25 - Lament and the Future of the Church with Soong Chan Rah / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio


Seth 1:29

Hey, everybody, welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast! I am Seth, your host, huge thank you to the Patreon supporters and to those that are emailing the show with feedback at Can I Say This At Church at gmail com interacting with the show on Facebook and Twitter. I very much appreciate every single item of feedback and especially those that have submitted names that you would want to hear. Those are working out quite well and I can't thank you enough. I found names that I didn't even know existed. And it is a pleasure to increase the the bubble of of knowledge that I'm able to try to try to intake. For those that have not yet pledged that support, please consider going to patreon.com/Can I Say This At Church and a buck a month for those of you that are supporters on Patreon. Thank you so much. I have a few things coming up that I think will help make your patronage a bit more enticing and entertaining. I'd like to do some smaller bits, some miniature versions of the podcast that I think don't fit a full episode but do work well. Regardless, and I would love to be able to share those in a way that they would have good engagement and I think you would enjoy them the guest today. I was able to speak with Professor Soong Chan Rah, who is from North Park Theological Seminary in Chicago Soong Chan has had many hats in the faith and the church that we all are a part of what you'll find in today's conversation with Soong Chan is a ease that comes with his history. And so what you'll find in today's conversation is a discussion of lament. Apparently, there is a book called Lamentations in our Bible, and I am as guilty as anyone else of passing right over that because I don't want to feel sad. And I don't want to believe that I'm not doing it perfect or at least trying too.

And so when we look at lament, what does that do to how we view our world? What does that do to how we seek to do justice to our communities? And what does that mean for the future of our church? And I mean that quite literally, you'll hear us reference, some articles and some new research that showed that the future of the church if we don't learn to do things differently, to do things prophetically, to do things intentionally, that the church is is at a tipping point, it's on a razor's edge and I firmly believe that and so, enough of me, let's get into the interview.

Seth 4:15

Professor Rah thank you so much for taking the time to join the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I know this has been a long time in the making and so I'm glad that we finally got it to work out.

Soong Chan 4:26

Thanks good to be on here.

Seth 4:30

So for those that are unfamiliar with either you your work or you know, North Park, the institution you work at what would you tell people about yourself kind of your story what brought you through what was your journey through life that brought you to do what you're doing now? What influenced you?

Soong Chan 4:44

Sure. I mean, we can go way back to I was born in Korea, and I was born into a family that had actually a pretty long Southern Baptist tradition in Korea. I believe was either my great grandfather, my great great grandfather was one of the first people who helped to find the First Baptist Church and in Korea, which was actually in Pyongyang, which is now the capital of North Korea, ironically, much of the Christian movement in Korea actually began in Pyongyang, which is the North Korean capital. So I come from a Christian family, actually a long history of in a Christian family. We moved to the United States, mainly because of my parents separation, we ended up living in kind of a rough neighborhood in Baltimore. And one of the things they noticed in that neighborhood was that there was a pretty strong division between three different groups, poor blacks, poor whites, and poor recent immigrants. And I often kind of struggled with “Well, we're all poor, we have that in common and yet, we really can't get along.” So that's been kind of something that I've been working through in my academic work in my church life, trying to figure out why when we have more in common that brings us together in the case of where my neighborhood was when I grew up in poverty and feeling like oppressed and alienated from the rest of society because of our poverty. And yet because of racial division, we were not able to get along. We were actually hostile to one another.

In fact, in elementary school, we sort of got along in junior high school, the racial tensions started to flare up by high school, we had full blown gangs split along racial lines. So that's been something that I've been kind of working through. Urban ministry has been a key part of my formation and my work, because I grew up in an inner city neighborhood, went on to college. For our family, the way out of the hood was actually through education. So my mom really stressed education for us.

So I went out and just got a degree after degree after degree. And that's been where my kind of energy has been, in so many ways, but also in ministry. I was a pastor for 17 years, a church planter and senior pastor. And for the last 11 years now I've been teaching at North Park Theological Seminary in areas of evangelism, justice, urban ministry, cross cultural ministry, etc.

But most of that is informed by my academic work, but also my time as a pastor that was a church planner, senior pastor of a church plant in the Cambridge Boston area. But for now 11 years I've been focusing more on the academic piece here at North Park seminary.

Seth 7:19

Do you know at all it's that church in North Korea still there? You don't ever hear about Christians in North Korea, at least not in a good way.

Soong Chan 7:28

Yeah, most of the churches, if not all of the churches that either go underground or were were destroyed. What actually happened is that during the war, many of the North Korean Christians fled to the south. My family and I were just in South Korea in Seoul over the summer. And we actually met with a 90 year old man who is actually kind of a well known personality in in Korea. He's kind of a public theologian. He comes on TV he has a PhD from Boston University, taught at Seoul National University he's in his 90s now retired but we got a chance to spend time with him. Mainly because my dad was the bus driver or the Jeep driver that helped him flee the border from North Korea to South Korea.

So those narratives are still very much in place and he was very committed Christian. My dad was part of that church. And like I said, most of that community ended up fleeing to the south and started a very large Baptist Church in Seoul. It's called Seoul Baptist Church. I think it's the largest Baptist Church in Korea.

Seth 8:24

Really? That's, we don't ever hear that much about that part of the world. That's why I don't know. We do a disservice to ourselves, I think in in much of the West and to insulate ourselves from that. So you wrote, not long ago a book and if people follow you on either Twitter or Facebook, you speak often to lament, and a call for the church to lament. And I've heard you use the words prophetic lament. I've spoken with Mark Charles, who also says that the church needs to enter a season of lament. And so what does that mean?

Soong Chan 9:04

Yeah, so that's a great question. Actually, Mark and I are currently working on a book. We've been working on this for a couple of years now, we hope to be done sometime this year. And so Mark’s work in the area of the history, especially with our Native peoples, and the way that American society and the government has suppressed and oppressed native communities. And I'm working on the lament, historical, theological piece.

And hopefully, this book will be out sometime next year, early next year, and I'm pretty excited about the content that's being pulled together. But I wrote a book called Prophetic Lament few years ago and it was a commentary on the book of Lamentations, which of course, was automatically a best seller because nobody wants to book of Lamentations. It's one of those books of the Bible that everybody kind of skips over.

Seth 9:51

It's right next to Song of Songs. It's right there.

Soong Chan 10:00

It’s about as popular as Leviticus you skip that you get the Lamentations, you skip that. So it's kind of funny that I wrote a book on Lamentations, which you know, my wife still jokes, five years to write this book four copies sold is kind of the mantra in our household that this is not a popular book of the Bible. And why is that? It's because lament as a discipline, as a spiritual practice, even as a topic or content to engage is pretty much absent in our in our church life.

So it was sparked by for example, when I started looking at worship life in the church. And there were a couple of different studies. One study was done by a Old Testament professor in the DC area, and she was finding that lament was absent in much of the liturgical tradition. And then Glenn Pemberton did a study on hymns and found that in the Baptist and Presbyterian hymnals you had such a small percentage of those hymns being lament hymns, and then I looked at contemporary worship songs and examined why so few of our contemporary worship songs are not laments.

Lament is 40% of the Old Testament Psalms, which means that the typical worship life of Israel almost half the time, Israel was practicing lament, was expressing lament. And lament is a cry out in the face of injustice. lament is a cry out in the midst of suffering in the midst of pain, when things are not going the way they're supposed to go, that's when lament is brought up. And for American Christians, if we don't engage lament, we don't see injustice as well. If we don't practice lament, we have no outlet for crying out against injustice.

And so that's part of the the reasons that kind of motivated me to write this book, in a context, in a social reality that we're in for American Christians have excessive sense of exceptionalism and triumphalism. The corrective of lament is missing, which further exasperate this problem and leads to even greater injustice.

Seth 12:00

So I know Mark speaks to exceptionalism, at least in his Doctrine of Discovery, which I found fascinating, infuriating, and fascinating, but more more infuriating than anything. So what is what is try… I can't say that word what is triumphalism?

Soong Chan 12:20

Triumphalism. Well, exceptionalism and triumphalism are related terms exceptionalism is the belief that, particularly American Christians are exceptional. And you see this language in politics a lot, and it actually crosses Democratic / Republican party lines. both Republicans and Democrats use different language but claim and exceptionalism. Republicans claim Make America Great Again, meaning there is an exceptionalism that needs to be reclaimed. Most Democrats are saying America is great and will continue to be great, which is kind of tapping into the narrative exceptionalism. This is very problematic for us as Christians, because America as a nation before God is not exceptional.

There is no kind of inherent value to the United States of America. Unfortunately, it's a very, very prominent narrative in our world right now. And this is part of the education that's needed. And as we were talking earlier about the church in Korea, America is not even the largest Christian nation anymore.

America is not the most prominent or, or dynamic Christian nation, those nations are in places like Korea, and in Africa, and China. China, probably at this point, has more actual number of Christians than possibly in the United States, because of the huge number of those who are committed and involved in the underground churches which are harder to track.

So what we're talking about is a Christianity that is not centered in the United States anymore. But when we have this narrative of exceptionalism, America is blessed by God, American churches are blessed by God. Number one, it doesn't match up to the reality. God is blessing Africa, with church growth more than the United States God has blessed in Korea with church growth. God's blessing China with church growth more than the United States. So America is has never been and never will be an exceptional nation before God; that is reserved for Israel and nobody else in the Bible, no other place in the Bible is mentioned.

So we also need to recognize is that because of that exceptionalism, this belief that American the nation is exceptional, American churches are exceptional. It leads to this triumphalism. Which means that we are going to conquer the world with our exceptionalism. We are going to go out and save the world and kind of the, the Messianic complex of American Christians. I'll give you an example of this. I was on sabbatical a few years ago from my school, I went away for a year did some further studies down in North Carolina came back after a year and I just had piles of junk mail on my desk and if you're a pastor, you know what I'm talking about. You go away for a week, all the junk mail that you get. So I had two huge piles of junk mail like ironically many of them were pretty environmental agencies asked me to say paper. So I get all these piles of paper. And I'm trying to cut through all this junk mail. And one of them was a DVD, instructional curriculum, from an American based NGO that said, the poor you will not have with you. Jesus said the poor you will not have with you, which of course is not what Jesus actually said.

So I looked through the material, and it was this very triumphalistic, exceptionalistic narrative coming from an American based NGO. Which said on one hand, which I agree with, which is we need to confront the issue of extreme poverty in the world. But the second part of it was we the exceptional, triumphalistic American church needs to be the one that saves poverty in Africa.

We have the education, we have the know how, we have the resources. Now I'm not against confronting extreme poverty in the world. I'm part of an international board, an NGO myself and I want to see extreme poverty come to an end. I don't believe that American churches are exceptional and triumphalist to solely be the ones that save the poverty in Africa. That's a triumphalism. That's the belief that we are such a unique and special people. We are especially ordained and blessed by God, to go out and save the world, and to do whatever it takes to save the world to save poverty in Africa to save the African continent.

By the way, that's the reason that point of view. And that assumption, self-assumption of exceptionalism is how Africa got its problems in the first place. Because the Europeans said, those poor Africans in Africa, we got to go save them, we got to bring our democracy, we got to bring our materialism, we got to bring our-all the things that's going to save Africa and ended up raping the land and taking resources from all over the place. And that's why Africa is what it is because of an exceptionalistic-triumphalistic rEuropean colonial powers.

Now, we're doing that through the church, American churches are exceptional, American churches are going to be triumphalistic. So let's go save the poor people in Africa. That's part of the problem of an exceptionalistic and triumphalistic narrative.

Seth 17:00

How do you do that then without I can. I can hear me saying that. You know what, let me put this way if I was the missionary coming back to the church asking for money. And I then tell you, I need you to give me money, but I'm probably not the best at this job. Like, how does the church relegate that? Or how do you how do you? How do you measure between, you know, lip service and platitudes versus “No, of course, I'm the person that has to do this. This is what I'm called to do. I'm great, because I'm do this.”

Soong Chan 17:32


Well, I think the best missionaries and the best servants, global evangelism servants, in the 21st century are going to be those who know how to work on the ground with the people that they are serving. So I once heard of a horrible sermon about how suburban churches can help poor inner city churches. First of all that is just not the way that works. But that was the description how these rich suburban churches gonna help these poor, urban churches and the speaker was saying, “we don't want to give handouts, we want to give a hand up.” Now what I said respond, right thought in response was, actually, I don't want your hand up either. Because if you're giving me a handout, you're at least giving me something. When you're saying I'm going to give you a hand up, which you're assuming is that you're at a better place, you're exceptional. And you're pulling me up to the place that I need to be at. Don't give me a handout, don't give me a hand up, give me a hand across. Reach a hand across the table and say, I might not know exactly what's needed in Africa, because I'm not there. I'm at a cushy executive office in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and I don't have the know it all to be able to go and fix the complex problems in Africa. What I need to do is reach a hand across, build the relationships with those who are suffering with those who are in pain and say what can we do together. So here's maybe an American solution to the need for water. We ship bottled water, and we ship bottled water over there so that the 50 kids that we sponsor can have bottled water. Well what we need to do is we need to drill wells, we need to drill wells and train the community to manage their own wells and to care for their own wells.

These are the things that we need to do. And so that comes from reaching a hand across not looking for a handout or a hand up. And so I think what lament does go back to this concept of lament, what lament does is it legitimizes and it gives voice to those who have been previously voiceless. So if those who have been silenced, have the opportunity to speak up and all probability to speak out and lament because they are the marginalized suffering voices. If we hear those voices, we will do better outreach because we're getting a sense of what it means to hear from those voices that are marginalized.

Seth 20:20

How does a church then…So much of American capitalism not to get political but I don't know a better word is geared around feeling good. And you'll see and I hear people all the time I lead worship at my church. Most Sundays I help lead worship at my church most Sundays and they just want to feel good. They don't really want to be pressured much. They want to leave feeling better than they left or they want to leave. Like they, you know, just, I don't know they want to leave like their team just won the Super Bowl. And so how do you preach limit and pull it off in the long term without your church shutting its doors because people just I don't want to be depressed.

Soong Chan 21:04

Yeah, I hear that. So I was a worship leader for many years and I was a senior pastor for many years. And as a church planter, by the way, and I write this in my book that the first sermon series, the full sermon series that I did a book of the Bible was actually in the book of Lamentations, which is a little bizarre if you think about it, right? So if you think about the church that needs to draw as many people as possible, and attract many people as possible, it's obviously a church plant, because you're getting off the ground, you're getting started. You want people to come to you rather than scare people away or, or, you know, depressed people to the point that they don't want to come back next week. What I found fairly interesting and fascinating was that even though we did a six week sermon series on Lamentations, which many would admit, and I would admit it, he was even one who wrote a commentary in the book. It can be kind of a downer, I mean, talks about really, really devastating, horrible things that you don't want to talk about on a typical basis.

First thing I found was that it actually did resonate with people, because you can fake good feelings at the end of each service. You know what, I've been a pastor long enough. I'm enough of a communicator, to be able to pull that off every Sunday to say something, sing a song, do something that makes everybody leave feeling good about themselves.

After a certain while though, a pastor has to get a really hard realistic look and say is this real discipleship? The church, most members of your church have 45 minutes to an hour and a half with other Christians every day of the week. That's that Sunday service that's an hour an hour and a half long.

And if every time what you're saying is affirming a sinful / dysfunctional life that they're leaving leading, then you're not doing your job as a pastor, which you are as a cheerleader for a dysfunctional team. You are a cheerleader…you're the press secretary to the President. You have to keep affirming the lies, you have to keep dancing around the truth. So what you end up doing is you end up not communicating the gospel, but communicating something that will keep your church going.

I think…I hope pastors are in this not to be popular, but to actually minister to people. Sometimes that's not popular. But we actually need to minister to people and sometimes that means lament. Now, I'm not saying, you know, lament every single day of the year because the Bible, like I said, is 40% lament and 60% praise. But when when it's 5% lament (our churches), now you've got a problem, because you are under representing a significant portion of Scripture. And your discipleship is inadequate, because your discipling only in certain ways, not in other ways. And that's why I am saying lament needs to be reintroduced, because without that lament, we're actually going to end up with a dysfunctional church.

Seth 24:08

You were talking about…America is not even the predominant christian nation just a little bit ago, and I saw a survey or a research study, and I don't remember who did it, let's say Pew Research, but it probably wasn't done. So I will put that caveat in there. I'm not editing that out. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. It's fine.

But it said basically, not only that, but implied that not only is America not the most Christian of all Christian nations, Christians aren't even the majority in America anymore.

Soong Chan 24:37

Yeah, I think you were referencing a study by PRRI. And it was actually a pretty much, much more specific than what you're saying, which was, I believe that if we're looking at the same study, it was that white Christians are no longer the majority. Now, what I wrote about in my first book in 2009, and this is almost 9-10 years ago, but it's it's it's it's even more true now than when I wrote it is that not only is Global Christianity becoming diverse, and where the center of Christianity is now in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. In fact, the largest church in the United States doesn't even sniff the top 10 churches in the world. It doesn't even come close to being the top 10 Church in the world. The largest church in the world right now is in Seoul, South Korea, it's about half a million to 750,000 people, depending on depending on when it's raining or not. I don't know how much it fluctuates. That's how large largest church in the world is. It's the Full Gospel Church in Seoul, South Korea.

My denomination, which is one of the fastest growing denominations in the United States right now is about 350,000 people. So one church is larger than one of the fastest growing denominations in the United States. So we've got to understand the scale of what's happening in American Christianity compared to global Christianity. But I wrote about this in The Next Evangelical, which was my first book, saying, come on, folks wake up that American Christianity is no longer dominated by white evangelicals. We've always thought the white evangelicals was the majority population in America or white Christians at least were majority population. Couple of trends.

One trend is that white Christianity is in sharp decline. In the mainline church, they've been hemorrhaging membership every 10 years about 25%. That's…that's, that's horrible. That's, you know, you're not going to survive. evangelicalism, white evangelicals are also losing members in large numbers. But the only reason that white evangelicalism, you don't see it in terms of numbers, is because there are enough immigrants, evangelicals of color to back up the numbers of evangelicalism, the United States is and so is that the fine line…

Seth 26:40

Is that decline because of, sounds crass, is that decline because of death? Is the church just not resupply…and not not training a child in the way it should go? Or is it just people just checking out?

Soong Chan 26:51

Well it is both, it is a combination? So one combination is that the more churched groups are the boomers, right, so the boomers were very churched post World War Two, they are very steeped in the church. It's when kind of the height of evangelicalism when the boomers are going to coming of age, but the boomers are now in their 60s and even in their 70s.

So they are dying off. They are retiring. I mean, think about two of our most prominent Boomer pastors, Rick Warren and Bill Hybels. You know Hybels has already announced his retirement. Warren, I'm sure it's not too far behind. We're talking about the builders of the mega church, the Biggers, the builders of these Boomer churches. They're now in their 60s and 70s. So the next generation, which would kind of fill in that population gap, there's a population drop. Right. So that's the busters, millennials, you have a little bit of an uptick, but what you're talking about is that this glut of retirees, mostly white, many evangelical, but the numbers are kind of dropping off because as they die off, the Gen-Xers and the millennials, there's, the numbers don't add up. But the other problem that you're alluding to is not only are the older whites dying off, but you're getting millennials leaving the church and huge huge numbers. So you get a population drop, as in there a less white people and but now a demographic change and that whites are leaving the church, younger whites are leaving the church. And the only reason these numbers are relatively stable is because you had immigrants coming into the church. You have African American churches growing, Asian American communities growing, Spanish speaking congregations flourishing.

Without these immigrant churches. Christianity would be kind of on its last breath. And the only reason Christianity is surviving into the 21st century in America is because of these non-white churches. We would probably be similar or close to the numbers you're seeing in Europe right now, where you see this ridiculous drop off in church attendance within a generation, and you're seeing that in the majority white population, but you're not seeing that in the immigrant churches, which is why, to me this cut and I don't know if you want to go down this right but this conversation about, you know, slowing down immigration for white Christians that is the last you should be asking for because without this influx of immigrants, the church will die in the United States.

Immigrants are saving the church in America and that's why it's so stunning that Boomer, white Boomer Americans are the ones who are saying, We don't want immigrants, when actually without immigrants, the church in America would die. So the question I would ask for white Boomer Christians, evangelicals is; do you care more about the church, or do you care more about America?

So you want to preserve America Make America Great Again, in the process of doing that you're going to destroy the church?

Seth 29:34

Yeah. So let's I agree with all of that. And I'm a banker by profession. And just a side note, don't really want to discuss it, I don't see a way that the country can survive with our entitlements without immigrants being allowed to come and pay for it because when people don't retire, and you have a well educated person working at Starbucks after college, paying on debt there's no way for a person to pay into the system at $15 an hour even the FICO taxes to pay for it, but I could talk banking all day I won't, I won't do that. won't do that.

Soong Chan 30:04

The same concept…does it apply to does that apply to the church, right? So I'm with you I mean I've been I'm not a numbers cruncher on this but I can just you know, my sociology work I've noticed in wait you got the boomers who are retiring and huge numbers population glut. They're living 20-30 years past your time it they don't have a good sense to die at 70, they're living to 80-90 years old.

Seth 30:22 (with sarcasm)

Selfish.

Soong Chan 30:25

So now you've got people on social security for 25 years. You have a population bust, the Gen-Xers can't pay for what Hey, you and I, hey, we're exits, right? We don't have we're not making enough to pay for them. There's not enough of us to pay for the, for our parents retirement and our kids there with their Starbucks jobs, they're not going to pay for our parents retirement.

So the only way you can actually pay for that is actually bringing in people who have fake social security numbers, who will pay social security taxes, but never take any of that out, who are pumping money into the system and paying for now what I'm saying is take that same parallel and think about the church. The boomers are dying off, they're retiring there. You know, that's why the churches in Arizona and Florida are growing because that's where all the boomers are moving to busters is too small to take over the boomer churches. That's why churches like Crystal Cathedral is shutting down.

Huge mega church for the boomers they shut down. They sold their building to a Catholic, Spanish-speaking congregation. So that's kind of the trend going forward. You have these Boomer churches where the buses can fill in the seats, and the millennials are gone. They don't they're not in church anymore. The only way to keep these churches going is if you have immigrant, ethnic, minority churches, multi-ethnic churches, take over these white Boomer churches.

Seth 31:44

I think, and I'm a lobby for this right now. I don't know what your next book will be after the one that recently came out. But I think it should be called “Busters” and you should you should write an entire book specifically about that and maybe get a licensing agreement from Fast and Furious or whatever. So building off, and I try not to get too political, but I don't see how not to. And so how, how do I say this? I don't see how the last presidential election did not break the word evangelical. You have on one hand, the church say “no, this is a man God ordained”, but it's fine that he's a liar. It's fine how he treats women, even though I wouldn't let them date my daughter. It's pastors endorsing “Well, it's he's the president, but the rest of you shouldn't really get around with prostitutes“. So how is the current president disrupting the church as we know it and then how do we address it, lament about it and move forward without…because it's going to happen for three more years. So yeah, if we wait three years, those those drastic drop offs like people in my generation, I just don't have time for that. I don't want to argue every day.

Soong Chan 33:00

Yeah, yeah. Well, the word evangelical is clearly in trouble; and some of that is we allowed a small subset of the evangelical population to define that word for us. So I consider myself an evangelical and I'm debating now whether I turn to my card or not. And, you know, disavow that whole movement or not. I know I've written a lot about evangelism. I mean, that's kind of my one of my books is called The Next Evangelicalism. Another project I have is looking at Black evangelicalism and 1960s and 70s. So I’ve written a lot of know about the history of like of evangelicalism. If as I had written nine years ago, evangelicalism was defined more as a theological, ecclesial movement that had kind of some very strong, important theological foundations such as: a high view of Scripture, high view of Jesus is an active type of faith, a concern for the last in the world and in all forms. So those kinds of foundational theological ecclesial factors drew me to Evangelical faith. I love an act of faith. I love the centrality of Scripture. These are the things that make me an Evangelical, but over the last 40 plus years, especially with the rise of the religious right, I have angelic realism is now first the sociological definition and now almost purely a political definition that's tied into sociology.

So we see this because the President and the election is a clear marker of that. So, evangelical leaders getting behind someone who clearly is not an evangelical. I don't know how much mental gymnastics you have to do to even come close to defining this person as an evangelical; and if you do that you lose your witness altogether. And the whole thing about him sleeping with a porn star and then an evangelical pastor actually saying this is okay. I mean, this is insane. This is how crazy this world has gotten where evangelical pastor gets on Fox News and defends the President's actions of immorality. So what we're talking about is a label that has become so politicized, it has nothing to do with the Christian faith.

So if it were about the Christian faith, even if you didn't agree with his, with his policy, you could still affirm. I mean, I'm sorry, I'm going to go the other way. Even if you didn't agree with his policy, you still can't agree with his lifestyle. And so what we're ending up with is this, our evangelical identity is so politicize that many of us who don't fall into that political sphere, are saying it may be too late.

I'm kind of in the middle right now. Because if Evangelicals of color, who do hang on to the spiritual and the ecclesial reasons for our faith, and prioritize that many of us not all of us, but many of us, then that is what could be redemptive, versus what is now defined as evangelical right now, that would might be difficult. I'll give you one more thing about the about abandoning that term so easily, and this my concern about abandoning the term.

I was at a conference with the Native American theologians A few years ago, and a white academic said, maybe it's time for us to abandon the word Christian because there's so much negative connotations, we just abandon that word altogether and say, you know, find a new word or find a different way to describe it so we don't talk about ourselves as Christian anymore. A native elder stood up, and he says, it, in my words, his description, this is a cop out. Because once you abandon that word, you are walking away from its history, both the good and the bad. And by walking away from the negative history, you are now absolving yourself the responsibility of the negative connotations of the word. So I would actually challenge white evangelicals not to abandon the word evangelicalism, but you've got to take responsibility for what the misuse of that word has led to. The terrible anti-evangelistic witness that word is now become. You've got to take responsibility for that. So to walk away from it so easily is actually an expression of privilege, rather than being able to say, this is a problem. And now I've got to confront and address that problem.

Seth 37:09

Yeah, you gotta stay on the same football field. You can't just peace out and go play soccer because you're not happy with what the score is.

Soong Chan 37:17

Exactly

Seth 37:51

So to call the church to own that, and to try to redefine the word evangelical, it's going to require justice and so what should that look like for our communities?

Soong Chan 38:00

Yeah, I mean, I go back to the the whole lament piece where lament is when you hear the voice of the poor and the marginalized. And again, if you think of the word, evangelical, you don't think of people who care about the poor, the downtrodden, the immigrants, the refugees. I mean, sadly, that name is taking on that negative connotation. But what would it mean for white evangelical churches to take a stand against racism and mass incarceration, The New Jim Crow, against ice raids against against the treatment of refugees against the demonization of Islam, all of these things which are horrible negative witnesses to the gospel? What would it mean for the white evangelical church to actually demonstrate the gospel and not just proclaim it? I mean, we’ve got volumes and volumes of books that talk about the proclamation of the Gospel. We are taught how to do the four spiritual laws, how to do the bridge illustrations the Romans way. We've got chapter after chapter on how to evangelize in words and Proclamation.

Most churches right now can do that well, or at least claim to do that well, and have zero going for them when it comes to the demonstration of the Gospel. So don't tell me you're going to evangelize to a Muslim in Syria, when you told that very person not to come to your country and be your neighbor. So yeah, you can talk all you want about the love of Christ, but if you are not demonstrating the love of Christ, then you are a noisy gong and a clanging cymbal. And so what I think is the problem with our evangelism is that it is so devoid of justice, that it has actually become a counterproductive witness.

Seth 40:00

Well, I can tell you when and I found that recently, the more that I do episodes of this show. And the further I get to a, I don't know, muddy version of whatever I was, as a Christian I'm much more willing to be graceful when I talk with people I don't agree with; which I think is good but I also didn't just get accused of not standing for anything but i do i just usually don't tell people what I stand for because I realized they don't really want to know.

I've found that the when you try to say things to people that way that they just get so angry and quick to defend whatever their constitutional right is, to do whatever they want to do, and I think they they become a Christian after they become an American or a Christian after they become a Russian or a Christian after they become a Canadian or whatever the country is. I do have a question. It's a hypothetical I asked it on on our Facebook page not long ago. is America the new Babylon?

Soong Chan 40:58

Well, let's go to the Book of Revelation where the church is roundly condemned. And the leaders of the church are soundly condemned by God for doing what? For having committed harlot tree and prostitution with Babylon, and there is a weeping and gnashing of teeth as Babylon falls, and there is a call to come out of Babylon.

I think there are multiple Babylons. I would say that for a number of people in our country right now who identify as evangelical America is clearly one of those Babylons. Because there has been, I think, among some white evangelical leaders, put a blood prostitution with the nation of America. You have sold your soul, you have sold your integrity, you have sold your value system for a few pieces of silver for a seat at the table. What you've done is committed prostitution with Babylon. Because Babylon is what?

Anything that replaces God, and what many white evangelicals have done is elevated Babylon above Jerusalem and elevated Babylon above, above God above the Kingdom of Heaven. And so, when I think of when the the end comes, and Jesus establishes his reign, will there be white American evangelicals, who are weeping and gnashing their teeth because Babylon has fallen?

I would say, based upon the evidence I've seen, yes, there will be; because America has become a Babylon, that when it falls, people will weep and gnashing of teeth.

Seth 42:51

Sure. Yeah, I know we're running short on time. So I have two final questions and one will be much more much more fun, I hope. So I'm guessing, as any theologian has, you must have certain people in church history that you really like. And I know that you were recently entered into a March Madness bracket, against theologians of time immemorial. And so my question is, do you, do you now still like the same people that you used to? Because from what I understand you were you didn't bust any brackets?

Soong Chan 43:22

Yeah, no, I got trounced in the first round first. First of all, I'm kind of like, I don't know, St. Mary's Catholic School for Girls. I mean, if I got invited to the big dance, I mean, I would be stunned and say, hey, how did I end up here?

Yeah, playing Kentucky, Kansas and Duke and I, you know, we've got we've got the St. Mary's Catholic School for Girls. So to be even on that list of the 64 people that are worthy of this tournament I just found amusing and very, very amusing and I went up against Saint Athansius and got trounced it was, you know, a 90, you know, by basketball scores like a 92-20 victory by St. Athansius. S I thought it was really, really, ausing what they did. Now, I was thrilled that two of my faculty advisors were also on the list and Emmanuel Katongle actually made it out of the first round, send it for Emmanuel, he was my advisor down at Duke. He's now at Notre Dame and Willie Jennings, who was also one of my advisors down at Duke. He's now at Yale was also in the bracket. So that makes me feel good that I learned not only from these others through books, but I also learned directly from two of the finest theologians at our time period, which is Emmanuel Katongle and Willie Jennings.

So I would say that right now, I would still give very high props to their influences, kind of living theologians who are continuing to write and do work that is phenomenal, challenges the church, so much of my theological formation comes from them, so I'm rooting for them. I'm hoping they get far.

Seth 44:49

To invert that I assume you no longer allow any coursework to be related to Athansius at all. It's thrown out.

Soong Chan 44:54

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, he is off the syllabus. He shall not be named!

Seth 45:00

You don't even speak his name anymore.

So then in closing, I know you have many works coming out over the next little bit. So where would you point people to get involved as they seek to…not to steal from Micah 6:8 just do justice like as they seek to do this? So yeah, where would you point people to either engage with yourself, works that they can dig into, ministries that they should support?

Soong Chan 45:28

Yeah, well one of the the best lessons and teachings I heard on engaging and works of justice, was my mentor at Gordon Conwell Eldin Villafañe and he talks about kind of a three stage process. One is understanding the context. Second is a theology that speaks to that context. And then third is actually thinking of methods of confrontation. So I would take that kind of approach to say, maybe the first step is to know the world we're living in and see what the problems are. I don't want people to miss diagnose, and say, “Hey, I'm going to go and solve this problem and it turns out that's no problem either you can't you can solve your problem that's not even there“. So I call that cliff or Villafañe and Holland, he will call this clarification, understanding the context.

So I would just say do the research, know what's going on in the world around you. If you want one of my books that might help you do that The Next Evangelicalism on InterVarsity Press might be a good starting point to understand the world that we're living in. The second in terms of theological concepts, I would recommend the book Prophetic Lament, which talks about the theology of lament as a necessary theological corrective to the world that we're living in. And in terms of conversation, there's a number of different books that you can look at a lot of conversa, though, I think it's not so much coming from books coming from experience and the integration of the social reality you're in, as well as the theological concepts you're engaging in.

The book that Mark and I are working on tentatively titled Truth be Told, will be also out on Intervarsity Press will be coming out sometime next year. And so look for that. And then the next book after that will be my dissertation that will be published on black evangelism.

Seth 47:00

Black evangelicalism…are you allowed to talk about black evangelicals?

Soong Chan 47:04

So it's more of a historical look. And there's kind of modern expressions of it, and I can I can get into that but more it's in the 60s and 70s, at kind of the when the the current of Evangelical movement was coming into the forefront. You had the Billy Graham's and the, you know, Chuck Colson and kind of these evangelical leaders coming up to the front.

There was a significant group of black evangelicals who were, who were theologically lined up almost exactly with where white evangelicals were, but on certain social issues like race and poverty, and I can watch just justice and injustice issues. They didn't quite line up. And many of them were were not allowed to be in the evangelical movement. So I kind of question that and what happened there now maybe some lessons that we can learn for the 21st century.

Seth 47:51


Well, it sounds like then I'm just gonna get you on air. I'm gonna have to have you back on we'll discuss that.

Soong Chan 47:55

Get both Mark and I when that book comes out, there'll be an incentive for us to get that book done.

Everything else not enough of an incentive the money?

Seth 48:06

I would think money would do it so well. Thank you. Thank you again for your time Professor Rah, I enjoyed this. All right, good.

Soong Chan 48:13

All right, good to talk to you.

Outro 48:38

Music from today's show was used with permission from the album typography by Brett Lee Miller. You can connect with Brett BrettLeeMiller.com you can find all the links to Brett in the show notes as well as you will see him featured on the Spotify playlist entitled Can I Say This At Church will talk to you next time.

24 - Holy Anarchy with Mark Van Steenwyk / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears and software, and may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Episode


Mark 0:00

The church is intrinsically a political reality. I mean, that's people get weird about it like, when they say politics, what do they mean? They mean the state, the apparatus of the state. And so then we let our imagination be co opted and think the only way of being political which is organizing with other human beings for a greater good, or for greater, taking care of each other and ourselves. That somehow the state is the where that happens. And then there's this thing magically outside of the realm of politics called the church. And that's just a horrible way of framing.

Seth Intro 0:52

Hello, everybody, welcome back to another episode of the Can I Say This At Church podcast. Before we get started, brief announcement, thank you to the handful of you that are continuing to support the show on Patreon. That means so much and I can't thank you enough. I had a blast talking with Mark van steam it today about Empire, politics, religion, government, all the things that they say you really shouldn't bring up because you'll lose friends. You know, you can't talk about religion. You can't talk about politics. We talked about it all and blend it together and it was very fun. And, and so a bit about mark. So for nearly 15 years, Mark has been sowing subversive seeds of spirituality throughout North America. He co founded the Mennonite worker in Minneapolis, with his wife in 2004. Mark is also an author of The Holy Anarchist, the Unkingdom of God, and A Wolf at the Gate, which is geared more towards a child audience. He also works specifically with the Center for Prophetic Imagination, based in Minneapolis, which serves as a purpose of integration with spiritual formation between political action, education, and nurturing leaders in a call to embrace God's vision as opposed to Empire and calls us to live and grow prophetically as we witness to the world around us. It is hard work, the work that the prophetic imagination center is doing. I think the work that they're doing, though, is something that will impact our children's children's generation, which I think we can all agree is the hope for our future. And so that's enough of me. Let's get into the conversation.

Seth 2:53

Mark, thank you so much for making the time this morning to come on to the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I've been looking for quite a few weeks. So I appreciate you being on.

Mark 3:02

Yes. Good to join you. Thanks, Seth.

Seth 3:04

For those that are unfamiliar with you, can you give us a quick crash course on what you would want people to know about yourself?

Mark 3:14

Oh wow! Well, most of my work is involved with figuring out how do we embody kind of a radical take on the way of Jesus. But beyond that, that's, that's already difficult to explain to folks. But the shape it takes is I live in an intentional community that my wife and I started about 15 years ago. I do a lot of speaking and writing around things. I put together conferences. And lately though, since I hit 40, and I'm trying to come into my..my burgeoning wilderness, I've been doing a lot more spiritual direction and retreats, and more teaching type stuff is is going going deeper instead of wider

Seth 3:57

is 40 the age that we become ready to be “in elderness” because I'm quickly approaching and I don't know that I'm ready for that yet.

Mark 4:04

Well see I had the almost cliche midlife crisis where I got depressed and I you know, things were, I bad health and all that sort of stuff. So for me, it was the turning point, like I need to. This is the age where I have to start focusing on what I'm planting in the world. And so that took me to more of an elder in place. I suppose. I'm not like there yet, but I'm like, okay, I could be dead at 65. So my grandpa died. So I got 25 years to kind of pass on what little scraps they have.

Seth 4:37

Yeah, I agree. I feel like yeah, my many of my family died at a younger age as well. And, and I always I joke it at my work all the time, like, well, I'm halfway there. I'm halfway to dead. So I need to do something.

Mark 4:49

You need to get your shit together. Yeah, (laughter)

Seth 4:53

Yeah. Make it make it happen. I just, yeah, I just, I've just been slovenly with the time that's been allotted me so…

Mark 4:59

Well, that's just grim! (Laughter)

Seth 5:00

I know. It is what it is. So you're many things. So you're an author and you run your center. Tell me more about this, this community that you've built, what is this?

Mark 5:13

Which one like the intentional community or the Center for Prophetic Imagination?

Seth 5:17

The one you and your wife started?

Mark 5:19

Yeah. So 15 years ago, actually, we started as an emerging church. But within the year, we kind of killed it and then it morphed into an intentional community. Really we are in the Catholic Worker tradition, we called ourselves miss your day, then the Mennonite worker, and we recently are calling ourselves the wildflower worker now, because hardly any of us besides me are Mennonites at this point. But we do hospitality. We have two community houses. And we do a lot of activist sort of stuff. It's all like out of the Catholic Worker playbook. In fact, the Catholic Worker community, the Minneapolis Catholic worker, is like a block away. They have got a couple houses, and we do a bunch of stuff together there for a while we did church services, but now we're not doing that anymore. It's just times of prayers, meals, hospitality. disrupting Empire is kind of our our “M O”.

Seth 6:12

Well, it's like you know where you're going. That's a beautiful segue. So for those that have yet to encounter you, I encourage people to reach out, Mark is easily accessible on all of the social media platforms. But you have a specific

Mark 6:26

Yeah, all of them.

Seth 6:28

I haven't found you on Snapchat, but that's my fault. I'm not on Snapchat, and I refuse to be so I won't find you on that.

Mark 6:32

The Gauntlet is thrown down.

Seth 6:35

I'm not doing it. I'm not doing it. If it's Yeah, just not doing it. I don't understand the icon, the logo that they use, and I just don't want to I don't want to do it. Anyway. that's a that's a rabbit trail. (Laughter)

So you have a pretty different stance on Empire and government and systems of government and how people interact with that. What, what are you like? So some people will say they're Republicans, some people will say they're a, I don't know, a Marxist or a libertarian or a…I don't know, there's so many different terms. So what are you what is your type of government that you see the church and are involved in or its relationship together?

Mark 7:15

Well, I tend to not…generally, the word I'd probably use and others would use for me is some sort of anarchist. But that word is constraining and tends to be centered in kind of the white, European narrative, but it fits. Basically, the idea of anarchism: anarchism was kind of backward Marx and others were talking about what socialism should look like, they quickly differentiate into kind of two paths. One that was top down, we need to seize the government and kind of bring about socialism and the other one was a bottom up, sort of approach where we need people need to organize apart from governance, in their unions, farmer collectives, and that was called anarchism. So anarchism isn't the absence of structure, it's just bottom up. We don't need it to be enforced from the top down. So I'm a socialist, who's also anti-authoritarian?

Seth 8:11

How does that work in America? And I will say, I often allude to what my job is. So I run a bank. And so there's a part of me that hears that. It's like, Oh, my gosh, I'll lose my job tomorrow if this type of government happens. So I, that doesn't mean I agree with it or not agree with it. I just I just have a family to feed. So are there both? So one is a government push down to socialism? And the other one is a people rising up to socialism? Is there any other difference between the two?

Mark 8:41

It gets into lots of nuances. This is the thing when you're around leftists of any sort for long you find out that there's like it's worse than being Baptist. There's like thousands of little mini fractures. And so there's an anarco cynicalyst, which is like the international Workers of the World where we think the things need to be organized around like syndicates of union organizing. There's the primitive is to think we should go back to hunter gatherers. I tend to be to me I'm, I think of anarchism, rather than the end goal as the process we do now. So anything that brings us more into radical democracy, where the people are having direct say, over what happens is more anarchistic. And so how it works is more ground level neighborhoods organizing to get what they need. And we live within the reality of governance right now. So it's not like the government's going away. So we have to figure out how to challenge the government without reaffirming its power, which is always the anarchist dance. So do I believe in universal health care? Well, if you're relying on the government to do government to do that, what do you do like so then there's all these conversations within anarchism, like how it gets to be complex? And I have no, there's no answers, quick answers, we just have to keep organizing in a more anarchist way where people are directly laying claim for what they want need.

Seth 10:11

So not to beat on the Baptist metaphor, but I have found being in a Baptist Church and being involved in leadership and one that if you're relying on people to do things, people just don't volunteer if there's no self interest of self vested interest in so for something like a universal health care, the government's going to have to administrate it unless they're not allowed to, in which case, the people would need to do that. But so how do you how do you hold people accountable? How do you even get them motivated to want to do that? Because I know, most people would not admit that they're lazy.

Mark 10:46

No, and I tend to look at it, I'm a less cynical about people's self interest. I think people will do stuff that's collaborative, and we'll share it help each other. Because if you move away from like the self interest economics, there's the self interest in security and prestige within a community, knowing that people need you and like you, is usually how traditional societies kind of work. Like people aren't like greedy, selfish bastards at heart, they want to be useful and cooperative. Right? And the problem is, we have all these myths that say, like, okay, there's a reason, for example, we had so many millions of people voting against their best interests with the Trump election, for example.

So they believe in these lies. And they think that the possibility of having neighborliness has been taken away from them. And so part of it is just reframing it, but then also looking at, we can actually support each other and have healthier ways of being, and most people will opt into that. That's why churches exist. There's very little in self interest with a church unless you unless you really believe that most people go to church because they don't want to go to hell.

Seth 11:53

Well, I think I think a lot of people believe that I don't believe that. But I do think a lot of fire insurance.

Mark 12:00

Yeah, but a lot of us don't. And we do it because we want to be a part of something that's meaningful, that aligns to what we think is ultimate truth. And we like being a part of something where we're all building something better.

Seth 12:11

So what is the church's role in politics? What should they be involved with? The not be involved? You know, the Moral Majority comes to mind. And then there's the inverse of absolutely not, we can't be involved at all. So how do we? I don't know, I follow so many people on Twitter, like a Brian Zahnd that says political things all the time and other other people saying, No, we shouldn't be involved in politics at all. We shouldn't vote, you shouldn't even be part of a party. You should just do church.

Mark 12:41

Yeah. And I mean, my way of cutting through all that is, the church is intrinsically a political reality. I mean, people get weird about it. Like, when they say politics, what do they mean? Do they mean the state, the apparatus of the state? And so then we let our imagination be co opted, and think the only way of being permitted which is organizing with other human beings for a greater good, or for greater, taking care of each other and ourselves. That somehow the state is the where that happens. And then there's this thing magically outside of the realm of politics called the church. And that's just a horrible way of framing it.

Now, if you start saying, well, the church is a political reality, which in certain leftist circles and traditions, you might call that pre-figurative, like the church is a is a pre-figurative political reality, where we try to live and embody how we want the world to go. Okay, so we're a demonstration plot for the Kingdom of God. Now, very rarely, we actually see a church embody that. So all these people that claim to have more radical values, but then in their church, like the best they have as $1,000 a year they set aside for a Jubilee fund. That's not pre-figurative. That's nice, that's helpful, but it's not fully embodying it. So because of that, it's also I think, important for the church to embody the prophetic role where we actually speak out and challenge the systems. I don't think we can make the government “Christian”. But we can challenge it to be just according to our understanding of what justice is, and we can do our best to embody the witness that we're calling the rest of the world to move towards. And I don't think the church is very good at either of them. Because we've so bought into this idea that we're not political. And that somehow, and the voting thing, like we act as the voting is our sacrament, where it's the one political thing we actually do is actually one of the least politically effective things that we can do. And we make too much out of it.

Seth 14:43

Yeah. Well, yeah, I agree on that the way our Electoral College system is set up, doesn't your vote, it matters in a pie in the sky type of thing. But it doesn't matter overall, as far as you know, who represents me, so…

Mark 14:59

No, the choices are mostly made for us before we get a chance to vote. And then we're, I mean, we should use it like I wish we would have used the people would have voted to not have Trump in office. But let's not kid ourselves. It's not…That's like, that's a very impotent amount of power that we've been given at that point. We should use it wisely or not use it, I understand, I was in nonvoter for years for kind of out of a political protest. But then I thought, it's not like I'm going to become compromised if I vote every once in a while..so

Seth 15:31

every decade, yeah, so what what is the what is the line then that we as a Christian community should draw in the sand of the difference between culture and politics. Of what we can speak prophetically to versus what we can speak against? What is that? What how do we find that line through a lens of Christ?

Mark 15:54

I think we have to discern it like so to me, I'm really, I'm a big believer that Jesus this meant it when he said that he would send us the Spirit to guide us into all truth. And that part of our mistake, especially in the Western tradition, has been to assume that we need hermeneutics to understand what the Bible said, and then apply it to culture as though it's some sort of disembodied intellectual exercise. And I think communities need to engage in the discernment.

I think there's reasons why the Quakers were such bad asses when it came to abolition and suffrage and all these things in the past and still have a strong peace tradition is because they still embody a practice of discernment, rather than coming up with disembodied external sort of principles. And I know that's not that makes it seem messy, and makes those of us who would kind of maybe are more reformed in our orientation, afraid of thinking about how messy that is, but then you look at the reformed tradition and think, well, you guys have sucked so? (Laughter) Well, it's not like we're going to do worse if we start trying to really be discerning and mystical about it. And so that's how we find the line communities have to discern together where the line is.

Seth 17:10

Yeah. What would you say? And and I don't know how I said with this, and I've struggled with the phrasing of this question over the past few weeks. So what would you say to someone that says, “Well, Mark, this is naive, this is never going to work, especially in the system that we currently live in, where people have become so interdependent on all forms of government, for many things, and if you take that away, the whole thing will collapse, like Rome will burn”, what would you say that this is just a naive view of of government?

Mark 17:43

Well, I mean, if I had a magical wand, I’m not saying that I would make all forms of governance and Civil Services disappear. Although I'd be curious, interesting thought exercise. I think once you, once you start organizing, if you're an organizing circle, you start organizing for some sort of change, that is replacing the existing corrupt, top down money sort of structure with a different one. So it's really not about this idea of anarchism as the absence of something as being a no governance or no structure is kind of, we need to replace that. No, it's a wonderful structured way that it's just, it's just bottom up. And then I don't know of any serious anarchist thinker who doesn't think about what kind of structures replace it with.

So this is one of the ways that they talk about this is dual power, you create an alternative structure within the shell of the old and you try to push it out. I mean, I would love it if like churches started thinking in terms of dual power, like, how do we meaningfully, if we see an injustice in the world? How do we meaningfully build a counter response to that, at the same time, as I'm calling up the injustice of it? So health insurance, like, there's no reason that churches can't, like denomination can't do universal health care, for example.

Seth 19:09

That the denomination provides?

Mark 19:14

Or the people that organize for themselves, like it's, if you in six friends can't really do insurance, but if there's a million people in a system, you can start thinking about all the kinds of things we could do instead. And not do it in an Amish way where we're disconnecting from the system. This is where I think some of my Anabaptist friends get a little bit too carried away. We're not detaching from the world, we got to embody it. And then that gives us some heft. When we say, hey, you need to get your act together Empire.

Seth 20:08

I feel like so much education would have to happen. So how do you do that? How do you re educate people in a way that doesn't make them feel ignorant of what they don't know? That doesn't make them defensive? Because I find lately, as I engage with any doctrine that I used to hold in, especially on Facebook, that I no longer hold, then I quickly they get blocked on followed called a heretic, or many other words, so how do you engage in that conversation without just being laughed right out of the conversation or dismissed altogether?

Mark 20:46

You know, I don't know. All I know is

Seth 20:49

That's discouraging.

Mark 20:52

It is. I mean that's what we're trying to work at, like with the Center for Prophetic Imagination is starting a trend to do especially with Christian folks. But I do know, like, for example, 100 years ago, a large number of rural Minnesotans, this is where I live in Minnesota, were either part of the Farm Labor Party, or there was a lot of them that were socialists, so rural Minnesotans were tended towards socialism. Okay, so this is only a couple of generations where all of a sudden, now you have this conservative Moral Majority kind of way of thinking about things and that's anchored in rural America; so it's possible.

And I think there I know, there are different tactics that I'm just kind of skeptical of like some groups like Sojourners and Red Letter Christians are trying to engage with an evangelicalism to bring about an evangelical left and look at the tactics that evangelical right has used, and try to do those same sorts of things to challenge the narrative. I think there's something to that, I think. But I don't know. I mean, there's so many ways out there, and I don't none of them ever really gotten at it. Because I mean, this is where it gets really, the problem is, is conservative, Christian, evangelical Christians and conservative Christians have more money to spend than the kind of the leftist ones. It's kind of what it comes down to. So that's the big problem. And I don't know how to get past that yet.

Seth 22:17

Yeah. I do want to talk about the Center for Prophetic Imagination. But I have one more question about sharing the gospel in relation to Empire. And, and so as I read Scripture, as I begin to reread Scripture, I've come to think that, you know, obviously, the Gospel, the good news of Jesus is for everyone. But it seems to always begin with the poorest, with the most broken, with the most handicap with the most disgusting of humanity, and it works its way inward to center. And I don't see much of a room there. For someone that is affluent, you know, as I sit here on a Macbook on high speed internet, you doing that? So how, how does the gut is the gospel only for poor, poorer people? That's not even a there's a good way to say that that's very hateful, which is the gospel only for the the least of us, because there doesn't seem to be much there for an affluent person.

Mark 23:10

It's not only but it starts with, like, so to me, reading the gospel of Luke, that's how I got radicalized. Like, right after 911, I was disillusioned with how angry everyone was. And I read the gospel of Luke and I went from being a fundamentalist to a pacifist in a period of a couple weeks, it is really mind bending. And then when you read through Luke, there's all these opportunities for wealthy or affluent people to be a part of the gospel, be a part of the kingdom, but it comes through the relationship with the poor. So from a Christian perspective, the engine of the Jesus(ey) sort of revolution is the poor, disenfranchised. And then but others, the good news for us who have more power, is that we can be a part of it too, if we align ourselves in solidarity with those who are oppressed. And so that's the good news. The idea that somehow, the idea that wealthy Christians can accept the way of Jesus and it doesn't affect their wealth is a lie that we tell people so that we can get their tithes. That's basically it.

Seth 24:21

I read you say something similar to that on Facebook not long ago about what is how I'm going to say it wrong. Something about it's, it's immoral for x, but it's also immoral to be a billionaire or millionaire. And I'm saying that wrong.

Mark 24:36

There's no there's no moral justification to be a millionaire or a billionaire.

Seth 24:40

Yeah. Because of something like that. Because I should give the money away. Is that what I'm hearing you say? Or that I should? I don't know what am I…say i inherit that money what am I supposed to do with it?

Mark 24:54

Well, I mean, the interesting thing is like, it's not about giving it away, it's about the power over the money, and the way that that money causes you to see the world. So a lot of people look at Warren Buffett or Bill Gates as examples of ”just” billionaires. My problem with that is they're still using their money to enforce a way, the way they want the world to be. Even if they're doing it charitably, it's still an expression of wealthy power.

What I see happening with Luke and Acts is this giving up, and it's not about just becoming poor ourselves, and I don't think that's the goal is lyst actual Jubilee, where the wealth that we are given has become part of a shared process for determining what is God doing in the world, and then our money should go towards that. So it's really, if we've got wealth and assets, we should ask, by what criteria would decide what to do with this and who has a say, if I, if we somehow think it's justifying to be able to tide some of it away, then we're still reinforcing this idea that the wealthy white people get to inflict their vision for the world upon the world. We need to challenge that. So what do you do if you inherit a billion dollars? I don't know. Like maybe develop some sort of discernment counsel with some oppressed folks and pray about it and let them have a say.

Seth 26:13

What if I wanted to give it to the Center for Prophetic Imagination?

Mark 26:17

I mean, you can we can help you…(laughter from both) go through that discernment!

Seth 26:23

Yeah. So the Center for prophetic imagination? We talked around it. So what exactly are you doing? What are we what am I prophetically imagining?

Mark 26:36

So what we're doing, we're trying to figure out ways of forming people, especially mentoring young leaders, to engage in a more prophetic posture in the world. So what does that mean? If you look at seminaries and any institutions of higher learning, they train church folks to be pastoral, which is ultimately a way of maintaining pastoring as a ministry of continuity. Like how do I maintain the integrity of this group?

Being prophetic is a ministry of disruption, it disrupts things. And there's good reason why seminaries don't train people for disruption. Because it doesn't keep the denomination and seminary life. So we're trying to figure out like, what does it mean to equip people for this, and we don't have a lot of money, for obvious sorts of reasons. But what we do is mentoring, we have a conference coming up in September. That's kind of the anniversary of Walter Bruggemann’s 40 year anniversary of Walter’s book, the Prophetic Imagination, which was part of the inspiration for a name. So he's coming out and some others, we do lots of retreats. And really, the big question is, how do we mentor people through a prophetic way of engaging the world?

Seth 27:50

So when I went to your website, I saw you've got these seven core principles. The first being foremost, Jesus is the center and ultimate example for your life. There was one on there that I'm confused about. And so it says, hold on, let me find it. I got it written down

Imperial structures and myths.

And that's the part I'm confused about

seek to alienate us from one another, from the rest of creation and from our Creator.

So what do you mean about myths and imperial structures?

Mark 28:19

Structures can be institutions, myths are just the stories that we believe; that give our lives in our society meaning. So an imperial structure would be, like the government, the big banks, sorry, sorry, dude,

Seth 28:38

I work I work at a small bank.

Mark 29:39

Oh, that's good, then you're golden.

Seth 28:41

I say small, it's about 100 branches. So I don't know if that's small. But it's not Bank of America.

Mark 28:47

Yeah…no, there's there's a difference. And so there's different structures the way like when we start talking about white supremacy, for example, we know that it's an institutional reality. Right? We see that within the banking and redlining and stuff, but then also like policing, Congress, there's all these ways that whiteness gets reinforced the prison industrial complex. But the myths are these ideas that could be any from from a small kind of little light, like the idea that black people are more violent, which that's a big lie but it's small in its simplicity, like it's a very simple idea. Or it could be a bigger one, the idea that, that the the myth of democracy, which we say like, for example, everyone in the United States thinks that we're, not everyone, but a lot of people think we're in a democracy. And the reason we get involved in places overseas is to spread democracy. That's complete bullcrap. That's not true. None of that's true at all.

So these are all myths that we believe in that keep us kind of trapped into assuming that the way things are is the only way things could ever really be. That democracy and the fact that soldiers when they die, it's a sacred thing. All these sorts of ideas, we just take them for granted. It's not even provocative to think them. It's just assumed. And so these things, if we buy into them, we end up being alienated from God from one another, and from the land. It's like our whole way of seeing the world is tainted.

Seth 30:19

Yeah. You know, I think, well, especially that part of us spreading democracy throughout the rest of the world. I had an online conversation not long ago with a friend from high school that I don't think we agree on a lot anymore, but we we do still respect each other. And he had said, you know, we should hold Russia accountable for meddling into the…yada, yada, yada. I said, Well, great. What do you want to do for holding America and accountable for all of the places that we've meddled? He's like, we haven't. And so I give him the list and how he like, he's like, well, they should, they should handle that. And they should prosecute us. It's like, well, great, how we spend more money on guns, and own more of everything than anyone else. So how do you want them to do that? How is Venezuela or any other the “vokias” or, you know, anywhere South? How are we supposed to? How are they supposed to prosecute us? And he he quickly change the topic.

Mark 31:08

I mean, it's not like the like the UN is going to be able to hold us accountable.

Seth 31:15

It's in America.

Mark 31:16

Yeah, we've got a grip on it.

Seth 31:17

Yeah. The ambassador lives downstairs or could if she wanted to, so, um, I had, I want to give you the opportunity to plug your podcast. I have enjoyed the Deep Roots podcast quite a bit specifically the one. Oh, man, I'm going to say his name wrong. It was related to Martin Luther King.

Mark 31:35

Byard Rustin.

Seth 31:37

Yeah, I can't I can't say that. Especially not with, not with these braces in my mouth. There's too many weird consonants in the wrong spot. So plug the podcast, what are you trying to do? And how does it relate to your ministry now?

Mark 31:51

Sure. One of the things that I know like Walter Bruegemann them bring them in talks about and prophetic imagination is one of the markers of a prophet is that we live in, in a sense of living memory, that we're a part of a tradition. And part of the thing I'm trying to express is that the prophetic tradition didn't just stop with John the Baptist, that Jesus embodied the fullness of the prophetic tradition. But then throughout church history today, we see the prophetic kind of ministry live. And it's not just the way we use the word prophetic in our society, if you're, if you're like a charismatic, it's someone who sees the future and speaks in tongues, which is my background. That's not really what the prophetic thing is. And it's not just people that are social justice(y). Like the idea of spiritual people who just do social justice as being prophetic, that doesn't get at it either. But a prophet is a type of mystic, somebody who's experienced with God is such that they actually feel the divine pathos, those they grieve God's grief. And then that propels them to challenge what they see around them.

And so I'm trying to tell the story of different prophetic movements or figures, through history to kind of like re re center our sense of the tradition that we're drawing from and also inspire us to be do likewise today. So it's, it's a history podcast. Everyone I've talked about has been dead except for one. I did one on Ernesto Cardinal from Nicaragua.

And the other piece about it is I'm also the thing I'm enjoying about the podcast is I share people's flaws as well as their…these aren't like hagiography is they're not just stories about awesome people who didn't have problems, like Ernesto Cardinal was part of a revolution that ended up failing in a way; he had it back out of it. Simone Weil did one on she had some, some self hatred and starve to death of her own will. Byard Rustin after MLK died, he started slowly shifting more of neoconservative and his Zionism ended causing him to give up on some of his earlier principles. But with each of these stories, you see the brilliance of God working through them. And that's part of the story to the amazing things they did and how they saw the world and their legacy.

Seth 34:22

You were talking a bit about feeling grief with God. And I spoke with Mark Charles not too many months ago, and I asked him, I said, Well, what would you do for the nation? And he said, “we need to enter a prophetic season of lament and not a service, not a month, we need to sit in limit long enough for God to show up because he will, if we would just stop believing we're better than everybody else. We are not exceptional”.

Which I don't know how to do. I have to it's hard to set aside your pride to enter into that because I want to be good. I mean, good not in a moral way. I mean, good is in a better than way. So that's, that's my worst me. So, I wanted to end on this because I want to see if you're serious, but I also like your ideas. So you are apparently running for for president in 2024.

Mark 35:19

I'm not that serious. But I might be funny. I mean, if there was a way to do it. Maybe I do it. But like I don't see me getting any traction for that.

Seth 35:30

Well, I don't know a lot of these ideas. You see people younger than me talking about. So you know, you got things in here like a student and health debt jubilee. I'm all about that being that I have student debt. I am curious on some of the things you stay in there, because I want to see what your minds coming. So you said cancellation, a third world debt. You don't know what they owe America or what they just you don't know anybody anymore? Like how do you enforce that?

Mark 35:56

Well, what do America so like? I mean, here's the thing, if you're President of the best you can do is you can determine how the United States enforces. You can also determine things like, yeah, enforcing of treaties, movement of troops. So a lot of these things, the things on the list, are all reasonable things that I think a president could initiate, but it's still up to Congress. But I think things like forgiveness of federal debt, what's owed the United States, pulling out of troops, issuing executive powers to kind of give guidelines for how you want, like Sallie Mae and all these other, like, all the I don't even

Seth 36:43

I don't even like people named Sally anymore.

Mark 36:46

So I mean, here's the thing, a lot of this, a lot of this stuff, like student debt is kind of managed by the executive branch, like you can't change the laws if you're President, but you could tell them to stop enforcing that. So it would be a functional kind of Jubilee, even though like maybe four years later when I'm, if I didn't make it, I got elected, I wouldn't even make it past the first year and probably so that you can definitely challenge some of that stuff.

Seth 37:10

The thing you didn't put in here is how do you how do you take back down the wall that we built by then?

Mark 37:18

You send in the National Guard, that you just pulled other parts of the world and then its like, everybody take him a break.

Seth 37:28

I laugh out loud on that. And one more, and it's one and I know you spoke with him, Josh, from he's a buddy of mine from from the Awkward Rhino podcast. He all the time talks about reparations. And so in how you view the world? What does that look like? Because I we have argued about that for years. How do you see reparations even working?

Mark 37:52

I don't know how it would actually end up working. But it's to me, it's a sin that a President hasn't at least formally said, we're going to start talking about reparations. We've screwed up. You need more than an apology. Let's talk about reparations and then bring people to the table. I mean, that's just common sense. And of course, there's too many players to like be able to like, it's like the President can declare, “okay, we're going to give whatever” reparations would be revolutionary. Unless it's unless you're talking about a token, some of like, $500 bucks or something, it's going to be revolutionary, because you're gonna have to start looking at not just redistributing some wealth, but also what generates wealth. I mean, that's the thing like land reform, breaking up monopolies, and giving some you know, like, but you gotta start talking about it, and at least start a national debate about it. So that something ends up happening, because that'll be more than anything, that that's the best chance you we'd probably have, before some sort of revolution to actually do reparations would be a President, or someone high up enough to to begin some conversation.

Seth 39:05

I would think if you would run on just that alone, you would have the the vote of everybody that ever wants that. So you could probably win, it would be fine. So enough about that?

Mark 39:15

Wow…President Mark

Seth 39:17

Yeah, why not? Yeah, you know, Making Reparations Great Again.

Mark 39:20

Do you want to cabinet position? I could try to work that out for you?

Seth 39:25

I don't know. Are you paying me? Because this sounds like a lot of this stuff. I'm not allowed to make much money.

Mark 39:29

Cabinet positions? I think they get paid.

I don't know. I haven't really looked into it. But I mean, you get you have a job. It could be like, I don't know, what's the what's the part of the government that oversees like finances or secretary of finance I don't even know.

Seth 39:48

I’m sure there is, I don't know all the cabinet positions

Mark 39:51

The Department of Interior or the Department of Labor, one of those two.

Seth 39:56

Probably the Department of Labor. But that sounds like more work than I want to do so. So for those listening, where would you point them to? And I will say you've written and we didn't talk about any of the books specifically, but you've written the Unkingdom of God, which I would recommend, I own that book. You've written the Holy Anarchist. And you also have a children's book correct. A wolf at the gate in that it's geared towards children?

Mark 40:17

Yeah, it's kind of a middle grade book with pictures.

Seth 40:20

Yeah. Well, where would you point people to to engage with you, Mark, I've enjoyed this, but I want to give you back the rest of your morning. Okay.

Mark 40:29

You can look at Mark van Steenwyk on Facebook, I'm there a fair bit. My own personal website is MarkVan.info. You can also look me up there. Those are probably the two easiest places.

Seth 40:46

Thank you Mark, I’ve enjoyed it.

Mark 40:47

Yeah, thanks for having me.

Seth Outro 41:02

Man that was a lot. I know if if you heard that, like I did. There is a lot that can be desired when we think about how church should play a role in our government. How we then should do things in place of the government and honestly how we should put our money where our mouth is. So what can we do? What can you do? Take a minute take today think about that? What is one thing that you can internalize in do in the community around you to in a subversive way, do the work that you trust the government to do but do it with God and mind and do it with the kingdom in mind as we begin to try to subvert the polarization that has become American politics and American Christianity. If even one of you listening felt impacted by any of the episodes that you've heard, please consider supporting the show for $1 and month@patreon.com. slash Can I Say This At Church. I cannot stress again how thankful I am for each of you that does that. This show is quite literally not possible without you. So thank you.

All the songs that you heard in today's episode were from artists Krum based out of Dallas, Texas. You can check his music out at IAMKrum.com. links to that will be in the show notes. And as with each and every episode. The specific songs featured in today's episode will be on the Can I Say This At Church Spotify playlist, which if I'm bias is a fantastic playlist.

23 - I'm Still Here with Austin Channing Brown / Transcript

Note: Can I Say This at Church is produced for audio listening. If able, I strongly encourage you to listen to the audio, which has inflection, emotion, sarcasm where applicable, and emphasis for points that may not come across well in written word. This transcript is generated using a combination of my ears, software, and the help of a friend and so it may contain errors. Please check the episode for clarity before quoting in print.

Back to the Audio Episode!


Austin 0:00

[My husband said], “There are some folks who are so sick,” and by sick he meant ‘a cold’ sick, “that the medicine you have for them will never be strong enough.” And he said, “And in the case of right racism, sometimes white folks just have to talk to white folks, that because you are a black woman, he'll never hear what you have to say, ever. And that's not a reflection of you. That's a reflection of how sick he is. He needs a different kind of medicine.”

Seth 0:54

Hey there, welcome back to the Can I Say This At Church podcast, I am Seth, your host. A little bit of a caveat before we get started. Thank you so much to everyone that is involved with the show on Patreon and on Facebook and on Twitter. I am very, very thankful for you all. To the Patreon supporters specifically, I am excited to share with you the upcoming blooper reel. I think it's going to be very fun and embarrassing for me. But hey, that's fine, we'll deal with it. If you haven't interacted, in a way, here's how you can help with the show. Just rate us on iTunes. It's free, takes a moment. Leave a comment on that as well. That would be great. I love the feedback. It helps make the show better, and that is my goal.

Today, I spoke with Austin Channing Brown. She has a new book releasing entitled I'm Still Here: Black Dignity in a World Made for Whiteness. And so we talked about that. The title basically says it all. How do we deal with race and culture and the world that we're in? How do we talk about white privilege without getting angry? How do we work through this so that, in 60 years, our children do not have to have the same conversations and arguments that we currently do? This matters for the church. It matters for our culture, it matters for our nation. It matters for our education. It matters for so many ways in life.

A bit of an aside. Austin was willing to come on, and you will hear in the back her newborn. You might hear some noise and a few baby cries and whatnot. Moving beyond that, I'm looking forward to you hearing the episode. Have a great one.

Seth 2:57

Austin, thank you so much for being able to join me today on the Can I Say This At Church podcast. I've enjoyed reading the book that you so graciously sent me, and I'm excited for today's discussion. I will be honest. I am slightly worried about it because we're talking about a world made for whiteness, and I am white and you are not. So we'll just address that elephant in the room. Hopefully we'll be all right.

Austin 3:21

I think we can handle it. I think we can do this.

Seth 3:24

Well, good. Well, Austin, can you just bring people up to speed? What's a little bit about you? The whole book is really a story of you and the world that we live in, What's a little about you? What would you want people to kind of understand about you going into this, as they read your book?

Austin 3:40

Yeah, so I feel like I've read a lot of books about blackness that take place in the Deep South, or that take place in The Hood, that are sort of coming of age stories around other black folks. Mine is a story of coming of age around a lot of white people. I really wanted to write a book that explored my identity development, having always been around white folks, as opposed to growing up around black folks and then being introduced to white-dominant culture.

Seth 4:19

What do you do now? Besides an author? What else do you do?

Austin 4:22

That's it. I take care of my son, who is seven months old. Before he was born, I was a resident director at Calvin College. I did that for three years, in addition to doing some multicultural stuff on campus. But now I just stay at home with my little baby and write and speak.

Seth 4:46

Nice. Nice. Yeah, I enjoy your writing, and I've listened to a little bit of your speaking. So what was the thought process behind you wanting to put all of this to paper, because you've laid yourself awful bare in your book. Well, probably not everything as personal as it could be, there's a lot of you in this. I can say, personally, when you do that in a public forum, like a podcast or like a blog or like a book that there is a lot of a lot of risk that comes with that and a lot of vulnerability. So what was kind of the genesis of this book?

Austin 5:20

The truth is, I've been talking about race and justice for a long, long time. I'm not a historian. I'm not an academic. I'm not a theologian. The only way for me to approach this work is via my own story. I personally have appreciated particularly academic approaches to this conversation. I like having new language. I like understanding America's history, it really fills me up. But I felt like, if there's a hole in our conversations about racial justice, it's this present moment. I feel like we've got a lot of books out there on history and understanding how we got here. I wanted to try my best to help people understand what racial injustice looks like on an everyday basis, no matter where you live, no matter where you are. I wanted to try and unpack how people of color, who are in the minority, may be feeling on a daily basis.

Seth 6:32

Yeah, yeah. I think you've hit that tone. I kept taking a few screenshots and sending it to a friend of mine that happens to be black as well, living just 25 or 30 minutes east to me. He's like, “I want that book. I want to read all of it.” I [replied], “Patience, it’ll be all right.”

Austin 6:50

That makes me really happy because I want the book to resonate with people of color, so that they can say, “Yep, this is my experienced too,” and hand it to their white friends and say, “Read this book.”

Seth 7:05

Yeah, I agree. Speaking for just my whiteness, “White people read this book.” It is challenging. We'll get into it in a little bit when we talk about white privilege and that type of stuff. It is challenging. I like the story that you tell about how and the reasoning you got your name. Can you go into that a little bit? I honestly never thought about [it]. I interview many people, and I can say, “I do filter people that same way.” I didn't realize that I did until I read you say it. Then I went back and I looked at how I filter people. I'm like, “You know, I do actually [filter], the name matters.” And I don't even know why the name should matter. Can you talk a bit about that lineage? Why you got the name? That story in the library, there’s just a bunch there, it really spoke to me.

Austin 7:55

Yeah. So, my first name is Austin, with is my grandmother's maiden name. Growing up, I always heard that I had the name Austin because I was the last Austin of our family line.

Seth 8:13

No boys.

Austin 8:14

No boys. Yeah. I was always very proud of that. I thought that was perfectly reasonable. But I always had known that it was a boy's name. I knew that because, back in the 80s, when I was growing up, mid 80s, early 90s, they always had those little key chains that had the nameplate on. My nameplate was always blue instead of pink. I was like, “Well sheesh.”

Seth 8:49

You didn't get a license plate for your bicycle?

Austin 8:52

I did not, unless I wanted a blue one, and that was unacceptable to me at the time.

Seth 8:57

I take it blue is not your favorite color.

Austin 9:00

I was an unenlightened child, what can I say? Blue was for boys, and I didn't appreciate it. Adults always reacted to my name as if I was supposed to be a boy. So teachers would walk into a classroom on the first day, not know who I was, called out Austin, and then would look towards where all the boys were sitting, waiting for one of the boys to raise their hands. I would literally be on the opposite side of the room doing jumping jacks trying to get their attention.

Seth 9:25

Yeah, “I'm right here.”

Austin 9:27

The girl is over here. I am a girl and my name is Austin. So all of that was very clear to me. But we spent a lot of time in our library near near my home. There was a day when I handed the librarian my card. And she said, “Is this your card?” And I was like, “I think so,” like I didn't double check before I handed it to her. But I was pretty sure it wasn't my mom's or my brother’s. So I said, “Yeah, I think so,” and she said, “Well, this card says Austin.” I said, “Yep, that’s mine.” She said, “Are you sure?” And I thought, “Am I sure my name is Austin?” Like I don’t understand the question. What does that mean?

Seth 10:12

I’m fairly certain.

Austin 10:16

It really pissed me off. I was so insulted that she would be doubting my intelligence or something. So I marched over to my mother. I was like, “Why on earth did you give me this name? I don't understand.” She sat me down and started to tell me about my grandmother's, and I was like, “Mama, I already know this. I'm asking you why you liked it. Like why did you pick this?” And she said, “Austin, we picked it because we knew one day you would have to fill out applications for college or a job, and we knew that having a white male name would be an asset.” She said, “We just need to get you to the interview.” She said, “Now once you get to interviews, we know you'll blow people away, but we just had to get you to the interview.”

I was like, “Huh, interesting.” It wasn't until that moment that I realized that every time I had met another Austin, not only was it a boy, but it was a white boy. That was a revelation for me, but I was young so I can’t say…

Seth 11:29

How old were you?

Austin 11:32

Probably eight, seven or eight, something like that. But it was my first “Aha-moment” beyond just, “I'm different from the kids at my school.” Right. I knew that my hair was different from the white girls’ hair. It’s it's not that I hadn’t noticed race before, but I didn't know the significance of race until that moment.

Seth 11:55

Yeah, no, I agree with that. I mean, my son just turned nine last Tuesday, beginning of April. I can say it's about that time that you notice a huge difference between what they begin to comprehend, as opposed to what they see.

Austin 12:13

Right, right, right. Kids notice race pretty early, just differences in skin color and hair and all that kind of stuff. But then there's this moment when we realize what America thinks about race, thinks about what those things mean. That was my moment.

Seth 12:28

Yeah. So talk about that a bit again. So you went to both kinds of schools. So you you talk a bit about when you were growing up, you had a school that was predominately white, and then you switch to a school that was not, correct?

Austin 12:41

I went to a summer day camp that was not. Yeah, yeah. So my schools have always been predominantly white. But there was a season in my life, probably three or four years, where the summer camp that I would go to was entirely black, and it was a culture shock. It was a big, big culture shock to be around all black kids, who were used to being in an all black neighborhood and all black school, like that's all they knew. I talked differently. I didn't know all the slang. I didn't know all the contemporary artists that were popular at the time. The SWV song “Weak” was extraordinarily popular that first summer. I did not know not one word, and I distinctly remember sitting on the bus lip-synching the entire thing, praying that nobody noticed no sound was actually coming out of my mouth.

Seth 13:40

You’re just soft spoken. You're hitting the falsetto. Yeah.

Austin 13:44

Right. It was a big, big shock to my system.

Seth 13:48

Yeah. So how do you deal with that? Because that still happens today. I mean, that happens every day, especially as more and more demographics seem to overlap, and people are able to move away from where they grew up. So how do we deal with that? Or how do we teach our kids to deal with that today? Because it's not going anywhere.

Austin 14:08

Truthfully, I have no idea. I will say this, though, it was really good for me. It was a hard, hard transition. I was called names. I was called like an Oreo, which means that I was black on the outside, but white on the inside. I was asked, why do I talk white? So there were a lot of hard days. It was just embarrassing to not know what all the other kids knew, to not be able to participate in their conversations about Whitney Houston and Bobby Brown. There was a lot of things that I didn't get.

It made me appreciate that blackness had a different culture, that they had a different way of talking, that they had a different conversation. They danced more, they joked more. In some sense, they were more free than anything I had experienced at an all-white school. Part of that is because it's a school versus day camp, right? There was still, nonetheless, a certain inner freedom that I experienced with these kids that I had never experienced in my white school. I'm really grateful to have to be able to appreciate what folks in my school would have called disrespectful or would have called unruly or would have called …. they would have had a name for it.

Seth 15:34

You mean, in the way that they acted? Or in the way that you all acted?

Austin 15:37

Sure, sure. It wasn’t. It was just fun and free and a different way of being. I was really glad to experience that.

Seth 15:47

Yeah, I've had a similar conversation with some of the other guests on the show, either from a Native American viewpoint or whatnot. What I'm coming to find is that, unless you can experience a down-pressing of culture on you, when you move past it, you genuinely experienced joy. Most people, at least in America, most white people don't ever experience that kind of oppression, the joy that I feel is - this is going to sound bad or it's going to sound trite - the joy that I feel doesn't compare because I'm coming from a place that is not as foundationally pressed on. I don't know if I'm saying that right or not, I don’t think I am.

Austin 16:29

Right. No, you totally are. I think an example of this is The Black Panther movie and how extraordinarily excited black folks were dressing up in African garb and giving each other the Wakanda Forever sign, taking pictures with the poster in the movie theater. You know, those are things we've never done before, and so to experience that level of freedom ,that level of joy comes from not having the opportunity to celebrate that way at the movie theater all the time, right? White folks really enjoy superhero movies. I'm pretty sure they do. I think they like Superman and Batman and all the things, but they didn't feel it as deeply when it comes out., right? They go, they enjoy it, they wear the T-shirt, but they're not necessarily taking pictures in front of the poster, you know what I’m saying? They're not giving each other a sign as they walk in the door.

Seth 17:29

I did see the movie, I gave nobody a sign. But that's because I'm not…I wouldn't do that anyway. It was a great movie, I took my son to see it. He didn't get any of the colonization cultural overtones of it because he's eight. I think Black Panther might be his favorite movie, he just likes him.

Austin 17:51

I think that's what made it such a fantastic movie, that for adults who are thinking through race, there was so much to have a conversation about. But if you’re a kid or if you just wanted to enjoy an action movie, perfect. It’s still a fantastic movie, I think I did both really, really well.

Seth 18:11

You talk in your book a bit about the ideology of whiteness as supreme? Can you speak to that a bit?

Austin 18:20

So a lot of people, when the phrase “white supremacy” shows up in the blog or on the news or whatever, people have a tendency to jump straight to the KKK or people who would say, “White power,” sort of an extreme buy into the ideology around white supremacy. In the whole book, I try to make clear that white supremacy shows up in a lot of small ways. At its core, it's this belief that what white folks are doing is the best way, is the right way, is the only way, is the most holy way, and don't genuinely stop to rethink what they're doing from the perspective of anyone else.

Not all organizations have the same white culture. I've been a part of organizations that are super minimalist and communal and you own as little as possible. You spend every waking moment together. You work together, you live together, you go to church together, and that is what is valued. Then there are other white cultures that are highly corporate, and you climb the ladder, and you do what you have to do. You dress a certain way, you look a certain way. It doesn't always look the same.

The point, though, is that whatever the culture that's created, there's no room for diversity within it. Let's take the communal white culture. Should I decide that I have other friends that I would really like to spend time with and I skip the Friday night dinners, instead of someone asking, “Huh, maybe we should investigate whether or not we all should form outside relationships and develop community beyond ourselves,” instead of doing that, white folks be like, “Does she not like us? Do you know if she's questioning her faith? Do you think she's as committed as the rest of us are?”

Seth 20:43

Bless her heart. We’re going to have to pray for her.

Austin 20:44

Then when they pray they say, “God, would you just move her heart to be more like us,” essentially, right?

Seth 20:53

Yeah, yeah. Usually when you're in the room, that's what it sounds like.

Austin 20:58

Yeah, yeah. That’s what I mean. I’ll try and give another hardcore example of this. So I have a lot of friends who are vocalist who sing at conferences and sing at churches. The nature of my work just lends me to know a lot of vocalists. It is not unusual for women of color, in particular, to be asked to be able to perform both in an ethnic-specific way, as well as the Christian contemporary country, pop, rock, whatever. It’s horrible.

Seth 21:35

What do you mean perform in an ethnic-way?

Austin 21:38

So if you're a black woman, you need to be able to sing all the songs that would normally be sung that the culture is used to. But then you also have to be able to sing gospel music on MLK Day, and you have to be able to put out a little rap, hip-hop spoken, word thing, for when they talk about justice Sunday. You gotta be good at both, but there’s one that still is dominating. There's one that's still dominant. Right, there's still one great way of doing this, and then the others we do, you know, occasionally.

Because the culture doesn't actually change, because we're not actually going to infuse gospel or rap or Spanish language songs, right, because we're not actually going to infuse that into our way of being, the vocalists who are white never have to learn that. They never have to try out hip hop. They never have to learn how gospel music actually works. They never have to study Spanish in order to make sure they're getting the lyrics right. You know what I mean? That is one way in which churches, consciously or not, are making whiteness supreme. There is a cultural way of being which elevates white Christian contemporary music above that of all the other different kinds of music that exists in the world and that are highly spiritual for people of color.

Seth 23:16

Yeah, yeah. Well, I will say worship is hard. I and other people lead the worship at one of the services at my church. On the way there, my son, who is who is nine now, he comes and he plays the djembe with us. He has a full drum kit just on the other side of the room, but he's not good on that yet. He comes and he practices with us, so he's there at 7:15, 7:30 in the morning before most people even come to church. On the way there he requests, so this is usually what we listen to, we'll listen to Propaganda or Andy Mineo. This week it was Heath McNease. It doesn't matter if they're white or black, just good, rhythmic music, which is almost always hip hop or spoken word. It's never really Chris Tomlin or Passion. Not that there's anything wrong with those songs, it’s just they're not there. I find it fun to watch him wanting to listen to music with his friends. They want to listen to country, and he’s like “I don’t, why do you like this? This isn't fun. This is not even music.” I don't know if I've indoctrinated him or if I'm making him something, I don't know what I'm doing to him, but I'm probably breaking him. But it'll be fine. He'll get older and it'll be fine.

Austin 24:28

We all are. It's okay. We're all just going to get them therapy.

Seth 25:02

I have a friend that teaches school. I let her read your book because I thought she would enjoy it. She is black as well, and I wanted her perspective from it. I wanted to ask you a bit to talk a little bit about the seating chart story that you go about in your book at that Catholic school. The reason being is, I think most people that are white will not admit fault. I'm not allowed to be wrong. I can say I'm wrong to my wife, but I'm not telling you. That’s what I liked the most about that. Can you go into a bit about that? Then I wanted to ask a few questions that she asked me. I said, “If you could ask Austin something, what would you ask?” She sent me a few from a feminine perspective, which I can't bring.

Austin 25:51

Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's great. I think this is another really good example of how white supremacy operates, even in people who are really nice and who aren’t actually trying to be mean. I had a religion teacher, who was amazing, in high school. She was extraordinarily honest. She told us all about her life, no matter how embarrassing it was. She used curse words on a regular basis, which was so much fun, because she's the religion teacher. She was just la breath of fresh air.

Seth 26:21

I don't remember you saying any of that in there, but I like it better now.

Austin 26:28

So one day, we walk into the classroom, this must have been at the turn of the semester, when she had a new class, and she says, “Guys, today you get to choose your own seats. Once you get seated, I'm going to tell you why.” We were like, “Okay, this is unusual. I don't think I've ever had a teacher who just switched mid semester.” So we all sat down. She was so serious, which was very unusual for her. And she said, “Guys, I realized I had made a seating chart for a new class, and I realized that I was doing something racist.” I was like, “Oh, my lord, where is this story going?” She said that she had made a seating chart, and the first time that class had walked into the door, there were two black girls who ended up sitting next to each other. Her first thought was, “Oh my goodness, these two girls are going to be so disrespectful for the rest of the year.” Then literally, she gasped in front of us, she went, “Ahhhhh,” as if she was having the realization all over again.

She said, “I realized, in that moment, as I thought that to myself, that I have been making seating charts based on trying to separate students of color, because I assume that if two students of color sit next to each other, they are going to be disruptive.” She said, “I will no longer create seating charts. All of you will sit where you want to sit.” I was like, “Whoa!” I think it's a really good example of how she's a woman in authority, she has power in her classroom. Even though she was super nice, she was still unwittingly using that power to enforce a racist bias.

Seth 28:30

If you're a teacher and you're listening to this and you hear that story, be you a white teacher, a black teacher, a Spanish teacher, an Asian teacher, it doesn't matter, how do you honor the people that are white, or not make them uncomfortable in a way that they no longer can learn, but how do you also, then, teach the staff to embrace culture so that you can then embrace culture with the students?

Austin 28:51

I speak and teach a lot, but not in the same way that teacher teachers do. I want to acknowledge my own limitations in being able to answer this question. I think in the book there's another teacher, whose name is Mr. Slavinski. He was a white teacher, and he did a fantastic job of honoring different cultures, all the cultures of his students, by infusing that into his curriculum. It’s perhaps easier for some than others, because he was an English teacher, but he was really, really thoughtful about varying the authors that we were reading, and the characters in our stories and the poetry and the time-frame. He just was very, very intentional, and he expected us to learn from everybody, that no matter who he put in front of us, no matter which author, no matter what background, whether they were Christian or not, it didn't matter. Everybody had something to teach us. I think that's one way.

I think teachers really have to attempt to be self-reflective of their own racial biases, right? So she probably got that bias easily, right? We were in a predominantly white school. I'm sure at some point, there were two black girls who sat next to each other and talked through her class. But why? I think it's hard for white folks to appreciate how difficult it can be to be the only one, the only one who looks like you, the only one who shares your cultural background, the only one who was hoping for something different from the teacher. That’s really hard to go through your whole day, and potentially not see anybody who looks like you. Then you get your one class where you get to sit next to your friend and, you know, you might get a little disruptive. The difference is, she had easily been teaching for a decade, I am sure that over the course of her 10 plus years, there was a moment when two white students were disruptive.

Seth 31:20

Yeah, but it just went unnoticed. It was fine.

Austin 31:22

But it unnoticed right, it wasn't attributed to their race. I think that was what she suddenly became aware of, that the two black girls wasn't about them not seeing each other, it wasn't about them just being 16, right? It wasn't attributed to anything other than race and her desire to stop students of color from her assumption that they would be disrespectful if they sat next to one another.

Seth 31:48

So when I talk to people on Facebook or Twitter and I say anything about race, or the president, but mostly about race, it quickly gets to be a, “Why do we have to discuss white privilege?” I mean, that happened just this morning, a friend of mine shared something from John Pavlovitz talking about white privilege. [My friend said], “White privilege isn't a thing. We shouldn't teach this way. We shouldn't try to change the culture. We should just try to be better.” But I am realizing often that I was born into a system geared for me to win, which isn't fair to me. It doesn't mean that I shouldn't be allowed to win, either, but it doesn't mean that you shouldn't be able to not win if you're a person of color.

How do we have a conversation about white privilege? Specifically, I'm interested in what you said about white fragility, where, somehow, it doesn't matter what I say or you say, you still have to give me permission to feel guilty. I don't hear people talk about that. Usually, it just quickly escalates into calling someone a fascist. How do we get to a level where we can talk about just the way that the rules are set?

Austin 33:00

I think white people have a lot of work to do, to be honest. I once ended up in a situation where I had been teaching a class and the content of my class made a white guy really, really angry. He was sort of all up in my face and pointing his fingers at me and just really, really angry. I went home and told my husband what happened. I never calmed him down. Another white guy, a co-worker had to intervene in order to calm him down.

So I went home and told my husband, and he said to me, “You know what Austin there are? There are some folks who are so sick,” and by sick he meant ‘a cold’ sick, “that the medicine you have for them will never be strong enough.” And he said, “And in the case of right racism, sometimes white folks just have to talk to white folks, that because you are a black woman, he'll never hear what you have to say, ever. And that's not a reflection of you. That's a reflection of how sick he is. He needs a different kind of medicine. The medicine that he needs is another white man to say, ‘This is what's real, and this is what is happening in the world.’” Yeah, I think white folks have been silent too long, to be truthful.

Seth 34:25

So how do I do that, then? How do I, as a white man, or someone listening as a white woman, how do I be that medicine without being prideful or arrogant or whatever the word is? How do I do that and be genuine about it?

Austin 34:40

I think you have to [first] remember what it was like when you weren't informed, right? To remember that there was a moment when you didn't get it either. There was a moment before you read that really good book, or before you made that friend, or before you travelled to that country, before you went to that great conference. And I think that's how you begin with humility and say that, “Everybody has to start somewhere,” and to remember that you, yourself, started somewhere. I think the second thing is to remember why you're doing it, that you don't do it because you're right. You don't do it because you're trying to “indoctrinate someone.” You’re doing it because you really believe in justice and you really believe in community. You really believe that, if we all join hands together, we could make the world better.

Truthfully, I think it takes a lot of courage, because I do know white folks who come really passionate about justice, who get talked about by their family members, or who have to have to take all the snide remarks. I think the risk is real. I had a handful of college students who were learning about justice, and particularly the criminal justice system, and how racialized it is. A number of them, right after the election, were very concerned about going home for Thanksgiving because they didn't know what to say and how to be gracious and how to be loving and how not to be ostracized. Especially if you're a student, how do you stand up to your uncle? What does it look like to be respectful?

Seth 36:32

I wanted to end with hope. I don't want to quote you unless it's okay. Is that okay?

Austin 36:39

Yeah, please do.

Seth 36:40

You said, “I ask myself, ‘Where is your hope, Austin?’ The answer, ‘Is it but a shadow.’” What does that mean?

Austin 36:48

Yeah. So I am a Christian, I do believe in ultimate Hope, hope that God is making all things right, hope that heaven will touch Earth and things will be perfect, right. I believe that with my whole heart, but this book was all about trying to acknowledge the place I live now. So though I believe in ultimate Hope, the exploration of hope in my chapter is about my daily experience. My hope is tentative these days.

I accept an invitation to go preach at the chapel service where all the students are required to be there, and my hope is tentative. I go and I preach the best sermon I possibly can and hope the students are inspired. But I'm also highly aware that there's probably going to be three or four students who fall asleep, another three or four who are angry by my message, and another two who are going to come up to me after the service and challenge me. Same thing for churches, for the blog. For all the folks who appreciate the book, hop on Amazon and read all the people who did not. That’s real. Am I hopeful about what could be on a daily basis? Am I hopeful about the church? Am I hopeful? Hopeful enough to do the work, hopeful enough to show up to preach the sermon, to write the next blog, to be on Twitter, to have these conversations with you?

Seth 38:36

Do you think it'll be better in 50 years than it is now?

Austin 38:39

I don't know. I think some things will be better. Our history, though, is that we just find new ways to perpetuate old systems. I think the question is, will we…

Seth 38:59

Find a new system?

Austin 39:00

….find a new system. Will we decide that there's a different way of being and of doing? I think that remains to be seen.

Seth 39:10

Yeah, well I hope so. For my kids’ sake. I would hate to know when I'm 90 that my son and daughters are having to have this same conversation or that your kids’ kids are having to have this same [conversation]. I don't know if you saw that Procter & Gamble commercial?

Austin 39:25

No.

Seth 39:26

There's a Procter & Gamble commercial and it's - I'm going to say this poorly - I had a friend that sent it to me, and they've gotten a lot of pushback. It basically is it that that we're going to market products to whoever we need to market products to. So it starts with a black mom combing out her daughter's hair. It talks about a woman trying to teach her daughter to drive and say, “When you get pulled over, you don't say anything.” She's like, “I'm not going to get a ticket.” She's like, “This ain’t about you getting a ticket. This is about you coming home.” The mom combing the daughter's hair basically says, “No, that was not a compliment. You are not beautiful for a black girl. You are just straight beautiful.” That’s what i mean. If you haven't seen the ad, I’d go to YouTube. And I think it's called “Black is beautiful, Procter & Gamble” or something like that. Very similar to that Dove commercial where they had the person describe the person in the waiting room with them, and it was talking about just the way that you see yourself as ugly and the way they see you is so beautiful and and glowing. I would really hate for, 50 to 60 years from now, my kids are having to have the same exact wheels-are-in-the-mud conversation at church, conversation at work, conversation with their kids.

Austin 40:36

I am in agreement that it would be really, really sad. The reason that I can't say, “Yes, we're so clearly moving that direction,” is that in 2015, a white supremacist shot up a black church, and just last year, a white supremacist ran his car into a group of people and killed a young woman.

Seth 41:02

Yeah. Just for context, I'm 20 miles from that, that is quite literally where I live.

Austin 41:09

Are you? I did not realize that.

Seth 41:10

Yeah, that day we actually had debated whether or not to go to a park in Charlottesville with my family. We decided, instead, just stay home and turn on the news ‘cause I'm not interested in driving across the mountain to go over there.

Austin 41:29

These are young folks. These people aren’t 70 years old and still screaming about segregation. These are young folks who have learned from someplace about the power of white supremacy. There are other people excusing, not necessarily Charleston, but certainly the parades… It’s a “both and.” I will say, in the book that at no point did all white people have to get it together in order for there to be progress. We don't have to have 100% participation to make progress.

Seth 42:24

Just more than zero.

Austin 42:25

That's right. That's right. And that's why these conversations are so important, because we can make change together. We just all have to be committed to doing that and taking the risk and having the courage to do so.

Seth 42:37

Right. Well, Austin, how would you point people to get involved with you, directed towards you and towards some of the work that you're doing? For those that are listening, as this releases, you'll be able to most likely buy the book, so I'll put a link in for that. It is well worth your time. I can tell you from experience, I would sit down at nine o'clock at night, intending, in preparation for this interview, to just read one chapter and look up and it would be midnight. That is a great problem; either either way, it was still a problem for me. I am sleep deprived, but it is well worth the read. I appreciate you writing it. But how would you direct people to get involved with you and interact with you a bit if they want to?

Austin 43:16

Sure, sure, sure. So I would love to have this conversation that you and I are having in person with folks. I still get a lot of invitations to preach or to speak somewhere. I am discovering that having these kinds of conversations, answering questions, is perhaps more productive, I think. I think it’s more productive, is more effective. I would love to do more of that.

Also, I'm in the process of creating a discussion guide to help groups think through this book, and it will also include a video series. I would just say look out for that. I'm hoping to release them in like June or so. Follow on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, and and all the things that are coming down the pipeline. There’ll be a couple book release parties. So stay tuned. I would say Twitter is probably where I spend most of my time, but Facebook and Instragram would be great. (Austin’s Website)

Seth 44:14

Yeah, no, I agree. I enjoy Twitter. I find I have the most honest conversations in small pieces on Twitter with random people. So it’s fun.

Austin 44:25

Yep, yep. I love it.

Seth 44:27

Well, thank you again for your time and for your patience with me. I'll let you get back to to your son.

Austin 44:34

Oh, you have definitely been the patient one. He and I both thank you.

Seth 44:55

The music that you heard today is provided with permission from artist Jordan St. Cyr. You can check out his music on Spotify, Apple Music, YouTube, anywhere else that you listen to music, as well as go to his website, jordanstcyr.com. As with all of the music featured on any of the episodes, you'll also find Jordan’s music on our own Spotify playlist called Can I Say This At Church.