No, you you can't see any quasars with your eyes.

Seth 11:48

Oh because it's the galaxy.

Paul 11:52

There's only one galaxy…well, there's only a handful of galaxies you can see other than the Milky Way, that you can see with your eye and they're all very close to us. All quasars are too dim to see with your eye, sorry to say.

Seth 12:05

No, that's fine. Because people have made nice little YouTube renderings that confused me and my 10 year old. Um, so you talk about in the beginning, the importance of in your book, the importance of having a realistic view of science. And then you you basically say, what is official science? So what is official science?

Like when we say the word science, what are we intending to mean? Because I think people say science and they mean a lot of things. Just like people say banking and they mean a lot of things or ministry and they mean a lot of things.

Paul 12:38

Well, when I use the word science in the book, I'm not talking about technology, or, you know, not talking about computer's, not talking about, you know, medical technology. I'm not talking about artificial intelligence. I'm talking about science as a process of understanding and revealing the world around us a process of asking questions, you know, and framing experiments and getting answers within that sort of, it's a process of discovery. That's what I mean by science.

Seth 13:19

Okay. And so by the inverse of that, how would you then say the relationship to science and religion should be?

Paul 13:29

Well, I think the simplest word to use is cooperative as opposed to “opposed”. They are not opposed to one another. I think that there is some friction between them but I think ultimately, ultimately, they they are complimentary, and cooperative.

Seth 13:52

Alright, so where is it at? You where is it at? Come here to me book, um, I don't usually dog ear. The problem is I highlighted a lot. Here we go. So there's a concept that you break down and you reference it four or five times, and it's called chessboxing. And that's one word. And I didn't know that that was a thing.

Paul 14:14

I didn't either until very recently.

Seth 14:16

Yeah. And so I can't be the only one. And then you use that metaphor, test boxing, as, I guess, you know, having to do science, which would be head and boxing, which would be you know, total being faith, religion, wholeness, whatever you want to call it. So, can you break down kind of that metaphor chessboxing? Kind of how it matters, how you're using it in the book, to kind of break through the logic of both religion and science.

Paul 14:41

Chessboxing is an actual sport. And it's, it's, it's a pretty big deal in parts of Asia and Europe, and it's starting to, you know, make a little make a little showing here in North America, but basically, it's a game were in where you alternate between rounds of chess and rounds of boxing. It opens with chess, the two players compete on a chessboard, then they get into the boxing ring and they you know, they have a two or three minute round. And then they come back and somehow they score this and there's a winner at the end.

So basically, it's a combination of chess which is of course a mind game and boxing which a physical game. As well as a mind game, I think. Um, but the point I wanted to make in the book was this that sometimes science tries to do more than it really can like a like a native boxer who tries to play chess but can't quite do it right. Science sometimes exceeds its limits exceeds his boundaries. And sometimes faith does something similar as a native chess player. Sometimes it's gets good at chess and thinks oh it can box also and so tries to tries to do science also. And so the analogy basically is that we have a native boxer and a native chess player who is trying to both do everything. So sometimes science over reaches its limits and sometimes faith overreaches its capacity. And because both try to do everything, chess and boxing, and turns out that when science and faith try to do everything in that way, that if it turns into a mess.

Seth 16:38

I want to talk about those limits. So what would you if you had to draw a line in the sand, so again, let's just use the metaphor of my son, because honestly, he asked the most scientific questions of anybody that I know. But I think that's a lot of his age, you know, everything he's beginning, you know, he's coming in, he's about to be in sixth grade. And so, we're starting to talk about things that aren't just repetitive as we slowly build upon “we had Native Americans. Also they were named this” also they were the palette, you know, every year we just build a new name. So right things are getting more difficult.

So what should be a limitation of science? Because science seems to constantly push the boundaries of knowledge. And so what is the scientific limitation, I guess of science?

Paul 17:22

Well, the example I use in the book is that science, sometimes you see people who are scientists, reject Scripture say on rounds that it is contradictory, for example. Which of course is true within Scripture. There's all kinds of voices and sometimes there are contradictions. Sometimes those contradictions are fruitful and sort of lead to new questions that are fruitful, sometimes they're just dumb contradictions that just don't mean much and that aren't important. But the problem for the scientist is that there are contradictions. In other words some scientists look at the Bible in the same way that you would look at a data set you want, you want a clean, complete data set, no matter what science you're doing, the cleaner and the less contradictions that are are interdict, that the better life is going to be.

And so I use as an example of treating Scripture like a data set, you're taking the science mindset and applying it to Scripture. And I think that's this is I, that would be a line for Science.

Seth 18:28

And then so what would be the line for faith or religion and and I mean that in so much as not just Christian faith, because it's not the only religion or faith? So what should be a healthy boundary as the to interact?

Paul 18:42

Well, the crossing of that boundary is most evident in a for example creationism. Religious people Ken Ham, sort of young earth creationists term, who insists that certain scientific ideas are out of bounds based on their understanding of Scripture? So they're going the opposite direction. They're taking the understanding of Scripture and applying it outside the limits of the text and saying, okay, evolution can't be true because Genesis contradicts it. That is taking a faith mindset and trying to do science with it because you're using faith to reject science. And you can only reject science by doing science. You can't reject science, doing, you know, it any other way. So faith is trying to do science and in that case, it it makes a mess of it.

Seth 19:42

Yeah. So how I don't do this. Well, how do you find so I have that conversation with a lot of people about you know, because I'm not an inerrantist. And I think I'm saying that right. I'm a literalist in the fact that I think that We should read scripture in the way that the author, I think intended this to be read and the

Paul 20:06

In the old sense of the word literal, yes.

Seth 20:07

to the person that read it like, like, I've used this example before, but 1000 years from now, the word Snapchat means something to me. And then I don't know what it will mean to people 1000 years from now. And to read that word, literally, would be to talk about an iPhone and the way that it works and social media and the way that that works and the cultural context and relevancy. I want to drill deeper on creation and evolution, and how the two interplay because you kind of talked about it a bit in your book that you know, the word creation and the word evolution aren't necessarily saying the same thing. And maybe I'm saying that wrong, you know, religiously, we're talking about the moral, the why, the god behind; and then evolution is just the like the mechanical. How am I am I saying that wrong? Like, can you break that apart a little bit further because I struggle to have a conversation with people that do that because we have Approach scripture entirely differently, which is a bigger chat than science and it’s also a different chat than faith.

Paul 21:04

Are you talking about when I talk, when I talk about the two being more or less independent? And I say that creation is a theological idea, it implies certain it, you know, creation implies relationship between us and God relationships between us and one another. It's theological, whereas evolution. When you talk about evolution, you're implying certain observations have been made and certain theories applied. And there are two separate things like I use in the book, you know, hold of a grapefruit and you say, is this yellow or is it spherical? And that's both right? To say is it creation or evolution. It's a I think that is as non in that part of the book. I'm saying this is nonsensical saying is grapefruit yellow or is it spherical? Because it's both. And those two, those two things are independent, yellow and spherical. Right?

Now, I don't necessarily advocate that point of view. But I do describe that point of view in my book, yes. And also, I would say, if I can, that that's an excellent way to start with an 11 year old or a 12 year old or a sixth grader,

Seth 22:30

just go get a piece of fruit out of the fridge?

Paul 22:31

Yes and to talk about I think, using that idea is a great place to start when you're talking to young kids about this stuff.

Seth 22:38

There's a part in here where you say,

similarly, the theological term creation implies a relationship between the creator and the creation, while the scientific term evolution implies just an observation about all the data set that we have.

Right? So what do we do then when you say that to someone and it’s in a fundamentalist mentality, and they're like, yeah, but if we're talking about evolution, that means that God is not all powerful. And you go through this, although I got slightly confused, Paul, there's a part in here, let me find it. So you say, you know, there's a few different ways to think about, you know, omnipotence or God. And you say there's three, but I only found two. One would be process theology, and the other was natural theology. I didn't actually see the third unless I missed it. It's entirely possible.

Paul 23:28

Maybe I missed it myself.

Seth 23:29

Like you said, here's the first, process is the second. And then you say all three perspectives outlined here, you know, emphasize cooperation or competition. But there may be an implied

Paul 23:42

Oh, I know what it was. It was independence, the independence model. I was counting that as a third because the independence model. They cooperate by ignoring each other.

Seth 23:56

Okay, so that's the prior chapter. Okay, sorry. I got it for a second I literally was like, number three I saw number one. Number three. So can you define then what you mean when you say natural theology and what you mean when you say process theology because those are jargon, theological jargon, for lack of a better word, and I think I'm with you, but I want to make sure everyone listening is.

Paul 24:20

Yeah, natural theology is looking to creation looking to nature, looking to science, to see what we can learn about God. And it's really not doing any different than you know, looking at the paintings of Van Gogh and learning something about the artist from looking at the paintings. You know, we're listening to Prince and learning something about who Prince is by listening to Prince's music. That's natural theology, just looking at creation and drawing conclusions about the nature of God based on creation. And for some people, it goes so far as to say that we can prove God by looking at creation. Now, I don't think that's true.

But some people can, would would say that we can actually prove that there is actually a God by looking at creation as also natural theology. So that's natural theology. Process theology is a much more intensive, total reworking of the Christian faith. And it makes it essentially smooths off a lot of the rough edges between traditional Christianity and science, and puts the two into a single system that's more or less self consistent. And it's very deeply philosophical but thats process theology.

Seth 25:54

I need to visit that because I talked about open theism way many years ago. That's not quite the same thing as process theology…

Paul 25:59

There's some overlap. You know, the Venn diagrams do overlap. Yeah,

Seth 26:03

I'm gonna have to dig into that. But that…that will require many, many more hours of reading.

Paul 26:08

And I don't I don't get into it in the book at all, but I am I am very, although I don't really cross over that line, I am deeply deeply sympathetic to process theology.

Seth 26:19

Why?

Paul 26:31

Because it resolves some problems that are big problems like you know the arbitrariness of suffering. And also just how to sort of frame Christian belief within an evolutionary context. Which is one thing that you just can't avoid. If you take science seriously the idea of evolutionary story that you just can't have that. And so it resolves some some of those tensions right there.

Seth 26:58

Would you call yourself a process theologian or you just like some of the pressures actresses are some of the ideas?

Paul 27:00

I like some of the ideas. But in the end, I just can't do it because I feel like it. And I've got friends who are process theologians like better than railing at me. But in my mind, it tends to flatten the world out a little too much and nailed down and smooth off the edges a little too much for my taste it you know what I mean?

Seth 27:29

That’s fair. So I have a question. And you infer that the discovery is noteworthy. And so I want to if it's alright, I want to read a part of your So you talked about gamma rays, which I recently learned with my son because he's learning about spectrums and light waves and yeah, Isaac Newton, and so I've been quizzing him, you know, what are the, you know, on the frequencies here on the spectrum? What can’t we see? And he's like, you know, infrared X ray, gamma ray, radio, and then you know, the normal, you know, violet, all this stuff, right?

And he's like, gamma, so we're all going to be the Hulk? And I'm like, no! And you make the same joke in here. You say, um, you know, gamma rays stream down constantly from the sky. And you're talking about a scientific discovery that you did and you say, you know,

at the time very few quasars were known to emit gamma rays, making my discovery noteworthy.

So what did you do? Like what were you like? How did you what is that so you talked about? I guess, proving no not proving? Finding? I don't I don't know what the right word is…

Paul 28:26

Yeah, finding it's like suppose you went into the forest and you found a tree that didn't really fit anybody else's taxonomy of trees you didn't really fit in the the system anywhere, you know, because this bark had certain characteristics, its leaf shape was a little odd the way its leaves were clustered, its fruit looked a little different and didn't really fit into anything, any previous category. And so after you spend some time, you know comparing your tree to everything else you start to realize, you discovered a new species of tree. Yeah, that's kind of logically what happened is that I just discovered a quasar.

Now, finding a quasar. It's not a big deal. It's no no more of a big deal and finding a new tree somewhere that nobody's ever noticed before, right? That's easy to do. But to find this particular species of Quasar was a little unusual. Its characteristics were odd.

Seth 29:25

Yeah. Why is that a big deal? Like why does that matter? To me to science to you? Like why?

Paul 29:32

In one very real sense, it doesn't make a difference at all. This thing was 7 billion light years away and has virtually zero effect on your life or my life. But it matters to me and to some others, because it's just a new…

Well, for two reasons. One, is that we, we've learned something about the world that we didn't know before. It's a small thing. You know, it's one tiny little object on the shelf of knowledge, you know, down in sub-basement seven, you know, it's a tiny little bit of knowledge. But to me, it's important and it was personally important because I felt at the time as if I had made a connection with the universe. That I had been able to look at something that was billions of light years away, which is inconceivably distant. I could sit around all day long and try to paint analogies, but I couldn't do it. I couldn't relate to you adequately that distance. And I felt like I had connected with this object that is perfectly real as real as you and I; 7 billion light years away. And to me, that's a bit of a miracle. Yeah, that I could. That that is even possible.

Seth 31:00

Yeah, well, it's also, I don't, I don't really believe in luck. But it's serendipitous that the technology exists and your brain exists and the instruments exists that you happen to because you could have also missed it. Because it's going to shoot right past Earth and go to whatever. I don't know which direction the universe is going things going in all directions.

Paul 31:24

It is.

Seth 31:26

Which, I've actually, I'm going to ask you now, so I understand that the universe is expanding because I don't always talk to someone that knows their stuff about science and expanding to nowhere and everywhere at the same time and I'm probably saying that poorly but it's the best way I can explain it.

Paul 31:40

That's about as good as I've heard it said.

Seth 31:42

Perfect. But is where's the center? So like if light because light is going to go both ways, like because lights out stretching, but it's also coming here as well. So where is it going? Like when it gets to this? Like, you know what I mean? Like what's the there must be a destination? Well, foreign origin and I don't mean it in the big bank sense. I mean literally, like, Is there a way to mathematically fix where it's at?

Paul 32:11

No. That will be unsatisfying. And I'm trying to think of the simplest way to say this for our listeners, if I had 10 minutes with you with a diagram, I could draw for you, I could help. But here's what did not happen with the Big Bang. And this is a very popular misunderstanding that there was you know, space sitting around empty, XYZ, three dimensional space, sitting around empty and then all of a sudden into that space occurred, this boom.

And that that boom happened at a location and that's the center that you're talking about. But that didn't work that way, because space itself, you have to understand, and we’ve believed this ever since Einstein, he convinced us that space itself is a thing that itself is a player in the in the drama here. And space itself was wrapped up in that bang.

There was no space into which the bang happened. Ok. Space itself was created at the moment of the bang. And think of space kind of like suppose you are on a balloon suppose, imagine a balloon and you're a point on that balloon and you can't get inside or outside you're stuck on the balloon. Okay? The balloon is finite, right? There's there's not an infinite amount of area on the balloon. But it's also not bounded. There's no walls anywhere on the surface of the balloon. There's no place where you go and then all sudden the balloon ends. Space is more like that. Space is more like if I go in that direction ahead and if I go long enough, I'll end up background started. I won't, there's no wall anywhere. There's no end of stuff anywhere. So obviously this is going to be hard to for listeners to imagine and it essentially involves getting more than 3 dimensions into the picture. Yeah, so it's, it's, you know, yeah takes a little bit of background work to get a clearer picture.

Seth 34:34

Well, yeah, that's just the way my brain works. You know, if it's, if it's if it's a meeting somewhere else, it's got to be coming or two anyway, doesn't matter. Right. Right. I don't know if you watch Or if you've ever watched the watchman and for those listening, if you're under a certain age probably don't watch the Watchmen. It's on HBO. But there's a character in there named Dr. Manhattan. Are you familiar with him?

Paul 35:11

No, I know the premise of the show, but I've never seen it.

Seth 35:13

So Dr. Manhattan effectively steps into some kind of mechanism. There's a mistake, and he literally is atomized. And then over the course of time, he knitted back together. He still has all of his memories, but he also exists everywhere. And the reason I bring that up is there's a part in here where you talked about after you, you know, you measured the gamma rays coming out of the quasar. It's a big deal. You're exuberant and so you say, you know,

I can still see the scientific vision that emerged from my victory walk on that hot Maryland day, courts were buzzing frenzy atoms we're moving in long molecules of DNA.

You're going to talk about birds flying across the globe. Jupiter's red spot still turning stars are cycling through their lives and you just keep on going as you like, zoom out into the universe and for some reason it made me think of. So he kind of that that character exists in and out of all times. And so everywhere that he is he's there. But guess he's also here and there. And there's a there's a line in the movie. He's like, you know, I'm in all like when he's about to die like I'm in all the I'm in all the good places with you right now at the same moment, because that's where I want to be. And that's for some reason it made me…it gave me a different perspective of time. And I say that to say, you have a story about time where there's twins, one takes off, one comes back. Can you rip apart a bit about how time matters in a religious frame when we're thinking about God, when we're using a data set from science? Because I think that we think of time as 24 hours, or I guess right a year even as changing from the Gregorian to the Julian calendar, right. But time is the engine that drives I think most everything that we do So in a religious sense with science knowledge, how is time bigger and bow smaller than what most people think that it is in this 24 hour day?

Paul 37:09

You mean, you want to theological idea of time? Or do you asking for, like, description of time, from sort of Einstein's point of view?

Seth 37:16

I know Einstein, if you've watched Interstellar, I'm assuming that that is bad science, but maybe it's not…

Paul 37:28

Mostly it was right. Mostly it was right.

Seth 37:30

Well, if you haven't watched it, and you're listening, go watch the darn movie because it's…it's gripping. And it'll, it is time in the story of a father and the daughter and which makes it memorable. But no time at a cosmic scale, because we reference scale earlier. And so, you know, when we think about theology, and we think about time, should time be a thing that we're concerned with time for creation, days, hours, millennia, centuries, or should we not even really concerned with it?

Paul 38:01

Oh, I think I think we should i think that you know, I think one of my first real religious experiences that I had as a child came when I first came face to face with what we call it today, deep time; is when I first realized, you know, when I was young, I knew that dinosaurs came before people did, right. But I never had a sense beyond that. But when I was maybe 10 or 12 years old, I found a geologic timeline, basically a cosmic timeline in a book, and I realize just how deep time is, as far as you know how recently we've shown up and it really rattled me and really kind of left me questioning a lot of things.

I'm I was like 10 or 12 years old, and I was stunned by this. And it really kind of made me feel like I was a ghost. Because, you know, the brevity of life sort of struck me. Nobody I know had died. But I got I got the same sense of the beauty of life when I was very young. And but I think looking back on that now, that, you know, that was a religious experience, it was it was face to face with reality. And, you know, I do think that that was religious in the sense that I think that when we connect with reality, we're connecting with God, is what I think. And so I think time does matter, quite a bit. I hope I've answered your question. And in the sense that satisfying to you there.

Seth 39:53

Well it's your answer. So as long as you're satisfied

Paul 39:57

I just want to make sure that I heard the question right.

Seth 40:01

There's a character in here named Tycho, am I saying his name right?

Paul 40:08

(pronounces name) tea-co

Seth 40:10

So I'm not saying it right. Um, yeah. So you kind of frame his logic in the way that many people approach both faith and science and like kind of his issues with Copernicus. But can you kind of break apart? Not necessarily specifics of that unless you want to, but kind of the who he was and how that mindset still affects the way that we do so many aspects of everything today. Because I think that that's it's really important. Really important. Matter of fact, I'm, I highlighted almost the whole chapter because the thoughts behind that are…

Paul 40:42

I'm glad you liked it.

Seth 40:48

Oh, yeah. Yeah. Well, especially. It was because it was new.

I watch a lot of sci fi so there's a the Expanse, which is on Amazon now, but it was on something else. There's like a station by a guy named Tycho or tiko or whatever, okay, and it's spelled the same way as well…

Paul 41:01

Probably. Yeah, yeah, he was a 16 three astronomer. He died in the first years of the 17th century. But he was he was the greatest European astronomer to never use a telescope. He died a few years for the telescope was invented. But his career occurred after Copernicus died. So during these years the Copernican theory, the idea that the Sun was in the middle, and the Earth goes around it was a new and radical idea. And astronomers and philosophers did not like Copernicus’ idea for a number of reasons, they had some really good reasons. One of them was that all of Aristotelian physics and cosmology, which is what they were taught, was a unified set of ideas, but it was grounded in the idea of the Earth at the center of the universe or in the middle of the universe, I should say. And anyway, Copernicus upset that, right? Copernicus put the Earth out around the Sun. And it disrupted the whole system of thought that had dominated universities for several hundred years.

And so that was a problem. Also, the scientific evidence Copernicus had was very thin and have a very strange kind. So there wasn’t that much scientific evidence in favor of it, so Tycho rejected it, which was the majority opinion at a time, but for two reasons. One is that there was not much scientific evidence for it; well really three reasons. One, there wasn't much scientific evidence for it. Number two that disrupted virtually everybody's ideas what the world was like, but the third one was theological. And the third one, was this: what very few people know about the Copernican theory, the idea that the sun sits in the middle and the Earth goes around it, is that true? If that were true, then the stars would have to be much, much, much, much further away than previously thought.

And then the details of that are not important. But the point is, is if Copernicus is right, then there's a whole lot of empty space between Saturn, which was the highest planet, and the stars expanded that distance by almost 1000 times. Minimum. And this idea that the universe will soon was empty space in it, for Tycho was an argument against Copernicus, because he thought, God would not possibly the universe was so much wasted space. That was his argument.

In other words, his theological assumptions about God interfered with his science and his ideas about God…that God wouldn't possibly make a universe that is so out of line with a common sense, right? There's no, you know, God certainly wouldn't do that, therefore this scientific theory must be wrong. Yeah, you know, putting his idea of God against science that way, and because he could not accept that God would do that. He rejected one of the greatest foundational scientific theories of history, because of his theological assumptions.

Seth 44:27

With what you know of him do you think, had he lived a little longer and had a telescope, he would have recanted? I don't know how much you know about him.

Paul 44:36

Laughter…That’s an excellent question!

Seth 44:42

Like if he had if he's like, like, looks at it and goes, actually I'm sorry, I was wrong.

Paul 44:43

He might have, but he had his own theory, a third theory of the universe. He proposed sort of compromise theory between Aristotle and Copernicus, and he had a lot invested in that. And that would have been really interesting to see if he would have come around, I think he might have but it would have been extremely painful for him, because he had basically all of his professional career invested in a theory that Galileo basically, and really the people around him proved to be wrong.

Seth 45:20

Yeah. I just curious. It's one of the one of the few things I wrote in the book was, I wonder if he would have changed his mind? You know?

Paul 45:26

That's an excellent question. I've never thought of that before.

Seth 45:29

You just talked about scale and the blank space in between. And so I recently in September, went to DC with my son, we toured everything, we went into the White House, we did all that stuff. And I had never really comprehended, I think because no one had ever broken it down for me, just the actual scale, you know, because Elon Musk will be like, we're gonna go to Mars. And if we launch right here, I can be there in 10 months, but I have to launch right here by what is 2021-22 whatever it is.

I don't think that humans are built to comprehend time at a scale that way or distances at a scale that way because it might, it breaks my brain. The math checks out, but the numbers are so big that it's like trying to comprehend how much interest I'll get back to what I do Bill Gates makes in a day. And for those, and for those that want to know, is literally a waste of his time! If he walked past $100 bill, it is quite literally a waste of his time to lean down and pick it up, he makes more money if he was just going to where he was going to go. That hundred dollars is not worth that half a second that it takes .

Paul 46:28

Wow…cause he is making more than $100 every half second?

Seth 46:31

Correct and he needs to go wherever he's going to continue to do so. It's literally not worth his time.

Paul 46:37

Wow.

Seth 46:38

You know, so but most people that aren't in banking are like that. It's $100 I'm like yeah, but he makes money at the second level; not an annual level he makes money. The total amount you can divide by seconds, not days, not years, not months, it's literally that much money.

So can you for those listening kind of breakdown that you know if we're if we're going to plant Earth here or the Sun here, the distance because I love the metaphor, and I didn't expect you to get I found myself going, Oh, he's going to be in Asia or he's going to be as I just didn't really know where to expect you to get. But I love it.

Paul 47:09

Well, what do I say? Do I say the sun is a basketball; do I make basketball? I think that's what I do…

Seth 47:17

I'm not sure that the object matters, but we can make it a basketball.

Paul 47:22

Yeah, it does. It would be I think it's…

Seth 47:25

…let me find it. There's a grapefruit now there's a there's a blueberry. There's a golf ball that doesn't float. I'm just like trying to find it. Let me see if I can find it.

Paul 47:35

I think is-it an 18 inch beach ball? I can't remember…

Seth 47:41

There is a beach ball. I don't remember the inches.

Paul 47:44

That's gotta be the Sun, if there's a beach ball. It's gotta be the sun.

Seth 47:46

There is a beach ball.

Paul 47:46

Yeah, there is a beach ball. Okay, so imagine a smallest beach ball at the Washington Monument. Right there and in downtown DC on the Mall. You got the sun. So we're going to do is we're going to imagine for ourselves a scale model of the solar system. So if the sun is a 18” inch, say beach ball, foot and a half across something like that smallest beach ball at the Washington Monument, then the solar system itself could fit pretty snugly into downtown Washington DC. Okay. Certainly within the limits of the city, Washington DC, the solar system would fit pretty well. Now, I'm thinking that the sun was actually smaller than that, but I don't know. I can't remember how I did it. Do you have it there? I'm just trying to find the page. I stopped

Seth 48:52

I'm just trying to find the page. I stopped looking when you started talking; I'll find it…

Paul 48:57

What chapter is that?

Seth 48:58

I feel like it's three…

Paul 49:00

Oh that far in. It might be three. Here we go. Here we go it's chapter drumroll please — six.

Seth 49:06

Wow, I was halfway there.

Paul 49:09

Yeah. Okay. So if the sun were here we go if the sun were is on page 46

if the sun were shrunk down to basketball size and placed at the base of the Washington Monument in Washington DC, Earth would be a peppercorn about 80 feet away. A blueberry and a distance of about 1600 feet, at the end of the Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool would serve nicely as Uranus. And the entire solar system as I said a moment ago would fit within the limits of the National Mall, including Pluto; and comets and so forth.

So the thing that I'm trying to communicate is not so much the size of the solar system, which itself is beyond human understanding, but the distance to the closest star so we've got the solar system fitting pretty nicely into downtown Washington DC. The next closest star, Proxima Centauri would be in Hawaii, on that scale.

Seth 50:21

From DC to Hawaii?

Paul 50:23

from DC to Hawaii, the next closest star would be on the eastern edge of the Big Island of Hawaii.

Seth 50:29

And then just time out so for those not in Virginia and I am because when I lived in Texas, I don't even know that I would have understand that reference. So center (at) the eastern seaboard, literally off the Atlantic coast from Washington DC you can be at the ocean within well with no traffic within a matter of minutes.

Paul 50:46

Yeah.

Seth 50:50

So just for scale there. Okay, so we're at Hawaii, and that is the next star.

Paul 50:54

The next closest star if the sun is a basketball and downtown Washington, DC The next closest star is about the size of a bowling ball and it's sitting on the beach on the Big Island of Hawaii. That is the scale. That is the ratio of, you know, star size to empty space between star size. When I first made that calculation, I made it back when I first started teaching astronomy 15, 16, 17 years ago, I sat down and did that calculation, and I thought it was wrong. I really thought that was wrong.

Seth 51:37

You thought it was too far too short,

Paul 51:39

It was too far. I thought if the sun were a basketball in Atlanta, Georgia; that the star would be maybe in South Georgia, huh? You know, 400 miles away 300 miles away, but turns out is 10 times that distance it is 3000 miles away. So if the Sun is a basketball next closest star is between three and 4000 miles away closer to the four actually.

Seth 52:06

…and then if I was going to drive there hypothetically because you can't drive on the ocean but let's assume we can because literally we just made a peppercorn the Earth so we can do whatever we want to do. How long would it take me to get there?

Paul 52:19

Well at 60 miles an hour…

Seth 52:21

No, in just real time like how many years; light years?

Paul 52:27

Oh gosh; how many years if you were to drive there?

Seth 52:32

Nor necessarily drive but if I could get there as fast as I possibly could?

Paul 52:36

Say in the fastest possible space probe…

Seth 52:39

Yeah or even you talk about your hypothetical time situation earlier. A solar sail that is laser driven. I don't even know how that works on. I have no idea how that works or how lasers with would drive kinetic energy, but whatever.

Paul 52:57

It's a speculative form of interstellar transport basically that people were working on.

Seth 53:02

my first thought when I read it is when the laser burned through the sale. And I realized I probably don't understand what lasers are outside of Star Wars..

Paul 53:11

Well, at the fastest possible, you know, with the space probes we actually have right now it would take you billions of years to get there. At least hundreds of millions of years to get there. That’s moving like 20,000 miles an hour.

Seth 53:27

Yeah. And if I could move as fast as light, how fast?

Paul 53:34

You would get there and a little over four years.

Seth 53:41

That's still insane. Either way it's still insane from from DC to Hawaii in four years is still insane. You know what I mean?

So I want to ask a couple rapid fire questions. And then I do have one very loaded question. I don't know which way you want to take it and I'll let you go wherever you want to go with it. hear your answer. So just rapid fire just because I have questions you're a scientist let's do this thing. Is Pluto a planet? Yes or no? Because I need to know why…

Paul 54:07

No. I'm very sorry. Emotionally I feel you, emotionally I was hurt by the decision back in 2006 I was hurt. My son was six years old at the time and he thought that Pluto had disappear because he heard that it wasn't a planet anymore and he hadn't seen this.

Yeah, so emotionally I was also hard because I loved Pluto right. It's the oddball right? He's the oddball, he's the weird uncle in the family that you keep upstairs you know when nice people come over, you know? And I really have a soft spot for that.

Seth 54:44

Do people do that?

“Uncle you gotta go upstairs and don't come down here for 3 hours!

Paul 54:51

Yo got nice people coming over to stay in the basement or stay in the attic or something your family but yeah, that's what they tell was because because because Pluto broke all the rules, all the planet rules. And I won't go into those right now but they there are certain patterns that you see in the solar system and certain rules that kind of apply and Pluto broke all of them and so he was kind of beloved for that reason, you know, but also eccentric a little bit, you know, you know, black sheep. Emotionally i was i was saddened by that, but scientifically I feel like it was the right exactly the right move to make.

Seth 55:32

That’s fair enough, I want it because I learned mvemnsnp from Saved by the Bell. I don't know how old you are. But there was a mnemonic you know, mercury, like move him Shut up. And if you spell it out, it's the whole thing, but you need the Pluto for them. Because if not, there's no way to enter that word.

Paul 55:50

It ends nice and tight with a P

Seth 55:52

Yeah, it's great because there's a you end of breath or your lips closed or what it doesn't without it, so that's fine. Whatever I'm mad about it, realistically Is there a chance that we just haven't seen something and it would be replaced by something within our solar system? Or is that just out of the realm of possibility? Like we've looked at everything we can look at?

Paul 56:07

Do you mean is there is there evidence for another planet?

Seth 56:10

Yeah, I mean, whether or not there is or not, yeah, like so can we just substitute something else for Pluto like, or is it unrealistic to think that we haven't already looked and it's done?

Paul 56:18

No, it's not unrealistic. In fact, there is some evidence, I haven't followed up on this. But six months or a year ago, I read several articles that said, there's some pretty good evidence that there is actually a nice, like, quite massive planet further out, really,

Seth 56:37

Really?

Paul 56:39

but it's in direct evidence. It's good statistically though, it seems pretty compelling.

Seth 56:44

It's evidence like the way that they found all the other outer planets like Neptune and whatnot where they're like yeah, we can see where it's being bent by the gravity of other things

Paul 56:51

What this amounts to is this, when you're in a boat and you go across the water you leave a wake, right, there's a wake behind it. So what we basically see out beyond Neptune, there's something called the Kuiper Belt. And it's like an asteroid belt. It's just got hundreds of thousands of tiny ice objects in it. Okay? And we see a wake in the Kuiper belt as if something passed through it, and, and put these things on certain orbits that either it's just a really nice coincidence that they all have these odd little orbits and make it look like something passed through, or something actually did pass through and push them into these odd orbits.

Seth 57:36

I know you said you hadn't really dug into it much but I want to clarify when you say pass through like we can repetitively see that something is passing through or this wake is like frozen in time as it orbits?

Paul 57:48

Well, once you have when I say wake, what I mean is that is that there's been a disk. It looks like there's been a disruption of orbits of the objects in the Kuiper Belt, okay, like something more massive than the average Kuiper Belt object passed through and disrupted these orbits. And so we're talking about is not like a static thing, we're talking about something that the dynamics of these orbits is a little bit unusual. And either it's just a really nice coincidence. It's like flipping a coin 50 times and getting heads 50 times in a row. Right. And that could happen

Seth 58:29

unlikely

Paul 58:31

unlikely, you know, either either the coin is not fair. Or you just got really lucky. And suddenly, it was just a coincidence that's kind of what we're talking about here; the odds aren't quite that strong, but something like that.

Seth 58:47

Sure. So next question. Should it matter whether or not there's life outside of planet Earth, either at a religious level or at a science level? Because realistically, I don't believe I will live long enough for it to ever matter to me, but should it matter as a species, if that is a thing, either for God or for science, well, science, it must. But you know what I mean?

Paul 59:09

I think yeah, it will. I think it does matter. I think that if we actually I think in other words, I think there would be theological consequences of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe.

Seth 59:24

How so?

Paul 59:26

Because, um, I think that it would say something about God's creativity, about the richness of creation, about if there's one there's going to be more, and I think also, that it would tend to have a unifying effect. Not Just within Christianity, but I think within all, at least Western religions, I think they would be sort of, you know, maybe I'm just too optimistic, but I think there would be a sort of unifying effect.

And I also think that there will be an also think that although there would be a massive freaked out by some people, I think in the long run, there will be a unifying effect on human beings, because we will begin to see ourselves as not so different from each other anymore, our similarities would would be much more evident than our differences.

Seth 1:00:34

Yeah. Because we can look at a different way. We can look at a different analog and go I'm not that like, I'm not a deer. I'm also not that.

Paul 1:00:41

Right. But I do want to say this with this question that whether there is or is not intelligent life out there. either answer is pretty weird. Right? There's not a non strange option here. If we're alone. Wow. Because we're really alone; theres a lot of space out there. And if we're not, then wow!

Seth 1:01:10

then Wow. There's a concept that we don't have time to break apart because I try to be concise. And this has gone slightly longer than I normally do. But I'm really enjoying this. I hope you have a few more minutes. There's a concept called, and I know it's not a concept. It's a quote from someone that says, Well, he's not even not wrong, or No, he's not. He's not even wrong. He's not even on either.

So as you're teaching and so you now do you teach science or do you teach faith or what do you what do you teach?

Paul 1:01:44

Right now and I'm in the office at the college. I teach physics here, okay, at the college, so it side here, but I'm the pastor for adult education at my church. Okay. So I end up teaching a lot in church too.

Seth 1:01:52

Yeah. So as people come to ask you questions, and I probably asked some of these questions as well. Probably even today. What is one or two of the biggest misconceptions that you're like the questions not bad. It's just the question the answers like you're not even wrong, like it's just poorly. What are those? If you could remove a question or two that comes up every year like I've heard that before. Again, you're not even wrong. What would those be?

Paul 1:02:14

Yeah, well at pretty much any question. And I could be more specific, I suppose. But any question that assumes that what we call the God of the Gaps. And this is always happening I get a question. And the assumption behind the question is that where science has understood something. God is not present.

That God is somehow a magician that does all this magic stuff that science can explain. The God of the gaps is a fallacy. And it basically says that God lives in those places that we don't understand. Like to think about Newton, at the time of Newton, the origin of life and the origin of species was a mystery.

So, you know, Newton kind of figured out his rules about how planets go around other planets. But for Newton, you know, God was obviously had made us human beings and there was no explanation for that. So that's where God didn't really keep the planets going. Yeah, right God, God, God was responsible for life.

But as time goes on, you know, as Darwin shows up, oh, now we have a scientific explanation for you know, Origin of Species. So God's not there anymore. Right. So questions like, like, what's a good question? Basically, creation revolution? That's the big question. Was the world created or did it evolve? But the assumption being that if it evolved, and God said Nothing to do with it. Because why would God do it that way? That doesn't make sense. You know, the idea that the two are opposed any question that comes out of that? Yeah. Yeah, I just have to, you know, bite your tongue and good while and turn it into a pastoral moment, you know?

Seth 1:04:20

Yeah. Turn it into you turn it into many more questions. Yeah, yeah. And so yeah for but I love I never heard that I highlighted wrote down I actually have it taped right up here you can't see it but to the right of the camera here of just to be mindful because I asked so many questions with so many people have read so many things. And I think it's a good maxim to kind of, you know, make sure what you're asking matters kind of thing, at least.

Paul 1:04:45

And, and if you want a specific question it was it would be like I want to talk about in the book where the woman asks but how the Big Bang get started, like what has happened here is that God has been pushed back to this point before Big Bang.. And you know, God's responsible for that. Maybe everything is sort of, you know, went on its own naturally, but at least God got things started that That, to me is a sign that there's some god of the gaps thinking.

Seth 1:05:12

All right, so final question, I think. So with your training. When you look at things, you see things working in a way that I just don't understand, like, when I look at bank accounts, numbers that ticker across on CNN or whatever, like, I see that and I actually see other things, then I think, what my wife would see or maybe what you would see. And so, I mean, and so does she like when she looks at that stupid thing on Grey's Anatomy, and she's like, it's not even plugged in. That's not how you hang a bag and chemos like, that's chemos not that color that's just there for tv. She's like, there's there's four colors, and none of them are that, you know, she sees things that I don't see. And she sees wonder and mystery differently and as do you.

And so, as a scientist with all the information that you have about physics, and atomic science, and astronomy? Where do you look out at night? And you're like, this is where I see wonder. And this is where I see the divine. This is how I'm still amazed, like, what is that for you?

Paul 1:06:13

You mean? What is it that I actually see? Like that is actually different than what a non-scientist would see?

Seth 1:06:19

No, I guess maybe, but with what your knowledge… so a lot of people, the further they dig into science, and you allude to it in your book a lot, you know, they just move away from any faith or religion because they need the data sets nice and clean. But I think I think with the right mentality and you do this in Isaiah a bit as well, where you're like, you know, I see things this this, you know, I could take this and read it this way. Or I could also take it and go, how beautiful is this? But when you're at home, watching your kids, you with your wife or whatever, and literally not saying anything, you're just looking up at the stars or reflecting, you know, in your office or whatever. What is it that you're like, oh, man, this is where the….I cannot wait for science to get here because this is going to be wonderful. Or maybe that's the wrong question. Really, this is how I see wonder. And I asked that because you talk about wonder a few different times. Yeah, begin, talking about the wonder of God with a story about the, you know, the sun setting, somewhere in the Blue Ridge Mountains.

And there's a really funny story with your parents. And you know, I think either your mom or your dad's like, why do you gotta come on out why you got to do that? Don't be that stuff it. But you also talk about wonder at the tail end, you know, you're trying to reconcile it, you know, there is wonder and glory. And it's beautiful. So my question is, where do you see that?

Paul 1:07:33

I see it pretty much everywhere. I'll make two comments about that. One of the main places I see it that, to this day, I really can't quite believe is that everything that we experience, you know, our living body, our buildings, the sky, the clouds, cats, planets, galaxies, everything. The thing that kills me is that we are basically composed of like, three different particles.

Everything, when you break it down is is, you know, there's a universal sort of particle that just show up everywhere. But it's amazing to me that from such utter simplicity such complexity can come. That to me is it's it's very simple a lot, but it occurs to me nearly every day at some point.

Another thing is that when I do look around, you know, yeah, I do see things differently than you would or other people would just because of my own particular training. But what science has taught me and what relatively few scientists will say although it motivates them every day, is that with everything that we know about stuff? The more we know, it's like the knowledge is not a closed system.

It's not like, “Oh, we know that now we can put that on the shelf”. Every time we think that's true, we come to realize that that is not true. And then that needs to be taken down because there are more questions. Questions multiply as fast or faster than our knowledge does. And so looking out and, and seeing things that you might be able to understand is a pleasure. But you have to also admit the pleasure of not knowing what is beyond what you know. And that to me is everywhere around me.

Seth 1:09:57

Yeah. Yeah. I like that. Let's go winded down, where would you send people to Paul to buy the book? I didn't read your first one, but I'm going to buy it, that's going to happen. Where would you send people to though to get ahold of you read what you do? You know, listen to other things like where would you send people?

Paul 1:10:20

My website is pwallace.net. And everything you need is there.

Seth 1:10:30

So I will link to that in the show notes will good. I've enjoyed it, there's so many more things I want to talk about that we don't really have time for, you know, flat earth and there's a whole bunch of things in there. When I read that, I'm like, Yes. And that analogy with the boat and we don't have to explain it here that people go by the if you want to read the analogy he gives. It's actually the logic and its simplicity. I remember read it I was like, that make sense.

Paul 1:10:54

How the boat disappears over the horizon.

Seth 1:10:55

Yeah, but we won't break that down. People need to go by the book. So Yeah, thank you for writing the book. Thank you for making it readable.

Paul 1:11:04

You're welcome.

Seth 1:11:06

Yeah, very much so, and is written in such a way that my son read pieces of it with me. And so I love that, you know, that's not the case for most of the books that I read. So, thank you again for coming on. I really appreciate your time.

Paul 1:11:20

You’re welcome. I had a great time.

Seth Outro 1:11:35

How amazing is that like, just to think about the wonder of silence and the wonder of it all and to feel, you know, for me, I used to would feel small when I would think about God, but the more that I learned and the smaller that I realize I am, the bigger that I feel, the more not important. The more scene I guess the more known that I feel. And I hope and pray that You feel the same way like as you further question faith, and further learn new things, and wrestle with Scripture, wrestle with God, whatever you want to call that, God. Now I pray that you find a wonder like you've never found it before. It's beautiful. I continue to look for it. And I think that's it, you just look for you just look for it. You'll see it. I know I have special thanks to the Dodds for the use of their music. I was blown away when I realized that they currently reside in my hometown and so we chatted back and forth on the emails about that which is kind of neat. However, special thanks to them for their use of their music. In today's episode, you'll find their music in the links in the show notes and Spotify playlist and iTunes playlist and all the playlist and again, thank you to those of you that you know that decided I really should hit that Patreon button or glow. Either way works I become a supporter of the show. My I have big goals for this year, and I need your help to do so. So thank you in advance. I'll talk with you next week. It's gonna be a great January.

Be blessed everybody.